On Sunday, December 18, 2011 00:15:40 Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 12/17/11 7:52 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > The only reason that I can think of to use a reference-counted struct
> > instead of a class is becuse then it's easier to avoid the GC heap
> > entirely. Almost all of a container's
On Sunday, December 18, 2011 06:17:22 Russel Winder wrote:
> The problem here is that educators forgot the importance of learning
> multiple languages and especially multiple paradigms. Java was used for
> all teaching and students suffered. If they had used Java and Haskell
> and Prolog things wou
On Sat, 2011-12-17 at 23:09 -0800, Walter Bright wrote:
[...]
> I find this an odd statement because the Java VM is written in C, so
> therefore
> it is on the same or fewer platforms than C.
It's the indirection thing again: rather than provide a C toolchain for
each platform, you load Java (o
On Sun, 2011-12-18 at 00:38 -0600, Caligo wrote:
[...]
> In my experience professors only get to choose what to wear to class, lol.
:-)
> It's interesting how many professors choose the same exact text book for
> the same courses they teach. And it's also interesting how those textbooks
> cost 1
On 12/17/2011 10:36 PM, Russel Winder wrote:
In all of this, the issue of portability of code has seemingly been
missed. One of the main reasons for Java in 1995 (other than the
trendiness of Web browser programming) was portability across all
platforms. This made the sys admin of provision of
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 11:01 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> In my experience, it's the professors who get to choose what they're
> teaching
> and the main reason that Java is used is a combination of its simplicitly
> and
> the fact that it's heavily used in the industry. C and C++ have a lot more
On Sat, 2011-12-17 at 21:01 -0800, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
[...]
> In my experience, it's the professors who get to choose what they're teaching
> and the main reason that Java is used is a combination of its simplicitly and
> the fact that it's heavily used in the industry. C and C++ have a lot
On 12/17/11 7:52 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
The only reason that I can think of to use a reference-counted struct instead
of a class is becuse then it's easier to avoid the GC heap entirely. Almost
all of a container's memory is going to end up on the heap regardless, because
the elements almos
On Sat, 2011-12-17 at 22:45 -0600, Caligo wrote:
[...]
I thought this thread had finished, but...
>
> That's like saying people should take Coke and Pepsi more seriously because
> they have bigger market shares when in reality all you need is water.
> Money isn't real, you know?
Taking that para
On Saturday, December 17, 2011 22:16:38 Michel Fortin wrote:
> On 2011-12-17 23:10:19 +, Andrei Alexandrescu
>
> said:
> > On 12/17/11 5:03 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> >> Well, you learn something new every day I guess. I'd never even heard
> >> of
> >> double-checked locking before this. I
On Saturday, December 17, 2011 22:45:51 Caligo wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 2:19 AM, Russel Winder wrote:
> > Java is the main language of development just now. D is a tiny little
> > backwater in the nether regions of obscurity. If any language is a joke
> > here, it is D since it is current
On Saturday, December 17, 2011 22:57:46 Caligo wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 9:08 PM, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
> > Is the plan for std.container still to have all of its containers be
> > final classes (classes so that they're reference types and final so
> > that their functions are inlinable)?
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 9:08 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> Is the plan for std.container still to have all of its containers be final
> classes (classes so that they're reference types and final so that their
> functions are inlinable)? Or has that changed? I believe that Andrei said
> something r
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu <
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org> wrote:
> I'm finding myself unable to set up my own Gravatar picture with dfeed.
> This is because I post on this newsgroup as seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org,
> which is a non-existent email address. Gravatar, how
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 2:19 AM, Russel Winder wrote:
> Java is the main language of development just now. D is a tiny little
> backwater in the nether regions of obscurity. If any language is a joke
> here, it is D since it is currently unable to claim any serious market
> share in the world of
On 2011-12-17 23:10:19 +, Andrei Alexandrescu
said:
On 12/17/11 5:03 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Well, you learn something new every day I guess. I'd never even heard of
double-checked locking before this. I came up with it on my own in an attempt
to reduce how much the mutex was used. Is
On Saturday, December 17, 2011 17:31:46 Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 12/13/11 9:08 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > Is the plan for std.container still to have all of its containers be
> > final classes (classes so that they're reference types and final so
> > that their functions are inlinable)?
On Sunday, December 18, 2011 04:09:21 Ruslan Mullakhmetov wrote:
> I want to ask you about D future
It will be years before we seriously start looking at D3, and while there are
ideas for what we might like to do with it, it's far too early to say what's
likely to happen with it. D2 needs to b
On Saturday, December 17, 2011 14:36:15 dsimcha wrote:
> The time has come to vote on the inclusion of Jonas Drewsen's CURL
> wrapper in Phobos.
>
>
> Code: https://github.com/jcd/phobos/blob/curl-wrapper/etc/curl.d
> Docs: http://freeze.steamwinter.com/D/web/phobos/etc_curl.html
>
>
> For thos
On Saturday, 17 December 2011 at 23:31:47 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
Safety is also an issue. I was hoping I'd provide safety as a
policy, e.g. one may choose for a given container whether they
want safe or not (and presumably fast). I think it's best to
postpone that policy and focus for
On Saturday, December 17, 2011 17:10:19 Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 12/17/11 5:03 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > Well, you learn something new every day I guess. I'd never even heard of
> > double-checked locking before this. I came up with it on my own in an
> > attempt to reduce how much the
On Saturday, December 17, 2011 13:20:33 Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 12/17/11 6:34 AM, so wrote:
> > If you are using singleton in your C++/D (or any other M-P language)
> > code, do yourself a favor and trash that book you learned it from.
> >
> > ---
> > class A {
> > static A make();
> > }
>
On Saturday, December 17, 2011 19:44:28 deadalnix wrote:
> Very good point. CTFE is improving with each version of dmd, and is a
> real alternative to static this(); It should be considered when
> apropriate, it has many benefices.
I think that in general, the uses for static this fall into one of
On 12/18/2011 02:42 AM, a wrote:
Ruslan Mullakhmetov Wrote:
Currently, after
introducing C++11 i see the only advantages of D over C++11 except
syntax sugare is garbage collector and modules.
So you are saying that sane templates, range based standard library and
concurrency improvements (t
Ruslan Mullakhmetov Wrote:
> Currently, after
> introducing C++11 i see the only advantages of D over C++11 except
> syntax sugare is garbage collector and modules.
So you are saying that sane templates, range based standard library and
concurrency improvements (thread local variables, immuta
On 17/12/11 11:31 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
The most important thing I noticed is that people expect standard
containers to have sophisticated memory management. Many ask not about
containers as much as "containers with custom allocators". Second,
containers tend to be large memory users by
On Saturday, December 17, 2011 09:21:42 Justin C Calvarese wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 5:56 AM, jdrewsen wrote:
> > On Thursday, 15 December 2011 at 07:46:56 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> >>> ...
> >
> > I'd argue that the acronyms should be in all caps if camelcasing would
> >
> >> req
On Saturday, December 17, 2011 23:51:08 Jakob Ovrum wrote:
> On Saturday, 17 December 2011 at 22:25:10 UTC, jdrewsen wrote:
> > On Saturday, 17 December 2011 at 20:38:46 UTC, Jakob Ovrum
> >
> > wrote:
> >> On Saturday, 17 December 2011 at 11:56:04 UTC, jdrewsen wrote:
> >>> AutoConnect sounds lik
On Saturday, December 17, 2011 23:10:00 jdrewsen wrote:
> On Thursday, 15 December 2011 at 08:51:29 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
>
> wrote:
> > Line# 235 is identical to line# 239. Shouldn't line# 235 be
> > creating an Http object, not an Ftp object? That mistake
> > definitely makes it look like downlo
On Saturday, December 17, 2011 12:56:02 jdrewsen wrote:
> On Thursday, 15 December 2011 at 07:46:56 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
>
> > I'd argue that the acronyms should be in all caps if
> > camelcasing would require that the first letter of the acronym
> > be capitalized and all lower case if camelcasi
On 18/12/11 12:06 AM, Jesse Phillips wrote:
But as to whether this should be what is implemented in the standard
library, I don't know. You make mention of custom allocators and such. Is
this interest going to be of benefit, or is it just something people are
use to having from C++? If it makes s
On 12/18/2011 01:09 AM, Ruslan Mullakhmetov wrote:
Hi all,
I want to ask you about D future, i mean next big iteration of D and
propose some new feature, agent-based programming. Currently, after
introducing C++11 i see the only advantages of D over C++11 except
syntax sugare is garbage collecto
On 12/17/2011 2:54 AM, bearophile wrote:
Walter:
x = x++;
Define order of evaluation as rvalue, then lvalue.
So I presume your desire is to define the semantics of all code like that,
and statically refuse no cases like that. This is an acceptable solution.
The advantage of this solution i
On Sat, 17 Dec 2011 17:31:46 -0600, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> The second decision is classes vs. structs. Walter correctly pointed out
> that the obvious choice for defining a reference type in D - whether the
> type is momonorphic or polymorphic - is making it a class. If containers
> aren't c
Hi all,
I want to ask you about D future, i mean next big iteration of D and
propose some new feature, agent-based programming. Currently, after
introducing C++11 i see the only advantages of D over C++11 except
syntax sugare is garbage collector and modules.
I recentrly attended student
Both concurrent execution and a compiler that assumes a single threaded
execution model can do really weird things in the name of optimization.
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 17, 2011, at 3:03 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> On Saturday, December 17, 2011 09:50:26 Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> On 1
On Sat, 17 Dec 2011 14:36:15 -0500, dsimcha wrote:
> The time has come to vote on the inclusion of Jonas Drewsen's CURL
> wrapper in Phobos.
>
>
> Code: https://github.com/jcd/phobos/blob/curl-wrapper/etc/curl.d Docs:
> http://freeze.steamwinter.com/D/web/phobos/etc_curl.html
>
>
> For those o
On Sat, 17 Dec 2011 11:50:39 -0800, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 12/17/2011 11:22 AM, Adam Wilson wrote:
On Sat, 17 Dec 2011 01:33:33 -0800, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 12/16/2011 9:01 PM, Adam Wilson wrote:
On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 01:34:32 -0800, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 12/14/2011 11:41 AM, A
On 12/13/11 9:08 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Is the plan for std.container still to have all of its containers be final
classes (classes so that they're reference types and final so that their
functions are inlinable)? Or has that changed? I believe that Andrei said
something recently about discu
YES!
Finally an easy way to do SMTP.
On 12/17/11 5:14 PM, Adam Wilson wrote:
This is a fantastic idea Andrei, I'll see what I can come up with. It
shouldn't be that hard, mostly i'll just have document the process, talk
about the limitations of dynamic libraries, and make sure that the
scoping issues are clearly defined and explaine
On Sat, 17 Dec 2011 14:27:12 -0800, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 12/17/11 1:22 PM, Adam Wilson wrote:
I know DLL's are relatively new to D so not much documentation exists
about how they work in D. I think this would be something good to
document, especially the special behaviors for Windows.
On 12/17/11 5:03 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Well, you learn something new every day I guess. I'd never even heard of
double-checked locking before this. I came up with it on my own in an attempt
to reduce how much the mutex was used. Is the problem with it that the write
isn't actually atomic? W
On Saturday, December 17, 2011 09:50:26 Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 12/17/11 1:56 AM, Andrew Wiley wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 1:47 AM, Andrew Wiley
wrote:
> >> I was looking through Jonathan Davis's pull request to remove static
> >> constructors from std.datetime, and I realized that
On Saturday, 17 December 2011 at 22:25:10 UTC, jdrewsen wrote:
On Saturday, 17 December 2011 at 20:38:46 UTC, Jakob Ovrum
wrote:
On Saturday, 17 December 2011 at 11:56:04 UTC, jdrewsen wrote:
AutoConnect sounds like a command to connection automatically
which might be confusing since that is no
yes
On 12/17/11 1:36 PM, dsimcha wrote:
The time has come to vote on the inclusion of Jonas Drewsen's CURL
wrapper in Phobos.
Code: https://github.com/jcd/phobos/blob/curl-wrapper/etc/curl.d
Docs: http://freeze.steamwinter.com/D/web/phobos/etc_curl.html
For those of you on Windows, a libcurl bina
On 12/17/11 1:22 PM, Adam Wilson wrote:
I know DLL's are relatively new to D so not much documentation exists
about how they work in D. I think this would be something good to
document, especially the special behaviors for Windows. I have to admit
that, coming from a C# and C++ background, I've b
Yes
On 12/2/11 10:26 PM, dsimcha wrote:
I volunteered ages ago to manage the review for the second round of
Jonas Drewsen's CURL wrapper. After the first round it was decided that,
after a large number of minor issues were fixed, a second round would be
necessary.
Significant open issues:
1. Should
On Saturday, 17 December 2011 at 20:38:46 UTC, Jakob Ovrum wrote:
On Saturday, 17 December 2011 at 11:56:04 UTC, jdrewsen wrote:
AutoConnect sounds like a command to connection automatically
which might be confusing since that is not what it does.
Therefore I went with AutoConnection which I st
On Thursday, 15 December 2011 at 08:51:29 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
Line# 235 is identical to line# 239. Shouldn't line# 235 be
creating an Http object, not an Ftp object? That mistake
definitely makes it look like download hasn't been properly
tested.
It has been tested as you can see by
The time has come to vote on the inclusion of Jonas Drewsen's CURL
wrapper in Phobos.
yes.
On 2011-12-17 22:36:15 +0300, dsimcha said:
The time has come to vote on the inclusion of Jonas Drewsen's CURL
wrapper in Phobos.
Code: https://github.com/jcd/phobos/blob/curl-wrapper/etc/curl.d
Docs: http://freeze.steamwinter.com/D/web/phobos/etc_curl.html
For those of you on Windows, a li
On Saturday, 17 December 2011 at 21:02:58 UTC, so wrote:
On Sat, 17 Dec 2011 21:20:33 +0200, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 12/17/11 6:34 AM, so wrote:
If you are using singleton in your C++/D (or any other M-P
language)
code, do yourself a favor and trash that book you learned it
from.
---
On Sat, 17 Dec 2011 21:20:33 +0200, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 12/17/11 6:34 AM, so wrote:
If you are using singleton in your C++/D (or any other M-P language)
code, do yourself a favor and trash that book you learned it from.
---
class A {
static A make();
}
class B;
B makeB();
---
What
On Saturday, 17 December 2011 at 11:56:04 UTC, jdrewsen wrote:
AutoConnect sounds like a command to connection automatically
which might be confusing since that is not what it does.
Therefore I went with AutoConnection which I still believe is
better.
How about something completely different
The docs for onReceiveHeader,
http://freeze.steamwinter.com/D/web/phobos/etc_curl.html#onReceiveHeader
explicitly says that the const string parameters are not valid
after the function returns. This is all well and good; but a
minor improvement would be to change the signature to:
@property
On 12/17/2011 11:22 AM, Adam Wilson wrote:
On Sat, 17 Dec 2011 01:33:33 -0800, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 12/16/2011 9:01 PM, Adam Wilson wrote:
On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 01:34:32 -0800, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 12/14/2011 11:41 AM, Adam Wilson wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I want to start this conversat
On 12/17/2011 4:56 AM, Robert Clipsham wrote:
> On 17/12/2011 06:40, Brad Roberts wrote:
>> On 12/16/2011 1:29 PM, Brad Anderson wrote:
>>> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Brad
>>> Robertsmailto:bra...@puremagic.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Left to do:
>>>
>>> 1) deploy changes to the tes
On 12/17/2011 2:36 PM, dsimcha wrote:
The time has come to vote on the inclusion of Jonas Drewsen's CURL
wrapper in Phobos.
Code: https://github.com/jcd/phobos/blob/curl-wrapper/etc/curl.d
Docs: http://freeze.steamwinter.com/D/web/phobos/etc_curl.html
For those of you on Windows, a libcurl bi
The time has come to vote on the inclusion of Jonas Drewsen's CURL
wrapper in Phobos.
Code: https://github.com/jcd/phobos/blob/curl-wrapper/etc/curl.d
Docs: http://freeze.steamwinter.com/D/web/phobos/etc_curl.html
For those of you on Windows, a libcurl binary built by DMC is available
at htt
On Sat, 17 Dec 2011 11:14:51 -0800, torhu wrote:
On 17.12.2011 19:05, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
Windows still ships with edit, which has more features than notepad.
Heheh.
cmd.exe /c edit
Makes me wonder what it's for, can you run a Windows server without the
GUI?
Starting with Windows S
On Sat, 17 Dec 2011 01:33:33 -0800, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 12/16/2011 9:01 PM, Adam Wilson wrote:
On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 01:34:32 -0800, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 12/14/2011 11:41 AM, Adam Wilson wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I want to start this conversation by pointing out that I come from a
On 12/17/11 6:34 AM, so wrote:
If you are using singleton in your C++/D (or any other M-P language)
code, do yourself a favor and trash that book you learned it from.
---
class A {
static A make();
}
class B;
B makeB();
---
What A.make can do makeB can not? (Other than creating objects of two
On 17.12.2011 18:21, Bane wrote:
Trass3r Wrote:
> DOS software can be more productive, since it's often keyboard-only.
How is that different from a Windows console app?
No Solitare, Facebook... much more productive!
Most likely they're running the DOS app in a window in Windows, but
th
On Thursday, 15 December 2011 at 08:16:52 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
That would be great. ATM, I just create dumb function in the
global namespace and thoses functions forward to the function
within the namespace.
That is what I do as well, but when I have thousands functions to
add it takes time.
On Friday, 16 December 2011 at 00:44:07 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
I hadn't planned to, but it's a good idea. I suggest adding it
as an enhancement request on bugzilla.
I will do as you suggested. Thanks Walter.
On 17.12.2011 19:05, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
Windows still ships with edit, which has more features than notepad. Heheh.
cmd.exe /c edit
Makes me wonder what it's for, can you run a Windows server without the GUI?
Le 17/12/2011 02:39, Andrei Alexandrescu a écrit :
On 12/16/11 6:54 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
By contrast, we could have a simple feature that was explained in the
documenation along with static constructors which made it easy to tell
the
compiler that the order doesn't matter - either by sayi
Le 16/12/2011 22:45, Andrei Alexandrescu a écrit :
> On 12/16/11 3:38 PM, Trass3r wrote:
>> A related issue is phobos being an intermodule dependency monster.
>> A simple hello world pulls in almost 30 modules!
>> And std.stdio is supposed to be just a simple wrapper around C FILE.
>
> In fact it
Le 17/12/2011 00:18, maarten van damme a écrit :
> how did other languages solve this issue? I can't imagine D beeing the
> only language with static constructors, do they have that problem too?
AFAIK, I believe like in D, it's best practice to avoid static
constructors as much as possible in Java
Windows still ships with edit, which has more features than notepad. Heheh.
cmd.exe /c edit
Trass3r Wrote:
> > DOS software can be more productive, since it's often keyboard-only.
>
> How is that different from a Windows console app?
No Solitare, Facebook... much more productive!
On 17.12.2011 17:59, torhu wrote:
On 17.12.2011 16:37, Trass3r wrote:
DOS software can be more productive, since it's often keyboard-only.
How is that different from a Windows console app?
From an interface point of view, it's basically the same thing. They
both support character graphi
On 17.12.2011 16:37, Trass3r wrote:
DOS software can be more productive, since it's often keyboard-only.
How is that different from a Windows console app?
From an interface point of view, it's basically the same thing. They
both support character graphics (like ncurses). Internally, they
On 12/17/11 1:56 AM, Andrew Wiley wrote:
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 1:47 AM, Andrew Wiley wrote:
I was looking through Jonathan Davis's pull request to remove static
constructors from std.datetime, and I realized that I don't know
whether Double Checked Locking is legal under D's memory model, and
== Quote from jdrewsen (jdrew...@nospam.com)'s article
> On Thursday, 15 December 2011 at 07:46:56 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
> wrote:
...
> > I'd argue that the acronyms should be in all caps if
> > camelcasing would require that the first letter of the acronym
> > be capitalized and all lower case if
== Quote from jdrewsen (jdrew...@nospam.com)'s article
> On Thursday, 15 December 2011 at 07:46:56 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
> wrote:
...
> > I'd argue that the acronyms should be in all caps if
> > camelcasing would require that the first letter of the acronym
> > be capitalized and all lower case if
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 5:56 AM, jdrewsen wrote:
> On Thursday, 15 December 2011 at 07:46:56 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>
>>
>>> ...
>
> I'd argue that the acronyms should be in all caps if camelcasing would
>> require that the first letter of the acronym be capitalized and all lower
>> case
DOS software can be more productive, since it's often keyboard-only.
How is that different from a Windows console app?
No. The most efficient thing would be to use core.atomic atomicLoad!msync.acq()
for the read and atomicStore!msync.rel() for the write. Use a temporary to
construct the instance, etc. I think Andrei outlined the proper approach in a
series of articles a while back.
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec
On 17/12/2011 06:40, Brad Roberts wrote:
On 12/16/2011 1:29 PM, Brad Anderson wrote:
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Brad
Robertsmailto:bra...@puremagic.com>> wrote:
Left to do:
1) deploy changes to the tester hosts (it's on 2 already)
done
2) finish the ui
very ugly
On Sat, 17 Dec 2011 01:50:51 +0200, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Friday, December 16, 2011 17:13:49 Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Maybe there's an issue with the design. Maybe Singleton (the most damned
of all patterns) is not the best choice here. Or maybe the use of an
inheritance hierarchy wit
On 17.12.2011 04:26, Trass3r wrote:
My girlfriend is interviewing for a job at a major government company
here in Norway, and was told that she'd need to use DOS at work. Likely
some ancient software that no-one's ever wanted to try and upgrade.
What is wrong with this world? ;)
DOS softwa
On Thursday, 15 December 2011 at 07:46:56 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Friday, December 02, 2011 23:26:10 dsimcha wrote:
I volunteered ages ago to manage the review for the second
round of
Jonas Drewsen's CURL wrapper. After the first round it was
decided
that, after a large number of minor
Walter:
> > x = x++;
>
> Define order of evaluation as rvalue, then lvalue.
So I presume your desire is to define the semantics of all code like that, and
statically refuse no cases like that. This is an acceptable solution.
The advantage of this solution is that it gives no restrictions on th
Bernard Helyer Wrote:
> We intend to be compatible with DMD to a point. Where we are not,
> will be through omission. Off the top of my head:
>
> *delete will not be implemented.
> *scope classes will not be implemented.
> *complex numbers will not be implemented.
> *version/debug levels will no
On 12/17/2011 2:04 AM, Kagamin wrote:
The back end will evaluate them in different orders, as it is more efficient
to evaluate varargs functions from right-to-left, and others from
left-to-right. It's not an insurmountable problem, it just needs to be worked
on.
Are you taking about push vs mo
The back end will evaluate them in different orders, as it is
more efficient to evaluate varargs functions from
right-to-left, and others from left-to-right. It's not an
insurmountable problem, it just needs to be worked on.
Are you taking about push vs mov? By default gcc preallocates
space
On 12/16/2011 9:01 PM, Adam Wilson wrote:
On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 01:34:32 -0800, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 12/14/2011 11:41 AM, Adam Wilson wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I want to start this conversation by pointing out that I come from a C/C++/C#
background and my ideas and frustrations in this post wi
91 matches
Mail list logo
