[freenet-dev] Testing release build 1475-pre4

2016-06-23 Freenet unstable testing prerelease build 1475-pre4 is now available. In this build: - Fix a major bug that might explain the poor connectivity since 1473 Please give it some testing and report back. It is as stable as 1475 will get; if you're running any of the previous pre-releases,

[freenet-dev] Testing release build 1475-pre3

2016-06-22 Freenet unstable testing prerelease build 1475-pre3 is now available. In this build: - Stop warning users that java9 isn't recent enough - Don't use FOAF if the HTL isn't high enough - Attempt to update update.sh Please give it some testing and report back. If all goes well we will re

Re: [freenet-dev] Testing release build 1475-pre2

On Tuesday, June 21, 2016 06:39:39 PM Florent Daigniere wrote: > 2016-06-21 > > Freenet unstable testing prerelease build 1475-pre2 is now available. > > In this build (on top of pre1): > - fix a critical bug: prevent announcement loops > - drop support for negtype9 (non-cummulative ack logic) >

[freenet-dev] Testing release build 1475-pre2

2016-06-21 Freenet unstable testing prerelease build 1475-pre2 is now available. In this build (on top of pre1): - fix a critical bug: prevent announcement loops - drop support for negtype9 (non-cummulative ack logic) - start to warn user that java7 is EOL - PluginInfoMessage: Fix wrong "does not

[freenet-dev] Testing release build 1475-pre1

Freenet unstable testing prerelease build 1475-pre1 is now available. It contains a fair amount of changes that have the potential to  break things. Please report any bug you might find, either by email  or on #freenet, specifying that you're running 1475-pre1. The following bugs have been fixed/

[freenet-dev] Testing release build 1474-pre1

Freenet unstable testing prerelease build 1474-pre1 is now available. This unplanned prerelease contains hotfixes that address two bugs. 1. When a bandwidth less than the minimum bandwidth is configured, the node no longer fails to start, but uses the minimum bandwidth instead. This fixes a regres

Re: [freenet-dev] Testing release build 1473-pre2

Bert Massop writes: > I've filed a pull request. Thanks for spotting this! Thank you! > → Back to thesis work after that, 2 weeks left to finish. Good luck! Best wishes, Arne -- Unpolitisch sein heißt politisch sein ohne es zu merken signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___

Re: [freenet-dev] Testing release build 1473-pre2

On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 11:26 AM, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > > In this build I’m missing the priorities for uploads in advanced mode, > but I don’t see that change in the changelog. Did I miss that for -pre1? > They are still available for Downloads. > I guess I slightly broke that in c11c5a

Re: [freenet-dev] Testing release build 1473-pre2

Steve Dougherty writes: > Freenet unstable testing prerelease build 1473-pre2 is now available. Yay! High Five to all involved! > This adds Sharesite - a fork of ShareWiki - as an official plugin. It’s cool that we got here! Thank you! Once 1473 is out, that adds a cool simple usecase for fir

[freenet-dev] Testing release build 1473-pre2

Freenet unstable testing prerelease build 1473-pre2 is now available. Like -pre1 before it and the stable build to be released in another week if all goes well, it requires Java 7. Two weeks after build 1473's stable release build 1472 will become mandatory. This pre-release requires Bouncy Castle

[freenet-dev] Testing release build 1473-pre1

Freenet unstable testing prerelease build 1473-pre1 is now available. It's the first build to require Java 7; the VM I use to build releases now uses Debian Jessie. In addition to many bugfixes my current understanding is that it fixes the last known regression introduced in build 1468, so absent o

Re: [freenet-dev] testing-build-1469-pre2

On Sun, 2015-07-19 at 21:36 -0400, Steve Dougherty wrote: > On 07/18/2015 01:47 PM, Florent Daigniere wrote: > > testing-build-1469-pre2 has been tagged and should be available > > using > > the manual update scripts. > > Can you push the tag please? > doh; done. Florent signature.asc Descrip

Re: [freenet-dev] testing-build-1469-pre2

On 07/18/2015 01:47 PM, Florent Daigniere wrote: > testing-build-1469-pre2 has been tagged and should be available using > the manual update scripts. Can you push the tag please? > It should deploy the new bouncycastle (1.52) and fix the crypto > performance issues of 1468. > > Please give it so

[freenet-dev] testing-build-1469-pre2

testing-build-1469-pre2 has been tagged and should be available using the manual update scripts. It should deploy the new bouncycastle (1.52) and fix the crypto performance issues of 1468. Please give it some good testing. I'm not publishing the corresponding freenet keys as I'd like some test

[freenet-dev] Testing after migrating to new server

This is a test message. Full details will be forthcoming shortly. -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL:

[freenet-dev] Testing after migrating to new server

This is a test message. Full details will be forthcoming shortly. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org http://osprey.vm.bytemark.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

[freenet-dev] Testing on Windows

On Monday 24 August 2009 17:03:21 Zero3 wrote: > Matthew Toseland skrev: > > On Friday 21 August 2009 20:12:39 Zero3 wrote: > >> Matthew Toseland skrev: > >>> Here's another one: > >>> > >>> I accidentally built the installer with the beta branch. The tray icon > >>> worked, but when I uninstalled

[freenet-dev] Testing on Windows

Matthew Toseland skrev: > On Friday 21 August 2009 20:12:39 Zero3 wrote: >> Matthew Toseland skrev: >>> Here's another one: >>> >>> I accidentally built the installer with the beta branch. The tray icon >>> worked, but when I uninstalled, and told it to do the survey, the survey >>> failed (as us

[freenet-dev] Testing on Windows

On Friday 21 August 2009 20:12:39 Zero3 wrote: > Matthew Toseland skrev: > > Here's another one: > > > > I accidentally built the installer with the beta branch. The tray icon > > worked, but when I uninstalled, and told it to do the survey, the survey > > failed (as usual), but control panel hu

Re: [freenet-dev] Testing on Windows

On Monday 24 August 2009 17:03:21 Zero3 wrote: > Matthew Toseland skrev: > > On Friday 21 August 2009 20:12:39 Zero3 wrote: > >> Matthew Toseland skrev: > >>> Here's another one: > >>> > >>> I accidentally built the installer with the beta branch. The tray icon > >>> worked, but when I uninstalled

Re: [freenet-dev] Testing on Windows

Matthew Toseland skrev: > On Friday 21 August 2009 20:12:39 Zero3 wrote: >> Matthew Toseland skrev: >>> Here's another one: >>> >>> I accidentally built the installer with the beta branch. The tray icon >>> worked, but when I uninstalled, and told it to do the survey, the survey >>> failed (as us

Re: [freenet-dev] Testing on Windows

On Friday 21 August 2009 20:12:39 Zero3 wrote: > Matthew Toseland skrev: > > Here's another one: > > > > I accidentally built the installer with the beta branch. The tray icon > > worked, but when I uninstalled, and told it to do the survey, the survey > > failed (as usual), but control panel hu

[freenet-dev] Testing on Windows

Matthew Toseland skrev: > Here's another one: > > I accidentally built the installer with the beta branch. The tray icon > worked, but when I uninstalled, and told it to do the survey, the survey > failed (as usual), but control panel hung. Ideas? I think it might be waiting > for firefox to cl

[freenet-dev] Testing on Windows

Matthew Toseland skrev: > tried 1231 installer on a windows system: > > freenet installer pops up before java installer has finished. is this a > problem? It shouldn't be a problem. The wininstaller waits for the JRE online installer to return before popping back up. Unfortunately, it returns

[freenet-dev] Testing on Windows

On Friday 21 August 2009 16:31:27 Matthew Toseland wrote: > tried 1231 installer on a windows system: > > freenet installer pops up before java installer has finished. is this a > problem? > > sometimes bootstrapping is really slow, start off with 2 peers, stay that way > for ages, make very fe

[freenet-dev] Testing on Windows

tried 1231 installer on a windows system: freenet installer pops up before java installer has finished. is this a problem? sometimes bootstrapping is really slow, start off with 2 peers, stay that way for ages, make very few requests... take many minutes to load sites... several of these in chr

Re: [freenet-dev] Testing on Windows

Matthew Toseland skrev: > Here's another one: > > I accidentally built the installer with the beta branch. The tray icon > worked, but when I uninstalled, and told it to do the survey, the survey > failed (as usual), but control panel hung. Ideas? I think it might be waiting > for firefox to cl

Re: [freenet-dev] Testing on Windows

On Friday 21 August 2009 16:31:27 Matthew Toseland wrote: > tried 1231 installer on a windows system: > > freenet installer pops up before java installer has finished. is this a > problem? > > sometimes bootstrapping is really slow, start off with 2 peers, stay that way > for ages, make very fe

Re: [freenet-dev] Testing on Windows

Matthew Toseland skrev: > tried 1231 installer on a windows system: > > freenet installer pops up before java installer has finished. is this a > problem? It shouldn't be a problem. The wininstaller waits for the JRE online installer to return before popping back up. Unfortunately, it returns

[freenet-dev] Testing on Windows

tried 1231 installer on a windows system: freenet installer pops up before java installer has finished. is this a problem? sometimes bootstrapping is really slow, start off with 2 peers, stay that way for ages, make very few requests... take many minutes to load sites... several of these in chr

[freenet-dev] Testing wanted: New Windows installer beta

Hi all I've released a new beta of the Windows installer. Please feel free to test away! Feedback of all kinds wanted. Source: http://github.com/freenet/wininstaller-staging/tree/beta Binary: http://privat.zero3.dk/FreenetInstaller_Beta.exe This beta covers the following reports on the bugtrack

[freenet-dev] Testing wanted: New Windows installer beta

Hi all I've released a new beta of the Windows installer. Please feel free to test away! Feedback of all kinds wanted. Source: http://github.com/freenet/wininstaller-staging/tree/beta Binary: http://privat.zero3.dk/FreenetInstaller_Beta.exe This beta covers the following reports on the bugtrack

[freenet-dev] Testing to devl

Testing to devl. -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL:

[freenet-dev] Testing to devl

Testing to devl. pgptedzUMSmVT.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

[freenet-dev] Testing - please ignore

Testing - please ignore

[freenet-dev] Testing - please ignore

Testing - please ignore ___ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

[freenet-dev] Testing, please ignore

ensuring it works

[freenet-dev] Testing, please ignore

ensuring it works ___ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Re: [freenet-dev] Testing...

Oops, my bad - screwy procmail configuration. On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 09:58:01AM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote: > These lists seem very quiet all of a sudden... time for a test message. > > ___ > Devl mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://dodo.freenetproj

[freenet-dev] Testing...

These lists seem very quiet all of a sudden... time for a test message. ___ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Re: [freenet-dev] Testing

On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 01:50:16PM -0400, Nick Tarleton wrote: > On Wednesday 01 October 2003 07:50 am, Tracy R Reed wrote: > > Make a new release twice a week and twice a week only on a schedule. > > Tuesdays and Fridays for example. Why? Because... > Some people may _want_ bleeding edge, but you

Re: [freenet-dev] Testing

On Wednesday 01 October 2003 07:50 am, Tracy R Reed wrote: > Make a new release twice a week and twice a week only on a schedule. > Tuesdays and Fridays for example. Why? Because... Some people may _want_ bleeding edge, but your plan would be good for the Average Joe's releases. > Last good build

Re: [freenet-dev] Testing

On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 10:14:49PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake thusly: > dont *remove* the line as fred fixes missing configuration parameters, such as > bwlimiting values, with *default* values, which are 10 KB/sec IIRC > rather use a rather high value for the bwlimits, such as 99 to enabl

Re: [freenet-dev] Testing

On October 02, 2003 04:14 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 09:04:52AM +0200, Niklas Bergh spake thusly: > >> 1MB/minute translates to about 12kbyte/s which is close to the default > >> outbound bwlimit. Are you sure that you have set outboundBandwidthLimit > >> t= > > > >o 0

Re: [freenet-dev] Testing

>On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 09:04:52AM +0200, Niklas Bergh spake thusly: >> 1MB/minute translates to about 12kbyte/s which is close to the default >> outbound bwlimit. Are you sure that you have set outboundBandwidthLimit t= >o 0 >> in all the nodes config files? > >Yes, I did go through all of the co

Re: [freenet-dev] Testing

On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 04:50:40AM -0700, Tracy R Reed spake thusly: > Last good build should ALWAYS be CURRENT_BUILD - 1. This way brand new > nodes will have someone to talk to but we will only be talking to the most Well, I finally got javac installed on my machine. It wasn't nearly the pain I

Re: [freenet-dev] Testing

On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 09:04:52AM +0200, Niklas Bergh spake thusly: > 1MB/minute translates to about 12kbyte/s which is close to the default > outbound bwlimit. Are you sure that you have set outboundBandwidthLimit to 0 > in all the nodes config files? Yes, I did go through all of the conf files

Re: [freenet-dev] Testing

D]> Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 1:50 PM Subject: [freenet-dev] Testing > ___ > Devl mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl ___ Devl m

Re: [freenet-dev] Testing

Tracy R Reed wrote: I've been holding off on sending this email for ages but I'm sitting here for the zillionth time looking an insert that is going nowhere preventing me from inserting the kind of legal and legitimate content that freenet needs to survive and my frustration level is getting the b

[freenet-dev] Testing

I've been holding off on sending this email for ages but I'm sitting here for the zillionth time looking an insert that is going nowhere preventing me from inserting the kind of legal and legitimate content that freenet needs to survive and my frustration level is getting the better of me. I've bee

Re: [freenet-dev] Testing 1 2 3

For those Debian fanatics who were pleased to see me criticize Redhat earlier - I thought you might be interested to note that the reason Matthew is sending more test messages is that Debian managed to screw up Mailman too :-) Ian. On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 09:37:24PM +0100, Toad wrote: > Testing s

[freenet-dev] Testing 1 2 3

Testing still. -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[freenet-dev] Testing a report that devl was borked

disregard -- Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] Coordinator, The Freenet Project http://freenetproject.org/ Weblog http://slashdot.org/~sanity/journal ___ devl mailing

[Freenet-dev] Testing prior to 0.3 release

Hi All! Ok, we are ramping up to our 0.3 release, for this we need everybody to test the current CVS release to death - reporting any exceptions thrown (check the logs), misbehaviours when things don't go right (try shutting down your node half way through a tranfer and such like), and usability p

[Freenet-dev] Testing again

The problem is that when there is a message, I want to pass the InputStream on to another class which reads and parses the message. If I already read the first byte, that is no good. So the option is pushing back, but that is really, really, ugly so I was hoping someone had a better idea. On Sun,

[Freenet-dev] Testing again

On Sun, 09 Apr 2000, hal at finney.org wrote: > I looked at this but couldn't figure out the logic. Why can't you just > fall into reading the stream in RawMessage, assuming that "closed" > is false? Is it so that you can be interrupted from another thread? > Could you use thread.interrupt or thr

[Freenet-dev] Testing again

On Fri, 31 Mar 2000, CacheMiss at aol.com wrote: > In a message dated 3/31/2000 5:44:04 AM Pacific Standard Time, > md98-osa at nada.kth.se writes: > I recently had this exact same problem in a different application I was > writing. I pulled out a significant amount of hair while screaming at

[Freenet-dev] Testing again

> I tried using this to read into an array of length 0, but this just returns 0 > right away, so it is no good for us. The only thing left I can think of is > to use a PushBackInputStream and read one byte and then bush it back when it > get's read. But, em, could it get any more annoying? Ca

[Freenet-dev] Testing again

> > available() has the nice feature of not blocking. However it will return 0 > > even if the stream has been closed, like you noticed. What I ultimately > > had > > to do was use setSoTimeout() on the Socket so it wouldn't block forever > > (and > > ignore the InterruptedIOExceptions), and