On Sun, 20 Oct 2002, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 03:11:29AM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> > Will they notice with FEC encoding kicking in by default?
>
> Actually, on further reading, FEC only kicks in by default if inserting
> with FProxy - many people insert large files via
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 05:47:15PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 05:29:15PM -0700, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > increase default storeSize to 256MB. The reason for this is that 200MB
> > cannot actually cache a 1MB file after you take into account fields
> > etc which are added
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 07:02:26PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 03:11:29AM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> > Will they notice with FEC encoding kicking in by default?
>
> Actually, on further reading, FEC only kicks in by default if inserting
> with FProxy - many people inse
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 06:58:15PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 02:00:07AM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > > I am pretty uncomfortable at the idea that Freenet won't work with files
> > > above a certain size. It is likely that there are many people who blame
> > > Freene
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 09:28:47PM -0400, Mathew Ryden wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Matthew Toseland"
>
> > On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 09:08:13PM -0400, Mathew Ryden wrote:
> > >
> > > It actually defaults to 10MB or 20% of free space whichever is greater,
> as
> > > long as it isn
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 09:59:27PM -0400, Gianni Johansson wrote:
> On Sunday 20 October 2002 20:47, you wrote:
>
> > > On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 05:29:15PM -0700, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > > increase default storeSize to 256MB. The reason for this is that 200MB
> > > cannot actually cache a 1MB f
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 03:11:29AM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 05:47:15PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 05:29:15PM -0700, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > > increase default storeSize to 256MB. The reason for this is that 200MB
> > > cannot actually cac
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 09:08:13PM -0400, Mathew Ryden wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Matthew Toseland"
>
> > On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 05:47:15PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > > On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 05:29:15PM -0700, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > > > increase default storeSize to 2
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 05:47:15PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 05:29:15PM -0700, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > increase default storeSize to 256MB. The reason for this is that 200MB
> > cannot actually cache a 1MB file after you take into account fields
> > etc which are added
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 05:47:15PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 05:29:15PM -0700, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > increase default storeSize to 256MB. The reason for this is that 200MB
> > cannot actually cache a 1MB file after you take into account fields
> > etc which are added
It's not in fproxy.
Though the FECEncoder doc does at least suggest that blocks should be <= 1M.
See javadoc for FECEncoder.getBlockSize()
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/freenet/freenet/src/freenet/client/FECEncoder.java?rev=1.2&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup
The actual impl
On Sunday 20 October 2002 20:47, you wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 05:29:15PM -0700, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > increase default storeSize to 256MB. The reason for this is that 200MB
> > cannot actually cache a 1MB file after you take into account fields
> > etc which are added to the file i
- Original Message -
From: "Matthew Toseland"
> On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 09:08:13PM -0400, Mathew Ryden wrote:
> >
> > It actually defaults to 10MB or 20% of free space whichever is greater,
as
> > long as it isn't greater than 2gb.
> Don't go below 2400kB. Is there a 2GB problem with wind
- Original Message -
From: "Matthew Toseland"
> On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 05:47:15PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 05:29:15PM -0700, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > > increase default storeSize to 256MB. The reason for this is that 200MB
> > > cannot actually cache a 1MB
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 03:11:29AM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> Will they notice with FEC encoding kicking in by default?
Actually, on further reading, FEC only kicks in by default if inserting
with FProxy - many people insert large files via FCP.
Ian.
--
Ian Clarkeian@[free
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 02:00:07AM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > I am pretty uncomfortable at the idea that Freenet won't work with files
> > above a certain size. It is likely that there are many people who blame
> > Freenet for not storing their 4 meg file. This effective file-size
> > l
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 03:11:29AM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> > I am pretty uncomfortable at the idea that Freenet won't work with files
> > above a certain size. It is likely that there are many people who blame
> > Freenet for not storing their 4 meg file. This effective file-size
> > lim
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 07:02:26PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 03:11:29AM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> > Will they notice with FEC encoding kicking in by default?
>
> Actually, on further reading, FEC only kicks in by default if inserting
> with FProxy - many people inse
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 03:11:29AM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> Will they notice with FEC encoding kicking in by default?
Actually, on further reading, FEC only kicks in by default if inserting
with FProxy - many people insert large files via FCP.
Ian.
--
Ian Clarkeian@[free
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 06:58:15PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 02:00:07AM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > > I am pretty uncomfortable at the idea that Freenet won't work with files
> > > above a certain size. It is likely that there are many people who blame
> > > Freene
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 02:00:07AM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > I am pretty uncomfortable at the idea that Freenet won't work with files
> > above a certain size. It is likely that there are many people who blame
> > Freenet for not storing their 4 meg file. This effective file-size
> > l
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 03:11:29AM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> > I am pretty uncomfortable at the idea that Freenet won't work with files
> > above a certain size. It is likely that there are many people who blame
> > Freenet for not storing their 4 meg file. This effective file-size
> > lim
It's not in fproxy.
Though the FECEncoder doc does at least suggest that blocks should be <= 1M.
See javadoc for FECEncoder.getBlockSize()
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/freenet/freenet/src/freenet/client/FECEncoder.java?rev=1.2&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup
The actual impl
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 09:28:47PM -0400, Mathew Ryden wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Matthew Toseland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 09:08:13PM -0400, Mathew Ryden wrote:
> > >
> > > It actually defaults to 10MB or 20% of free space whichever is greater,
> as
>
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 05:47:15PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 05:29:15PM -0700, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > increase default storeSize to 256MB. The reason for this is that 200MB
> > cannot actually cache a 1MB file after you take into account fields
> > etc which are added
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 05:47:15PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 05:29:15PM -0700, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > increase default storeSize to 256MB. The reason for this is that 200MB
> > cannot actually cache a 1MB file after you take into account fields
> > etc which are added
- Original Message -
From: "Matthew Toseland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 09:08:13PM -0400, Mathew Ryden wrote:
> >
> > It actually defaults to 10MB or 20% of free space whichever is greater,
as
> > long as it isn't greater than 2gb.
> Don't go below 2400kB. Is there a 2G
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 09:59:27PM -0400, Gianni Johansson wrote:
> On Sunday 20 October 2002 20:47, you wrote:
>
> > > On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 05:29:15PM -0700, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > > increase default storeSize to 256MB. The reason for this is that 200MB
> > > cannot actually cache a 1MB f
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 03:11:29AM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 05:47:15PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 05:29:15PM -0700, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > > increase default storeSize to 256MB. The reason for this is that 200MB
> > > cannot actually cac
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 09:08:13PM -0400, Mathew Ryden wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Matthew Toseland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 05:47:15PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > > On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 05:29:15PM -0700, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > > > increase def
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 05:29:15PM -0700, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> increase default storeSize to 256MB. The reason for this is that 200MB
> cannot actually cache a 1MB file after you take into account fields
> etc which are added to the file in storage. Change/add some
> descriptions.
I am prett
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 05:29:15PM -0700, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> increase default storeSize to 256MB. The reason for this is that 200MB
> cannot actually cache a 1MB file after you take into account fields
> etc which are added to the file in storage. Change/add some
> descriptions.
I am prett
On Sunday 20 October 2002 20:47, you wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 05:29:15PM -0700, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > increase default storeSize to 256MB. The reason for this is that 200MB
> > cannot actually cache a 1MB file after you take into account fields
> > etc which are added to the file i
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 05:47:15PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 05:29:15PM -0700, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > increase default storeSize to 256MB. The reason for this is that 200MB
> > cannot actually cache a 1MB file after you take into account fields
> > etc which are added
- Original Message -
From: "Matthew Toseland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 05:47:15PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 05:29:15PM -0700, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > > increase default storeSize to 256MB. The reason for this is that 200MB
> > > cannot ac
35 matches
Mail list logo
