On 13/06/2011 02:31, Paul D. Anderson wrote:
Alix Pexton Wrote:
On 12/06/2011 16:11, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 04:36:55 -0400, Alix Pexton
wrote:
On 12/06/2011 02:40, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 13:04:47 -0400, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
On 6/11/1
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 14:59:57 -0400, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> "Andrei Alexandrescu" wrote in message
> news:it1cvf$21d4$1...@digitalmars.com...
>>
>> It's the namespace pollution and the non-self-containedness of the
>> function that's most troublesome. Also see Steve's point about methods.
>> It'
I have a hard time believing that std.string.capwords or
std.string.captitalize are actually used much. It just doesn't seem to me like
they would be generally useful functions. They're far too specific in what
they do and aren't flexible enough. And if they're not pulling their own
weight, the
Steve Teale wrote:
> Can DMD D2/Linux do this yet?
dmd can't do it yet. But if all you want is to link a against a shared
library you can try the following:
1. Create a shared library
$ gcc -m64 -fPIC -shared shared.c -o libshared.so
2. Building (without linking using dmd)
$ dmd -m64 -c dynamic.
On 12/06/2011 23:37, bearophile wrote:
Andrei:
Don, instead of this fix, could be at best phase everything
built-in about complex out?
Two usages of complex numbers in the RosettaCode site.
Acommon place where you find complex numbers is to plot
Mandelbrot/Julia sets: http://rosettacode.org/
On 12/06/2011 22:15, Walter Bright wrote:
Nobody seems to have noticed yet, but yesterday I removed the
restriction preventing import declarations from being used in functions.
These now work:
void test1()
{
import std.c.stdio;
printf("hello world\n");
}
void test2()
{
static import std.c.stdio
On 13/06/2011 03:22, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I just want to say, I'm thoroughly impressed by the speed and effort
Daniel Murphy is putting into fixing bugs with the compiler. Not to
mention, he is closing already fixed bugs (an important, but tedious task).
Bravo, Daniel!
-Steve
Indeed -
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 12:36:27 +0100, Robert Clipsham wrote:
> On 12/06/2011 23:37, bearophile wrote:
>> Andrei:
>>
>>> Don, instead of this fix, could be at best phase everything built-in
>>> about complex out?
>>
>> Two usages of complex numbers in the RosettaCode site.
>>
>> Acommon place where y
All they are is passed through the tokeniser to ensure they lex as valid
D (not parse).
http://d-programming-language.org/lex.html
A naked slash is not a valid token on its own, AFAIK, so it shouldn't
work. But the other two are fine.
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 12:13:13 +, Bernard Helyer wrote:
> All they are is passed through the tokeniser to ensure they lex as valid
> D (not parse).
>
> http://d-programming-language.org/lex.html
>
> A naked slash is not a valid token on its own, AFAIK, so it shouldn't
> work. But the other two
Actually, the \u stuff indicates a literal and not an actual token, so
the only actually valid one is '"'. Third time's the charm!
On 6/13/11 4:23 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
I have a hard time believing that std.string.capwords or
std.string.captitalize are actually used much. It just doesn't seem to me like
they would be generally useful functions. They're far too specific in what
they do and aren't flexible enough. And if
On 6/13/11 4:27 AM, Jens Mueller wrote:
Steve Teale wrote:
Can DMD D2/Linux do this yet?
dmd can't do it yet. But if all you want is to link a against a shared
library you can try the following:
1. Create a shared library
$ gcc -m64 -fPIC -shared shared.c -o libshared.so
2. Building (without
On 6/13/11 6:36 AM, Robert Clipsham wrote:
I seemed to think the plan for complex numbers was to do what happened
with associative arrays, that is, keep the language syntax, but have the
feature implemented in the library. Is this not the case?
No, the current vision is to completely replace co
On 6/13/11 6:43 AM, Robert Clipsham wrote:
On 13/06/2011 03:22, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I just want to say, I'm thoroughly impressed by the speed and effort
Daniel Murphy is putting into fixing bugs with the compiler. Not to
mention, he is closing already fixed bugs (an important, but tediou
Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> Is there anyone on the newsgroup here who actually uses
> std.string.capwords or std.string.capitalize?
> And if you do, do you use them often?
I use capitalize from time to time. It seems to work well enough.
Is there really a need to break people's code every other da
On 13/06/2011 14:39, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Walter is continuously working on improving speed of pull request
integration. The bottleneck right now is the compiler test suite, which
takes hours to run.
Andrei
Is there some way we could speed this up? Obviously it can't be run for
multiple
On 13/06/2011 14:32, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Two questions - first, what steps do we need to take to convince the
linker call from within dmd to work as above?
Second, how about the converse - loading a shared library from a program
written in either C or D?
I was under the impression that
Robert Clipsham wrote:
> On 13/06/2011 14:39, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> Walter is continuously working on improving speed of pull request
>> integration. The bottleneck right now is the compiler test suite, which
>> takes hours to run.
>>
>> Andrei
>
> Is there some way we could speed this up?
I vote for the changes. They are better name for newbies like me.
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
> Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>> Would it be better to rename toStringz to toCString when fixing it
>
> I think it should stay just how it is: toStringz, with a lowercase
> z.
>
> T
On 6/13/11, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>> Is there anyone on the newsgroup here who actually uses
>> std.string.capwords or std.string.capitalize?
>> And if you do, do you use them often?
>
> I use capitalize from time to time. It seems to work well enough.
>
>
> Is there reall
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 08:36:32 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 6/13/11 6:36 AM, Robert Clipsham wrote:
>> I seemed to think the plan for complex numbers was to do what happened
>> with associative arrays, that is, keep the language syntax, but have
>> the feature implemented in the library. I
How safe is "safe D" to run on your computer as if it is a client application.
Let's say you want something like this.
1) The source is compared to the local one on the current disk. If the remote
version
is newer the new version is downloaded.
2) The source gets compiled and then executed in s
On the main page:
http://www.d-programming-language.org/index.html
Click on "Howtos" in the left menu. That takes you to the first howto:
http://www.d-programming-language.org/windows.html
Then the Howto link called "PortÂing to 64 Bits" is broken:
http://www.d-programming-language.org/32-64-por
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 6/13/11 4:27 AM, Jens Mueller wrote:
> >Steve Teale wrote:
> >>Can DMD D2/Linux do this yet?
> >
> >dmd can't do it yet. But if all you want is to link a against a shared
> >library you can try the following:
> >
> >1. Create a shared library
> >$ gcc -m64 -fPIC -sha
sclytrack Wrote:
>
> How safe is "safe D" to run on your computer as if it is a client application.
>
> Let's say you want something like this.
>
> 1) The source is compared to the local one on the current disk. If the remote
> version
> is newer the new version is downloaded.
>
> 2) The sourc
On 2011-06-13 07:07, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > Is there anyone on the newsgroup here who actually uses
> > std.string.capwords or std.string.capitalize?
> > And if you do, do you use them often?
>
> I use capitalize from time to time. It seems to work well enough.
>
>
>
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 14:51:52 +, Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 08:36:32 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>
>> A complex() convenience function should be useful. If anyone has the
>> time, please create a pull request. [...]
>
> Sure, I'll add complex().
As promised:
https
On 2011-06-13 08:02, sclytrack wrote:
> How safe is "safe D" to run on your computer as if it is a client
> application.
>
> Let's say you want something like this.
>
> 1) The source is compared to the local one on the current disk. If the
> remote version
> is newer the new version is downloaded
It looks like people have reimplemented capitalize in some libs:
D:\dev\lib\D\boxen\src\xf\utils\CT.d:25:pragma(ctfe) char[]
capitalize(char[] name) {
D:\dev\lib\D\boxen\src\xf\xpose2\MiniD.d:51:pragma(ctfe) private
char[] capitalizeFirst(char[] str) {
D:\dev\lib\D\boxen\src\xf\xpose2\MiniD.d:62:
On 2011-06-13 08:50, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
> It looks like people have reimplemented capitalize in some libs:
>
> D:\dev\lib\D\boxen\src\xf\utils\CT.d:25:pragma(ctfe) char[]
> capitalize(char[] name) {
> D:\dev\lib\D\boxen\src\xf\xpose2\MiniD.d:51:pragma(ctfe) private
> char[] capitalizeFirst(cha
On 2011-06-13 08:56, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> On 2011-06-13 08:50, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
> > It looks like people have reimplemented capitalize in some libs:
> >
> > D:\dev\lib\D\boxen\src\xf\utils\CT.d:25:pragma(ctfe) char[]
> > capitalize(char[] name) {
> > D:\dev\lib\D\boxen\src\xf\xpose2\Min
On 6/13/11 10:33 AM, Jens Mueller wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 6/13/11 4:27 AM, Jens Mueller wrote:
Steve Teale wrote:
Can DMD D2/Linux do this yet?
dmd can't do it yet. But if all you want is to link a against a shared
library you can try the following:
1. Create a shared library
$
On 6/13/11 9:12 AM, Robert Clipsham wrote:
On 13/06/2011 14:39, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Walter is continuously working on improving speed of pull request
integration. The bottleneck right now is the compiler test suite, which
takes hours to run.
Andrei
Is there some way we could speed this
On 6/13/11, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> Well, capwords is not something you're likely to find implementations of by
> grepping, since the name has a good chance of being different. But
> regardless,
> I find it much easier to believe that someone is using capitalize than
> capwords, particularly sin
How do you run the DMD unittests, is it just "make -fwin32.mak debdmd"
? I'd like to test it on my hardware.
sclytrack:
> How safe is "safe D" to run on your computer as if it is a client application.
Walter (I think) has decided to call it "Safe D", but a better name is "memory
safe D" because it describes better that it gives only a specialized kind of
safety.
Bye,
bearophile
Jonathan M Davis:
> But there are a number of functions in
> std.string which at least _look_ like their of limited usefulness, and if
> they're really not used, then they shouldn't be there.
What functions?
(I think in Python I have used capitalize only once so far.)
Bye,
bearophile
Andrei:
> Walter wants to keep the "i" postfix as a hack, but I think
> that's completely unnecessary.
Before deciding I'd like to know the rationale to keep it. In principle I like
handy complex number literals. In practice I don't use them often enough...
Another note: I'd like std.math.abs
Andrej Mitrovic:
> Hey I've just realized something (well, it was in the docs, doh!), we
> can use already use "switch case;" to fallthrough to the next label
> without explicitly using goto:
>
> void main()
> {
> int x = 2;
> switch (x)
> {
> case 2:
> goto case;
sclytrack wrote:
> Like a replacement for HTML5 and javascript.
You *could* make this work, but the language itself won't help you.
There's two approaches:
a) Run the code on your server and only output the display on the
client's computer. Like an X11 application.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wik
Andrei:
> If we all get convinced that named parameters are worth it,
I think this is not going to happen because some people (two?) don't want this
feature.
I am for it, if it's well implemented. The reordering is one important part of
this feature.
An optional sub-feature is a way to depreca
Yeah I'd rather have it be something like "goto next", but then this
steals another keyword. Anyway you can always be explicit with your
gotos if you want readability.
Walter:
> bearophile, some way in which you are replying causes Thunderbird to lose
> track
> of the thread you are replying to, and starts a new thread.
I know... and I am sorry (The cause is me that I want to the web interface, and
because it is buggy, it breaks the threads very easily).
By
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 6/13/11 10:33 AM, Jens Mueller wrote:
> >Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> >>On 6/13/11 4:27 AM, Jens Mueller wrote:
> >>>Steve Teale wrote:
> Can DMD D2/Linux do this yet?
> >>>
> >>>dmd can't do it yet. But if all you want is to link a against a shared
> >>>library
On 2011-06-13 06:21:47 +0300, Mehrdad said:
Yeah I was referring to something similar to what C# has (aside from
the lack of boxing).
On 6/12/2011 6:46 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 6/12/11 8:28 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
They aren't virtual. For an interface to work, it has to be virtu
On 2011-06-13 09:55, bearophile wrote:
> Jonathan M Davis:
> > But there are a number of functions in
> > std.string which at least _look_ like their of limited usefulness, and if
> > they're really not used, then they shouldn't be there.
>
> What functions?
>
> (I think in Python I have used cap
On 2011-06-13 09:57, bearophile wrote:
> sclytrack:
> > How safe is "safe D" to run on your computer as if it is a client
> > application.
>
> Walter (I think) has decided to call it "Safe D", but a better name is
> "memory safe D" because it describes better that it gives only a
> specialized kin
On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 14:41 +, Timon Gehr wrote:
> Robert Clipsham wrote:
> > On 13/06/2011 14:39, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> >> Walter is continuously working on improving speed of pull request
> >> integration. The bottleneck right now is the compiler test suite, which
> >> takes hours to r
On 6/12/2011 7:22 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I just want to say, I'm thoroughly impressed by the speed and effort Daniel
Murphy is putting into fixing bugs with the compiler. Not to mention, he is
closing already fixed bugs (an important, but tedious task).
Bravo, Daniel!
I agree. Other p
Not available yet, but Intel announced support for manipulating FS and GS in
user mode. Protection for fiber local storage is one use case.
http://software.intel.com/file/36945
"Steven Schveighoffer" wrote in message
news:op.vwzsvfkyeav7ka@localhost.localdomain...
>I just want to say, I'm thoroughly impressed by the speed and effort
>Daniel Murphy is putting into fixing bugs with the compiler. Not to
>mention, he is closing already fixed bugs (an important, but tedio
Right now there are lot of Phobos functionality that fully expects
A.init to return just that - a default initialized value of type A.
Now consider:
struct A
{
int i;
void init(int K)
{
//blah
}
}
Then:
map!"a.i"([A(1), A(2), A(3)]);
for me explodes with :
std\algorithm
I am interested in more proper language features to implement.
Github is good tool for contributing to D community.
Kenji Hara (9rnsr)
2011/6/14 Walter Bright :
> On 6/12/2011 7:22 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
>>
>> I just want to say, I'm thoroughly impressed by the speed and effort
>> Daniel
I'm having some fun with this.
import std.array;
void main()
{
with (namespace!("std.stdio std.algorithm std.range"))
{
auto squares = map!("a * a")([2, 4, 6]);
writeln(squares);
}
}
template namespace(string x)
{
mixin(namespaceImpl(x));
}
string namespaceImpl(s
Btw, it's disappointing that I can't call split with a separator at
compile-time:
enum result = split("bla, bla"); // ok
enum result = split("bla, bla", ","); // nope
I'm having the same issue with a COM interface that happens to define
an init method. I've used a COM object inside a struct and used the
'alias this' trick to forward all calls, but for init I had to create
a special 'initialize' method in the struct that would call the COM
object's init method ex
On 2011-06-13 12:50, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
> Right now there are lot of Phobos functionality that fully expects
> A.init to return just that - a default initialized value of type A.
>
> Now consider:
> struct A
> {
> int i;
> void init(int K)
> {
> //blah
> }
> }
>
On 14.06.2011 0:03, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On 2011-06-13 12:50, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
Right now there are lot of Phobos functionality that fully expects
A.init to return just that - a default initialized value of type A.
Now consider:
struct A
{
int i;
void init(int K)
{
On 2011-06-13 13:06, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
> On 14.06.2011 0:03, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > On 2011-06-13 12:50, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
> >> Right now there are lot of Phobos functionality that fully expects
> >> A.init to return just that - a default initialized value of type A.
> >>
> >> Now
On Jun 14, 11 03:55, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
Btw, it's disappointing that I can't call split with a separator at
compile-time:
enum result = split("bla, bla"); // ok
enum result = split("bla, bla", ","); // nope
That's due to (at least) http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4047.
"bearophile" < bearophileh...@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:it5gqj$a1g$1...@digitalmars.com...
> Andrei:
>
>> If we all get convinced that named parameters are worth it,
>
> I think this is not going to happen because some people (two?) don't want
> this feature.
>
> I am for it, if it's well
"Andrei Alexandrescu" wrote in message
news:it3ne2$1g2f$1...@digitalmars.com...
> On 6/12/11 2:19 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>> "Andrei Alexandrescu" wrote in message
>> news:it32j8$2gfq$1...@digitalmars.com...
>>> On 6/12/11 1:45 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Andrei Alexandrescu" wrote in
On 6/13/11 4:02 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Andrei Alexandrescu" wrote in message
news:it3ne2$1g2f$1...@digitalmars.com...
That actually does help, but not for enums used by more than one function.
The other issues remain too.
I would think that an enum used by more than one function *should
> On 6/13/11 4:02 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>> "Andrei Alexandrescu" wrote in message
>> news:it3ne2$1g2f$1...@digitalmars.com...
>>> That actually does help, but not for enums used by more than one function.
>>> The other issues remain too.
>>>
>>
>> I would think that an enum used by more than
Hi Adam,
Were you in the past not working on a Gui lib that did an a) type of thing?
IFAIR, The app ran on the server, the gui was on the client. Someone
could (via a client) connect to the app on the server, but have it
displayed locally?
~ filgood
On 13/06/2011 18:15, Adam D. Ruppe wrote
> Were you in the past not working on a Gui lib that did an a) type of
> thing?
Yes. It's still something I'm very slowly working on, but with my
web app based day job taking up so much time it hasn't had any new
code for months now...
But yeah, it'd run on a server and you display it locally. Yo
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> module my_module;
>
> void fun()
> {
> import std.random;
> return uniform(0, 100);
> }
>
> int gun()
> {
> import std.stdio;
> writeln(fun());
> }
>
> This module won't compile in today's D, but not for a matter of
> principles; it's just a random l
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011, Jens Mueller wrote:
> There have been some posts regarding support for shared libraries. On
> top of my head there we're at least 5 things that need to be done to get
> it working.
> $ dmd -m64 -L-shared shared.d -oflibshared.so
> /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.4
Timon Gehr:
> Will this be fixed too?
Mutually recursive inner functions are not so common, and there is a
workaround, making one of them a delegate defined before.
But what about this?
auto foo()()
out(result) {
} body {
return 0;
}
void main() {
foo();
}
test.d(1): Error: function
std.ctype is modeled after C's ctype.h. It has functions for operating on
characters - particularly functions which indicate the type of a character (I
believe that ctype stands for character type, so that makes sense). For
instance, isdigit will tell you whether a particular character is a digi
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 20:19:15 +0300, bearophile <
wrote:
Andrei:
If we all get convinced that named parameters are worth it,
I think this is not going to happen because some people (two?) don't
want this feature.
I think they worth it and it is the right time to talk extensively why
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:28 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> std.ctype is modeled after C's ctype.h. It has functions for operating on
> characters - particularly functions which indicate the type of a character (I
> believe that ctype stands for character type, so that makes sense). For
> instance
On 6/14/11 8:36 AM, so wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 20:19:15 +0300, bearophile <
wrote:
Andrei:
If we all get convinced that named parameters are worth it,
I think this is not going to happen because some people (two?) don't
want this feature.
I think they worth it and it is the right time
On 2011-06-13 18:43, Jose Armando Garcia wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:28 PM, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
> > std.ctype is modeled after C's ctype.h. It has functions for operating on
> > characters - particularly functions which indicate the type of a
> > character (I believe that ctype stands
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 04:46:54 +0300, Ary Manzana
wrote:
On 6/14/11 8:36 AM, so wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 20:19:15 +0300, bearophile <
wrote:
Andrei:
If we all get convinced that named parameters are worth it,
I think this is not going to happen because some people (two?) don't
want th
I'm all for it. I've never liked ctype, and I got lost trying to find
ascii functions since I didn't know where to look. The first time I
saw ctype I thought it was a collection of C type aliases.. heh.
Come to think of it, I think I had a note in a todo somewhere that
said "post a feature request to change ctype to ascii". It's a good
standard name.
Walter, it looks like this addition inadvertently fixes the issue of
DLLs not linkable due to Phobos imports.
I've had this DLL (alongside with dllmodule.d which had initialization
calls inside DLLMain):
module EdrLib;
import std.utf;
pragma(lib, "gdi32.lib");
pragma(lib, "comdlg32.lib");
import
On 6/13/2011 8:28 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
> Walter, it looks like this addition inadvertently fixes the issue of
> DLLs not linkable due to Phobos imports.
>
> I've had this DLL (alongside with dllmodule.d which had initialization
> calls inside DLLMain):
> module EdrLib;
>
> import std.utf;
>
When I add module ctors/dtors, I get the ModuleInfoZ shenanigans again.
And they do run, I've tested it in a non-DLL example.
I'm guessing this is what you're after:
http://codepad.org/TCtG68Fw
http://codepad.org/65GBDjPS
rdmd main.d
shared ctor!
ctor!
foo.test
dtor!
shared dtor!
Should DLLs even have module ctors/dtors?
I think this is what DLLMain's DLL_PROCESS_ATTACH, DLL_THREAD_ATTACH
and their detach counterparts are for.
On 6/13/2011 8:48 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
> I'm guessing this is what you're after:
>
> http://codepad.org/TCtG68Fw
> http://codepad.org/65GBDjPS
>
> rdmd main.d
> shared ctor!
> ctor!
> foo.test
> dtor!
> shared dtor!
Actually, not what I was thinking. I was thinking something like this:
f
Well it seems to work fine. :)
== Quote from filgood (filg...@somewhere.net)'s article
> Hi Adam,
> Were you in the past not working on a Gui lib that did an a) type of thing?
> IFAIR, The app ran on the server, the gui was on the client. Someone
> could (via a client) connect to the app on the server, but have it
> displayed lo
Hi,
Can someone please explain what needs to be done (other than fixing
the plethora of bugs) to call D2 final? And if someone can provide
an approximate estimate of when?
I would like to switch majority of my programming from C++ to D2 but
the number of bugs and uncertainty of how exactly will n
"Petr Janda" wrote in message
news:it6npg$6l8$1...@digitalmars.com...
>
> Also, how much slower is D2 compared to C++? Will D2 final have
> comparable performance?
>
D2 already has comparable performance to C++. And various things like
built-in slices and good metaprogramming make it easier to
"Petr Janda" wrote in message
news:it6npg$6l8$1...@digitalmars.com...
> Hi,
>
> Can someone please explain what needs to be done (other than fixing
> the plethora of bugs) to call D2 final? And if someone can provide
> an approximate estimate of when?
>
I already find D2, even with occasional bu
"so" wrote in message news:op.vw1msqy0mpw3zg@so-pc...
> On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 04:46:54 +0300, Ary Manzana
> wrote:
>
>> On 6/14/11 8:36 AM, so wrote:
>>> On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 20:19:15 +0300, bearophile <
>>> wrote:
>>>
Andrei:
> If we all get convinced that named parameters are worth
Am 14.06.2011 07:24, schrieb Nick Sabalausky:
> "Petr Janda" wrote in message
> news:it6npg$6l8$1...@digitalmars.com...
>> Hi,
>>
>> Can someone please explain what needs to be done (other than fixing
>> the plethora of bugs) to call D2 final? And if someone can provide
>> an approximate estimate
"Jonathan M Davis" wrote:
std.ctype is modeled after C's ctype.h. It has functions for operating on
characters - particularly functions which indicate the type of a character
(I
believe that ctype stands for character type, so that makes sense). For
instance, isdigit will tell you whether a p
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 08:32:59 +0300, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
I think Ary's suggestion is very simple and easy to understand. Hybrid
calls
are *only* confusing when an unnamed parameter comes after a named one.
An example to it.
fun(int a, int b, int c, int d)
Say we want to name only c:
fu
On Jun 14, 11 09:36, so wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 20:19:15 +0300, bearophile <
wrote:
Andrei:
If we all get convinced that named parameters are worth it,
I think this is not going to happen because some people (two?) don't
want this feature.
I think they worth it and it is the right tim
On 2011-06-13 22:48, Jouko Koski wrote:
> "Jonathan M Davis" wrote:
> > std.ctype is modeled after C's ctype.h. It has functions for operating on
> > characters - particularly functions which indicate the type of a
> > character (I
> > believe that ctype stands for character type, so that makes se
On 6/14/11 12:58 PM, so wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 08:32:59 +0300, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
I think Ary's suggestion is very simple and easy to understand. Hybrid
calls
are *only* confusing when an unnamed parameter comes after a named one.
An example to it.
fun(int a, int b, int c, int d)
S
Brad Roberts wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jun 2011, Jens Mueller wrote:
>
> > There have been some posts regarding support for shared libraries. On
> > top of my head there we're at least 5 things that need to be done to get
> > it working.
> > $ dmd -m64 -L-shared shared.d -oflibshared.so
> > /usr/bin/ld:
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 09:33:54 +0300, Ary Manzana
wrote:
On 6/14/11 12:58 PM, so wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 08:32:59 +0300, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
I think Ary's suggestion is very simple and easy to understand. Hybrid
calls
are *only* confusing when an unnamed parameter comes after a named
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 09:18:42 +0300, KennyTM~ wrote:
I'd rather have no reordering and allow hybrid call. Named argument is
useful for specifying the nature of an argument. If the type is clear
for all but one argument, the rest is just noisy redundant info.
fun(bool, bool, bool, bool, bool
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
