On Sunday 07 March 2010 18:31:42 David ?Bombe? Roden wrote:
> On Friday 05 March 2010 15:19:53 Matthew Toseland wrote:
>
> > > the server side of web pushing does not depend on HTMLNode heavily,
> > > and it will be a relatively easy task to migrate it to another base.
> > > As only a few Updateab
On Sunday 07 March 2010 18:31:42 David ‘Bombe’ Roden wrote:
> On Friday 05 March 2010 15:19:53 Matthew Toseland wrote:
>
> > > the server side of web pushing does not depend on HTMLNode heavily,
> > > and it will be a relatively easy task to migrate it to another base.
> > > As only a few Updateab
On Friday 05 March 2010 15:19:53 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > the server side of web pushing does not depend on HTMLNode heavily,
> > and it will be a relatively easy task to migrate it to another base.
> > As only a few UpdateableElements present yet, it shouldn't take more
> > than a day of work.
On Friday 05 March 2010 15:19:53 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > the server side of web pushing does not depend on HTMLNode heavily,
> > and it will be a relatively easy task to migrate it to another base.
> > As only a few UpdateableElements present yet, it shouldn't take more
> > than a day of work.
Hi,
the server side of web pushing does not depend on HTMLNode heavily,
and it will be a relatively easy task to migrate it to another base.
As only a few UpdateableElements present yet, it shouldn't take more
than a day of work. I'll be skiing for a week from today, so I can
look at the new templ
On Friday 05 March 2010 13:57:55 sashee wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the server side of web pushing does not depend on HTMLNode heavily,
> and it will be a relatively easy task to migrate it to another base.
> As only a few UpdateableElements present yet, it shouldn't take more
> than a day of work. I'll be s
Bombe has built a simple, fast template library for us. This is faster than our
HTMLNode code and is remarkably concise in the code to use it. It's great. This
should be used/merged soon. It should be ready very soon if it isn't now,
although it will take considerable work to apply it everywhere
On Friday 05 March 2010 13:57:55 sashee wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the server side of web pushing does not depend on HTMLNode heavily,
> and it will be a relatively easy task to migrate it to another base.
> As only a few UpdateableElements present yet, it shouldn't take more
> than a day of work. I'll be s
Hi,
the server side of web pushing does not depend on HTMLNode heavily,
and it will be a relatively easy task to migrate it to another base.
As only a few UpdateableElements present yet, it shouldn't take more
than a day of work. I'll be skiing for a week from today, so I can
look at the new templ
Bombe has built a simple, fast template library for us. This is faster than our
HTMLNode code and is remarkably concise in the code to use it. It's great. This
should be used/merged soon. It should be ready very soon if it isn't now,
although it will take considerable work to apply it everywhere
10 matches
Mail list logo