Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet and Tor

2014-01-07 Thread Matthew Toseland
On 07/01/14 20:59, Ian Clarke wrote: > On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Matthew Toseland > wrote: > >> On 07/01/14 17:00, Ian Clarke wrote: >>> It's not really clear what you are proposing here, what is the context? >> We should allow, optionally, tunneling the first hop over Tor or I2P. >> Hence: >

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet and Tor

2014-01-07 Thread Ian Clarke
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On 07/01/14 17:00, Ian Clarke wrote: > > It's not really clear what you are proposing here, what is the context? > We should allow, optionally, tunneling the first hop over Tor or I2P. > Hence: > - We implement a simple binary protocol over

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet and Tor

2014-01-07 Thread Matthew Toseland
On 07/01/14 20:33, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On 07/01/14 17:00, Ian Clarke wrote: >> It's not really clear what you are proposing here, what is the context? > We should allow, optionally, tunneling the first hop over Tor or I2P. Hence: > - We implement a simple binary protocol over TCP. > - Nodes c

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet and Tor

2014-01-07 Thread Matthew Toseland
On 07/01/14 17:00, Ian Clarke wrote: > It's not really clear what you are proposing here, what is the context? We should allow, optionally, tunneling the first hop over Tor or I2P. Hence: - We implement a simple binary protocol over TCP. - Nodes can optionally expose this for "transient" clients. -

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet and Tor

2014-01-07 Thread Ian Clarke
It's not really clear what you are proposing here, what is the context? Ian. On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 5:36 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > The leaked files on Tor suggest it is significantly stronger than at > least I had assumed. > > It might be interesting to create a simple, but cryptographicall

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7.5 build 1458 released

2014-01-07 Thread Matthew Toseland
On 07/01/14 05:26, Steve Dougherty wrote: > On 01/06/2014 09:00 PM, Steve Dougherty wrote: >> TheSeeker points out a bug in negtype 10 that only affects seednodes. >> We're investigating and may have to release another update. > Our current understanding is that when a 1458 node attempts to connect

[freenet-dev] Freenet and Tor

2014-01-07 Thread Matthew Toseland
The leaked files on Tor suggest it is significantly stronger than at least I had assumed. It might be interesting to create a simple, but cryptographically verified, TCP-based protocol for communicating with gateways through tunnels, to protect the first hop. This would be a "transient" request/re