First of all, my compliments to Larry Phillips on a well thought out and
well written response. For those wishing to delve deeply into these
issues, there are two discussion groups (probably amongst many others)
that I recommend for some detailed and excellent discussions in this
subject field.
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 14 October 2005 4:28 AM
To: The Digital Divide Network discussiongroup; The Digital Divide Network
discussiongroup
Subject: Re: Re: [DDN] Intellectual Property Rights
I agree with you on almost everything you say, Claude
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone else think it is unethical (as well as illegal) to digitize works that are protected by copyright? Don't the writers and producers of intellectual and artistic property own their works and have the right to control how they are distributed
To
Sarah,
thank you for your answer: I agree that former non-digital piracy does
not justify digital piracy. What I had written was just aimed at not
demonizing too much the piracy potential of digital tools, but it is
true that it must be addressed.
Same with plagiarism, btw: people have
I agree with John that the Google's and Yahoo's digitization of books
is not a problem if the purpose is to provide access to specific
portions only - the creation of the intellectual showroom (look what
happened when the Border brothers encouraged people in their Ann
Arbor bookstore to
Does anyone else think it is unethical (as well as illegal) to digitize works
that are protected by copyright? Don't the writers and producers of
intellectual and artistic property own their works and have the right to
control how they are distributed?
(Don't Google and Yahoo and the
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 8:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [DDN] Intellectual Property Rights
Does anyone else think it is unethical (as well as illegal) to digitize
works that are protected by copyright? Don't the writers and producers
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 11:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [DDN] Intellectual Property Rights
Does anyone else think it is unethical (as well as illegal) to digitize
works that are protected by copyright? Don't the writers and producers
Sarah Blackmun wrote:
Does anyone else think it is unethical (as well as illegal) to digitize
works that are protected by copyright?
It can be unethical and illegal in some cases, but Taran Rampersad, whom
you seem to be answering was only speaking using Optical Character
Recognition with
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 8:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [DDN] Intellectual Property Rights
Does anyone else think it is unethical (as well as illegal) to digitize
works that are protected by copyright? Don't
It is neither unethical or illegal to digitize (i.e. copy) books
that are protected by copyright, if done right. It has been done for
over 100 years in the analog world. Example: Copyright owner
authorizes printer to make 50 copies. Printer makes 65, gives 50 back
to author, gets paid for making
On 10/13/05, Sharon V Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do believe that writers and artist should control how they work is
distributed - . . . .
Congress appears to disagree. Back in 1909, when it was codifying
what has come to be known as the first sale doctrine, the Judiciary
Committee
/13 Thu PM 03:22:03 EDT
To: The Digital Divide Network discussion group
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [DDN] Intellectual Property Rights
Sarah Blackmun wrote:
Does anyone else think it is unethical (as well as illegal) to digitize
works that are protected by copyright
13 matches
Mail list logo
