Am Samstag, 21. Juli 2007 17:46 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> Ok. Implemented something like this in the latest code:
>
> Freenet first time wizard! - Friends and strangers
>
> Connect to strangers?
>
> Your node can either automatically find untrusted nodes to connect to
> ("Strangers"), or you can
Ok. Implemented something like this in the latest code:
Freenet first time wizard! - Friends and strangers
Connect to strangers?
Your node can either automatically find untrusted nodes to connect to
("Strangers"), or you can manually add connections to trusted nodes
("Friends") run by people
Ok. Implemented something like this in the latest code:
Freenet first time wizard! - Friends and strangers
Connect to strangers?
Your node can either automatically find untrusted nodes to connect to
(Strangers), or you can manually add connections to trusted nodes
(Friends) run by people you
Am Samstag, 21. Juli 2007 17:46 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
Ok. Implemented something like this in the latest code:
Freenet first time wizard! - Friends and strangers
Connect to strangers?
Your node can either automatically find untrusted nodes to connect to
(Strangers), or you can manually
* Ian Clarke [2007-07-20 12:34:42]:
> On 7/20/07, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> >
> >Okay, so what should this question say then exactly? Perhaps:
> >
> >"Connect to strangers?
> >
> >Your node can either automatically find untrusted nodes to connect to
> >("Strangers"), or you can manually add
Hi,
Am Freitag, 20. Juli 2007 17:34:14 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
[...]
> Okay, so what should this question say then exactly? Perhaps:
>
> "Connect to strangers?
>
> Your node can either automatically find untrusted nodes to connect to
> ("Strangers"), or you can manually add connections to
On Friday 20 July 2007 00:14, Ian Clarke wrote:
> I have no objection to asking the user, provided that it is clearly
> apparent to users that unless you know people already running Freenet, you
> need to go with opennet or Freenet will be useless to you.
That's the idea. That's the whole point
On 7/20/07, Matthew Toseland wrote:
>
> Okay, so what should this question say then exactly? Perhaps:
>
> "Connect to strangers?
>
> Your node can either automatically find untrusted nodes to connect to
> ("Strangers"), or you can manually add connections to trusted nodes
> ("Friends") run by
On Friday 20 July 2007 00:14, Ian Clarke wrote:
I have no objection to asking the user, provided that it is clearly
apparent to users that unless you know people already running Freenet, you
need to go with opennet or Freenet will be useless to you.
That's the idea. That's the whole point of
Hi,
Am Freitag, 20. Juli 2007 17:34:14 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
[...]
Okay, so what should this question say then exactly? Perhaps:
Connect to strangers?
Your node can either automatically find untrusted nodes to connect to
(Strangers), or you can manually add connections to trusted nodes
On 7/20/07, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, so what should this question say then exactly? Perhaps:
Connect to strangers?
Your node can either automatically find untrusted nodes to connect to
(Strangers), or you can manually add connections to trusted nodes
(Friends) run by
* Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-07-20 12:34:42]:
On 7/20/07, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, so what should this question say then exactly? Perhaps:
Connect to strangers?
Your node can either automatically find untrusted nodes to connect to
(Strangers), or you can
On Thursday 19 July 2007 18:16, NextGen$ wrote:
> * Matthew Toseland [2007-07-19 12:16:48]:
> > I'm not convinced it should just be a default.
>
> Huh ? isn't opennet useless if it's not the default ? I'm really surprised
> that someone (you in particular) objects here :)
>
> > Can't we
* Matthew Toseland [2007-07-19 21:58:28]:
> On Thursday 19 July 2007 18:16, NextGen$ wrote:
> > * Matthew Toseland [2007-07-19 12:16:48]:
> > > I'm not convinced it should just be a default.
> >
> > Huh ? isn't opennet useless if it's not the default ? I'm really surprised
> > that someone (you
I have no objection to asking the user, provided that it is clearly apparent
to users that unless you know people already running Freenet, you need to go
with opennet or Freenet will be useless to you.
I'm all for letting users make an informed choice, but I'm certainly not in
favor of corralling
* Matthew Toseland [2007-07-19 12:16:48]:
> I'm not convinced it should just be a default.
Huh ? isn't opennet useless if it's not the default ? I'm really surprised
that someone (you in particular) objects here :)
> Can't we explicitly ask the user a yes/no, maybe during the post-setup
I'm not convinced it should just be a default. Can't we explicitly ask the
user a yes/no, maybe during the post-setup wizard?
On Thursday 19 July 2007 01:16, you wrote:
> Author: nextgens
> Date: 2007-07-19 00:16:16 + (Thu, 19 Jul 2007)
> New Revision: 14189
>
> Added:
>
I'm not convinced it should just be a default. Can't we explicitly ask the
user a yes/no, maybe during the post-setup wizard?
On Thursday 19 July 2007 01:16, you wrote:
Author: nextgens
Date: 2007-07-19 00:16:16 + (Thu, 19 Jul 2007)
New Revision: 14189
Added:
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-07-19 12:16:48]:
I'm not convinced it should just be a default.
Huh ? isn't opennet useless if it's not the default ? I'm really surprised
that someone (you in particular) objects here :)
Can't we explicitly ask the user a yes/no, maybe during the
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-07-19 21:58:28]:
On Thursday 19 July 2007 18:16, NextGen$ wrote:
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-07-19 12:16:48]:
I'm not convinced it should just be a default.
Huh ? isn't opennet useless if it's not the default ? I'm really
I have no objection to asking the user, provided that it is clearly apparent
to users that unless you know people already running Freenet, you need to go
with opennet or Freenet will be useless to you.
I'm all for letting users make an informed choice, but I'm certainly not in
favor of corralling
21 matches
Mail list logo
