Hi,
Interesting, though I do have my worries about having to deal with actual
exceptions in velocity. Probably the most common usecase would be just to
display the exception, but others may now be tempted to look at exception
types and display custom messages for each error situation. That should
/948c4f24-2485-4b33-8452-1e6e1a2d6c74/cff5f5253f8324d9dc760cb9380c61d9
- jira:
https://www.evernote.com/shard/s119/sh/b8803c9b-4ea7-43dd-a2ed-1226080074f2/1f60d551a55a709cfc4aaca73dce9004
Thanks
-Vincent
Guillaume
ᐧ
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 9:12 AM, Eduard Moraru wrote
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Thomas Mortagne thomas.morta...@xwiki.com
wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Marius Dumitru Florea
mariusdumitru.flo...@xwiki.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 10:00 AM, Eduard Moraru enygma2...@gmail.com
wrote:
As mentioned to Vincent in a previous
Hi,
My conclusion from this thread is that having a permanent display of the
interface language is a waste of UI. In other words and IMO, the interface
language should be a user preference just like User Type or Editor
Preferences inside the user's profile.
Funnily enough, we have the perfect
Florea
mariusdumitru.flo...@xwiki.com wrote:
+1 to try it out.
Thanks,
Marius
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Eduard Moraru enygma2...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi devs,
Reviving this thread since I`ve stumbled upon this again while looking
for
Fundry alternatives after a user asked
Updated again the Contributing page for better visibility:
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/Contributing#HSponsoringissues
Thanks,
Eduard
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 6:46 PM, Eduard Moraru enygma2...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Thanks to Vincent, we have installed the Jira plugin and we
Hi devs,
As mentioned last week, I propose we do a BFD (BFD#64) tomorrow:
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/XWikiDays#HBugfixingdays
We have not really made any progress on this yet, since for the 1 year
period we are at 106 bugs behind. See:
http://jira.xwiki
)
vali...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Eduard Moraru enygma2...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I kind of like this proposal. As Jeremie pointed out, we`re more or
less
back where we started from, with the improvement that the Add
button
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Guillaume Lerouge guilla...@xwiki.com
wrote:
Hi Edy,
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 12:07 AM, Eduard Moraru enygma2...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Guillaume Lerouge guilla...@xwiki.com
wrote:
Hi Caty,
On Mon, Sep 29
Results for last Thursday's BFD:
http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Blog/Bug+Fixing+Day+63
Thanks for participating!
We should probably keep this up the following weeks to catch up.
Thanks,
Eduard
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Eduard Moraru enygma2...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi devs,
Just
cases.
But I don't think the Create wiki action is one of those cases.
Thanks,
Guillaume
Thanks,
Caty
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Eduard Moraru enygma2...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Guillaume Lerouge
guilla...@xwiki.com
wrote:
Hi
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Guillaume Lerouge guilla...@xwiki.com
wrote:
Hi Edy,
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Eduard Moraru enygma2...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Guillaume Lerouge guilla...@xwiki.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 12:03 PM
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu ser...@xwiki.com wrote:
On 09/26/2014 06:10 PM, Eduard Moraru wrote:
P.S.: I`m fairly sure that writing a quick greasemonkey userscript for
GitHub to simulate a Jira-like Commits tab would be quick and easy to
do,
since issues are already
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 11:16 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu ser...@xwiki.org wrote:
On 09/27/2014 03:36 PM, Eduard Moraru wrote:
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu ser...@xwiki.com
wrote:
On 09/26/2014 06:10 PM, Eduard Moraru wrote:
P.S.: I`m fairly sure that writing a quick
Hi,
I`m not very happy with seeing [Thread-1] DEBUG o.x.shutdown everywhere
and knowing that a problem occurred during shutdown instead of knowing
the exact component and location of the problem. It might look a bit better
for users, but users are not the ones that will be fixing the problem, so
...talk about Contributions pain points.
I have to say, I agree with Sergiu here. We might be a bit swimming against
the tide here, since, from a regular-Joe contributor's point of view we`re
coming with all these restrictions and accounts, infrastructure and
procedures, when all he wants to do
+1 for having some visibility, defining performance metrics and generating
(at least) release-based performance reports for XWiki.
ATM, XWiki`s performance is black magic/taboo for me, since nobody is
measuring it (until Thomas started working specifically on it), so we can`t
really talk about it
+1 to remove it.
Thanks,
Eduard
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 3:01 PM, vinc...@massol.net vinc...@massol.net
wrote:
Hi devs,
AFAIK we have no plans to release a 6.1.1 version since we’re releasing
6.2 final next week.
I’m thus proposing to remove the 6.1.x branch.
Let me know if someone needs
Great job, Vladis!
I did not actually install it yet, but from the description, you seem to
have hit the nail on the head with this one. I also had a quick look to see
how you handled blog post summaries and I see you have created a new class
to model the summary and assigned a string property to
Hi devs,
Just a reminder that today is BFD #63.
Thanks,
Eduard
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 4:15 PM, Eduard Moraru enygma2...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi devs,
Since we`ve skipped the last ones, I propose we do a BFD (BFD#63) tomorrow:
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/XWikiDays
Hi devs,
I`m not sure if we already have a discussion started on this topic, but in
my opinion, it's long overdue. I see people start being confused and
questions like this [1] start to be asked.
The new location of the Add menu in Flamingo is problematic IMO for a
various number of reasons:
-
Hi Guillaume,
I have started a new discussion [1] on the topic of the new location of the
Add menu in Flamingo which is, IMO, the real problem here.
Regarding your actual proposal, I`d be inclined to -1 it, as IMO it makes
basic CRUD operations on the wiki model harder to perform (i.e. harder to
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Guillaume Lerouge guilla...@xwiki.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Eduard Moraru enygma2...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Guillaume,
I have started a new discussion [1] on the topic of the new location of
the
Add menu in Flamingo which is, IMO
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Guillaume Louis-Marie Delhumeau
gdelhum...@xwiki.com wrote:
Hi Eddy,
2014-09-25 11:59 GMT+02:00 Eduard Moraru enygma2...@gmail.com:
Hi devs,
I`m not sure if we already have a discussion started on this topic, but
in
my opinion, it's long overdue. I
Hi devs,
Since we`ve skipped the last ones, I propose we do a BFD (BFD#63) tomorrow:
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/XWikiDays#HBugfixingdays
As we already know, the numbers for the 1 year status have spiralled out of
control. We are currently 102 bugs behind. See:
The XWiki development team is proud to announce the availability of XWiki
6.2.
This release is mainly focused on the Flamingo skin and it being now used
by default, but also features improvements for applications such as AWM and
Blog and various performance improvements.
Developers can benefit
Hi devs,
Since we`ve skipped the last one, I propose we do a BFD (BFD#63) today:
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/XWikiDays#HBugfixingdays
As noticed recently, on the 1 year status, we’re behind by 48 bugs, see:
http://jira.xwiki
Also, as Vincent suggested, I`m going to go ahead and announce the proposal
of doing BFD#63 next week.
This way maybe the devs can be more prepared for it and we can have an
impressive result :)
Thanks,
Eduard
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Eduard Moraru enygma2...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok. I
+1 for Thomas' logic. If its own maker dropped support for it, there is no
logic in us supporting it. simple and easy to defend.
Thanks,
Eduard
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) vali...@gmail.com
wrote:
My vote goes to:
+1 to support IE11(IE10) for Flamingo
-1 to
Hi devs,
Starting tomorrow and the full next week I won`t be available (holidays),
so we need to find someone to take care of the 6.2 RC1 release on Monday.
Also, we`d need someone to manage the next 2 XWiki days (tomorrow and next
Thursday).
Any (committer) volunteers for any of the 2 tasks?
The XWiki development team is proud to announce the availability of XWiki
6.2 Milestone 2.
This release mostly focuses on the Flaming skin and sets it as the new
default skin for XWiki. A new themes application for the new skin is
introduces, along with the AppBar set by default and other various
Hi Guillaume,
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Guillaume Louis-Marie Delhumeau
guillaume.delhum...@xwiki.com wrote:
Hi Eddy,
2014-08-23 23:59 GMT+02:00 Eduard Moraru enygma2...@gmail.com:
Hi devs,
Any idea why this test expects that the html export of the homepage
contains
I`ve also registered on the jenkins-users list hoping for a helpful reply.
This problem is happening now *too* often and it has become a problem.
Either there is something in our build that jenkins does not like, either
it's a slave, a plugin, some configuration or even the hardware, we
*really*
XWIKI-10828: Speed up XWiki
instance starting in functional tests
(rev 6b00f7cd764aaab4522d1be7b65fff2c481d7a6e)
[Eduard Moraru] Aug 23, 2014 12:15:44 AM XE-1404: Switch to Flamingo Skin
by default.
(rev b9260b50a3f69a99c96a050208e92f8d71688c91)
Changes for Build #3378
Changes for Build
the top level modules for example.
(rev 172194e2764218ba6796f6fb4e6bd3972ca2ce66)
[Vincent Massol] Aug 22, 2014 6:19:43 PM XWIKI-10828: Speed up XWiki
instance starting in functional tests
(rev 6b00f7cd764aaab4522d1be7b65fff2c481d7a6e)
[Eduard Moraru] Aug 23, 2014 12:15:44 AM XE-1404: Switch
, Eduard Moraru enygma2...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
For tomorrow I propose a Bug Fixing Day.
Last week's IFD was quite productive, so let`s hope tomorrow will be a
good BFD as well :)
I`ll make the official announcement tomorrow if there are no objections or
better suggestions.
Thanks,
Eduard
Hi Guillaume,
Just a small mention is that the build has not been broken entirely, just
some of the tests. It's only the past few days that we have actual build
problems (i.e. code not building successfully).
Anyway, we`ve decided that we focus on build issues today so we should be
able to fix
Hi,
Most relevant result I found on Google about this:
http://jenkins-ci.361315.n4.nabble.com/Parsing-HTML-unit-test-for-the-project-configuration-page-td4699061.html
Though it does not say much more than we already know, just that it seems
to be a long standing mechanism for Prototype.js to
Hi,
What I don`t fully understand is why changing a skin should affect the UI
tests of an application?
Page objects should be specific to the application's UI elements that are
custom coded to reflect the state of and to perform operations on the UI
elements of the tested application only. These
Hi devs,
= Introduction =
With the recent addition of the CookieTool [1] as a velocity tool and the
recent upgrade to velocity-tools 2.0 [2] we`ve been having some issues with
the build. More precisely, the usage of CookieTool requires servlet-api to
be used as dependency for
Hi devs,
Today is Bug Fixing Day #61.
We're currently at +3 bugs for the 1600 days period:
http://jira.xwiki.org/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=10352
We`ll need to update the period shortly after.
Here's the BFD#61 dashboard to follow the progress during the day:
:00 Eduard Moraru enygma2...@gmail.com:
Hi Danilo,
Perhaps you forgot to do this
http://platform.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/DevGuide/JavaScriptAPI#HRequireJSandjQueryAPIs
when working with jQuery in XWiki?
Thanks,
Eduard
On Wed
Hi Danilo,
Perhaps you forgot to do this
http://platform.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/DevGuide/JavaScriptAPI#HRequireJSandjQueryAPIs
when working with jQuery in XWiki?
Thanks,
Eduard
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica)
vali...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
+1 to remove as long as the 1.0 documents are still editable in an
alternative editor (wiki editor or wysiwyg).
Thanks,
Eduard
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Thomas Mortagne thomas.morta...@xwiki.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 9:03 PM, vinc...@massol.net vinc...@massol.net
wrote:
Hi,
For tomorrow I propose a Bug Fixing Day.
Last week's IFD was quite productive, so let`s hope tomorrow will be a good
BFD as well :)
I`ll make the official announcement tomorrow if there are no objections or
better suggestions.
Thanks,
Eduard
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 5:40 PM, Eduard Moraru
://freedomsponsors.org/stats/
[2] https://github.com/freedomsponsors/freedomsponsors-jira-plugin
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Eduard Moraru enygma2...@gmail.com wrote:
From Vincent's link[1], I see that this is intended, as it is actually the
system's philosophy which is OK in theory, but it is also obvious
The XWiki development team is proud to announce the availability of XWiki
6.2 Milestone 1.
Among others, this release adds various responsive UI improvements for the
new Flamingo skin, a new structure for applications created with
Application Within Minutes and the possibility to have alternative
, Eduard Moraru enygma2...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 1:53 PM, vinc...@massol.net vinc...@massol.net
wrote:
Hi Eduard,
On 13 Jul 2014 at 12:34:10, Eduard Moraru (enygma2...@gmail.com(mailto:
enygma2...@gmail.com)) wrote:
Hi,
Maybe it would be a better idea to vote
, Eduard Moraru enygma2...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi devs,
As part of the investigation on the Activity Stream Refactoring for the
6.2
roadmap, I have written a couple of documents [1] on some of the problems
(specifically performance [2]) of the current implementation and also
tried
to list
+1
Thanks,
Eduard
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Thomas Mortagne thomas.morta...@xwiki.com
wrote:
+1
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Marius Dumitru Florea
mariusdumitru.flo...@xwiki.com wrote:
+1
Thanks,
Marius
On Jul 18, 2014 7:39 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu ser...@xwiki.org
Hi devs,
As part of the investigation on the Activity Stream Refactoring for the 6.2
roadmap, I have written a couple of documents [1] on some of the problems
(specifically performance [2]) of the current implementation and also tried
to list various use cases [3] that a better AS implementation
Hi devs,
As some of you might have already seen, as part of the AS investigation for
6.2, I have made a small analysis on the way we display events.
As this document [1] shows, we have 2 issues here:
1) What events do we display in AS (user generated, application generated,
messages, etc...)
2)
Hi Jeremie,
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Jeremie BOUSQUET
jeremie.bousq...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
2014-07-18 16:32 GMT+02:00 Eduard Moraru enygma2...@gmail.com:
Hi devs,
As part of the investigation on the Activity Stream Refactoring for the
6.2
roadmap, I have written
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 1:53 PM, vinc...@massol.net vinc...@massol.net
wrote:
Hi Eduard,
On 13 Jul 2014 at 12:34:10, Eduard Moraru (enygma2...@gmail.com(mailto:
enygma2...@gmail.com)) wrote:
Hi,
Maybe it would be a better idea to vote/decide on the topic of the XWiki
days
Hi Scott,
According to the FAQ, Institutions and FOSS projects can join from now
until the end of June. Is the registration period over, or does it span
until the end of August?
Thanks,
Eduard
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 7:36 PM, Scott Wilson
scott.bradley.wil...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
Hi,
Maybe it would be a better idea to vote/decide on the topic of the XWiki
days before they actually happen (either at the end of the previous day, or
in the roadmap, or at start of the week, don`t know), so that people can
plan for them, or at least not have to switch context so abruptly. IMO,
Hi devs,
While thinking about XWIKI-8757 [1] and the fact that the new skin focuses
[2] a lot on applications, a number of questions pop up inevitably because
of XWiki's loose/ad-hoc way of handling/defining applications.
For the AWM problem, I came to the conclusion that we should probably just
+1, but hopefully without duplicating the doc.content field in a new
xproperty.
Thanks,
Eduard
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 10:54 AM, vinc...@massol.net vinc...@massol.net
wrote:
On 30 Jun 2014 at 09:45:58, Marius Dumitru Florea (
Glad to be back :)
Thanks,
Eduard
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 9:36 AM, vinc...@massol.net vinc...@massol.net
wrote:
Results:
http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Blog/Bug+Fixing+Day+60
8 bugs fixed, not bad, slightly under the 10 that would have been nice.
Still at -6 at the end of the day
+1
Thanks,
Eduard
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Guillaume Louis-Marie Delhumeau
gdelhum...@xwiki.com wrote:
+1
2014-04-04 14:55 GMT+02:00 Marius Dumitru Florea
mariusdumitru.flo...@xwiki.com:
+1
Thanks,
Marius
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Thomas Mortagne
+1
Thanks,
Eduard
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 6:27 PM, Denis Gervalle d...@softec.lu wrote:
+1
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Thomas Mortagne
thomas.morta...@xwiki.comwrote:
+1
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 6:13 PM, vinc...@massol.net vinc...@massol.net
wrote:
Hi devs,
On
+1,
Thanks,
Eduard
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Marius Dumitru Florea
mariusdumitru.flo...@xwiki.com wrote:
+1,
Thanks,
Marius
On Jan 30, 2014 3:34 PM, vinc...@massol.net vinc...@massol.net wrote:
Hi,
Our RTF export has never been very good and is even crashing depending on
+1
Thanks,
Eduard
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Marius Dumitru Florea
mariusdumitru.flo...@xwiki.com wrote:
+1
Thanks,
Marius
On Jan 30, 2014 3:06 PM, vinc...@massol.net vinc...@massol.net wrote:
Hi devs,
I'd like to propose removing the feature of extracting the title from
+1
Thanks,
Eduard
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu ser...@xwiki.com wrote:
+1, Java6 has been EOL for a year already, and almost all GNU/Linux
distributions are using J7.
On 01/31/2014 03:54 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
Hi devs,
I would like to propose that we move to
Hi,
Well, the idea of Workspaces was to promote collaboration and openness.
Joining a workspace was about gaining the ability to collaborate (edit),
while viewing the contents by default was about the wiki principle. The
idea was just like in the main wiki, you are a (new?) user who can view
Hi,
FYI, there already exist an issue [1] in Jira for the problem you have
mentioned, if I have properly understood. I`ve created the issue because I
did not have the time, at that moment, to do it.
Regarding the discussion, I`m -1 for explicitly writing code that checks
the presence of
Congrats Guillaume D.!
-Eduard
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 4:21 PM, vinc...@massol.net vinc...@massol.netwrote:
Hi devs,
Guillaume Delhumeau has been voted as a committer by the other committers
and he’s accepted the role! :)
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/Committership
Hi,
Try adding xpage=plain to the requested URL.
Thanks,
Eduard
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 9:18 PM, Valdis Vītoliņš valdis.vitol...@odo.lvwrote:
Due to performance reasons I had to improve Groovy script to
print results directly to the response object:
{{groovy}}
Hi,
Also, keep in mind that, with the code you`re using, you`re creating empty
wikis. In practice, when using (copying) a template or a flavour/extension
(future feature done with the Extension Manager), your wiki creation times
will grow considerably. Basically all you are testing now is the
Eduard Moraru enygma2...@gmail.com
Technical note: Looking at the code, I can`t see these
WikiPropertyGroups
being handled anywhere. I imagine that you would have to delegate
the
task
of creating WikiDescriptor instances to the WikiManager which
will,
in
turn, be in charge
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Guillaume Louis-Marie Delhumeau
gdelhum...@xwiki.com wrote:
Hi Edy
2013/10/11 Eduard Moraru enygma2...@gmail.com
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Guillaume Louis-Marie Delhumeau
gdelhum...@xwiki.com wrote:
Hi Eduard,
2013/10
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Guillaume Louis-Marie Delhumeau
gdelhum...@xwiki.com wrote:
Hi Eduard,
2013/10/9 Eduard Moraru enygma2...@gmail.com
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Guillaume Louis-Marie Delhumeau
gdelhum...@xwiki.com wrote:
Thanks for all your
Hi Guilllaume,
1) What is the point of the WikiDescriptorAlias class if it just holds and
returns a string?
Also, the only method in the WikiDescriptorManager that works with aliases
accepts a String instead of the WikiDescriptorAlias class, so this means
that the class is useless:
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Guillaume Louis-Marie Delhumeau
gdelhum...@xwiki.com wrote:
Hi Eddy.
First, thanks for your answer.
2013/10/7 Eduard Moraru enygma2...@gmail.com
Hi Guilllaume,
1) What is the point of the WikiDescriptorAlias class if it just holds
and
returns
/xwiki/wiki
I have only changed the API, not the implementation.
I think it starts to be clean.
2013/10/7 Guillaume Louis-Marie Delhumeau gdelhum...@xwiki.com
Hi Eddy.
First, thanks for your answer.
2013/10/7 Eduard Moraru enygma2...@gmail.com
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Guillaume Louis-Marie Delhumeau
gdelhum...@xwiki.com wrote:
Hi Vincent,
My comments below:
2013/10/1 Vincent Massol vinc...@massol.net
Hi Guillaume,
On Oct 1, 2013, at 12:21 PM, Guillaume Louis-Marie Delhumeau
gdelhum...@xwiki.com wrote:
Hi
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Guillaume Louis-Marie Delhumeau
gdelhum...@xwiki.com wrote:
Hi Eddy!
2013/10/1 Eduard Moraru enygma2...@gmail.com
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Guillaume Louis-Marie Delhumeau
gdelhum...@xwiki.com wrote:
Hi Vincent,
My comments below
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Vincent Massol vinc...@massol.net wrote:
To summarize the following still have unknown states:
commons:
remotes/origin/XWIKI-7748
remotes/origin/feature-execution-context-metadata
rendering:
+1
Thanks,
Eduard
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Guillaume Louis-Marie Delhumeau
gdelhum...@xwiki.com wrote:
Almost everybody has voted so I think this proposal is approved.
2013/9/13 Sergiu Dumitriu ser...@xwiki.com
On 09/13/2013 08:51 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
On Thu, Sep 12,
+1 for E. It's basically what Workspaces did from the start and that was
the whole point: navigation, hierarchy and consistency. I believe the first
users of Workspaces found it quite intuitive and nobody complained :)
Side Note: I'm also against the notion of System in the UI that's
recently
+1 but specially for building releases with JDK 7 (not only for
development) :)
Thanks,
Eduard
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 8:12 PM, Vincent Massol vinc...@massol.net wrote:
See http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XCOMMONS-432
Now anyone can use Java7 with xwiki right now (lot of us already do)… :)
Yes, we should definitely start with a recommendation/warning first.
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Denis Gervalle d...@softec.lu wrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Vincent Massol vinc...@massol.net
wrote:
On Sep 16, 2013, at 11:22 AM, Eduard Moraru enygma2...@gmail.com
wrote
Hi Denis,
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Denis Gervalle d...@softec.lu wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Vincent Massol vinc...@massol.net
wrote:
On Mar 15, 2013, at 10:50 AM, Denis Gervalle d...@softec.lu wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Vincent Massol
, Eduard Moraru enygma2...@gmail.com wrote:
Are we sure we want to drop the $msg binding in the future [1]?
IMO yes, for consistency, but it's a good question to ask. It's not just
about $msg but about all bindings. If we allow shortcut aliases for
bindings we need to make this general and allow
-8829
[5] http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-8876
[6] http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-8877
[7] http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-8914
[8] https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-platform/pull/86/commits
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Eduard Moraru enygma2...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 4
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Vincent Massol vinc...@massol.net wrote:
Very very nice results for this BFD:
http://jira.xwiki.org/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=11500
So far 36 bugs closed :)
You mean 37 ;)
We did it! In one go when I thought we would need 2 or 3 BFDs! Well done
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Thomas Mortagne
thomas.morta...@xwiki.comwrote:
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 8:53 AM, Marius Dumitru Florea
mariusdumitru.flo...@xwiki.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Vincent Massol vinc...@massol.net
wrote:
Hi everyone,
So here are the results:
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Vincent Massol vinc...@massol.net wrote:
On Mar 6, 2013, at 6:16 PM, Jeremie BOUSQUET jeremie.bousq...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
@Vincent : I agree with all your points, my feedback was more on that
these
points may not be clear for contributors at
if the site does not block the money then it's risky
Ludovic
2013/3/5 Eduard Moraru enygma2...@gmail.com
Hi,
Yes, I really like the fact that it's integrated with jira and that
everything is contextualized.
However, I am a bit reserved about the success it is going to have,
since,
AFAIU
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Denis Gervalle d...@softec.lu wrote:
Hi Eduard,
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Eduard Moraru enygma2...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Denis,
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 1:42 AM, Denis Gervalle d...@softec.lu wrote:
Hi Edouard,
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013
Hi,
Yes, I really like the fact that it's integrated with jira and that
everything is contextualized.
However, I am a bit reserved about the success it is going to have, since,
AFAIU, there is nothing stopping people from spam-funding issues they want
fixed, but in the end decide that they are
+1 to stop using it and remove it from the standard.
Thanks,
Eduard
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) vali...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi devs,
Our documentation
http://platform.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/DevGuide/VerticalForms is
requesting to use .buttonwrapper class as
Hi Denis,
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 1:42 AM, Denis Gervalle d...@softec.lu wrote:
Hi Edouard,
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Eduard Moraru enygma2...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Denis,
Nice feedback! Please see below...
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Denis Gervalle d...@softec.lu wrote
Hi devs,
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea
mariusdumitru.flo...@xwiki.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Eduard Moraru enygma2...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi devs,
To further fuel this discussion, I will mention some points that are more
or less problematic when
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Vincent Massol vinc...@massol.net wrote:
On Mar 1, 2013, at 2:38 PM, Sorin Burjan sorin.bur...@xwiki.com wrote:
Hello,
XWiki 5.0 M1 is soon going to be released, scheduled for Monday.
Good reminder!
I see in the Release Notes Page only 2 things
With those changes, you will fix most issue regarding the reachability of
wikis in virtual mode, and therefore, having virtual as the default should
not be an issue anymore, whatever your configuration is.
WDYT ?
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Eduard Moraru enygma2...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi
/wikimanager/WikiManager.java#L223
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Eduard Moraru enygma2...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi devs,
To be more precise, the essence of my proposed change [1] is to actually
always return true in the isVirtualMode() method, ignoring any
configuration and marking the method
-virtual-mode
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Thomas Mortagne
thomas.morta...@xwiki.comwrote:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Thomas Mortagne
thomas.morta...@xwiki.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Eduard Moraru enygma2...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Thomas,
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013
to preserve the
possibility of going back to a non-virtual mode? (mostly addressed to
Thomas, but to others as well)
Thanks,
Eduard
--
[1]
https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-platform/commit/ce3d9d28aefdb327d407ef179a4c869ccce74478
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Eduard Moraru enygma2...@gmail.com
I have updated by calendar! ;)
-Eduard
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 12:24 PM, Vincent Massol vinc...@massol.net wrote:
Thanks to the 3 committers you've participated (let's have more
participating next time! :)):
http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/Bug+Fixing+Day+9
-Vincent
On Feb 21,
601 - 700 of 1005 matches
Mail list logo
