[freenet-dev] Question: clientport

2002-11-12 Thread Oskar Sandberg
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 02:14:03PM +, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 01:52:20PM +0100, Oskar Sandberg wrote: < > > > Actually, FCP encryption is already supported. All you need to do is > > send the first protocol designator byte as whatever FNP uses instead of > > whatever

[freenet-dev] Question: clientport

2002-11-12 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 01:52:20PM +0100, Oskar Sandberg wrote: > On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 08:30:00PM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote: > > Anonymous (mtoseland at cableinet.co.uk) wrote: > > > > > does the clientport (default 8481) use any encryption? > > > > > > or is it in clear text? > > > > It's c

[freenet-dev] Question: clientport

2002-11-12 Thread Oskar Sandberg
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 08:30:00PM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote: > Anonymous (mtoseland at cableinet.co.uk) wrote: > > > does the clientport (default 8481) use any encryption? > > > > or is it in clear text? > > It's clear text. > > > If it's not encrypted, is possible to ask you for future imple

[freenet-dev] Question: clientport

2002-11-12 Thread fish
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, Anonymous wrote: > hello, > > does the clientport (default 8481) use any encryption? > > or is it in clear text? > > I ask this because I'd like to make a public gateway with public FCP to use > FMB or FROST remotely. > > If it's not encrypted, is possible to ask you for

Re: [freenet-dev] Question: clientport

2002-11-12 Thread Oskar Sandberg
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 02:14:03PM +, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 01:52:20PM +0100, Oskar Sandberg wrote: < > > > Actually, FCP encryption is already supported. All you need to do is > > send the first protocol designator byte as whatever FNP uses instead of > > whatever

Re: [freenet-dev] Question: clientport

2002-11-12 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 01:52:20PM +0100, Oskar Sandberg wrote: > On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 08:30:00PM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote: > > Anonymous ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > > > does the clientport (default 8481) use any encryption? > > > > > > or is it in clear text? > > > > It's clear text.

Re: [freenet-dev] Question: clientport

2002-11-12 Thread Oskar Sandberg
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 08:30:00PM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote: > Anonymous ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > does the clientport (default 8481) use any encryption? > > > > or is it in clear text? > > It's clear text. > > > If it's not encrypted, is possible to ask you for future implementation?

[freenet-dev] Question: clientport

2002-11-12 Thread Anonymous
hello, does the clientport (default 8481) use any encryption? or is it in clear text? I ask this because I'd like to make a public gateway with public FCP to use FMB or FROST remotely. If it's not encrypted, is possible to ask you for future implementation? regards. _

[freenet-dev] Question: clientport

2002-11-12 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 01:48:51AM +0100, Anonymous wrote: > hello, > > does the clientport (default 8481) use any encryption? > > or is it in clear text? It is cleartext, in the interests of simplicity and speed, since it is primarily used locally. > > I ask this because I'd like to make a publ

[freenet-dev] Question: clientport

2002-11-11 Thread Greg Wooledge
Anonymous (mtoseland at cableinet.co.uk) wrote: > does the clientport (default 8481) use any encryption? > > or is it in clear text? It's clear text. > If it's not encrypted, is possible to ask you for future implementation? It's not designed to be used anonymously by a public resource. It's

Re: [freenet-dev] Question: clientport

2002-11-11 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 01:48:51AM +0100, Anonymous wrote: > hello, > > does the clientport (default 8481) use any encryption? > > or is it in clear text? It is cleartext, in the interests of simplicity and speed, since it is primarily used locally. > > I ask this because I'd like to make a publ

Re: [freenet-dev] Question: clientport

2002-11-11 Thread Greg Wooledge
Anonymous ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > does the clientport (default 8481) use any encryption? > > or is it in clear text? It's clear text. > If it's not encrypted, is possible to ask you for future implementation? It's not designed to be used anonymously by a public resource. It's designed to

Re: [freenet-dev] Question: clientport

2002-11-11 Thread fish
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, Anonymous wrote: > hello, > > does the clientport (default 8481) use any encryption? > > or is it in clear text? > > I ask this because I'd like to make a public gateway with public FCP to use > FMB or FROST remotely. > > If it's not encrypted, is possible to ask you for

[freenet-dev] Question: clientport

2002-11-11 Thread Anonymous
hello, does the clientport (default 8481) use any encryption? or is it in clear text? I ask this because I'd like to make a public gateway with public FCP to use FMB or FROST remotely. If it's not encrypted, is possible to ask you for future implementation? regards. _