Considering the rate at which bugs are being discovered and fixed, would it
be possible to shorten the release cycle, say, every 2-3 weeks instead of
1-2 months?
2012/1/2 Adam D. Ruppe destructiona...@gmail.com
On Monday, 2 January 2012 at 01:14:43 UTC, Mail Mantis wrote:
If I undestood you correctly...
Potentially, yes, But, from syntactical point of view, is there any [...]
On 02-01-2012 06:25, Gou Lingfeng wrote:
D's definitions of is and == have so much redundency. That might
indicate some flaw. If references and values (for classes and arrays)
could be clearly distinguished in the syntax, the is operator is not
necessary at all.
Of course it is. 'is' is
On 02-01-2012 01:15, Sean Cavanaugh wrote:
On 12/29/2011 10:16 AM, Trass3r wrote:
On Thursday, 29 December 2011 at 16:00:47 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Thursday, 29 December 2011 at 15:58:55 UTC, Trass3r wrote:
What's the stance on using C++11 features in the dmd source code in
the
Hi,
in 2's complement the value T.min is special because its inverse is
itself. I'm using std.math.abs which computes the inverse using the
unary operator -. That's why it holds
assert(std.math.abs(int.min) == int.min)
Which is on one hand a bit strange because I'd expect the absolute of a
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1034979
Andrei
On 01/01/2012 10:49 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Sunday, 1 January 2012 at 04:28:45 UTC, bls wrote:
WEB Development is for sure doable in D, reusable Frameworks are
nevertheless AFAIK not available.
What kind of features did you have in mind for this?
Hi Adam,
first of all: A happy and
On 01/01/2012 07:02 AM, Steve Teale wrote:
On Sat, 31 Dec 2011 20:28:43 -0800, bls wrote:
Not yet available. In case that Steve Teale (and he did a dammed
good Job, as well as Piotr) will add std.database this will not change
the situation significantly. 'Cause std.database will contain
On 01/01/2012 12:22 AM, Jimmy Cao wrote:
GUI library for Windows. Pretty easy to use.
... and should be named Forms4D
I definitely like this library. Pretty straight OOP, Each DOTNET Forms
developer will immediately feel at home. New liberal license. Just cool!
On 12/31/2011 09:34 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
to the entire D community!
Andrei
And from France. A successful new year to all of you.
Bjoern
Is there any pattern in the testsuite organization? There are loads of
test[0-9]+. files etc. And folders are only used to group
compilable/runnable...
I honestly wouldn't know where to add or search for a test case.
Hi everybody,
I wanted to ask if there is any specific reason why the name of the
first C function exported from a dll starts with underscore and any
subsequesnt name does not.
Regards,
Martin
Disclaimer: I have already posted this as a subquestion in one D-Learn
thread, but it did not get
On 01/02/2012 08:15 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1034979
Andrei
C will reign supreme forever.
Feedback : - Oh cool, a talking dinosaur :)
Thanks man.
On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 14:06:36 +0100, Martin Drasar dra...@ics.muni.cz
wrote:
Hi everybody,
I wanted to ask if there is any specific reason why the name of the
first C function exported from a dll starts with underscore and any
subsequesnt name does not.
Regards,
Martin
Disclaimer: I
I think this is a linker bug:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3956
A workaround is to list the names in the linker definition file.
On 02.01.2012 14:06, Martin Drasar wrote:
Hi everybody,
I wanted to ask if there is any specific reason why the name of the
first C function
I think that I'll defer the support for runtime loading of shared library
(plugins)
in favor of getting linked shared library support done now.
There are several issues that require more thoughts.
- Per-thread initialization of modules is somewhat tricky.
Doing it in Runtime.loadLibrary
On 2012-01-02 20:20, Martin Nowak wrote:
I think that I'll defer the support for runtime loading of shared
library (plugins)
in favor of getting linked shared library support done now.
There are several issues that require more thoughts.
- Per-thread initialization of modules is somewhat
I'm a day late, but Happy Hangover Day!
maarten van damme maartenvd1...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:mailman.1985.1325157846.24802.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
I think it would be an object oriented language, I'm a believer in the
string theory :)
I heard on the Science Channel that M-theory was becoming favored over
string
On Thursday, December 29, 2011 12:23:47 maarten van damme wrote:
I think it would be an object oriented language, I'm a believer in the
string theory :)
Well, if you want to discuss string theory...
http://xkcd.com/171/
http://xkcd.com/397/
:)
- Jonathan M Davis
Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote in message
news:jdilar$k66$1...@digitalmars.com...
On 12/29/11 2:29 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 12/29/2011 11:47 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 12/29/2011 3:19 AM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
I'd like to invite you to translate Daniel Vik's C
Maybe it's just me but I really miss SuperDan ... respective all his
incarnations.
SuperDanification is indeed not a piece of cake.
I think we could see this as Natural language to DSL translation problem
Which could lead us, (being positive this year) to a programming
paradigm not yet
On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 20:38:50 +0100, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
On 2012-01-02 20:20, Martin Nowak wrote:
I think that I'll defer the support for runtime loading of shared
library (plugins)
in favor of getting linked shared library support done now.
There are several issues that require
On Thu, 29 Dec 2011 21:08:29 +0100, FeepingCreature
default_357-l...@yahoo.de wrote:
On 12/29/11 19:27, Walter Bright wrote:
On 12/29/2011 2:15 AM, Caligo wrote:
If there is a God (I'm not saying there
isn't, and I'm not saying there is), what language would he choose to
create the
Dne 2.1.2012 19:52, Martin Nowak napsal(a):
Do you mean exported by dmd?
AFAIK on Windows cdecl function names are prefixed with an underscore.
Yes, dmd v2.057
This code:
import std.c.windows.windows;
import core.sys.windows.dll;
export extern (C) void fn1() {}
export extern (C) void fn2()
Dne 2.1.2012 20:02, Rainer Schuetze napsal(a):
I think this is a linker bug:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3956
A workaround is to list the names in the linker definition file.
Hi, thanks for the answer. It really looks like that bug...
Am I the only one who regularly has
Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch wrote in message
news:jdlbpq$2b7e$1...@digitalmars.com...
What the template 'X' currently achieves is an improvement in syntax:
string generated = foo!\~x~\(\~bar(y)~\);
Ewww, who in the world uses double-quote strings for code containing quotes?
That's not a
On 01/02/2012 11:07 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Timon Gehrtimon.g...@gmx.ch wrote in message
news:jdlbpq$2b7e$1...@digitalmars.com...
What the template 'X' currently achieves is an improvement in syntax:
string generated = foo!\~x~\(\~bar(y)~\);
Ewww, who in the world uses double-quote
On 01/02/2012 09:00 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
maarten van dammemaartenvd1...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:mailman.1985.1325157846.24802.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
I think it would be an object oriented language, I'm a believer in the
string theory :)
I heard on the Science Channel
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch wrote:
On 01/02/2012 09:00 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
maarten van dammemaartenvd1...@gmail.com** wrote in message
news:mailman.1985.1325157846.**24802.digitalmars-d@puremagic.**com...
I think it would be an object oriented
Just found this:
http://pastebin.com/XPHS845M
Andrei
Just found this:
https://github.com/he-the-great/d.vim
On 1/1/2012 7:02 AM, Steve Teale wrote:
Even being retired does not mean there's nothing else to do but D library
components.
Steve,
Happy New Year!
Now get back to work! g
On 1/2/2012 9:58 AM, Trass3r wrote:
Is there any pattern in the testsuite organization?
No.
There are loads of
test[0-9]+. files etc. And folders are only used to group compilable/runnable...
I honestly wouldn't know where to add or search for a test case.
It doesn't really matter where
On 12/31/2011 9:34 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
to the entire D community!
New Zealand
Tanzania
Japan
Russia
France
U.S.
D is taking over zee vorld!!! Mua-hah-ha-ha!
On 1/1/2012 8:02 AM, Don wrote:
Just one or two more merged pull requests would have pushed Walter below 50%.
Awesome.
KIRK: I’m losing command. I’m losing the Enterprise. The ship is sailing on and
on. I’m alone. Alone. Alone. I’m losing command.
On Sun, 1 Jan 2012, Don wrote:
On 01.01.2012 09:40, Caligo wrote:
Top 10 Authors:
Walter Bright1440 (50.07%)
Don Clugston541 (18.81%)
Brad Roberts402 (13.98%)
k-hara221 (7.68%)
Daniel Murphy70 (2.43%)
dawg63 (2.19%)
KennyTM~29 (1.01%)
Shahid19 (0.66%)
David Nadlinger19
I just built both 32 64 bit DMD.
The 32 bit works fine, but the 64 bit not.
I always get this:
/usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible
/home/anta40/Digital-Mars/dmd-dev/lib64/libphobos2.a when searching for
-lphobos2
Every time I build 64 bit phobos, I always make sure that it is the 64
bit dmd that
On Sat, 24 Dec 2011 01:45:56 +0100, Łukasz Wrzosek wrote:
writefln should be replaced with writeln and it works on d2 too.
D1 does not have a writeln function:
http://digitalmars.com/d/1.0/phobos/std_stdio.html
On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 21:29:26 +0700, Andre Tampubolon wrote:
I just successfully built dmd, druntime, and phobos from the git tree.
Later I tried using this command to build a simple D program, and
failed: ~/Digital-Mars/dmd/src/dmd -I~/Digital-Mars/druntime/import
-I~/DigitalMars/phobos
Premake has good support for cross compilation - Which makes it possible to
use it to build executables for game consoles for instance. CMake can't
really do this (with some ugly hacks you can get close). On the other hand
Premake doesn't handle installation on a Linux/BSD system really at all -
On Mon, 2012-01-02 at 13:18 +0100, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
On 02-01-2012 06:25, Gou Lingfeng wrote:
D's definitions of is and == have so much redundency. That might
indicate some flaw. If references and values (for classes and arrays)
could be clearly distinguished in the syntax, the is
On 01/03/2012 06:10 AM, Gou Lingfeng wrote:
On Mon, 2012-01-02 at 13:18 +0100, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
On 02-01-2012 06:25, Gou Lingfeng wrote:
D's definitions of is and == have so much redundency. That might
indicate some flaw. If references and values (for classes and arrays)
could be
On 01/03/2012 12:10 AM, Gou Lingfeng wrote:
On Mon, 2012-01-02 at 13:18 +0100, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
On 02-01-2012 06:25, Gou Lingfeng wrote:
D's definitions of is and == have so much redundency. That might
indicate some flaw. If references and values (for classes and arrays)
could be
On Tue, 2012-01-03 at 06:43 +0100, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 01/03/2012 06:10 AM, Gou Lingfeng wrote:
On Mon, 2012-01-02 at 13:18 +0100, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
On 02-01-2012 06:25, Gou Lingfeng wrote:
D's definitions of is and == have so much redundency. That might
indicate some flaw. If
and I'm pretty sure there is no garbage collector included in gods
language :p
Are you sure? There is good evidence he strongly prefers gc's. Consider
almost all insects; consider dung beetles specifically. Consider super
novas, gravity and accretion disks. Consider Disney and the Circle of
On 2012-01-02 21:57, Martin Nowak wrote:
Then also unload all this when the library is unloaded.
It seems that libraries can't be unloaded deterministically,
because GC finalization still references them.
Could you elaborate this, I guess I'm not really familiar with the GC
finalization.
On 2012-01-02 21:57, Martin Nowak wrote:
On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 20:38:50 +0100, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
On 2012-01-02 20:20, Martin Nowak wrote:
I think that I'll defer the support for runtime loading of shared
library (plugins)
in favor of getting linked shared library support done
On Tue, 3 Jan 2012 14:37:36 +1000
Danni Coy danni@gmail.com wrote:
Premake has good support for cross compilation - Which makes it
possible to use it to build executables for game consoles for
instance. CMake can't really do this (with some ugly hacks you can
On the other hand Premake
On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 23:29:17 +0100
Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch wrote:
God cannot be omnipotent. If he was, he could invent a task he cannot
solve.
Wrong. He is not static, but dynamic, so He can invent a task he cannot
solve, but in the next moment he can solve it. ;)
Sincerely,
Gour
--
On 01/03/2012 08:26 AM, Gour wrote:
On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 23:29:17 +0100
Timon Gehrtimon.g...@gmx.ch wrote:
God cannot be omnipotent. If he was, he could invent a task he cannot
solve.
Wrong. He is not static, but dynamic, so He can invent a task he cannot
solve, but in the next moment he can
On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 08:31:33 +0100
Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch wrote:
I meant he can invent a task he will never be able to solve. ;)
Nah...those are just side-effects, iow. noise. :-D
Sincerely,
Gour
--
But those who, out of envy, disregard these teachings and do not
follow them are to
Is it possible for the autotester to allow downloading the latest build
that passed testing?
Is it possible to create a template turning any value into a lvalue?
This would be helpful if a function expects a reference but you dont
need the result of the change:
///decode(S)(in S str, ref size_t index);
auto c = std.utf.decode(some_string, lval!0);
On 01/02/2012 03:02 PM, Joshua Reusch wrote:
Is it possible to create a template turning any value into a lvalue?
This would be helpful if a function expects a reference but you dont
need the result of the change:
///decode(S)(in S str, ref size_t index);
auto c = std.utf.decode(some_string,
On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 15:02:30 +0100, Joshua Reusch yos...@arkandos.de
wrote:
Is it possible to create a template turning any value into a lvalue?
This would be helpful if a function expects a reference but you dont
need the result of the change:
///decode(S)(in S str, ref size_t index);
Am 02.01.2012 22:13, schrieb Simen Kjærås:
On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 15:02:30 +0100, Joshua Reusch yos...@arkandos.de
wrote:
Is it possible to create a template turning any value into a lvalue?
This would be helpful if a function expects a reference but you dont
need the result of the change:
auto r = new int[][5];
this is ok
auto r = new int[][];
this is not ok
Error: new can only create structs, dynamic arrays or class objects
, not int[][]'s
why?
On 01/02/2012 11:04 PM, RenatoL wrote:
auto r = new int[][5];
this is ok
auto r = new int[][];
this is not ok
Error: new can only create structs, dynamic arrays or class objects
, not int[][]'s
why?
What would you expect the code to do?
What you are trying to achieve is similar to:
class
Just curious... the answer of the compiler it's a bit unclear to
me...
T[] is a dynamic array of type T.
T[][] is a dynamic array of T[]. But this doesn't work. Why?
On 01/02/2012 11:21 PM, RenatoL wrote:
Just curious... the answer of the compiler it's a bit unclear to
me...
T[] is a dynamic array of type T.
T[][] is a dynamic array of T[]. But this doesn't work. Why?
It does work. Why do you think it does not?
T[] a; // ok
T[][] b;
Am 02.01.2012 23:33, schrieb Timon Gehr:
On 01/02/2012 11:21 PM, RenatoL wrote:
Just curious... the answer of the compiler it's a bit unclear to
me...
T[] is a dynamic array of type T.
T[][] is a dynamic array of T[]. But this doesn't work. Why?
It does work. Why do you think it does not?
I have:
auto r = new int[][];
Error: new can only create structs, dynamic arrays or class objects
, not int[][]'s
while
auto r = new int[][3];
is ok.
On 01/03/2012 12:03 AM, RenatoL wrote:
I have:
auto r = new int[][];
Error: new can only create structs, dynamic arrays or class objects
, not int[][]'s
while
auto r = new int[][3];
is ok.
new int[][3] is an alternate form of new int[][](3); new int[][3]
allocates an int[][] with 3
On 01/03/2012 12:02 AM, Mafi wrote:
Am 02.01.2012 23:33, schrieb Timon Gehr:
On 01/02/2012 11:21 PM, RenatoL wrote:
Just curious... the answer of the compiler it's a bit unclear to
me...
T[] is a dynamic array of type T.
T[][] is a dynamic array of T[]. But this doesn't work. Why?
It does
On 3 January 2012 00:27, Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch wrote:
On 01/03/2012 12:03 AM, RenatoL wrote:
I have:
auto r = new int[][];
Error: new can only create structs, dynamic arrays or class objects
, not int[][]'s
while
auto r = new int[][3];
is ok.
new int[][3] is an alternate
RenatoL wrote:
Error: new can only create structs,
dynamic arrays or class objects, not int[][]'s
There is an error in the error message:
new can only create _static_ arrays.
-manfred
On Monday, January 02, 2012 23:49:36 Manfred Nowak wrote:
RenatoL wrote:
Error: new can only create structs,
dynamic arrays or class objects, not int[][]'s
There is an error in the error message:
new can only create _static_ arrays.
Um no. new is used for creating _dynamic_ arrays, not
On 01/03/2012 12:46 AM, Matej Nanut wrote:
On 3 January 2012 00:27, Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch
mailto:timon.g...@gmx.ch wrote:
On 01/03/2012 12:03 AM, RenatoL wrote:
I have:
auto r = new int[][];
Error: new can only create structs, dynamic arrays or class
Thank you both.
I've created a D DLL [http://dlang.org/dll.html], then I've loaded it from a C
program [compiled with dmc].
However, I'd want to be able to call it from a C program compiled with MSVC,
and I got a link error - unresolved external symbol [link testdll.obj
/implib:mydll.lib
Jonathan M Davis wrote:
new is used for creating _dynamic_ arrays, not static arrays.
Correct, my fault. I meant something like statically initialized dynamic,
because `new' currently needs an `uint' number to allocate some space for
the elements of the outermost array.
The posting shows,
On 1/3/2012 10:02 AM, DNewbie wrote:
Thank you both.
I've created a D DLL [http://dlang.org/dll.html], then I've loaded it from a C
program [compiled with dmc].
However, I'd want to be able to call it from a C program compiled with MSVC,
and I got a link error - unresolved external symbol
Maybe I'm wrong, but IIRC objconv won't work on import libs.
But there are other ways to do it: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/131313
Resolved.
Thanks everyone.
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012, at 04:49 AM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
Maybe I'm wrong, but IIRC objconv won't work on import libs.
But there are other ways to do it: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/131313
--
D
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7106
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7120
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #1
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7174
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch, rejects-valid
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7196
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch, rejects-valid
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4976
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7196
Stewart Gordon s...@iname.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||s...@iname.com
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7196
--- Comment #3 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2012-01-02 03:19:13 PST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
This is strange - issue 52 is marked as fixed, so why does it still EVER pick
the wrong instance?
This problem is only when the caller of
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7073
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch, rejects-valid
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4349
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7198
Summary: Delegate literals with nameless arguments fail to
infer a type
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7198
--- Comment #1 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2012-01-02 05:35:59 PST ---
I guess the trouble is that the delegate argument Widget is interpreted as a
parameter name, not the type. Using int instead of Widget compiles.
Yes, you're right.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7198
Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d...@me.com
--- Comment
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7199
Summary: std.string.indexof cannot be compiled with -inline
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords: rejects-valid
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7198
--- Comment #6 from Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de 2012-01-02 07:44:36
PST ---
Ok, I understand.
There are already a number of situation where the decision Type/Variable is
deferred to the semantic phase. Would it be possible to do the
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7198
--- Comment #7 from Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com 2012-01-02 09:09:00 PST ---
(In reply to comment #5)
(In reply to comment #4)
(In reply to comment #3)
(I don't actually know why we have unnamed parameters at all; most modern
languages
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7200
Summary: Array append causes Access Violation with symbolic
debug info
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7201
Summary: Lambda template assignment to variable
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7202
Summary: Hole in type system still present for delegates
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Keywords: accepts-invalid
Severity:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7196
--- Comment #4 from timon.g...@gmx.ch 2012-01-02 11:47:18 PST ---
(In reply to comment #3)
(In reply to comment #2)
This is strange - issue 52 is marked as fixed, so why does it still EVER
pick
the wrong instance?
This problem is
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5813
--- Comment #15 from Rob Jacques sandf...@jhu.edu 2012-01-02 12:02:40 PST ---
Vladimir, the code in
https://github.com/CyberShadow/ae/blob/master/utils/appender.d
seems to be under the MPL, which isn't Phobos compatible. What license is the
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5813
--- Comment #16 from Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com 2012-01-02
12:10:18 PST ---
(In reply to comment #15)
Vladimir, the code in
https://github.com/CyberShadow/ae/blob/master/utils/appender.d
seems to be under the MPL, which
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7203
Summary: Method pointer types differ depending on context
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7204
Summary: [CTFE] Assertion failure when attempting to access
function pointer of delegate
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5813
--- Comment #17 from Rob Jacques sandf...@jhu.edu 2012-01-02 13:16:19 PST ---
That said, I did write a faster
chained appender for your benchmarks; however I did this by initializing the
appender with a page of memory, which definitely
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5813
--- Comment #18 from Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com 2012-01-02
13:32:01 PST ---
(In reply to comment #17)
For part 1 (fastest possible 'chained' appender): Simply construct specifying
a
large number of elements. i.e.
auto app
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7205
Summary: Function attribute inference fails in case of mutual
dependencies
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity:
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
