On 05/05/11 01.31, Sean Kelly wrote:
On May 4, 2011, at 2:05 PM, jdrewsen wrote:
import std.concurrency;
void main(string[] args) {
receiveOnly!bool();
}
This simple program results in segmentation fault. I know i does not spawn a
thread to receive anything from but is this the expected be
In case not everyone knows about this, Brad Roberts conceived, implemented, set
up and maintains an automated tester that watches github for checkins, and when
there's something new it does a complete build of dmd and phobos, then runs the
test suite on it, and posts the results:
http://d.pure
I too think it's awesome.
Just some quick thoughts;
* Could some kind of benchmarking be integrated to track performance
aspects, especially find regressions? Perhaps a bit high on the
utility/work-scale?
* Is the script available for running offline, on some local machine,
I.E. verifying differ
Am 05.05.2011 22:15, schrieb Ulrik Mikaelsson:
> I too think it's awesome.
>
> Just some quick thoughts;
> * Could some kind of benchmarking be integrated to track performance
> aspects, especially find regressions? Perhaps a bit high on the
> utility/work-scale?
> * Is the script available for
On 05/05/2011 21:15, Ulrik Mikaelsson wrote:
I too think it's awesome.
Just some quick thoughts;
* Could some kind of benchmarking be integrated to track performance
aspects, especially find regressions? Perhaps a bit high on the
utility/work-scale?
Yes, this wouldn't be of much use though,
On Thu, 5 May 2011, Ulrik Mikaelsson wrote:
> Just some quick thoughts;
> * Could some kind of benchmarking be integrated to track performance
> aspects, especially find regressions? Perhaps a bit high on the
> utility/work-scale?
Could? Yes.
Am I going to? Not likely. If someone else does, it
Awesome stuff!
One small comments. Have you thought about displaying it as a table? A
lot of words are duplicated hence wasting precious display space. The
table can look as follows:
Linux x86 ...
compileunittest ...
Currying is well established name as well, especially for people coming from
a functional programming background.
(Cristi Cobzarenco)
Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/cristi.cobzarenco
On 4 May 2011 23:40, bearophile wrote:
> Lutger Blijdestijn:
>
> > partial application is getting a ne
On 2011-05-06 00:54:34 +0300, Cristi Cobzarenco said:
Currying is well established name as well, especially for people coming
from a functional programming background.
Current implementation does not curry the function, it partialy applies it.
Currying is converting a function that takes mult
Through Reddit I've seen another document that shows common little bugs in
C/C++ code found by a static analysis tool. The bugs shown seem to be real,
from real software:
http://www.slideshare.net/Andrey_Karpov/add2011-en
>From the slides I have selected seven of the bugs, here translated to D2:
On 2011-05-05 23:21, Brad Roberts wrote:
On Thu, 5 May 2011, Ulrik Mikaelsson wrote:
Just some quick thoughts;
* Could some kind of benchmarking be integrated to track performance
aspects, especially find regressions? Perhaps a bit high on the
utility/work-scale?
Could? Yes.
Am I going to?
11 matches
Mail list logo
