On Tuesday 01 May 2012 00:27:26 Michael Grube wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 7:06 PM, Steve Dougherty asksteved.com>wrote:
>
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On 04/28/2012 06:56 PM, Zlatin Balevsky wrote:
> > > In Gnutella we observed that long-lived nodes tend to b
On Thursday 10 May 2012 01:08:45 Evan Daniel wrote:
> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 7:48 AM, Zlatin Balevsky wrote:
> >> On 04/28/2012 06:56 PM, Zlatin Balevsky wrote:
> >>> In Gnutella we observed that long-lived nodes tend to be better
> >>> connected and that they also cluster with other high-uptime n
On Tuesday 01 May 2012 00:27:26 Michael Grube wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 7:06 PM, Steve Dougherty wrote:
>
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On 04/28/2012 06:56 PM, Zlatin Balevsky wrote:
> > > In Gnutella we observed that long-lived nodes tend to be better
> > >
On Thursday 10 May 2012 01:08:45 Evan Daniel wrote:
> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 7:48 AM, Zlatin Balevsky wrote:
> >> On 04/28/2012 06:56 PM, Zlatin Balevsky wrote:
> >>> In Gnutella we observed that long-lived nodes tend to be better
> >>> connected and that they also cluster with other high-uptime n
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 7:48 AM, Zlatin Balevsky wrote:
>> On 04/28/2012 06:56 PM, Zlatin Balevsky wrote:
>>> In Gnutella we observed that long-lived nodes tend to be better
>>> connected and that they also cluster with other high-uptime nodes.
>>> If the same is true for Freenet it's a good idea t
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 7:48 AM, Zlatin Balevsky wrote:
>> On 04/28/2012 06:56 PM, Zlatin Balevsky wrote:
>>> In Gnutella we observed that long-lived nodes tend to be better
>>> connected and that they also cluster with other high-uptime nodes.
>>> If the same is true for Freenet it's a good idea t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/30/2012 07:27 PM, Michael Grube wrote:
>> Right. Funnily enough, the swapping algorithm is most concisely
>> described in the Pitch Black paper. I'd suggest that as a
>> reference for quick implementation.
Thanks for the suggestion; will do.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/30/2012 07:27 PM, Michael Grube wrote:
>> Right. Funnily enough, the swapping algorithm is most concisely
>> described in the Pitch Black paper. I'd suggest that as a
>> reference for quick implementation.
Thanks for the suggestion; will do.
> On 04/28/2012 06:56 PM, Zlatin Balevsky wrote:
>> In Gnutella we observed that long-lived nodes tend to be better
>> connected and that they also cluster with other high-uptime nodes.
>> If the same is true for Freenet it's a good idea to keep an eye for
>> side effects as you tweak the behavior.
> On 04/28/2012 06:56 PM, Zlatin Balevsky wrote:
>> In Gnutella we observed that long-lived nodes tend to be better
>> connected and that they also cluster with other high-uptime nodes.
>> If the same is true for Freenet it's a good idea to keep an eye for
>> side effects as you tweak the behavior.
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 7:06 PM, Steve Dougherty wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 04/28/2012 06:56 PM, Zlatin Balevsky wrote:
> > In Gnutella we observed that long-lived nodes tend to be better
> > connected and that they also cluster with other high-uptime nodes.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/28/2012 06:56 PM, Zlatin Balevsky wrote:
> In Gnutella we observed that long-lived nodes tend to be better
> connected and that they also cluster with other high-uptime nodes.
> If the same is true for Freenet it's a good idea to keep an eye for
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 7:06 PM, Steve Dougherty wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 04/28/2012 06:56 PM, Zlatin Balevsky wrote:
> > In Gnutella we observed that long-lived nodes tend to be better
> > connected and that they also cluster with other high-uptime nodes.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/28/2012 06:56 PM, Zlatin Balevsky wrote:
> In Gnutella we observed that long-lived nodes tend to be better
> connected and that they also cluster with other high-uptime nodes.
> If the same is true for Freenet it's a good idea to keep an eye for
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 10:34 PM, Steve Dougherty
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Here's an update on my progress on the statistics project for the
> first week:
>
> The current probes are biased towards better-connected nodes: at each
> hop they choose a random peer
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 10:34 PM, Steve Dougherty wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Here's an update on my progress on the statistics project for the
> first week:
>
> The current probes are biased towards better-connected nodes: at each
> hop they choose a random peer t
Are you assuming opennet, darknet, a mix?
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 10:34 PM, Steve Dougherty wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Here's an update on my progress on the statistics project for the
> first week:
>
> The current probes are biased towards better-connected nodes
Are you assuming opennet, darknet, a mix?
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 10:34 PM, Steve Dougherty wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Here's an update on my progress on the statistics project for the
> first week:
>
> The current probes are biased towards better-connected nodes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Here's an update on my progress on the statistics project for the
first week:
The current probes are biased towards better-connected nodes: at each
hop they choose a random peer to pass the request to - this is a random
walk. However, because better-c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Here's an update on my progress on the statistics project for the
first week:
The current probes are biased towards better-connected nodes: at each
hop they choose a random peer to pass the request to - this is a random
walk. However, because better-c
20 matches
Mail list logo
