* Robert Hailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-01-02 18:23:28]:
On Jan 2, 2008, at 3:44 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Wednesday 02 January 2008 17:22, Robert Hailey wrote:
On Dec 29, 2007, at 5:39 AM, Florent Daignière wrote:
synchronized void updateShouldDisconnectNow
* David Sowder [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-01-03 07:36:39]:
Florent Daignière wrote:
* Robert Hailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-01-02 18:23:28]:
On Jan 2, 2008, at 3:44 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Wednesday 02 January 2008 17:22, Robert Hailey wrote:
On Dec 29, 2007, at 5:39
* David Sowder [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-01-03 07:52:44]:
Florent Daignière wrote:
* David Sowder [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-01-03 07:36:39]:
Florent Daignière wrote:
* Robert Hailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-01-02 18:23:28]:
On Jan 2, 2008, at 12:30 PM, David Sowder wrote
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-01-03 15:25:55]:
On Saturday 29 December 2007 13:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: nextgens
Date: 2007-12-29 13:34:33 + (Sat, 29 Dec 2007)
New Revision: 16839
Modified:
trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/FNPPacketMangler.java
Log:
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-01-03 16:30:36]:
Doh. Well it's technically a trivial refactoring; read the commit!
I'm not saying it isn't... bytecode wise it's different, that's all it
tells :)
NextGen$
On Wednesday 02 January 2008 16:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
toad has
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-01-03 16:49:45]:
On Thursday 03 January 2008 16:15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: nextgens
Date: 2008-01-03 16:15:23 + (Thu, 03 Jan 2008)
New Revision: 16856
Modified:
trunk/freenet/src/freenet/clients/http/ConnectionsToadlet.java
* Matthew Toseland [2008-01-02 12:56:11]:
> On Tuesday 25 December 2007 01:19, Florent Daigni?re wrote:
> > * toad at freenetproject.org [2007-12-22
> > 00:12:28]:
> >
> > > Author: toad
> > > Date: 2007-12-22 00:12:28 + (Sat, 22 Dec 2007)
> > > New Revision: 16775
> > >
> > > Added:
> >
* Matthew Toseland [2008-01-02 12:58:45]:
> On Saturday 29 December 2007 11:39, Florent Daigni?re wrote:
> > * Florent Daigni?re [2007-12-29 12:05:17]:
> >
> > > * robert at freenetproject.org [2007-12-29
> 01:46:31]:
> > >
> > > > Author: robert
> > > > Date: 2007-12-29 01:46:31 +
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-01-02 12:58:45]:
On Saturday 29 December 2007 11:39, Florent Daignière wrote:
* Florent Daignière [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-29 12:05:17]:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-29
01:46:31]:
Author: robert
Date: 2007-12-29
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-01-02 12:56:11]:
On Tuesday 25 December 2007 01:19, Florent Daigni?re wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-22 00:12:28]:
Author: toad
Date: 2007-12-22 00:12:28 + (Sat, 22 Dec 2007)
New Revision: 16775
Added:
* Robert Hailey [2007-12-28 20:41:31]:
>
> On Dec 28, 2007, at 8:36 PM, robert at freenetproject.org wrote:
>
> > Author: robert
> > Date: 2007-12-29 02:36:16 + (Sat, 29 Dec 2007)
> > New Revision: 16837
> >
> > Modified:
> > trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/FNPPacketMangler.java
> > Log:
* Robert Hailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-28 20:41:31]:
On Dec 28, 2007, at 8:36 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: robert
Date: 2007-12-29 02:36:16 + (Sat, 29 Dec 2007)
New Revision: 16837
Modified:
trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/FNPPacketMangler.java
Log:
opps,
* Florent Daigni?re [2007-12-29 12:05:17]:
> * robert at freenetproject.org [2007-12-29
> 01:46:31]:
>
> > Author: robert
> > Date: 2007-12-29 01:46:31 + (Sat, 29 Dec 2007)
> > New Revision: 16834
> >
> > Modified:
> >trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/PeerNode.java
> > Log:
> > maybe
* Robert Hailey [2007-12-28 20:46:14]:
>
> On Dec 28, 2007, at 7:41 PM, robert at freenetproject.org wrote:
>
> > Author: robert
> > Date: 2007-12-29 01:41:06 + (Sat, 29 Dec 2007)
> > New Revision: 16833
> >
> > Modified:
> > trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/PeerNode.java
> > Log:
> >
* robert at freenetproject.org [2007-12-29
01:46:31]:
> Author: robert
> Date: 2007-12-29 01:46:31 + (Sat, 29 Dec 2007)
> New Revision: 16834
>
> Modified:
>trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/PeerNode.java
> Log:
> maybe help wont-fetch-ark deadlock #2
>
>
> Modified:
* robert at freenetproject.org [2007-12-29
01:37:31]:
> Author: robert
> Date: 2007-12-29 01:37:31 + (Sat, 29 Dec 2007)
> New Revision: 16832
>
> Modified:
>trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/FNPPacketMangler.java
> Log:
> logging & don't get MessageDigest if we don't use it
>
>
>
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-29 01:37:31]:
Author: robert
Date: 2007-12-29 01:37:31 + (Sat, 29 Dec 2007)
New Revision: 16832
Modified:
trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/FNPPacketMangler.java
Log:
logging don't get MessageDigest if we don't use it
Modified:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-29 01:46:31]:
Author: robert
Date: 2007-12-29 01:46:31 + (Sat, 29 Dec 2007)
New Revision: 16834
Modified:
trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/PeerNode.java
Log:
maybe help wont-fetch-ark deadlock #2
Modified:
* Robert Hailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-28 20:46:14]:
On Dec 28, 2007, at 7:41 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: robert
Date: 2007-12-29 01:41:06 + (Sat, 29 Dec 2007)
New Revision: 16833
Modified:
trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/PeerNode.java
Log:
maybe help
* Florent Daignière [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-29 12:05:17]:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-29 01:46:31]:
Author: robert
Date: 2007-12-29 01:46:31 + (Sat, 29 Dec 2007)
New Revision: 16834
Modified:
trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/PeerNode.java
Log:
maybe
* Matthew Toseland [2007-12-21 13:30:35]:
> NPE in talking to seednodes? If so, we need to release again .. can you show
> me the original bug?
No... It was a file corruption problem (NPE was occurring during startup
while reading the peer file from disk)
>
> On Thursday 20 December 2007
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-21 13:30:35]:
NPE in talking to seednodes? If so, we need to release again .. can you show
me the original bug?
No... It was a file corruption problem (NPE was occurring during startup
while reading the peer file from disk)
On Thursday 20
* Matthew Toseland [2007-12-19 19:08:52]:
> On Wednesday 19 December 2007 19:04, Florent Daigni?re wrote:
> > * Matthew Toseland [2007-12-19 18:23:35]:
> >
> > > I don't understand the fix. It's supposed to randomize it and then record
> the
> > > new port number?
> >
> > I'm ensuring that
* Matthew Toseland [2007-12-19 18:23:35]:
> I don't understand the fix. It's supposed to randomize it and then record the
> new port number?
I'm ensuring that -1 isn't used as a port number in freenet.ini (because the
code doesn't handle it properly: can't overwrite it and keeps on
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-19 19:08:52]:
On Wednesday 19 December 2007 19:04, Florent Daignière wrote:
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-19 18:23:35]:
I don't understand the fix. It's supposed to randomize it and then record
the
new port number
* Matthew Toseland [2007-12-18 15:40:03]:
> On Tuesday 18 December 2007 15:25, Florent Daigni?re wrote:
> > * Matthew Toseland [2007-12-18 15:19:59]:
> >
> > > I don't get it.
> >
> > I don't get what you don't get :)
> >
> > What it was doing was :
> > 1) take the mutex
> > 2) test if
* toad at freenetproject.org [2007-12-18 15:32:11]:
> Author: toad
> Date: 2007-12-18 15:32:11 + (Tue, 18 Dec 2007)
> New Revision: 16672
>
> Modified:
>trunk/freenet/src/freenet/client/async/BinaryBlobInserter.java
> Log:
> Not necessary
>
That's everything *but* clear without the
* Matthew Toseland [2007-12-18 15:21:28]:
> On Monday 17 December 2007 00:39, nextgens at freenetproject.org wrote:
> > Author: nextgens
> > Date: 2007-12-17 00:39:23 + (Mon, 17 Dec 2007)
> > New Revision: 16639
> >
> > Modified:
> >
* Matthew Toseland [2007-12-18 15:19:59]:
> I don't get it.
I don't get what you don't get :)
What it was doing was :
1) take the mutex
2) test if fecRunnerThread is null
3) if so, *re*test if it's not (always false)
4) then log something...
What it should do is :
1) take the mutex
2) test if
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-18 15:19:59]:
I don't get it.
I don't get what you don't get :)
What it was doing was :
1) take the mutex
2) test if fecRunnerThread is null
3) if so, *re*test if it's not (always false)
4) then log something...
What it should do is :
1) take the
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-18 15:21:28]:
On Monday 17 December 2007 00:39, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: nextgens
Date: 2007-12-17 00:39:23 + (Mon, 17 Dec 2007)
New Revision: 16639
Modified:
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-18 15:40:03]:
On Tuesday 18 December 2007 15:25, Florent Daignière wrote:
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-18 15:19:59]:
I don't get it.
I don't get what you don't get :)
What it was doing was :
1) take the mutex
2
* Robert Hailey [2007-12-17 11:07:55]:
>
> On Dec 16, 2007, at 6:11 PM, nextgens at freenetproject.org wrote:
>
> > Author: nextgens
> > Date: 2007-12-17 00:11:57 + (Mon, 17 Dec 2007)
> > New Revision: 16635
> >
> > Modified:
> > trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/RequestHandler.java
> >
* Thomas Young [2007-11-29 14:09:55]:
> > 3. When IP addresses are detected by
> > IPAddressDetector, there is no checking to see
> whether
> > this interface is actually connected to another
> > computer. In my case,
> IPAddressDetector.getAddress()
> > returns an IPv6 address that is
* Thomas Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-11-29 14:09:55]:
3. When IP addresses are detected by
IPAddressDetector, there is no checking to see
whether
this interface is actually connected to another
computer. In my case,
IPAddressDetector.getAddress()
returns an IPv6 address that is
* Matthew Toseland [2007-12-11 17:49:56]:
> On Tuesday 11 December 2007 17:10, Sven-Ola T?cke wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > I'm an active member of Freifunk Berlin. I'd like to implement a local
> freenet
> > on embedded devices (mood-300, cheap, 40Gb Disk, MIPS CPU). The vm on the
> > target
* Matthew Toseland [2007-12-11 01:29:09]:
> On Tuesday 11 December 2007 01:21, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > I've done some usability testing with a local newbie volunteer. The main
> > conclusions:
> >
> ...
> >
> > 5. Firefox is not optimised for Freenet: it has too few parallel
>
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-11 01:29:09]:
On Tuesday 11 December 2007 01:21, Matthew Toseland wrote:
I've done some usability testing with a local newbie volunteer. The main
conclusions:
...
5. Firefox is not optimised for Freenet: it has too few parallel
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-11 17:49:56]:
On Tuesday 11 December 2007 17:10, Sven-Ola Tücke wrote:
Hey,
I'm an active member of Freifunk Berlin. I'd like to implement a local
freenet
on embedded devices (mood-300, cheap, 40Gb Disk, MIPS CPU). The vm on the
target
* Matthew Toseland [2007-12-10 18:11:17]:
> Why does this please netbeans? Is there any good reason to make these classes
> public?
>
It was complaining about "private members are beeing exported through
the public API"
> On Sunday 09 December 2007 22:40, you wrote:
> > Author: nextgens
> >
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-10 18:11:17]:
Why does this please netbeans? Is there any good reason to make these classes
public?
It was complaining about private members are beeing exported through
the public API
On Sunday 09 December 2007 22:40, you wrote:
Author:
* Jack O'Lantern [2007-12-09 05:50:46]:
> Hi,
>
> I'm in the process of updating the README of 0.5 and found the section
> on securing Mozilla in need of a rewrite. I haven't found a similar
> section in the 0.7 README, so the follwing information might be of
> interest for 0.7, too.
>
> I
* Jack O'Lantern [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-09 05:50:46]:
Hi,
I'm in the process of updating the README of 0.5 and found the section
on securing Mozilla in need of a rewrite. I haven't found a similar
section in the 0.7 README, so the follwing information might be of
interest for 0.7, too.
* toad at freenetproject.org [2007-12-08 17:15:56]:
> Author: toad
> Date: 2007-12-08 17:15:56 + (Sat, 08 Dec 2007)
> New Revision: 16403
>
> Modified:
>trunk/freenet/src/freenet/io/NetworkInterface.java
> Log:
> ignoreUnbindable -> ignoreUnbindableIP6, and change it to implement that.
* Jack O'Lantern [2007-12-07 10:51:46]:
> --- Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > Are you planning on maintaining the unstable branch (0.6) ? If so,
> > why? We deprecated it, is there any good reason to revive it?
>
> The differences between stable and unstable are very small (try diff
> -ruwB -x
* Matthew Toseland [2007-12-06 02:01:50]:
> Announcement is working, including connecting to initial seednodes. We don't
> have any automated way of gathering seednodes yet. There are a couple of
> largish bugs in the deployed code which cause announcements to bounce around
> the network
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-06 02:01:50]:
Announcement is working, including connecting to initial seednodes. We don't
have any automated way of gathering seednodes yet. There are a couple of
largish bugs in the deployed code which cause announcements to bounce around
the
* Julien Cornuwel [2007-12-04 18:10:05]:
> Hi,
>
> This translation file features several new strings and numerous fixes of
> chains that had been modified in the english version.
>
> Regards.
Commited in r16265
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
* Julien Cornuwel [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-04 18:10:05]:
Hi,
This translation file features several new strings and numerous fixes of
chains that had been modified in the english version.
Regards.
Commited in r16265
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
* Matthew Toseland [2007-12-03 12:17:11]:
> That's one of nextgens' netbeans auto-indents, are you sure it's real? If it
> is, we may have a lot more similar problems...
>
Yeah, I apologize about that, most of the new-build-spree going on
lately could have been avoided...
Yes, tt turns out
* Matthew Toseland [2007-12-03 14:24:07]:
> 1L* ? That's also redundant, just put the L on the 1000, or the 7.
>
Imho it's clearer code-wise... so that if someone changes the value it
*will* be clear for him that it's meant to be casted into a long.
Arguably noone will ever touch that method
* luke771 [2007-12-03 12:27:26]:
> - Some rewordings to complete and make more accurate some translations, and
> also make things easier to understand, expecially in long strings with
> technical explanations.
>
> => One mess sorted out: part of the First Time Wizard section was "out of
>
* luke771 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-03 12:27:26]:
- Some rewordings to complete and make more accurate some translations, and
also make things easier to understand, expecially in long strings with
technical explanations.
= One mess sorted out: part of the First Time Wizard section was out
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-03 14:24:07]:
1L* ? That's also redundant, just put the L on the 1000, or the 7.
Imho it's clearer code-wise... so that if someone changes the value it
*will* be clear for him that it's meant to be casted into a long.
Arguably noone will ever
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-03 12:17:11]:
That's one of nextgens' netbeans auto-indents, are you sure it's real? If it
is, we may have a lot more similar problems...
Yeah, I apologize about that, most of the new-build-spree going on
lately could have been avoided...
Yes,
* Cooo heter [2007-12-02 13:55:57]:
> Swedish translation V.7 - Cooo
>
> Another update to the swedish translation.
> Mostly new translations, some of them might be updates to old ones.
>
Commited in r16208
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name:
Freenet build 1085 is out. It fixes an important bug, hence it is
self-mandatory tonight at midnight.
Your node should auto-update soon, if it doesn't before tomorrow,
force a manual update.
NextGen$
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name:
Freenet build 1085 is out. It fixes an important bug, hence it is
self-mandatory tonight at midnight.
Your node should auto-update soon, if it doesn't before tomorrow,
force a manual update.
NextGen$
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
* Cooo heter [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-02 13:55:57]:
Swedish translation V.7 - Cooo
Another update to the swedish translation.
Mostly new translations, some of them might be updates to old ones.
Commited in r16208
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
* Matthew Toseland [2007-12-01 18:17:09]:
> Is there any way that this can be verified automatically?
I've found http://andrei.gmxhome.de/bytecode/index.html ... maybe you
can use it to compare the produced bytecode.
> If not, I'd like you to revert it.
Well, tell me; if that doesn't work
* Matthew Toseland [2007-12-01 18:17:09]:
> Is there any way that this can be verified automatically? If not, I'd like
> you
> to revert it. Indenting as in changing whitespace is one thing, indenting as
> in eliminating the {}'s in { one statement } is quite another thing...
Hmm, sorry
* Matthew Toseland [2007-12-01 17:51:35]:
> IMHO we should allow DDA's to have an Identifier, which if not specified is
> the directory name given. Then we can easily implement #1753.
>
And what would be the point ? how do we decide which one rules if
results are different ?
> On Friday 30
* Thomas [2007-12-01 00:59:00]:
> Added/changed some more strings and reverted 2 not intended changes from last
> commit
Commited in r16172
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc:
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-01 17:51:35]:
IMHO we should allow DDA's to have an Identifier, which if not specified is
the directory name given. Then we can easily implement #1753.
And what would be the point ? how do we decide which one rules if
results are different ?
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-01 18:17:09]:
Is there any way that this can be verified automatically? If not, I'd like
you
to revert it. Indenting as in changing whitespace is one thing, indenting as
in eliminating the {}'s in { one statement } is quite another thing...
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-01 18:17:09]:
Is there any way that this can be verified automatically?
I've found http://andrei.gmxhome.de/bytecode/index.html ... maybe you
can use it to compare the produced bytecode.
If not, I'd like you to revert it.
Well, tell me; if that
* Thomas [2007-11-30 22:26:52]:
> some strings updated
Commited in r16155
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
* Julien Cornuwel aka batosai [2007-11-30 16:20:13]:
> Hi,
>
> Here is a partial translation of the new "Connectivity page". I did not
> translate it fully as Nextgens told me it was temporary...
>
> Regards
Commited in r16136
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was
* Matthew Toseland [2007-11-30 01:26:40]:
> PROPOSAL:
>
> Requests are by default queued. Queued is in fact a stage which requests go
> through once it is decided they need to be routed. Requests MAY have
> deadlines, this is an interesting question which we should examine later: it
> has
* Michael Rogers [2007-11-30 03:17:14]:
> Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > But the
> > practical effect was reports from various places, not least on my own node,
> > of the node using a lot more bandwidth and doing a lot more work than it
> > would otherwise have done.
>
> If the problem is just
* luke771 [2007-11-30 06:23:21]:
> upd. to 1078 r16115M
> includes connectivity page
> fixed a couple of typos
> changed one string to a more understandable version
> _ph00
Commited in r16116.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
* Jack O'Lantern [2007-11-29 14:52:02]:
> My reply to this message appears to have gone lost, so I'll try again:
>
> --- Florent Daigni?re wrote:
> > I've commited something in r16002.
>
> Thanks! But the auto-generated
> http://downloads.freenetproject.org/freenet-stable-latest.tgz still
>
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-11-30 01:26:40]:
PROPOSAL:
Requests are by default queued. Queued is in fact a stage which requests go
through once it is decided they need to be routed. Requests MAY have
deadlines, this is an interesting question which we should examine later:
* Michael Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-11-30 03:17:14]:
Matthew Toseland wrote:
But the
practical effect was reports from various places, not least on my own node,
of the node using a lot more bandwidth and doing a lot more work than it
would otherwise have done.
If the problem
* Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-11-30 22:26:52]:
some strings updated
Commited in r16155
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
* Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-01 00:59:00]:
Added/changed some more strings and reverted 2 not intended changes from last
commit
Commited in r16172
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
* Julien Cornuwel aka batosai [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-11-30 16:20:13]:
Hi,
Here is a partial translation of the new Connectivity page. I did not
translate it fully as Nextgens told me it was temporary...
Regards
Commited in r16136
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
* luke771 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-11-30 06:23:21]:
upd. to 1078 r16115M
includes connectivity page
fixed a couple of typos
changed one string to a more understandable version
_ph00
Commited in r16116.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
* Thomas Young [2007-11-29 14:09:55]:
> > 3. When IP addresses are detected by
> > IPAddressDetector, there is no checking to see
> whether
> > this interface is actually connected to another
> > computer. In my case,
> IPAddressDetector.getAddress()
> > returns an IPv6 address that is
* Thomas Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-11-29 14:09:55]:
3. When IP addresses are detected by
IPAddressDetector, there is no checking to see
whether
this interface is actually connected to another
computer. In my case,
IPAddressDetector.getAddress()
returns an IPv6 address that is
* Jack O'Lantern [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-11-29 14:52:02]:
My reply to this message appears to have gone lost, so I'll try again:
--- Florent Daignière [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've commited something in r16002.
Thanks! But the auto-generated
http://downloads.freenetproject.org/freenet
* Matthew Toseland [2007-11-28 14:19:57]:
> If you're going to do that then pull minVersion too! I introduced the below
> check originally so we could only send probe requests to nodes that support
> them. It might be useful in future.
Reverted in r16024
-- next part
* Matthew Toseland [2007-11-28 15:25:31]:
> On Wednesday 28 November 2007 15:20, Florent Daigni?re wrote:
> > * Matthew Toseland [2007-11-28 14:20:49]:
> >
> > > There was a reason for that. We need File's pointing to temp bucket
> > > file's
> to
> > > be comparable. So it needs to be
* Matthew Toseland [2007-11-28 14:21:23]:
> The title's are all blank for the default bookmarks for me: the "description"
> is just part of the name.
>
I've changed that in r16018
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type:
* Matthew Toseland [2007-11-28 14:20:49]:
> There was a reason for that. We need File's pointing to temp bucket file's to
> be comparable. So it needs to be canonical. Of course, that means we can keep
> a separate File for the original if we need it for config purposes...
Previously it was
* Matthew Toseland [2007-11-28 14:21:00]:
> On Tuesday 27 November 2007 20:20, you wrote:
> > Author: nextgens
> > Date: 2007-11-27 20:20:22 + (Tue, 27 Nov 2007)
> > New Revision: 15994
> >
> > Modified:
> >trunk/freenet/src/freenet/config/PersistentConfig.java
> > Log:
> >
* Matthew Toseland [2007-11-28 14:20:55]:
> How long was this bug live for?
>
Dunno, noone has reported it but I've caught it while debugging the
uninstaller.
> On Tuesday 27 November 2007 19:50, you wrote:
> > Author: nextgens
> > Date: 2007-11-27 19:50:31 + (Tue, 27 Nov 2007)
> > New
* Matthew Toseland [2007-11-20 23:14:00]:
> You should put each BookmarkItem as a sub-fieldset, not a string. Then you
> can
> cleanly extend it and record key, name, etc.
>
Implemented in r16009
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name:
* Volodya [2007-11-28 08:27:46]:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > On Sunday 25 November 2007 15:50, David Sowder (Zothar) wrote:
> >> I was just implementing https://bugs.freenetproject.org/view.php?id=1816
> >
> > Not everything that is a bug
* Michael T?nzer [2007-11-28 03:11:57]:
> Hi folks,
>
> Here is an update of the German Translation.
>
> Greets
> Michael
Commited in r16004.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc:
* Matthew Toseland [2007-11-20 23:14:00]:
> You should put each BookmarkItem as a sub-fieldset, not a string. Then you
> can
> cleanly extend it and record key, name, etc.
>
Well, in fact I haven't done it that way because I couldn't see any usecase
where
it would be useful... do you have
* Jack O'Lantern [2007-11-26 16:10:32]:
> --- Florent Daigni?re
> wrote:
> > * Jack O'Lantern [2007-11-25
> > 05:33:22]:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > currently, the official public freenet repository
> is
> > > svn://freenet.googlecode.com/svn, while the
> > > sourceforge CVS repository is
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-11-20 23:14:00]:
You should put each BookmarkItem as a sub-fieldset, not a string. Then you
can
cleanly extend it and record key, name, etc.
Implemented in r16009
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-11-28 14:20:49]:
There was a reason for that. We need File's pointing to temp bucket file's to
be comparable. So it needs to be canonical. Of course, that means we can keep
a separate File for the original if we need it for config purposes...
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-11-28 14:21:23]:
The title's are all blank for the default bookmarks for me: the description
is just part of the name.
I've changed that in r16018
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Devl
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-11-28 15:25:31]:
On Wednesday 28 November 2007 15:20, Florent Daignière wrote:
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-11-28 14:20:49]:
There was a reason for that. We need File's pointing to temp bucket
file's
to
be comparable. So
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-11-28 14:19:57]:
If you're going to do that then pull minVersion too! I introduced the below
check originally so we could only send probe requests to nodes that support
them. It might be useful in future.
Reverted in r16024
signature.asc
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-11-28 14:21:00]:
On Tuesday 27 November 2007 20:20, you wrote:
Author: nextgens
Date: 2007-11-27 20:20:22 + (Tue, 27 Nov 2007)
New Revision: 15994
Modified:
trunk/freenet/src/freenet/config/PersistentConfig.java
Log:
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-11-28 14:20:55]:
How long was this bug live for?
Dunno, noone has reported it but I've caught it while debugging the
uninstaller.
On Tuesday 27 November 2007 19:50, you wrote:
Author: nextgens
Date: 2007-11-27 19:50:31 + (Tue, 27 Nov 2007)
* Jack O'Lantern [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-11-26 16:10:32]:
--- Florent Daignière [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
* Jack O'Lantern [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-11-25
05:33:22]:
Hi,
currently, the official public freenet repository
is
svn://freenet.googlecode.com/svn, while
801 - 900 of 1326 matches
Mail list logo
