Am 03.08.2011, 21:52 Uhr, schrieb David Nadlinger :
On 8/3/11 9:48 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
System: Windows XP, Core 2 Duo E6850
Is this Windows XP 32 bit or 64 bit? That will probably make
a difference on the longs I'd expect.
It doesn't, long is 32-bit wide on Windows x86_64 too (LLP64).
On 2011-08-04 02:05, Adam Davis wrote:
Dreamhost doesn't provide an updated glibc in my vps server. Is it possible to
run dmd on somewhat outdated linux distributions?
I tried running dmd from the distribution but got:
./dmd: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.11' not found (required by ./dmd)
T
On 2011-08-04 07:16, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
So, does anyone actually have an opinion on this? Should we fix the names or
not? One person has said that they're in favor of fixing the enum names, and
pretty much everything else in this thread has been on what to do about
renaming the ones which ar
On 8/3/2011 5:05 PM, Adam Davis wrote:
If it's not possible to run the standard DMD package, could I build it from
source using those versions?
Sure. D doesn't have any dependency on the semantics of the newer glib.
On Sunday 31 July 2011 19:30:20 Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> Okay. Per the current naming conventions in Phobos, enum values are supposed
> to be camelcased just like any other variable. The enum _type_ is pascal
> cased just like any other user-defined type, but the values are camelcased.
> A number
On Wed, 03 Aug 2011 21:46:45 +0300, Jonathan Hanselman
wrote:
Can Orage be used as an object/document database? If not, are there any
plans
to add support to it.
I can't find anything on the web about Orage, an object/document database.
And also, is there anyone working on an object/doc
Trass3r:
> C++ no SIMD:
> Skinned vertices per second: 4242
>
...
> D gdc:
> Skinned vertices per second: 2345
Are you able and willing to show me the asm produced by gdc? There's a problem
there.
Bye,
bearophile
C++:
Skinned vertices per second: 4866
C++ no SIMD:
Skinned vertices per second: 4242
D dmd:
Skinned vertices per second: 159046
D gdc:
Skinned vertices per second: 2345
D ldc:
Skinned vertices per second: 3791
ldc2 -O3 -release -enable-inlining dver.d
C++:
Skinned vertices per second: 4866
C++ no SIMD:
Skinned vertices per second: 4242
D dmd:
Skinned vertices per second: 159046
D gdc:
Skinned vertices per second: 2345
Compilers:
gcc version 4.5.2 (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.5.2-8ubuntu4)
g++ -s -O3 -mfpmath=sse -ffast-math -march=nativ
Trass3r:
> I'm afraid not. dmd's backend isn't good at floating point calculations.
Studying a bit the asm it's not hard to find the cause, because this benchmark
is quite pure (synthetic, despite I think it comes from real-world code).
This is what G++ generates from the C++ code without intri
> Dreamhost doesn't provide an updated glibc in my vps server. Is it possible
> to run dmd on somewhat outdated linux distributions?
>
> I tried running dmd from the distribution but got:
>
> ./dmd: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.11' not found (required by ./dmd)
>
> The instaled versions are:
Looks like a spiteful joke... In other words: WTF?! JavaScript is about
10 times faster than D in floating point calculations!? Please, tell me
that I'm mistaken.
I'm afraid not. dmd's backend isn't good at floating point calculations.
On 8/4/11 2:05 AM, Adam Davis wrote:
If it's not possible to run the standard DMD package, could I build it from
source using those versions?
I don't know it off hand, but just try running »make -f posix.mak« in
the src/ directory and you'll see (add »MODEL=64« for x86_64).
David
Dreamhost doesn't provide an updated glibc in my vps server. Is it possible to
run dmd on somewhat outdated linux distributions?
I tried running dmd from the distribution but got:
./dmd: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.11' not found (required by ./dmd)
The instaled versions are:
$ ldd --versio
This is interesting:
http://openil.sourceforge.net/
In particular that news post from 2010. Apparently the author might
consider changing the license if there's interest in it.
Denis Shelomovskij:
> (tests from bearophile's message, C++ test is "skinning_test_no_simd.cpp").
For a more realistic test I suggest you to time the C++ version that uses the
intrinsics too (only for float).
> Looks like a spiteful joke... In other words: WTF?! JavaScript is about
> 10 times
03.08.2011 22:48, Adam D. Ruppe пишет:
System: Windows XP, Core 2 Duo E6850
Is this Windows XP 32 bit or 64 bit? That will probably make
a difference on the longs I'd expect.
I meant Windows XP 32 bit (5.1 (Build 2600: Service Pack 3)) (according
to what is "Windows XP" in wikipedia)
> System: Windows XP, Core 2 Duo E6850
Is this Windows XP 32 bit or 64 bit? That will probably make
a difference on the longs I'd expect.
On 8/3/11 9:48 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
System: Windows XP, Core 2 Duo E6850
Is this Windows XP 32 bit or 64 bit? That will probably make
a difference on the longs I'd expect.
It doesn't, long is 32-bit wide on Windows x86_64 too (LLP64).
David
03.08.2011 22:15, Ziad Hatahet:
I believe that "long" in this case is 32 bits in C++, and 64-bits in the
remaining languages, hence the same result for int and long in C++. Try
with "long long" maybe? :)
--
Ziad
2011/8/3 Denis Shelomovskij mailto:verylonglogin@gmail.com>>
03.08.2011
I believe that "long" in this case is 32 bits in C++, and 64-bits in the
remaining languages, hence the same result for int and long in C++. Try with
"long long" maybe? :)
--
Ziad
2011/8/3 Denis Shelomovskij
> 03.08.2011 18:20, bearophile:
>
> The benchmark info:
>> http://chadaustin.me/2011
03.08.2011 18:20, bearophile:
The benchmark info:
http://chadaustin.me/2011/01/digging-into-javascript-performance/
The code, in C++, JS, Java, C#:
https://github.com/chadaustin/Web-Benchmarks/
The C++/JS/Java code runs on a single core.
D2 version translated from the C# version (the C++ versio
I'm not sure this is the right place to post this. I apologize in advance.
Can Orage be used as an object/document database? If not, are there any plans
to add support to it.
And also, is there anyone working on an object/document database for D or
bindings to existing projects?
Thank you.
> Jonathan M Davis Wrote:
> > There's a difference between a programming language which has reached an
> > appropriate level of maturity that people can use it without fear of
> > running into compiler bugs or issues with the spec and a language which
> > is frozen.
>
> Maybe, they just enjoy runn
Jonathan M Davis Wrote:
> There's a difference between a programming language which has reached an
> appropriate level of maturity that people can use it without fear of running
> into compiler bugs or issues with the spec and a language which is frozen.
Maybe, they just enjoy running into matu
On Aug 3, 2011, at 8:06 AM, David Nadlinger wrote:
> As you might know, the current druntime release contains a GC bug which
> causes hard to track down crashes due to premature garbage collection in
> combination with the OS X Lion ASLR, which is enabled by default on all
> systems now. The pr
There's pdcurses which apparently works on Windows. It's public
domain. I'm not sure if this is the one that supports ASCII escape
codes though. And I haven't tested it.
Home: http://pdcurses.sourceforge.net/
Binaries: http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/packages/pdcurses.htm
The benchmark info:
http://chadaustin.me/2011/01/digging-into-javascript-performance/
The code, in C++, JS, Java, C#:
https://github.com/chadaustin/Web-Benchmarks/
The C++/JS/Java code runs on a single core.
D2 version translated from the C# version (the C++ version uses struct
inheritance!):
ht
As you might know, the current druntime release contains a GC bug which
causes hard to track down crashes due to premature garbage collection in
combination with the OS X Lion ASLR, which is enabled by default on all
systems now. The problem is well understood, and a fix has already been
merged
On Wednesday 03 August 2011 04:52:51 Kagamin wrote:
> Don Wrote:
> > Completely agree. Right now, we don't *want* to attract anybody who
> > expects a finished product. We shouldn't advertise as if we do.
>
> Well, there's not such thing as a finished product. Things either rock or
> suck. If some
On Wednesday 03 August 2011 08:35:10 Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Aug 2011 18:18:39 -0400, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> > "Lars T. Kyllingstad" wrote in message
> > news:j16pv5$id8$3...@digitalmars.com...
> >
> >> Folks, please state your preferences in terms of function names. I'll
> >>
Don Wrote:
> Completely agree. Right now, we don't *want* to attract anybody who
> expects a finished product. We shouldn't advertise as if we do.
Well, there's not such thing as a finished product. Things either rock or suck.
If something doesn't work, it sucks, but that's manageable with adve
On Mon, 01 Aug 2011 18:18:39 -0400, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> "Lars T. Kyllingstad" wrote in message
> news:j16pv5$id8$3...@digitalmars.com...
>>
>> Folks, please state your preferences in terms of function names. I'll
>> try to put personal bias aside and compose a naming scheme that is both
>>
On Aug 3, 11 13:53, Lutger Blijdestijn wrote:
Jimmy Cao wrote:
2011/8/2 so
On Tue, 02 Aug 2011 03:51:56 +0300, Brad Roberts<
bra...@slice-2.puremagic.com> wrote:
I don't think that any gui library belongs in phobos because there's
essentially no agreement about what cross-platform librar
34 matches
Mail list logo
