On Tue, 07 Apr 2009 22:39:03 -0400, Jussi Jumppanen wrote:
> Christopher Wright Wrote:
>
>> The GUI is better than that of cmd.exe, but not anywhere near as good
>> as, say, GNOME Terminal. (It's still fixed width, as I recall; just
>> wider by default.)
>
> The cmd.exe terminal window can be re
Mikola Lysenko wrote:
downs Wrote:
Ellery Newcomer wrote:
Baas wrote:
Tech info:
- Parse the code into XML using Regular Expressions.
*double take*
It's all about the better optimizations that are now possible!
I know of a pumping lemma or two that would disagree with you:
http://en.wiki
> downs Wrote:
>
> > Ellery Newcomer wrote:
> > > Baas wrote:
> > >> Tech info:
> > >> - Parse the code into XML using Regular Expressions.
> > >
> > > *double take*
> >
> > It's all about the better optimizations that are now possible!
>
I know of a pumping lemma or two that would disagree wi
On Tue, 07 Apr 2009 22:12:07 +0200, Ralf Schneider wrote:
>> Well at least you've got to make up your mind. It's amazing how you
>> mention instability in three instances and stagnation in two instances,
>> without ever noticing the irony. What's happening?
>
> Instability: Red hat crashes most o
Christopher Wright Wrote:
> The GUI is better than that of cmd.exe, but not anywhere near
> as good as, say, GNOME Terminal. (It's still fixed width, as
> I recall; just wider by default.)
The cmd.exe terminal window can be resized.
With the cmd.exe window visible click on the icon in the top
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 8:21 PM, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
> Might I suggest that this not be the case. I'd rather see a statement like
> the following in the script (if you wish to do miniD by default):
>
> #!/bin/mdsh
> %shell.setMode(scripted)
>
> // and to set it back
> shell.setMode(intera
On 2009-04-07 16:55:05 -0400, Walter Bright said:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
sudo apt-get install virtualbox
That's too hard for me. Can you make it easier?
alias please="sudo apt-get"
then
please install virtualbox
--
Michel Fortin
michel.for...@michelf.com
http://mich
Tue, 07 Apr 2009 21:03:54 +0200, grauzone wrote:
>> I can log into ANY Linux, Solaris, BSD, OSX, etc system and have a
>> reasonable /bin/sh that allows at least bourne shell functionality. The
>> same can't be said for almost any other scripting language you can throw
>> at me.
>
> Sure, /bi
On Tue, 07 Apr 2009 20:02:33 -0400, Jarrett Billingsley
wrote:
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 7:53 PM, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
OK, that was *really* confusing, let me re-explain:
if you are in interactive mode, the default is shell mode, and % turns
miniD
on and off, which continues beyond
Tue, 07 Apr 2009 19:06:04 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Apr 2009 18:48:19 -0400, Sergey Gromov
> wrote:
>
>> Using Cygwin tools is a pain because Cygwin emulates a Unix-like file
>> system view while other tools produce and expect native Windows paths.
>
> just as an aside,
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 7:53 PM, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
> OK, that was *really* confusing, let me re-explain:
>
> if you are in interactive mode, the default is shell mode, and % turns miniD
> on and off, which continues beyond a single line
> if you are in a script file, then you are always
On Tue, 07 Apr 2009 19:41:36 -0400, Jarrett Billingsley
wrote:
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
(It also follows that if you wrote a full shellscript, in a .mdsh file
or something, the compiler would, when compiling it, start in MiniD
mode by default so you would
On Tue, 07 Apr 2009 19:52:12 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On Tue, 07 Apr 2009 19:41:36 -0400, Jarrett Billingsley
wrote:
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
(It also follows that if you wrote a full shellscript, in a .mdsh file
or something, the compiler
Yigal Chripun wrote:
ever heard of powershell? it is in fact a superior design for a shell
compared to most unix shells.
I have tried it briefly. Too briefly to give a good analysis of it.
The GUI is better than that of cmd.exe, but not anywhere near as good
as, say, GNOME Terminal. (It's sti
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
>> (It also follows that if you wrote a full shellscript, in a .mdsh file
>> or something, the compiler would, when compiling it, start in MiniD
>> mode by default so you wouldn't have to escape every statement with a
>> %.)
> I'm a lit
On Tue, 07 Apr 2009 18:17:12 -0400, Jarrett Billingsley
wrote:
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 3:30 PM, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
And regarding using it as an user shell: there's an interactive command
line interpreter.
if you type ls, does it work, or do you have to type __run__("ls") or
whate
On Tue, 07 Apr 2009 18:48:19 -0400, Sergey Gromov
wrote:
Using Cygwin tools is a pain because Cygwin emulates a Unix-like file
system view while other tools produce and expect native Windows paths.
just as an aside, have you looked at cygwin's cygpath tool? Not a
complete solution, but i
== Quote from Sergey Gromov (snake.sc...@gmail.com)'s article
>
> Windows is my main development platform, and it drives me nuts. I'd
> move to Linux but I'm afraid of little important things getting in the
> way, like a requirement to use Outlook for my corporate mail, and Flash
> CS4 for develop
Mon, 06 Apr 2009 20:19:40 -0400, Jussi Jumppanen wrote:
>> As a commandline utility, it can be combined with other stuff such
>> as ls, sort, grep, sed, awk, etc... I don't know if I'd start there
>> though...
>
> Replace ls with dir, download the Win32 version of grep, sed, awk
> and you can
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 3:30 PM, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
>> And regarding using it as an user shell: there's an interactive command
>> line interpreter.
>
> if you type ls, does it work, or do you have to type __run__("ls") or
> whatever?
I think it's things like this that are the reason a lo
grauzone wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
rdmd?
Some things wouldn't be so beautiful with rdmd:
1. You need a main function, you can't just start typing.
2. You need at least one import statement. This is kind of annoying,
because you'd probably always import the same single module, that
contains
On 07/04/2009 05:29, Christopher Wright wrote:
Jussi Jumppanen wrote:
Replace ls with dir, download the Win32 version of grep, sed, awk and
you can run all those tools just fine from the Windows command line,
or from within any decent editor.
You don't have to go to Unix to find the command lin
Walter Bright wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
There's been a number of experiments to replace the shell with scheme,
perl, or python. I'm not sure how successful they were for particular
people, but they didn't quite take. My speculation is that general
languages are "too powerful" for shell
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
There's been a number of experiments to replace the shell with scheme,
perl, or python. I'm not sure how successful they were for particular
people, but they didn't quite take. My speculation is that general
languages are "too powerful" for shell scripting.
rdmd?
Don wrote:
(My pet
hate is the way Windows copied the 'folder' idea from the Mac as an
analogy for a directory structure,
I agree. It is especially annoying when trying to help someone with
their Windows box, and you say "go to this directory" and they say
"what's a directory"?
I learned t
Mon, 06 Apr 2009 14:23:20 -0700, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> I just committed all of Phobos into svn on dsource.org. That is not an
> official release and has known and unknown bugs, limitations, and
> rhinodemons. I expect some ripples before we stabilize, but when we will
> we'll stabilize at a
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
sudo apt-get install virtualbox
That's too hard for me. Can you make it easier?
On Tue, 07 Apr 2009 15:58:34 -0400, grauzone wrote:
The complete language reference (including index) has 102 pages.
Considering that it's probably more formal than the sh description in
your Nutshell book, it's not that much compared to sh.
The nutshell description is formal and complete
grauzone Wrote:
> > Stagnation: On *NIX: same (command line) tools, same concepts
> > (everything is a file) as decades ago. New ideas are usually copied
> > badly from Apple or Windows years later.
>
> What exciting new concepts are there under Windows? Drive letters?
fuckin' ole. bill gates
Stagnation: On *NIX: same (command line) tools, same concepts
(everything is a file) as decades ago. New ideas are usually copied
badly from Apple or Windows years later.
What exciting new concepts are there under Windows? Drive letters?
Well at least you've got to make up your mind. It's amazing how you
mention instability in three instances and stagnation in two instances,
without ever noticing the irony. What's happening?
Instability: Red hat crashes most often. AIX, Solaris and HP-UX just
run. Windows crashes sometimes.
About your general point, I think that's only because all the shell
commands are available by default. To delete a file, there's simply
"rm". A general purpose language would normally require more code to
delete a file, and that additional code is perceived as "noise". The
thing to do would be
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Tue, 07 Apr 2009 15:03:54 -0400, grauzone wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Tue, 07 Apr 2009 14:35:04 -0400, grauzone wrote:
But shell scripting in itself is so powerful for this kind of
stuff. I've written lots of little scripts to do fantastic things
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Ralf Schneider wrote:
If I were to quickly give the most significant bit of my opinion,
that would be this: Unix is for programmers and Windows is for end
users. As such, even though both ultimately accomplish the task of
putting a computer's resources at your dispos
On Tue, 07 Apr 2009 17:24:07 +0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Denis Koroskin wrote:
Well, actually I think that having an Appender object is an overkill. I
never use, although I wrote a few implementations. Instead, I found the
following method to be extemely handy, very fast and cover al
Walter Bright wrote:
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
VMs have nothing to do with multiboot. I have Ubuntu in a Sun
Virtualbox on my desktop and it's wonderful. It's fun to watch an OS
start in a window. I can also share a folder across the boundary; the
clipboard works seamlessly; input grabbing i
On Tue, 07 Apr 2009 15:03:54 -0400, grauzone wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Tue, 07 Apr 2009 14:35:04 -0400, grauzone wrote:
But shell scripting in itself is so powerful for this kind of stuff.
I've written lots of little scripts to do fantastic things that on
Windows would be so
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
VMs have nothing to do with multiboot. I have Ubuntu in a Sun
Virtualbox on my desktop and it's wonderful. It's fun to watch an OS
start in a window. I can also share a folder across the boundary; the
clipboard works seamlessly; input grabbing is nearly seamless. An
Ralf Schneider wrote:
If I were to quickly give the most significant bit of my opinion, that
would be this: Unix is for programmers and Windows is for end users.
As such, even though both ultimately accomplish the task of putting a
computer's resources at your disposal, their foci are different
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
For example, here's a script I wrote to change which D compiler I want
to use:
What would be fun is seeing how that script would look written in D,
then run using rdmd!
Walter Bright:
> Andrei Alexandrescu:
> > It took me a couple of minutes to write under her eyes a script that
> > downloaded HTML, scraped the code for links, followed those of interest,
> > and output a concatenation of all pages she was interested in, with
> > details highlighted, that was lo
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
> I'll risk an example. A while ago my wife was looking for a place for her
> medical residency. There was an online service that would give her a long
> webpage with links to all institutions she was interested in. The links were
> in th
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
I'll risk an example. A while ago my wife was looking for a place for her
medical residency. There was an online service that would give her a long
webpage with links to all institutions she was interested in
grauzone wrote:
Sure, /bin/sh is the least common denominator. But is there a UNIX that
can't run python?
Well one good part about these tools is that there's plenty of overlap
between them. Like stick-shift cars, you can drive at a given speed in
two gears without ruining the engine.
I use
Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 10:29:57PM -0400, Christopher Wright wrote:
The Windows terminal emulator sucks. This is not subject to debate.
What terminal emulator?
This might be a bit of a nitpick, but Windows doesn't try to emulate a
terminal (not in the OS anyway; there are
grauzone wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
grauzone wrote:
I'm not expecting anything from Linux GUIs anymore. Seriously, Linux
on the desktop sucks. God, does it suck!
What standard are you holding it against? The Mac GUI is snappier, but
First, I didn't ever use a Mac. Hell, these things
If I were to quickly give the most significant bit of my opinion, that
would be this: Unix is for programmers and Windows is for end users. As
such, even though both ultimately accomplish the task of putting a
computer's resources at your disposal, their foci are different. You're
a programmer.
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Tue, 07 Apr 2009 14:35:04 -0400, grauzone wrote:
But shell scripting in itself is so powerful for this kind of stuff.
I've written lots of little scripts to do fantastic things that on
Windows would be so painful (without cygwin of course). Like
renaming all
Lutger wrote:
Have you ever tried virtualbox? It has a seamless mode, which tears out
windows apps in the virtual instance and make them behave just as if you
started them under linux. It's very pleasant, you don't have to switch
anything anymore and just run those windows userthings next to yo
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Walter Bright
wrote:
> Lutger wrote:
>>
>> Have you ever tried virtualbox? It has a seamless mode, which tears out
>> windows apps in the virtual instance and make them behave just as if you
>> started them under linux. It's very pleasant, you don't have to switch
>
Walter Bright wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
It took me a couple of minutes to write under her eyes a script that
downloaded HTML, scraped the code for links, followed those of
interest, and output a concatenation of all pages she was interested
in, with details highlighted, that was loadab
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Tue, 07 Apr 2009 13:02:34 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
The only thing it lacks is iTunes (yeah, screw you, I like iTunes :)
The probability of iTunes on Linux just got a whole lot higher
http://tech.yahoo.com/news/macworld/20090407/tc_macworld
On Tue, 07 Apr 2009 14:35:04 -0400, grauzone wrote:
But shell scripting in itself is so powerful for this kind of stuff.
I've written lots of little scripts to do fantastic things that on
Windows would be so painful (without cygwin of course). Like renaming
all files of a certain type to
But shell scripting in itself is so powerful for this kind of stuff.
I've written lots of little scripts to do fantastic things that on
Windows would be so painful (without cygwin of course). Like renaming
all files of a certain type to something else, or copying select files
to another direc
On Tue, 07 Apr 2009 14:11:44 -0400, Walter Bright
wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
It took me a couple of minutes to write under her eyes a script that
downloaded HTML, scraped the code for links, followed those of
interest, and output a concatenation of all pages she was interested
in
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
It took me a couple of minutes to write under her eyes a script that
downloaded HTML, scraped the code for links, followed those of interest,
and output a concatenation of all pages she was interested in, with
details highlighted, that was loadable back in the browser
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 11:11:44AM -0700, Walter Bright wrote:
> Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> >It took me a couple of minutes to write under her eyes a script that
> >downloaded HTML, scraped the code for links, followed those of interest,
> >and output a concatenation of all pages she was intere
http://tech.yahoo.com/news/macworld/20090407/tc_macworld/itunesisdrmfreeaddsvariablepricing_1
I doubt it will happen within the next five years. Apple admits that
Windows exists because it has to; it won't ignore >85% of the market.
But it will never admit that any other desktop o
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Tue, 07 Apr 2009 13:56:34 -0400, grauzone wrote:
only thing it lacks is iTunes (yeah, screw you, I like iTunes :) and it
There are lots of iTunes clones. Maybe you should try to get used to
one of them?
I'm sorry, but I'm ignorant of such issues. Do they al
On Tue, 07 Apr 2009 13:56:34 -0400, grauzone wrote:
only thing it lacks is iTunes (yeah, screw you, I like iTunes :) and it
There are lots of iTunes clones. Maybe you should try to get used to one
of them?
I'm sorry, but I'm ignorant of such issues. Do they allow downloading
music from
only thing it lacks is iTunes (yeah, screw you, I like iTunes :) and it
There are lots of iTunes clones. Maybe you should try to get used to one
of them?
(Personally, I'm still looking for a decent music player, now that xmms
got removed from Debian. xmms was very crappy, but useable.)
davidl wrote:
htod seems not able to convert stlport stuff well..
Since D cannot interface with C++ template generated code, and that's
pretty much all stl is, it's moot that htod doesn't work on stl. Sorry
about that.
On Tue, 07 Apr 2009 13:02:34 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
The only thing it lacks is iTunes (yeah, screw you, I like iTunes :)
The probability of iTunes on Linux just got a whole lot higher
http://tech.yahoo.com/news/macworld/20090407/tc_macworld/itunesisdrmfreeaddsvariablepricing_1
davidl wrote:
err, I tried a little bit with htod seems it always bug me with error
messages. any idea?
void operator delete(void* ptr, const std::nothrow_t&) throw();
^
d:\digitalmars\dm\include\../include/new.h(77) : Error: must
On Mon, 06 Apr 2009 19:36:11 -0400, Daniel Keep
wrote:
I desperately wish my computer-illiterate family members would move
off of Windows as well, since it would eliminate basically every tech-
support call I field from them. Perhaps I've simply had good luck with
other OSes, but Windows i
在 Wed, 08 Apr 2009 00:53:09 +0800，davidl 写道:
err, I tried a little bit with htod seems it always bug me with error
messages. any idea?
void operator delete(void* ptr, const std::nothrow_t&) throw();
^
d:\digitalmars\dm\include\
err, I tried a little bit with htod seems it always bug me with error
messages. any idea?
void operator delete(void* ptr, const std::nothrow_t&) throw();
^
d:\digitalmars\dm\include\../include/new.h(77) : Error: must be void
oper
Walter Bright wrote:
...
> I find myself more and more switching back and forth between the two for
> specific tasks (I use a KVM switch to go back and forth).
Have you ever tried virtualbox? It has a seamless mode, which tears out
windows apps in the virtual instance and make them behave just a
Jesse Phillips wrote:
Many people suggest Live-CDs for introduction, but this is only
go to show that you have a browser in Linux. It doesn't give a true Linux
experience.
I agree. Somehow I'm surprised that the discussion drifted into a pure
user-level feature comparison though.
Below I'll
grauzone wrote:
> Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> grauzone wrote:
>>> I'm not expecting anything from Linux GUIs anymore. Seriously, Linux
>>> on the desktop sucks. God, does it suck!
>>
>> What standard are you holding it against? The Mac GUI is snappier, but
>
> First, I didn't ever use a Mac.
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 5:13 AM, Georg Wrede wrote:
> Any large application benefits from being able to load DLLs, sooner or
> later. Some applicatons seem to do it effortlessly, even in very disparate
> environments. For example, the Lua interpreter appears to consider it a
> trivial excercise.
>
Jesse Phillips wrote:
You will find little things that make your life easier, I will state some
here, but they don't sound very important and some you may not like.
Multiple desktops (If you have tried this on Windows you have been
cheated in how it really should work). The middle mouse copy/pa
Saaa wrote:
Yah, I too remember my Windows-only days the way I'd remember a temporary
disability. (I recall to this day: any little thing I wanted to do, I'd
start off a wizard in Dev Studio. It was kind of a surprise for me to find
out that all those programs had been written, along with plent
On Tue, 07 Apr 2009 01:10:38 +0200, Saaa wrote:
> Thanks,
> I really do feel impaired. Not so much as in that I don't use unix, but
> more in that I see software lagging behind hardware. I think maybe this
> lag is a bit less when using unix but only if I would start using the
> right tools (yes I
On Tue, 07 Apr 2009 09:48:57 -0400, Jason House wrote:
> Saaa Wrote:
>
>
>> "Andrei Alexandrescu" wrote in message
>> news:grduhp$1rk...@digitalmars.com...
>> > Saaa wrote:
>> >>> When you'd be writing computer programs.
>> >>
>> >> But that would go like this: install eclipse, check how to com
bearophile wrote:
grauzone:
The font rendering is very very ugly. At which point size/DPI is this
font supposed to be displayed?
I use it at about this size, and I find it the most readable among all the ones
I have tried so far:
http://www.fantascienza.net/leonardo/ar/inconsolatag/two_incons
bearophile wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu:
Denis Koroskin wrote:
void append(T)(T[] array, ref size_t index, T value)
I'm pretty sure you meant to pass array by reference.
AH, that's the bug of mine I was talking about here:
http://www.digitalmars.com/webnews/newsgroups.php?art_group=digitalmars
Andrei Alexandrescu:
> Denis Koroskin wrote:
> > void append(T)(T[] array, ref size_t index, T value)
> I'm pretty sure you meant to pass array by reference.
AH, that's the bug of mine I was talking about here:
http://www.digitalmars.com/webnews/newsgroups.php?art_group=digitalmars.D&article_id=87
grauzone wrote:
Alexander Pánek wrote:
grauzone wrote:
Christopher Wright wrote:
Tom S wrote:
How is compilar formed? How is compilar formed? How executable get
maked?
They need to do way> instain programer, who wriet thier compilars,
just becuase these compilars cant get debuged?
It was
grauzone:
> The font rendering is very very ugly. At which point size/DPI is this
> font supposed to be displayed?
I use it at about this size, and I find it the most readable among all the ones
I have tried so far:
http://www.fantascienza.net/leonardo/ar/inconsolatag/two_inconsolata_20090213.pn
Alexander Pánek wrote:
grauzone wrote:
Christopher Wright wrote:
Tom S wrote:
How is compilar formed? How is compilar formed? How executable get
maked?
They need to do way> instain programer, who wriet thier compilars,
just becuase these compilars cant get debuged?
It was on the newsgroup
bearophile wrote:
grauzone:
Will try later. Success depends from how well freetype renders it at low
resolutions.
I use it as my default programming font on my Ubuntu (for Python, D, etc), it's
nonproportional. But I use it at high enough sizes, to spot bugs better.
The font rendering is ve
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
grauzone wrote:
I'm not expecting anything from Linux GUIs anymore. Seriously, Linux
on the desktop sucks. God, does it suck!
What standard are you holding it against? The Mac GUI is snappier, but
First, I didn't ever use a Mac. Hell, these things even require spe
downs Wrote:
[...]
> .. Wait. Did I just read that right - when an argument is null, isNull
> returns *false*?
>
> What the hell?
At least that is what he had written. Seems to be a case of
"double negation is still a negation", an idiom quite common
here in Bavaria. Not in programming, though
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
grauzone wrote:
Why does everyone think "Ubuntu" when talking about Linux? I find the
Ubuntu desktop almost as annoying as the Windows one. Even worse,
Ubuntu feels like a Windows clone. Most of this is because it uses
GNOME by default.
If you really want to use Li
Jason House wrote:
> Saaa Wrote:
>
>>
>> "Andrei Alexandrescu" wrote in message
>> news:grduhp$1rk...@digitalmars.com...
>> > Saaa wrote:
>> >>> When you'd be writing computer programs.
>> >>
>> >> But that would go like this: install eclipse, check how to compile
under
>> >> Linux and start
Saaa Wrote:
>
> "Andrei Alexandrescu" wrote in message
> news:grduhp$1rk...@digitalmars.com...
> > Saaa wrote:
> >>> When you'd be writing computer programs.
> >>
> >> But that would go like this: install eclipse, check how to compile under
> >> Linux and start programming.
> >
> > Nope :o). W
grauzone wrote:
I'm not expecting anything from Linux GUIs anymore. Seriously, Linux on
the desktop sucks. God, does it suck!
What standard are you holding it against? The Mac GUI is snappier, but
overall the Mac is still not as stable as Ubuntu. I don't miss anything
from the Windows GUI.
grauzone wrote:
Why does everyone think "Ubuntu" when talking about Linux? I find the
Ubuntu desktop almost as annoying as the Windows one. Even worse, Ubuntu
feels like a Windows clone. Most of this is because it uses GNOME by
default.
If you really want to use Linux, don't use a crappy desk
Lutger wrote:
This is looking very impressive, will you be covering some of these concepts
and idioms used in phobos in your upcoming TDPL?
This url returns a 404:
http://www.erdani.dreamhosters.com/d/web/phobos/std_patterns.html
Sorry, that module is not meant to be visible yet.
Andrei
Denis Koroskin wrote:
Well, actually I think that having an Appender object is an overkill. I
never use, although I wrote a few implementations. Instead, I found the
following method to be extemely handy, very fast and cover all my cases:
void append(T)(T[] array, ref size_t index, T value)
{
bearophile wrote:
dsimcha:
Two things that had been discussed on this NG that I noticed are
conspicuously absent: eager(), which converts a lazy range to an
array,
eager() name is bad. Better array(), or toArray(), or something like
that. More descriptive.
At best this is a more general fun
grauzone wrote:
Christopher Wright wrote:
Tom S wrote:
How is compilar formed? How is compilar formed? How executable get
maked?
They need to do way> instain programer, who wriet thier compilars,
just becuase these compilars cant get debuged?
It was on the newsgroup this mroing, a programe
grauzone:
> Will try later. Success depends from how well freetype renders it at low
> resolutions.
I use it as my default programming font on my Ubuntu (for Python, D, etc), it's
nonproportional. But I use it at high enough sizes, to spot bugs better.
Bye,
bearophile
bearophile wrote:
grauzone:
Why does everyone think "Ubuntu" when talking about Linux?
I am ignorant about this topic, but I think the answers to your questions are:
1) Because it's one of the very few distros that seem designed by people that
care a bit about ergonomics, usability studies, u
Christopher Wright wrote:
Tom S wrote:
How is compilar formed? How is compilar formed? How executable get maked?
They need to do way> instain programer, who wriet thier compilars, just
becuase these compilars cant get debuged?
It was on the newsgroup this mroing, a programer in d.D who had
bearophile wrote:
grauzone:
The free fonts suck, and I still use some Microsoft fonts on Linux.<
Have you tried my version of Inconsolata? :-)
http://www.fantascienza.net/leonardo/ar/inconsolatag/inconsolata-g_font.zip
Will try later. Success depends from how well freetype renders it at low
Christopher Wright wrote:
Tom S wrote:
How is compilar formed? How is compilar formed? How executable get maked?
They need to do way> instain programer, who wriet thier compilars, just
becuase these compilars cant get debuged?
It was on the newsgroup this mroing, a programer in d.D who had
grauzone:
>The free fonts suck, and I still use some Microsoft fonts on Linux.<
Have you tried my version of Inconsolata? :-)
http://www.fantascienza.net/leonardo/ar/inconsolatag/inconsolata-g_font.zip
Bye,
bearophile
grauzone:
> Why does everyone think "Ubuntu" when talking about Linux?
I am ignorant about this topic, but I think the answers to your questions are:
1) Because it's one of the very few distros that seem designed by people that
care a bit about ergonomics, usability studies, user interfaces, etc.
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
