On Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 08:38:37PM +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Sometime in the Freenet 0.5 series, it would be really useful to include
> some form of scripting. I believe if we include the interpreter in
> fproxy, or generally somewhere in the web interface code, and the code
> can only call
And I was starting to think Freenet would never be searchable.
Sounds like that could have pretty huge implications if it can be done.
--Reskill
On Sun, 23 Feb 2003 13:52:15 -0800 Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 12:48:35PM -0800, Ian Clarke wrote:
>> Well, I
Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 12:48:35PM -0800, Ian Clarke wrote:
Well, I am not sure why this would be useful, but if we were to do it,
the best bet might be BeanShell (www.beanshell.org) - this is actually
pretty cool generally, those that don't know of it might be interes
On Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 12:48:35PM -0800, Ian Clarke wrote:
> Well, I am not sure why this would be useful, but if we were to do it,
> the best bet might be BeanShell (www.beanshell.org) - this is actually
> pretty cool generally, those that don't know of it might be interested
> to take a look.
Well, I am not sure why this would be useful, but if we were to do it,
the best bet might be BeanShell (www.beanshell.org) - this is actually
pretty cool generally, those that don't know of it might be interested
to take a look.
Another possibility would be SISC (sisc.sf.net). This is a Java s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 23 February 2003 03:38 pm, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Sometime in the Freenet 0.5 series, it would be really useful to include
> some form of scripting. I believe if we include the interpreter in
> fproxy, or generally somewhere in the web int
Sometime in the Freenet 0.5 series, it would be really useful to include
some form of scripting. I believe if we include the interpreter in
fproxy, or generally somewhere in the web interface code, and the code
can only call methods that we provide, we can make it reasonably safe.
So, we need some
