[freenet-dev] Templates and web-pushing

2010-03-09 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Sunday 07 March 2010 18:31:42 David ?Bombe? Roden wrote: > On Friday 05 March 2010 15:19:53 Matthew Toseland wrote: > > > > the server side of web pushing does not depend on HTMLNode heavily, > > > and it will be a relatively easy task to migrate it to another base. > > > As only a few Updateab

Re: [freenet-dev] Templates and web-pushing

2010-03-09 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Sunday 07 March 2010 18:31:42 David ‘Bombe’ Roden wrote: > On Friday 05 March 2010 15:19:53 Matthew Toseland wrote: > > > > the server side of web pushing does not depend on HTMLNode heavily, > > > and it will be a relatively easy task to migrate it to another base. > > > As only a few Updateab

[freenet-dev] Templates and web-pushing

2010-03-07 Thread David ‘Bombe’ Roden
On Friday 05 March 2010 15:19:53 Matthew Toseland wrote: > > the server side of web pushing does not depend on HTMLNode heavily, > > and it will be a relatively easy task to migrate it to another base. > > As only a few UpdateableElements present yet, it shouldn't take more > > than a day of work.

Re: [freenet-dev] Templates and web-pushing

2010-03-07 Thread David ‘Bombe’ Roden
On Friday 05 March 2010 15:19:53 Matthew Toseland wrote: > > the server side of web pushing does not depend on HTMLNode heavily, > > and it will be a relatively easy task to migrate it to another base. > > As only a few UpdateableElements present yet, it shouldn't take more > > than a day of work.

[freenet-dev] Templates and web-pushing

2010-03-05 Thread sashee
Hi, the server side of web pushing does not depend on HTMLNode heavily, and it will be a relatively easy task to migrate it to another base. As only a few UpdateableElements present yet, it shouldn't take more than a day of work. I'll be skiing for a week from today, so I can look at the new templ

[freenet-dev] Templates and web-pushing

2010-03-05 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Friday 05 March 2010 13:57:55 sashee wrote: > Hi, > > the server side of web pushing does not depend on HTMLNode heavily, > and it will be a relatively easy task to migrate it to another base. > As only a few UpdateableElements present yet, it shouldn't take more > than a day of work. I'll be s

[freenet-dev] Templates and web-pushing

2010-03-05 Thread Matthew Toseland
Bombe has built a simple, fast template library for us. This is faster than our HTMLNode code and is remarkably concise in the code to use it. It's great. This should be used/merged soon. It should be ready very soon if it isn't now, although it will take considerable work to apply it everywhere

Re: [freenet-dev] Templates and web-pushing

2010-03-05 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Friday 05 March 2010 13:57:55 sashee wrote: > Hi, > > the server side of web pushing does not depend on HTMLNode heavily, > and it will be a relatively easy task to migrate it to another base. > As only a few UpdateableElements present yet, it shouldn't take more > than a day of work. I'll be s

Re: [freenet-dev] Templates and web-pushing

2010-03-05 Thread sashee
Hi, the server side of web pushing does not depend on HTMLNode heavily, and it will be a relatively easy task to migrate it to another base. As only a few UpdateableElements present yet, it shouldn't take more than a day of work. I'll be skiing for a week from today, so I can look at the new templ

[freenet-dev] Templates and web-pushing

2010-03-05 Thread Matthew Toseland
Bombe has built a simple, fast template library for us. This is faster than our HTMLNode code and is remarkably concise in the code to use it. It's great. This should be used/merged soon. It should be ready very soon if it isn't now, although it will take considerable work to apply it everywhere