* Jack O'Lantern [2007-12-07 10:51:46]:
> --- Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > Are you planning on maintaining the unstable branch (0.6) ? If so,
> > why? We deprecated it, is there any good reason to revive it?
>
> The differences between stable and unstable are very small (try diff
> -ruwB -x
On Friday 07 December 2007 00:27, Jack O'Lantern wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've applied the Diffie-Hellman patch to unstable now. Could Nextgens
> or a different site admin apply the same patch to the unstable
> build.xml that was applied to the stable one in revs 16002/16003/16113,
> please? Thank you!
--- Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Are you planning on maintaining the unstable branch (0.6) ? If so,
> why? We deprecated it, is there any good reason to revive it?
The differences between stable and unstable are very small (try diff
-ruwB -x .svn stable/ unstable/, that returns only few dozen K of
On Friday 07 December 2007 00:27, Jack O'Lantern wrote:
Hi,
I've applied the Diffie-Hellman patch to unstable now. Could Nextgens
or a different site admin apply the same patch to the unstable
build.xml that was applied to the stable one in revs 16002/16003/16113,
please? Thank you!
Are
--- Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you planning on maintaining the unstable branch (0.6) ? If so,
why? We deprecated it, is there any good reason to revive it?
The differences between stable and unstable are very small (try diff
-ruwB -x .svn stable/ unstable/, that returns only
Hi,
I've applied the Diffie-Hellman patch to unstable now. Could Nextgens
or a different site admin apply the same patch to the unstable
build.xml that was applied to the stable one in revs 16002/16003/16113,
please? Thank you!
Jack
Hi,
I've applied the Diffie-Hellman patch to unstable now. Could Nextgens
or a different site admin apply the same patch to the unstable
build.xml that was applied to the stable one in revs 16002/16003/16113,
please? Thank you!
Jack
