Hi Malaka,
Don't you need a xwiki syntax parser for this?
As you probably know I have written such a parser in the new rendering
module. Just make you don't reinvent one.
Thanks
-Vincent
On Jun 12, 2008, at 6:05 AM, malaka ekanayake wrote:
Hi fabio
Regarding the xwiki syntax I have some
I see your point but, as an external XWiki user/developer (I'm not
committer), I think these are only velocity scripts containing useful
variables and parts of interaction code but no core core... These
scripts could be copied/pasted in any XWiki document... To my mind, the
important thing is not
Hi Lilianne,
On Jun 12, 2008, at 6:04 AM, Lilianne E. Blaze wrote:
Hello,
Is there any particular reason why /templates are not in /WEB-INF?
I don't like the idea of having part of the source code accessible by
everyone.
They are content like any content file you put in your webapp root.
Hello,
Pascal Voitot wrote:
scripts could be copied/pasted in any XWiki document... To my mind, the
important thing is not to hide these scripts but to verify they don't
I agree it's more important, but it's better to take a multi-layered
approach and both secure and hide the code. No point
On Jun 12, 2008, at 10:06 AM, Fabio Mancinelli wrote:
Hi everybody.
I have some code to commit for XWIKI-2432 and XWIKI-2428...
There has been a previous vote for my committership but no official
announcement of the results (unless I missed it).
So I am just asking for the official ok
In fact, the question is always: where is the limit between content and
code? what's presentation layer and what's business layer? :)
JSP should never contain any code in modern web architecture and only be
presentation layer...
PHP often mixes both but this can be limited using a good PHP
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 9:53 AM, Lilianne E. Blaze
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Pascal Voitot wrote:
scripts could be copied/pasted in any XWiki document... To my mind, the
important thing is not to hide these scripts but to verify they don't
I agree it's more important, but it's
Tiago Rinck Caveden wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 9:53 AM, Lilianne E. Blaze
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Pascal Voitot wrote:
scripts could be copied/pasted in any XWiki document... To my mind, the
important thing is not to hide these scripts but to verify they don't
I agree it's
Hi Venkatesh,
On Jun 12, 2008, at 10:40 AM, Venkatesh Nandakumar wrote:
[snip]
1. Syntax Highlighting, to a large extent, though there have been
problems, as pointed out by Malaka, *bold~~combined~~bold* doesn't
give
the required effect, and secondly, the complex use of '*' in the wiki
On 12 juin 08, at 10:48, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi Venkatesh,
On Jun 12, 2008, at 10:40 AM, Venkatesh Nandakumar wrote:
[snip]
1. Syntax Highlighting, to a large extent, though there have been
problems, as pointed out by Malaka, *bold~~combined~~bold* doesn't
give
the required effect,
On Jun 12, 2008, at 11:11 AM, Fabio Mancinelli wrote:
On 12 juin 08, at 10:48, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi Venkatesh,
On Jun 12, 2008, at 10:40 AM, Venkatesh Nandakumar wrote:
[snip]
1. Syntax Highlighting, to a large extent, though there have been
problems, as pointed out by Malaka,
Hi devs,
While working on the new GWT-based WYSIWYG editor, I find out that the
default DialogBox from GWT moves very slow when dragged if it contains
many HTML elements (like a table with 10 rows and 20 columns). In the
current WYSIWYG editor dialog boxes are used for color picker, custom
Hi devs,
While working on the new GWT-based WYSIWYG editor, I find out that the
default DialogBox from GWT moves very slow when dragged if it contains
many HTML elements (like a table with 10 rows and 20 columns). In the
current WYSIWYG editor dialog boxes are used for color picker, custom
On Jun 12, 2008, at 2:15 PM, Jerome Velociter wrote:
Hi devs,
While working on the new GWT-based WYSIWYG editor, I find out that
the
default DialogBox from GWT moves very slow when dragged if it
contains
many HTML elements (like a table with 10 rows and 20 columns). In the
current
Hi devs,
While working on the new GWT-based WYSIWYG editor, I find out that the
default DialogBox from GWT moves very slow when dragged if it contains
many HTML elements (like a table with 10 rows and 20 columns). In the
current WYSIWYG editor dialog boxes are used for color picker, custom
On Jun 12, 2008, at 2:15 PM, Jerome Velociter wrote:
Hi devs,
While working on the new GWT-based WYSIWYG editor, I find out that
the
default DialogBox from GWT moves very slow when dragged if it
contains
many HTML elements (like a table with 10 rows and 20 columns). In the
current
On Jun 12, 2008, at 2:26 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea wrote:
Hi devs,
While working on the new GWT-based WYSIWYG editor, I find out that
the
default DialogBox from GWT moves very slow when dragged if it
contains
many HTML elements (like a table with 10 rows and 20 columns). In
the
current
On Jun 12, 2008, at 2:50 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea wrote:
On Jun 12, 2008, at 2:26 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea wrote:
Hi devs,
While working on the new GWT-based WYSIWYG editor, I find out that
the
default DialogBox from GWT moves very slow when dragged if it
contains
many HTML elements
I think some of the recipes which are described there are working on
http://i2geo.net/
paul
Le 12-juin-08 à 06:05, Lilianne E. Blaze a écrit :
Hello,
Is http://platform.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/ShortURLs final or a
work in progress?
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 2:32 PM, Pascal Voitot
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By the way, you might also be interested in
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Design/OverhaulOfXWikiClassesAndObjectsManagement.
..
I'll take a look at it:)
Hi,
I've replaced the hand drawings by drafts made by
On Jun 12, 2008, at 3:24 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
I'd say that what GWT gives us is not scalable all the time. I'll
look for
alternatives GWT libraries for both dialog boxes and dragdrop logic.
But, you don't have something against using dialog boxes? I know
Anca has.
I
Hi everyone,
Yesterday was our first bug fixing day (which we intend to have every
wednesday). The following bugs were fixed: http://tinyurl.com/5wcvs8
- Vincent
* XWIKI-2454 XWiki products don't stop correctly under Tomcat
- Sergiu
* XWIKI-1007Removing all content in page has no
Paul Libbrecht wrote:
I think some of the recipes which are described there are working on
http://i2geo.net/
Tip: the only problem I see is that the initial redirect contains a long URL.
You should modify
com.xpn.xwiki.web.HomePageRedirectServlet, recompile it and put it in
It still is time to vote and help open source get on radio again !
Don't forget your family members or friend can also vote as long as they
have an email..
Thanks for all that already voted !
Ludovic
Ludovic Dubost wrote:
Hi XWiki users and developers !
It's voting time again.. You have
Hi community !
The second XWiki DocHour is planned on Thursday 19th of June.
So what is this DocHour thing ?
Here is the rules:
* 1 hour
* You choose at what time you want to work on the documentation.
* On xwiki.org
* You choose to document what you want. Ideas of missing documentation:
- In
finally I preferred voting for a nice looking girl instead of you ludovic...
Sorry about that :(...
Pascal the joker
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 4:37 PM, Ludovic Dubost [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It still is time to vote and help open source get on radio again !
Don't forget your family
On Jun 12, 2008, at 5:08 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
vmassol (SVN) wrote:
Author: vmassol
Date: 2008-06-12 10:08:57 +0200 (Thu, 12 Jun 2008)
New Revision: 10278
Modified:
xwiki-platform/web/trunk/standard/src/main/webapp/templates/
login.vm
Log:
XWIKI-2458: Ensure that the username
I was sure somebody would choose Patricia J.
Pascal Voitot wrote:
finally I preferred voting for a nice looking girl instead of you ludovic...
Sorry about that :(...
Pascal the joker
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 4:37 PM, Ludovic Dubost [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It still is time to
Lilianne E. Blaze wrote:
Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
Paul Libbrecht wrote:
I think some of the recipes which are described there are working on
http://i2geo.net/
Tip: the only problem I see is that the initial redirect contains a long
URL. You should modify
bad guy... hope for you she's not in this mailing list :):):):)
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 7:08 PM, Ludovic Dubost [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was sure somebody would choose Patricia J.
Pascal Voitot wrote:
finally I preferred voting for a nice looking girl instead of you
I know ! Could not help it ! But you started it by voting for her !
This is also why I avoided putting the full name to make sure it would
not be googled on markmail !
Ludovic
Pascal Voitot wrote:
bad guy... hope for you she's not in this mailing list :):):):)
On Thu, Jun 12,
31 matches
Mail list logo
