"lurker" wrote in message
news:ie8rc3$27l...@digitalmars.com...
> Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
>
>> "piotrek" wrote in message
>> news:ie8fu9$ej...@digitalmars.com...
>> > On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 09:49:50 -0600, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> >> By the way, I couldn't stop cringing at the distasteful, male
"lurker" wrote in message
news:ie8rji$283...@digitalmars.com...
> Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
>
>> "Jacob Carlborg" wrote in message
>> news:ie8f5f$o6...@digitalmars.com...
>> >
>> > Probably not, but, for example, Scala allows very compact delegate
>> > literals:
>> >
>> > Array(1, 2, 3, 4, 5).selec
"lurker" wrote in message
news:ie8r60$276...@digitalmars.com...
> Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
>
>> "snk_kid" wrote in message
>> news:ie8gst$tt...@digitalmars.com...
>> > None of those usernames are mine except this one (snk_kid). You need to
>> > stop making assumptions and nobody really cares about
"Adam D. Ruppe" wrote in message
news:ie9hjv$r1...@digitalmars.com...
>> What about Hotmail, Yahoo, MobileMe, etc?
>
> I haven't used most of them for a long time. Gmail gets most
> my ranting because its the one I've used most recently. (And
> I remember my password to it so I could sign in and
"Michael Stover" wrote in message
news:mailman.1004.1292372981.21107.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
>
> Complaining the editor isn't like vi just makes me roll my eyes. Few
> would
> really want it to be. However, again, there are vi clones in javascript,
> if
> one were really wanted it.
>
Michel Fortin:
> I have to echo a similar concern with by-reference containers from my
> experience of Cocoa. It's really too easy to have two references to the
> same container without realizing it.
A partial (but maybe better) solution to this problem is to introduce "linear
types" in D, ad
Jonathan Schmidt-Dominé Wrote:
> Just about my experiences: When trying to hack some algorithms quickly in
> Ruby I made a lot of mistakes because I had to care about a .clone
> everywhere and because Array.new(5, []) does not work as expected (sorry,
> but Array.new(5) { return [] } is not ni
Jonathan Schmidt-Dominé Wrote:
> For me something like ref const scope (or ref scope for primitives) should
> be used as often as possible, it should even be the default in many cases
> (function parameters, foreach-variables etc.)
So you want your containers by reference everywhere?
> What about Hotmail, Yahoo, MobileMe, etc?
I haven't used most of them for a long time. Gmail gets most
my ranting because its the one I've used most recently. (And
I remember my password to it so I could sign in and re-check
my statements before posting too.)
If I were writing a webmail program
http://blog.regehr.org/archives/320
I ran across that post and started wondering: how hard would it be to get
a version of DMC running on linux?
Adam D. Ruppe Wrote:
> Michael Stover:
> > Did you use the gmail webapp to write that?
>
> No. My public email address is gmail so I get a free spam
> filter and online archive, but I don't actually use their
> awful, awful interface. (All incoming mail to that address is
> forwarded to my real e
On 2010-12-14 17:05:47 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
said:
On 12/14/10 3:29 PM, Jonathan Schmidt-Dominé wrote:
However, some reasons for by-value-containers:
*First of all you often have to deal with mutli-dimensional data-
structures,
you map something to a map of lists of whatever and you want
"Jonathan M Davis" wrote in message
news:mailman.1005.1292374292.21107.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
On Tuesday, December 14, 2010 16:35:34 Craig Black wrote:
> What say you?
I feel like the odd man out here since my perspective is so different. I
use custom container classes even in C++,
On 2010-12-14 16:29:18 -0500, Jonathan Schmidt-Dominé
said:
Just about my experiences: When trying to hack some algorithms quickly in
Ruby I made a lot of mistakes because I had to care about a .clone
everywhere and because Array.new(5, []) does not work as expected (sorry,
but Array.new(5) {
> copy_if on a multidimensional container should not naively copy entire
> hyperplanes. More generally, I think that whenever an arbitrarily large
> object is to be copied, that should be explicit instead of implicit. A
> lot of focus in C++ is dedicated to making sure you don't copy the wrong
> th
Hi!
>> *Another argument: It should be very simple (at least in C++ it is, I
>> have
>> never had problems with it, I just added the& here and there) to handle
>> references to by-value-types, but wrapping by-reference-types into
>> by-value- types is really ugly, although it may be the right thi
Extrawurst wrote:
On 14.12.2010 20:23, Simen kjaeraas wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
2) I would really like the idea to be able to get a compiletime
string of version identifiers in some kind of way. Perhaps even an
array of version-strings.
I don't know what that means.
Likely something li
On Tuesday, December 14, 2010 16:35:34 Craig Black wrote:
> > What say you?
>
> I feel like the odd man out here since my perspective is so different. I
> use custom container classes even in C++, partly because I can usually get
> better performance that way, and because I can customize the the
What say you?
I feel like the odd man out here since my perspective is so different. I
use custom container classes even in C++, partly because I can usually get
better performance that way, and because I can customize the the container
however I like. So I will probably be doing my own con
I've used Pegasus, thunderbird, Exchange, Evolution, and whatever is on my
Mac by default (briefly). I've used other web emails too, including one for
Exchange, which is terrible. Some of your complaints are not generic to
javascript/web apps - like the right click complaint. It can be done
easi
On 14.12.2010 20:23, Simen kjaeraas wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
2) I would really like the idea to be able to get a compiletime
string of version identifiers in some kind of way. Perhaps even an
array of version-strings.
I don't know what that means.
Likely something like __traits( versio
> I don't have any problems you seem to have with gmail.
Two questions:
a) Have you ever tried a better alternative? If you've only
used crap, a polished turd looks really really good.
b) How much email do you handle? I used the web interface
for quite a while before I went into business. It wor
I don't have any problems you seem to have with gmail. I suspect attitude
is a big difference.
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 6:43 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> Michael Stover:
> > Did you use the gmail webapp to write that?
>
> No. My public email address is gmail so I get a free spam
> filter and online
"Andrei Alexandrescu" wrote in message
news:ie8vpc$2gb...@digitalmars.com...
On 12/14/10 5:09 PM, Craig Black wrote:
Arg! Someone removed my bug report and assumed I was wrong about it
without even checking into it. Why do I even try to help the D community?
The bug report stands, thanks fo
On 12/14/10 5:09 PM, Craig Black wrote:
Arg! Someone removed my bug report and assumed I was wrong about it
without even checking into it. Why do I even try to help the D community?
The bug report stands, thanks for clarifying it.
Andrei
On 2010-12-14 14:02:34 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
said:
What say you?
I'd prefer them to be value types.
And I agree that if you want to give them reference semantics it's much
cleaner if they're implemented as a class. I fear the null pointers
however...
I understand your paralysis.
Michael Stover:
> Did you use the gmail webapp to write that?
No. My public email address is gmail so I get a free spam
filter and online archive, but I don't actually use their
awful, awful interface. (All incoming mail to that address is
forwarded to my real email address, and my outgoing mail i
Andrei:
> One issue that I noticed about myself and other people coming to D from
> C++ is that we expect to bring with us, along with the many things that
> make C++ great, the baggage of common worries, misgivings, and just rote
> work that we got used to.
Yes, this is a common thing (it hap
I don't know, do you have an example ?
For example taking a classname and a bunch of field types and names, and
turning it into a class definition complete with constructor from field
values, constructor from an input stream, a method to write to an output
stream, and const getters. Or maybe s
Alex_Dovhal wrote:
"Don" wrote:
Agreed. I've just looked through some code that I thought used them
extensively, but found only two complex literals: 1i (dozens of
instances)
and 2i (one instance).
So if D removes complex literals what the proposed name for Imaginary
One
would be?
_
Arg! Someone removed my bug report and assumed I was wrong about it without
even checking into it. Why do I even try to help the D community?
Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
> "Jacob Carlborg" wrote in message
> news:ie8f5f$o6...@digitalmars.com...
> >
> > Probably not, but, for example, Scala allows very compact delegate
> > literals:
> >
> > Array(1, 2, 3, 4, 5).select(_ > 3).collect(_ * _)
> >
> > Or more verbose:
> >
> > Array(1, 2, 3, 4,
Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
> "piotrek" wrote in message
> news:ie8fu9$ej...@digitalmars.com...
> > On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 09:49:50 -0600, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> >> By the way, I couldn't stop cringing at the distasteful, male-centric
> >> sexual jokes that the talk is peppered with. Wonder if the
On Tuesday, December 14, 2010 11:02:34 Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> I kept on literally losing sleep about a number of issues involving
> containers, sealing, arbitrary-cost copying vs. reference counting and
> copy-on-write, and related issues. This stops me from making rapid
> progress on definin
Oh sorry those @i and @j also would be build in. Ignore this.
Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
> "snk_kid" wrote in message
> news:ie8gst$tt...@digitalmars.com...
> > None of those usernames are mine except this one (snk_kid). You need to
> > stop making assumptions and nobody really cares about a comment voting
> > system. You come off as a child making such an u
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Adam Ruppe wrote:
> > Have you tried, for example, CoffeeScript:
>
> I have not - my main problem with Javascript isn't so much the
> language as the browsers in which it runs, which is why I feel things
> like emscripten (and google native client) are pretty usele
"Don" wrote:
> Agreed. I've just looked through some code that I thought used them
> extensively, but found only two complex literals: 1i (dozens of instances)
> and 2i (one instance).
So if D removes complex literals what the proposed name for Imaginary One
would be?
_i , i_ , _i_, _
Jonathan Schmidt-Dominé wrote:
>> I continue to belief, that containers should be value-types. In order
>> to prevent useless copying you can use something like "Impl * impl"
>> and reference-counting. Then you only do a copy on actual change. This
>> is the way I'm currently implementing in my ow
On 12/14/10 3:29 PM, Jonathan Schmidt-Dominé wrote:
Hi!
Just about my experiences: When trying to hack some algorithms quickly in
Ruby I made a lot of mistakes because I had to care about a .clone
everywhere and because Array.new(5, []) does not work as expected (sorry,
but Array.new(5) { return
> I continue to belief, that containers should be value-types. In order
> to prevent useless copying you can use something like "Impl * impl"
> and reference-counting. Then you only do a copy on actual change. This
> is the way I'm currently implementing in my own container-classes.
>From my point
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 16:35:49 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 12/14/10 2:44 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 15:35:30 -0500, Patrick Down
wrote:
== Quote from Steven Schveighoffer (schvei...@yahoo.com)'s article
Would it help to allow 'else' and 'else if' on the t
On 12/14/10 2:44 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 15:35:30 -0500, Patrick Down wrote:
== Quote from Steven Schveighoffer (schvei...@yahoo.com)'s article
Would it help to allow 'else' and 'else if' on the template constraints?
void foo(R)(R r) if(isRandomAccessRange!R)
{...}
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Any idea how this can be 'solved' or do we need to continue doing things
like this? My naive instinct is to use the declaration order to
determine a match (first one to match wins), but that kind of goes
against other overloads in D.
Yeah, I'd be extremely relucta
Hi!
Just about my experiences: When trying to hack some algorithms quickly in
Ruby I made a lot of mistakes because I had to care about a .clone
everywhere and because Array.new(5, []) does not work as expected (sorry,
but Array.new(5) { return [] } is not nice). So in fact C++ made my life
ea
No. Can you file a bug?
-Steve
done
On 12/14/10 2:09 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
But now, when you or someone else comes along and compiles it for
OS_D, it's going to silently use the code for OS_B and OS_C
*regardless* of whether or not that's correct for OS_D.
That particular problem has bitten me probably
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 16:05:14 -0500, Craig Black
wrote:
Thanks Steve. clear seems to be calling the destructor twice. Is this
intentional?
No. Can you file a bug?
-Steve
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 16:03:18 -0500, so wrote:
It is exactly your proposal (first one to match wins), with uglier
syntax :D
Not exactly. It fits within the syntax of D (if-else), and order of
evaluation is explicit, whereas one might expect with my original proposal
that order does not m
s/exactly/essentially/
On 14.12.2010 20:53, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Coming from an STL background I was also very comfortable with the
notion of value. Walter pointed to me that in the STL what you worry
about most of the time is to _undo_ the propensity of objects getting
copied at the drop of a hat. For example, t
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 21:46:47 +0300, Extrawurst wrote:
Hi i just want to discuss two points about D version statements.
1) Why is it not possible to negate the condition of a version
statement. I think it is unintuitive and keeps me writing weird
statements like:
version(Win32){}else{versi
Thanks Steve. clear seems to be calling the destructor twice. Is this
intentional?
-Craig
"piotrek" wrote in message
news:ie8fu9$ej...@digitalmars.com...
> On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 09:49:50 -0600, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> By the way, I couldn't stop cringing at the distasteful, male-centric
>> sexual jokes that the talk is peppered with. Wonder if there was any
>> woman in the audienc
About the destructor being called twice, perhaps clear is passing by value
rather than by reference? If so, is this desirable?
-Craig
"Jacob Carlborg" wrote in message
news:ie8f5f$o6...@digitalmars.com...
>
> Probably not, but, for example, Scala allows very compact delegate
> literals:
>
> Array(1, 2, 3, 4, 5).select(_ > 3).collect(_ * _)
>
> Or more verbose:
>
> Array(1, 2, 3, 4, 5).select((x) => x > 3).collect((x, y) => x *
It is exactly your proposal (first one to match wins), with uglier syntax
:D
Would it even fulfill your requirements? For example "What if I don't have
control over that module?"
This one would make it impossible.
"snk_kid" wrote in message
news:ie8gst$tt...@digitalmars.com...
> None of those usernames are mine except this one (snk_kid). You need to
> stop making assumptions and nobody really cares about a comment voting
> system. You come off as a child making such an unprofessional post in a
> public
"Jacob Carlborg" wrote in message
news:ie8i8c$15f...@digitalmars.com...
> On 2010-12-14 19:13, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>> "Graham St Jack" wrote in message
>> news:ie76ig$b2...@digitalmars.com...
>>>
>>> What you are suggesting here seems to be a way to dramatically reduce
>>> the
>>> complexity
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 15:35:30 -0500, Patrick Down wrote:
== Quote from Steven Schveighoffer (schvei...@yahoo.com)'s article
Would it help to allow 'else' and 'else if' on the template constraints?
void foo(R)(R r) if(isRandomAccessRange!R)
{...}
else if(isInputRange!R)
{...}
This could basical
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 15:33:26 -0500, Craig Black
wrote:
"Steven Schveighoffer" wrote in message
news:op.vnpz6ob6eav...@steve-laptop...
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 15:18:32 -0500, Craig Black
wrote:
I know emplace is used to do placement new. What is the equivalent
placement delete?
x = emp
== Quote from Steven Schveighoffer (schvei...@yahoo.com)'s article
Would it help to allow 'else' and 'else if' on the template constraints?
void foo(R)(R r) if(isRandomAccessRange!R)
{...}
else if(isInputRange!R)
{...}
This could basically be translated into two specializations like this:
void f
"Steven Schveighoffer" wrote in message
news:op.vnpz6ob6eav...@steve-laptop...
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 15:18:32 -0500, Craig Black
wrote:
I know emplace is used to do placement new. What is the equivalent
placement delete?
x = emplace(yourAllocationFunction!T());
...
clear(x);
yourDeallocat
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 15:18:32 -0500, Craig Black
wrote:
I know emplace is used to do placement new. What is the equivalent
placement delete?
x = emplace(yourAllocationFunction!T());
...
clear(x);
yourDeallocationFunction(x); // if necessary. For instance, stack data
doesn't need to be
"Walter Bright" wrote in message
news:ie8j0d$1a9...@digitalmars.com...
> Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>> But now, when you or someone else comes along and compiles it for OS_D,
>> it's going to silently use the code for OS_B and OS_C *regardless* of
>> whether or not that's correct for OS_D.
>
> That
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 15:13:36 -0500, Walter Bright
wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
The two words overhead comes from the vtable and the mutex.
I don't think that overhead is a problem. For small numbers of values,
one should use an array. The more complex containers are for larger
num
I know emplace is used to do placement new. What is the equivalent
placement delete?
-Craig
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
The two words overhead comes from the vtable and the mutex.
I don't think that overhead is a problem. For small numbers of values, one
should use an array. The more complex containers are for larger numbers of
values, where 2 words is insignificant.
"Steven Schveighoffer" wrote in message
news:op.vnpx3oioeav...@steve-laptop...
> On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 14:02:34 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
> wrote:
>
>> Advantages of the change:
>>
>> - Clear, self-documented reference semantics
>>
>> - Uses the right tool (classes) for the job (define a type wi
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
But now, when you or someone else comes along and compiles it for OS_D, it's
going to silently use the code for OS_B and OS_C *regardless* of whether or
not that's correct for OS_D.
That particular problem has bitten me probably hundreds of times, and every
other progra
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 14:56:55 -0500, Kagamin wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
That all being said, I'd like to make a motion that should simplify
everyone's life - if only for a bit. I'm thinking of making all
containers classes (either final classes or at a minimum classes with
only final me
On 12/14/10 1:56 PM, Kagamin wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
That all being said, I'd like to make a motion that should simplify
everyone's life - if only for a bit. I'm thinking of making all
containers classes (either final classes or at a minimum classes with
only final methods). Currently
On 12/14/10 1:42 PM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
On 14.12.2010 22:02, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I also continue to believe that controlled lifetime (i.e.
reference-counted implementation) is important for a container.
Containers tend to be large compared to other objects, so exercising
strict contr
On 2010-12-14 19:13, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Graham St Jack" wrote in message
news:ie76ig$b2...@digitalmars.com...
What you are suggesting here seems to be a way to dramatically reduce the
complexity of code that generates source-code and mixes it in. I think
something like that is needed befo
On 12/14/10 1:43 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 13:51:50 -0500, so wrote:
Any idea how this can be 'solved' or do we need to continue doing
things like this? My naive instinct is to use the declaration order
to determine a match (first one to match wins), but that kind of
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
> That all being said, I'd like to make a motion that should simplify
> everyone's life - if only for a bit. I'm thinking of making all
> containers classes (either final classes or at a minimum classes with
> only final methods). Currently containers are implemented
On 12/14/10 1:38 PM, Simon Buerger wrote:
I continue to belief, that containers should be value-types. In order to
prevent useless copying you can use something like "Impl * impl" and
reference-counting. Then you only do a copy on actual change. This is
the way I'm currently implementing in my ow
On 14.12.2010 22:02, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I kept on literally losing sleep about a number of issues involving
containers, sealing, arbitrary-cost copying vs. reference counting and
copy-on-write, and related issues. This stops me from making rapid
progress on defining D containers and oth
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 13:51:50 -0500, so wrote:
Any idea how this can be 'solved' or do we need to continue doing
things like this? My naive instinct is to use the declaration order to
determine a match (first one to match wins), but that kind of goes
against other overloads in D.
One big
"Jacob Carlborg" wrote in message
news:ie8fdf$ol...@digitalmars.com...
> On 2010-12-14 19:46, Extrawurst wrote:
>> Hi i just want to discuss two points about D version statements.
>>
>> 1) Why is it not possible to negate the condition of a version
>> statement. I think it is unintuitive and keep
On 14.12.2010 20:02, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I kept on literally losing sleep about a number of issues involving
containers, sealing, arbitrary-cost copying vs. reference counting and
copy-on-write, and related issues. This stops me from making rapid
progress on defining D containers and other
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 14:02:34 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
I continue to believe that containers should have reference semantics,
just like classes. Copying a container wholesale is not something you
want to be automatic.
I agree.
I also continue to believe that controlled lifetime
None of those usernames are mine except this one (snk_kid). You need to stop
making assumptions and nobody really cares about a comment voting system. You
come off as a child making such an unprofessional post in a public mailing list
of a programming language. Is this what the D community is ab
On 12/14/10 1:19 PM, so wrote:
Could you please elaborate the disadvantages part?
Thanks!
Consider the empty() property. A struct using a pointer internally can
return true from empty if the pointer is null. A class cannot do that.
struct Array {
Impl * p;
@property bool empty() { r
Walter Bright wrote:
2) I would really like the idea to be able to get a compiletime string
of version identifiers in some kind of way. Perhaps even an array of
version-strings.
I don't know what that means.
Likely something like __traits( versions ), that returns ["DigitalMars",
"Windo
Could you please elaborate the disadvantages part?
Thanks!
--
Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
Extrawurst wrote:
Hi i just want to discuss two points about D version statements.
1) Why is it not possible to negate the condition of a version
statement. I think it is unintuitive and keeps me writing weird
statements like:
version(Win32){}else{version = NotWin32;}
The idea is that versi
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 09:49:50 -0600, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> By the way, I couldn't stop cringing at the distasteful, male-centric
> sexual jokes that the talk is peppered with. Wonder if there was any
> woman in the audience, and how she might have felt. And this is not a
> ghetto rant - it's
On 2010-12-14 20:03, Adam Ruppe wrote:
Have you tried, for example, CoffeeScript:
I have not - my main problem with Javascript isn't so much the
language as the browsers in which it runs, which is why I feel things
like emscripten (and google native client) are pretty useless.
Browsers are goo
"Iain Buclaw" wrote in message
news:ie6ahr$1co...@digitalmars.com...
== Quote from Craig Black (craigbla...@cox.net)'s article
> Testing your C++ program (altered getCycle() for GCC)
>
> Times I get:
> ---
> Sorting with Array: 46869.159840
> Sorting with pointers: 38688.937320
> 17.45331
On 2010-12-14 19:46, Extrawurst wrote:
Hi i just want to discuss two points about D version statements.
1) Why is it not possible to negate the condition of a version
statement. I think it is unintuitive and keeps me writing weird
statements like:
version(Win32){}else{version = NotWin32;}
That
On 2010-12-14 19:33, Stephan Soller wrote:
I think it's a matter of consistency. In Ruby blocks are used all the
time for pretty much everything. In D this isn't the case because
usually templates are used for stuff where blocks are used in Ruby (e.g.
map, group and find in std.algorithm).
I t
I kept on literally losing sleep about a number of issues involving
containers, sealing, arbitrary-cost copying vs. reference counting and
copy-on-write, and related issues. This stops me from making rapid
progress on defining D containers and other artifacts in the standard
library.
Clearly
> Have you tried, for example, CoffeeScript:
I have not - my main problem with Javascript isn't so much the
language as the browsers in which it runs, which is why I feel things
like emscripten (and google native client) are pretty useless.
Browsers are good for displaying html pages. Javascript
Any idea how this can be 'solved' or do we need to continue doing things
like this? My naive instinct is to use the declaration order to
determine a match (first one to match wins), but that kind of goes
against other overloads in D.
One big plus of current solution is that everything you
Stephan Soller wrote:
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5].select((int e){ return e > 3; })
.collect((int e){ return e*e; });
It's already fairly compact. The main overhead is the parameter type and
the return statement. I don't believe this can be reduced any more
without breaking cons
"Jacob Carlborg" wrote in message
news:ie8dpq$kf...@digitalmars.com...
> On 2010-12-14 13:05, Don wrote:
>> Graham St Jack wrote:
>>> On 14/12/10 20:33, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 09:30:46 +0200, Graham St Jack
wrote:
> There is of course the worry that it c
Hi i just want to discuss two points about D version statements.
1) Why is it not possible to negate the condition of a version
statement. I think it is unintuitive and keeps me writing weird
statements like:
version(Win32){}else{version = NotWin32;}
2) I would really like the idea to be able
On 2010-12-14 13:56, Adam Ruppe wrote:
Today being online matters for languages. I have found
another way to (in theory) run D code on the web.
I've been running D code on the web, professionally, for almost a year now.
To toy around, I've also done C, C++, and even assembly.
How? It runs on
On 2010-12-14 13:05, Don wrote:
Graham St Jack wrote:
On 14/12/10 20:33, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 09:30:46 +0200, Graham St Jack
wrote:
There is of course the worry that it could get so easy that everyone
starts doing it, and we have (relatively) impenetrable code everyw
1 - 100 of 165 matches
Mail list logo
