why is something like that not possible? (except the missing langauge
feature thing)
could it be a nice extension?
double A,B;
alias ( A + B * 10 ) my_expression;
double C = my_expression;
davidl wrote:
>
> Actually I'm not sure about what kind of bugs my d apps usually have.
> But I notice that the harmonia project(I now make it uptodate) gets the
> problem of integer overlapping(actually I find it quite hard to detect
> and fix).
>
> What's your opinion and experience?
I'd say i
Robert Fraser Wrote:
> I'm assuming overflow<
Which could be 95% solved by buffer overflow checks :-)
My ears are ringing.
Bye,
bearophile
davidl wrote:
Actually I'm not sure about what kind of bugs my d apps usually have.
But I notice that the harmonia project(I now make it uptodate) gets the
problem of integer overlapping(actually I find it quite hard to detect
and fix).
What's your opinion and experience?
Null references/
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 12:07 AM, davidl wrote:
Actually I'm not sure about what kind of bugs my d apps usually have. But I
notice that the harmonia project(I now make it uptodate) gets the problem of
integer overlapping(actually I find it quite hard to detect and fix)
Robert Fraser:
> Compilers seem like they'd be easier to parallelize than other
> applications...
Because compilers are (almost) pure functions :-)
This is less silly than it sounds.
Bye,
bearophile
Brad Roberts wrote:
BCS wrote:
Hello Daniel,
http://dobbscodetalk.com/index.php?option=com_myblog&show=Multithreade
d-I-O.html&Itemid=29
-- Daniel
P.S. "It really seems barbaric in our digital age that we all have
motors and levers and gears and spinning things in our boxes." Those
damned
davidl Wrote:
> Actually I'm not sure about what kind of bugs my d apps usually have.
I suggest every serious programmer to keep a document that contains all the
bugs he/she/shi has fixed in her/his/hir code, plus a note that explains such
bug a bit.
This is a bug I have put 3 times in my D pr
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Bill Baxter wrote:
> I'm pretty sure this used to work:
> hg clone http://hg.dsource.org/proects/dwt-win dwt-win
Duh, I'm blind. Trying to working on too many different "proects" at
the same time.
Actually I found the error by going back to Mercurial 1.0.1 fo
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 12:07 AM, davidl wrote:
>
> Actually I'm not sure about what kind of bugs my d apps usually have. But I
> notice that the harmonia project(I now make it uptodate) gets the problem of
> integer overlapping(actually I find it quite hard to detect and fix).
What the hell is "i
Actually I'm not sure about what kind of bugs my d apps usually have. But
I notice that the harmonia project(I now make it uptodate) gets the
problem of integer overlapping(actually I find it quite hard to detect and
fix).
What's your opinion and experience?
在 Mon, 06 Apr 2009 10:09:05 +0800，Bill Baxter 写道:
Hi there folks,
Back when Gregor was dragging his feet getting DSSS 0.76 out the door,
I build my own release of it because some bug in 0.75 was causing me
troubles.
As I recall, Gregor subsequently never actually release a 0.76 but
jumped str
== Quote from Andrei Alexandrescu (seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org)'s
> 2. In storing structs larger than a threshold. I know how to do that and
> there's a bugzilla on it, just haven't gotten around to implementing it.
I'm looking at this and thinking about how to implement it and submit it. One
i
I'm pretty sure this used to work:
hg clone http://hg.dsource.org/proects/dwt-win dwt-win
But now I get the error:
abort: requirement '' not supported!
Did something change with the Dwt-win repository?
Did something change with the Dsource handling of hg repositories?
Or is it my hg install
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 11:09:05 +0900
Bill Baxter wrote:
> http://www.billbaxter.com/projects/d/
I will give it a try. thank you!
--
yidabu
http://www.dsource.org/projects/dwin/
D 语言-中文(D Chinese):
http://www.d-programming-language-china.org/
http://bbs.d-programming-language-china.org/
htt
Hi there folks,
Back when Gregor was dragging his feet getting DSSS 0.76 out the door,
I build my own release of it because some bug in 0.75 was causing me
troubles.
As I recall, Gregor subsequently never actually release a 0.76 but
jumped straight to 0.77. But 0.77 has some kind of change that
BCS wrote:
> Hello Brad,
>
>> Careful.. that rule of thumb applies to compute bound use of threads.
>>
>
> I did qualify that as "after the files are loaded".
>
In the current impl, after files are loaded, it's all one thread still. :)
Hello Brad,
Careful.. that rule of thumb applies to compute bound use of threads.
I did qualify that as "after the files are loaded".
BCS wrote:
> Hello Daniel,
>
>> http://dobbscodetalk.com/index.php?option=com_myblog&show=Multithreade
>> d-I-O.html&Itemid=29
>>
>> -- Daniel
>>
>> P.S. "It really seems barbaric in our digital age that we all have
>> motors and levers and gears and spinning things in our boxes." Those
>> damne
Hello Daniel,
http://dobbscodetalk.com/index.php?option=com_myblog&show=Multithreade
d-I-O.html&Itemid=29
-- Daniel
P.S. "It really seems barbaric in our digital age that we all have
motors and levers and gears and spinning things in our boxes." Those
damned spinning things!
Some sort of
Christopher Wright wrote:
Your Variant can be extended more easily than mine. Your Variant is
faster than mine. But yours cannot be used everywhere, and mine can.
But this may be an artificial constraint. For example, you may say "my
variant can be used with old-style variadics". Phobos' doesn
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Christopher Wright wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Christopher Wright wrote:
What information did you find that you needed but is not available
in TypeInfo?
To have constant-type dispatching without limitations you need the
static type information.
What do you
bearophile wrote:
Is this an improvement of the DMD backend? Now I'm curious: isn't DMD
a legacy backend? If this is true, isn't improving it a waste of
time, and time is better spent improving something like LLVM? (I am
not trying to offend anyone here, I am just curious).
Those changes were t
dsimcha wrote:
== Quote from Andrei Alexandrescu (seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org)'s article
Christopher Wright wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Christopher Wright wrote:
What information did you find that you needed but is not available in
TypeInfo?
To have constant-type dispatching without
== Quote from Andrei Alexandrescu (seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org)'s article
> Christopher Wright wrote:
> > Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> >> Christopher Wright wrote:
> >>> What information did you find that you needed but is not available in
> >>> TypeInfo?
> >>
> >> To have constant-type dispatchi
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
> Georg Wrede wrote:
>>
>> Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>>
>>> void foo_templated(T...)(T args)
>>> {
>>> Variant[args.length] dynatyped;
>>> foreach (i, arg; args) dynatyped[i] = arg;
>>> return foo(dynatyped);
>>> }
>>> void foo(Va
Christopher Wright wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Christopher Wright wrote:
What information did you find that you needed but is not available in
TypeInfo?
To have constant-type dispatching without limitations you need the
static type information.
What do you mean by this? At first I th
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Christopher Wright wrote:
What information did you find that you needed but is not available in
TypeInfo?
To have constant-type dispatching without limitations you need the
static type information.
What do you mean by this? At first I thought you meant that TypeIn
Hi Michel,
> I'm not exactly sure of what you're trying to do, but perhaps, if
> you're on a Mac, you'd be interested in trying the D/Objective-C bridge
> I've made.
I am on a Mac, and I am very interested in your D/Objective-C bridge. Very
cool!
Ultimately, what I would like to do, is what
bearophile schrieb:
Daniel Keep:
http://dobbscodetalk.com/index.php?option=com_myblog&show=Multithreaded-I-O.html&Itemid=29
Is this an improvement of the DMD backend? Now I'm curious: isn't DMD a legacy
backend? If this is true, isn't improving it a waste of time, and time is
better spent im
dennis luehring schrieb:
bearophile schrieb:
Daniel Keep:
http://dobbscodetalk.com/index.php?option=com_myblog&show=Multithreaded-I-O.html&Itemid=29
Is this an improvement of the DMD backend? Now I'm curious: isn't DMD a legacy
backend? If this is true, isn't improving it a waste of time, an
bearophile wrote:
Daniel Keep:
http://dobbscodetalk.com/index.php?option=com_myblog&show=Multithreaded-I-O.html&Itemid=29
Is this an improvement of the DMD backend? Now I'm curious: isn't DMD a legacy
backend? If this is true, isn't improving it a waste of time, and time is
better spent impr
Walter Bright wrote:
x-code wrote:
I want to build last D 2.0 compiler in Microsoft Visual Studio IDE.
Prompt me please, what create and adjust *.vcproj project in MSVC
2003/2005/2008 (or *.dsp for VC6) for assembly of the D compiler in
Visual Studio?
I tried this do, but faced that that some fi
Tomas Lindquist Olsen wrote:
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 11:49 PM, Robert Fraser
wrote:
x-code wrote:
I want to build last D 2.0 compiler in Microsoft Visual Studio IDE.
Prompt me please, what create and adjust *.vcproj project in MSVC
2003/2005/2008 (or *.dsp for VC6) for assembly of the D compil
dennis luehring schrieb:
dennis luehring schrieb:
bearophile schrieb:
Daniel Keep:
http://dobbscodetalk.com/index.php?option=com_myblog&show=Multithreaded-I-O.html&Itemid=29
Is this an improvement of the DMD backend? Now I'm curious: isn't DMD a legacy
backend? If this is true, isn't improv
Daniel Keep:
> http://dobbscodetalk.com/index.php?option=com_myblog&show=Multithreaded-I-O.html&Itemid=29
Is this an improvement of the DMD backend? Now I'm curious: isn't DMD a legacy
backend? If this is true, isn't improving it a waste of time, and time is
better spent improving something like
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
> interface Interface { void foo(); }
> void foo(T : Interface)() { ... }
> class C { void foo(); }
>
> C does not explicitly declare abiding to Interface. However,
> structurally it does. Should foo be called? If interface is meant for
> binary binding, no. If interf
Christopher Wright Wrote:
> The idea is that the syntax
> of template constraints is sufficiently obtuse that you need to use
> idioms to get around it
So they should be fixed to become usable.
> Using that, it's difficult to determine what types you can pass to Template.
It's difficult only
Daniel Keep wrote:
http://dobbscodetalk.com/index.php?option=com_myblog&show=Multithreaded-I-O.html&Itemid=29
Reddit too:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/8a2y9/walter_bright_multithreaded_io/
39 matches
Mail list logo
