On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 18:40:20 +0100
Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
DStep is currently used only for automatically generating bindings
for C functions and Objective-C classes and methods.
OK. Thank you.
But it depends what code I output, I could change dstep to output
code that uses CWrap.
On 15.02.2012 05:47, Walter Bright wrote:
Anyone care to count up the number of bug fixes here?
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.073.zip
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote in message
news:ji1dfl$17ha$1...@digitalmars.com...
http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-6-The-D-Episode-with-Walter-Bright-and-Andrei-Alexandrescu
Sounds like I should finish my extern(C++) branch...
Le 22/02/2012 13:58, Daniel Murphy a écrit :
Walter Brightnewshou...@digitalmars.com wrote in message
news:ji1dfl$17ha$1...@digitalmars.com...
http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-6-The-D-Episode-with-Walter-Bright-and-Andrei-Alexandrescu
Sounds like I should finish my
On 21/02/2012 00:53, James Miller wrote:
snip
There are a potentially infinite number of possible configurations,
and sites need to be aimed at the lowest-common denominator. Doesn't
look right with an enlarged font size? Tough.
snip
Try saying that in court when you're sued for disability
On 21/02/2012 11:43, James Miller wrote:
snip
Its more, if you are using a font with a massive difference in size,
then obviously things aren't going to look right. However, if a
website require pixel-perfect rendering, then it isn't going to work
anyway once it hits a platform that isn't the
Stewart Gordon smjg_1...@yahoo.com wrote in message
news:ji31ut$172j$1...@digitalmars.com...
On 21/02/2012 11:43, James Miller wrote:
snip
Its more, if you are using a font with a massive difference in size,
then obviously things aren't going to look right. However, if a
website require
Le 20/02/2012 08:12, Ali Çehreli a écrit :
I have continued working on the book.
1) Translated the Parallelism chapter:
http://ddili.org/ders/d.en/parallelism.html
2) Translated more chapters from the beginning of the book:
* Redirecting Standard Input and Output Streams
* Files
* auto and
On 02/22/2012 08:15 AM, deadalnix wrote:
http://ddili.org/ders/d.en/index.html
Kindle and Lulu versions will follow later.
Ali
This book is awesome ! I really think it. This is what D needs.
Thank you very much for the kind words. I know where it needs more work
and keep making it
20.02.2012 19:34, Gour пишет:
On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 18:02:49 +0400
Denis Shelomovskijverylonglogin@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Denis,
D has complete (IMHO) compiler support for calling C functions (using
extern(C)). But there is a lack of library support.
I'm glad you're working on (another)
22.02.2012 13:41, Gour пишет:
That would be nice and make the whole job of binding C functions and
providing customized D API easier...and let's not forget about extra
points for coordinating work. ;)
I'm open for emails about using/changing/fixing CWrap.
On 2012-02-22 19:59, Denis Shelomovskij wrote:
22.02.2012 13:41, Gour пишет:
That would be nice and make the whole job of binding C functions and
providing customized D API easier...and let's not forget about extra
points for coordinating work. ;)
I'm open for emails about
On Wednesday, 22 February 2012 at 15:26:45 UTC, Stewart Gordon
wrote:
Try saying that in court when you're sued for disability
discrimination.
Tch... God damn America.
On Wednesday, 22 February 2012 at 15:34:54 UTC, Stewart Gordon
wrote:
Pricing isn't set yet, nor has a web site been set up yet, this is just a heads
up to reserve the dates on your calendar, and start thinking about that
presentation you want to do!
The general idea is:
Wed evening - meet greet at the Banker's Suite
Thu-Fri - presentations at the Banker's
Good news!
I plan to travel abroad :)
Masahiro
On Wednesday, 22 February 2012 at 22:07:26 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
Pricing isn't set yet, nor has a web site been set up yet, this
is just a heads up to reserve the dates on your calendar, and
start thinking about that presentation you want
On Tuesday, 14 February 2012 at 22:13:42 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Tuesday, 14 February 2012 at 22:00:06 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
http://forum.dlang.org/
This should replace the old miserable web interface to the
forums.
Thanks to Vladimir Panteleev for an awesome job writing this!
On 2/22/2012 5:31 PM, Masahiro Nakagawa wrote:
Good news!
I plan to travel abroad :)
It'll be great to see everyone in 3D land!
On Wednesday, 22 February 2012 at 02:16:31 UTC, Caligo wrote:
I thought GDC was going to be part of GCC 4.7, but Andrei in
the video
said 4.8. That's another year, :-(
Didn`t have it ready for 4.7 so the work is planned for 4.8, but
still not certain.
On 2012-02-22 08:33, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Wednesday, February 22, 2012 08:22:21 Jacob Carlborg wrote:
Now I'm completely lost. According to what I've read this is thread this
is exactly what you want to do, put the formatting inside the exceptions.
No. He wants to provide a way for an
On 22 February 2012 03:31, Juan Manuel Cabo juanmanuel.c...@gmail.comwrote:
On 02/21/2012 10:13 PM, Sean Kelly wrote:
I think this is actually a good thing, since working with unsigned
integers is a pain.
Yes, I would prefer that msb bit to be the sign too, but behavior might
depend on it,
Hello!
We're considering what would be the optimal way way to resolve
object-relational impedance mismatch problem in our application which
we would like to write using D language.
Considering it's planned to be multi-platform desktop GUI app and have
extensive research capabilities available
Le 22/02/2012 08:32, H. S. Teoh a écrit :
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 08:56:03PM +0100, deadalnix wrote:
Le 21/02/2012 20:00, H. S. Teoh a écrit :
[...]
You're right, that would be unnecessary duplication, especially since
an unhandled Condition becomes a thrown Exception anyway, and it's a
very
Le 21/02/2012 20:01, H. S. Teoh a écrit :
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 07:57:37PM +0100, deadalnix wrote:
Le 21/02/2012 03:33, Robert Jacques a écrit :
[...]
Aren't __traits and opDispatch fun?
opDispatch is nice, but rather incomplete. It doesn't handle template
methods for example.
Does RTTI
Le 22/02/2012 06:47, H. S. Teoh a écrit :
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 07:43:32PM -0500, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, February 21, 2012 14:15:03 Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I thought I was pushing the generics angle, and OO people explained
it to me that that was wrong.
I've changed my
I have wrote a ini parser it can use bidirectional range
example of ini file able to parse:
___
[sectionA]
param1=value1
param2=value2
[[subSectionA]]
param1sub=value1sub
[sectionB]
param3=value3
; I am a comment
param4=value4
On 2012-02-22 07:41:21 +, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com said:
void foo (T) () {}
void main ()
{
foo!(int);
foo!(char);
}
$ dmd -inline -O -release main.d
$ nm main | grep foo
000112b8 T _D4main10__T3fooTaZ3fooFZv
000112b0 T _D4main10__T3fooTiZ3fooFZv
Outputs two
On 2/22/12 1:22 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
Now I'm completely lost. According to what I've read this is thread this
is exactly what you want to do, put the formatting inside the exceptions.
No, just have exceptions inform an external formatter.
Andrei
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 21:51:34 -0600, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
On 2/21/12 6:11 PM, Robert Jacques wrote:
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 09:12:57 -0600, Adam D. Ruppe
destructiona...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, 21 February 2012 at 02:33:15 UTC, Robert Jacques
wrote:
Nope.
Le 19/02/2012 21:19, bearophile a écrit :
A belated comment on the GoingNative 2012 talk Defending C++ fom Murphy's Million
Monkeys by Chandler Carruth:
http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/GoingNative/GoingNative-2012/Clang-Defending-C-from-Murphy-s-Million-Monkeys
The slides:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 6:32 PM, deadalnix deadal...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 21/02/2012 00:23, Andrei Alexandrescu a écrit :
On 2/20/12 4:44 PM, Juan Manuel Cabo wrote:
HAhaha, it sometimes feel as though people are afraid that the
Variant[string]
idea is to never use plain old variables and
On 22/02/2012 02:23, Walter Bright wrote:
snip
The C99 Standard sez:
The types are ptrdiff_t which is the signed integer type of the result of
subtracting two
pointers; size_t which is the unsigned integer type of the result of the sizeof
operator;
And what does it say about what type the
update (minor)
I have do a pull request here:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/449
On 22/02/2012 07:24, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-02-22 06:24, Walter Bright wrote:
On 2/21/2012 2:11 PM, Stewart Gordon wrote:
snip
Are we going to have c_long_long as well?
Probably.
Wouldn't that always be a long in D? Or is it the same as with long in C.
long in D is 64 bits.
long
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 11:18:13AM +0100, deadalnix wrote:
Le 21/02/2012 20:01, H. S. Teoh a écrit :
[...]
Does RTTI handle template methods?
I'm not aware of any language that have both template and RTTI. So I'm
clueless about this.
Doesn't C++ have RTTI?
T
--
The number you have
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 08:53:06AM +0100, Paulo Pinto wrote:
[...]
This has been changing in the last years since Microsoft introduced
Powershell and due to market pressure created headless versions of
Windows.
Wow. Headless Windows? Can it even be called Windows anymore? :)
T
--
IBM =
On Wednesday, 22 February 2012 at 14:27:18 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
Le 19/02/2012 21:19, bearophile a écrit :
A belated comment on the GoingNative 2012 talk Defending C++
fom Murphy's Million Monkeys by Chandler Carruth:
On 22/02/12 06:16, Walter Bright wrote:
On 2/21/2012 6:07 PM, Juan Manuel Cabo wrote:
16bit intel had 16bit segments and offsets, so memory was segmented
and you couldn't address more than 64kb at a time.
So you couldn't have grabbed^H^Hallocated more than 64kb in real
mode in intel
in a single
On 22 February 2012 17:16, Stewart Gordon smjg_1...@yahoo.com wrote:
On 22/02/2012 07:24, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-02-22 06:24, Walter Bright wrote:
On 2/21/2012 2:11 PM, Stewart Gordon wrote:
snip
Are we going to have c_long_long as well?
Probably.
Wouldn't that always be a
On 22 February 2012 17:39, Don Clugston d...@nospam.com wrote:
On 22/02/12 06:16, Walter Bright wrote:
On 2/21/2012 6:07 PM, Juan Manuel Cabo wrote:
16bit intel had 16bit segments and offsets, so memory was segmented
and you couldn't address more than 64kb at a time.
So you couldn't have
On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 06:06:19 -, Daniel Murphy
yebbl...@nospamgmail.com wrote:
I agree, and I doubt it was intentional.
if (arr) should mean if (arr.length arr.ptr)
But since you can only get (arr.length != 0 arr.ptr == null) when
doing
unsafe things with arrays, I think it's
Le 22/02/2012 16:33, H. S. Teoh a écrit :
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 11:18:13AM +0100, deadalnix wrote:
Le 21/02/2012 20:01, H. S. Teoh a écrit :
[...]
Does RTTI handle template methods?
I'm not aware of any language that have both template and RTTI. So I'm
clueless about this.
Doesn't C++
H. S. Teoh hst...@quickfur.ath.cx wrote in message
news:mailman.860.1329924869.20196.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 08:53:06AM +0100, Paulo Pinto wrote:
[...]
This has been changing in the last years since Microsoft introduced
Powershell and due to market pressure
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 14:19:17 -, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
On 2/21/12 5:55 AM, Regan Heath wrote:
On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 23:04:59 -, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
On 2/19/12 4:00 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Seriously, how is
The overhead of creating pull requests was getting to me, so I've
written a little script to make it easier:
https://gist.github.com/1885859
This script does three things:
1) Pushes the current branch to your GitHub fork
2) Sets the default remote for the branch, so that you can just
type
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 11:08:41AM -0500, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
H. S. Teoh hst...@quickfur.ath.cx wrote in message
news:mailman.860.1329924869.20196.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 08:53:06AM +0100, Paulo Pinto wrote:
[...]
This has been changing in the last years
On Wednesday, February 22, 2012 08:19:38 Robert Jacques wrote:
To Variant? Yes, definitely. To Appender? I don't think so. There is an
slight change in API behavior necessitated by performance considerations,
but I don't think it warrants a review by the community at large.
Specifically,
On 2012-02-22 13:53, Michel Fortin wrote:
On 2012-02-22 07:41:21 +, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com said:
void foo (T) () {}
void main ()
{
foo!(int);
foo!(char);
}
$ dmd -inline -O -release main.d
$ nm main | grep foo
000112b8 T _D4main10__T3fooTaZ3fooFZv
000112b0 T
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 06:32:14PM +0100, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
[...]
1. The example is correct, you can call a method without parentheses
[...]
This is not directly related, but isn't calling methods without
parentheses deprecated, unless it's marked @property? I thought we will
soon enforce
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 11:53:39AM +0100, deadalnix wrote:
[...]
Additionnaly, I would mention that the transient isn't a caracteristic
of the Exception, but of the recovery strategy.
Technically correct. Though I'm playing with the idea of making recovery
strategies a property of an exception
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 11:14:11AM +0100, deadalnix wrote:
Le 22/02/2012 08:32, H. S. Teoh a écrit :
[...]
I have an idea. What if handlers took *two* arguments, a Condition,
and a (possibly derived) Exception object? The raise system would
then match conditions to handlers by both the
Vladimir Panteleev vladi...@thecybershadow.net wrote in message
news:hvwkhrqbzbeeqhewm...@forum.dlang.org...
The overhead of creating pull requests was getting to me, so I've written
a little script to make it easier:
https://gist.github.com/1885859
This script does three things:
1)
Regan Heath:
I too am unsettled by the conflation of null and empty
- and argued against it on several occasions, but hey, too late now I
suspect.
It's not too much late.
Bye,
bearophile
On Wednesday, 22 February 2012 at 16:51:14 UTC, Vladimir
Panteleev wrote:
The overhead of creating pull requests was getting to me, so
I've written a little script to make it easier:
https://gist.github.com/1885859
Personally, I use »hub« as a wrapper for Git all the time:
On Wed, 22 Feb 2012 11:33:57 -0600, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com
wrote:
On Wednesday, February 22, 2012 08:19:38 Robert Jacques wrote:
To Variant? Yes, definitely. To Appender? I don't think so. There is an
slight change in API behavior necessitated by performance
considerations,
H. S. Teoh hst...@quickfur.ath.cx wrote in message
news:mailman.865.1329932055.20196.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 11:08:41AM -0500, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
H. S. Teoh hst...@quickfur.ath.cx wrote in message
David Nadlinger s...@klickverbot.at wrote in message
news:ziirmcwpgshvrymge...@forum.dlang.org...
On Wednesday, 22 February 2012 at 16:51:14 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
The overhead of creating pull requests was getting to me, so I've written
a little script to make it easier:
On Wednesday, 22 February 2012 at 17:34:16 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On a more serious note, this is perhaps a proof that it's not a
good
idea to conflate the OS with the GUI. :) But then I'm just being
pedantic.
Do you wanna say modern hardware still can't run GUI system?
On 2012-02-22 17:32:14 +, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com said:
On 2012-02-22 13:53, Michel Fortin wrote:
On 2012-02-22 07:41:21 +, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com said:
void foo (T) () {}
void main ()
{
foo!(int);
foo!(char);
}
$ dmd -inline -O -release main.d
$ nm main | grep foo
On 2/22/2012 8:51 AM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
The overhead of creating pull requests was getting to me, so I've written a
little script to make it easier:
https://gist.github.com/1885859
This script does three things:
1) Pushes the current branch to your GitHub fork
2) Sets the
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Nick Sabalausky a@a.a wrote:
David Nadlinger s...@klickverbot.at wrote in message
news:ziirmcwpgshvrymge...@forum.dlang.org...
On Wednesday, 22 February 2012 at 16:51:14 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
The overhead of creating pull requests was getting to
Application spec is one thing, ORM spec is another.
On Wednesday, 22 February 2012 at 18:10:24 UTC, David Nadlinger
wrote:
On Wednesday, 22 February 2012 at 16:51:14 UTC, Vladimir
Panteleev wrote:
The overhead of creating pull requests was getting to me, so
I've written a little script to make it easier:
https://gist.github.com/1885859
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 07:36:24PM +0100, Kagamin wrote:
On Wednesday, 22 February 2012 at 17:34:16 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On a more serious note, this is perhaps a proof that it's not a good
idea to conflate the OS with the GUI. :) But then I'm just being
pedantic.
Do you wanna say modern
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 01:13:24PM -0500, bearophile wrote:
Regan Heath:
I too am unsettled by the conflation of null and empty
- and argued against it on several occasions, but hey, too late now I
suspect.
It's not too much late.
[...]
I agree.
Conflating null and empty has been
As I'm not satisfied with the current GC D has and don't see the
situation improving in the future without significant changes to the
compiler I wrote the following document that points out all the possible
issues with garbage collection I could think of and possible solutions
for them. This
On Friday, 17 February 2012 at 06:25:49 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
But who am I to speak out against more than four decades of
historical
accidents, right? I think I'll shut up now.
Can you forgive me a little investigation? I heard similar
proposals and wonder where they come from. What do you
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 07:57:31PM +0100, Kagamin wrote:
On Friday, 17 February 2012 at 06:25:49 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
But who am I to speak out against more than four decades of
historical accidents, right? I think I'll shut up now.
Can you forgive me a little investigation? I heard
On Wednesday, February 22, 2012 12:16:43 Robert Jacques wrote:
There's a big difference between sealed and not accessible. .data's API
requires exposing an array, and there's no way to do this without leaking
memory like a sieve in one way or another. However, if all you need is to
iterate the
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 07:56:15PM +0100, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
As I'm not satisfied with the current GC D has and don't see the
situation improving in the future without significant changes to the
compiler I wrote the following document that points out all the
possible issues with garbage
On Wednesday, 22 February 2012 at 19:04:55 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Wait, which proposal? To replace and || with 'and' and 'or'?
Or my slightly extreme rant about replacing '==' with '=' and
'=' with
':=', amongst other things?
Well, it's hard to explain. Proposals like python's semantic
Am 22.02.2012 20:40, schrieb H. S. Teoh:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 07:56:15PM +0100, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
As I'm not satisfied with the current GC D has and don't see the
situation improving in the future without significant changes to the
compiler I wrote the following document that points out
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 08:35:21PM +0100, Kagamin wrote:
On Wednesday, 22 February 2012 at 19:04:55 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Wait, which proposal? To replace and || with 'and' and 'or'?
Or my slightly extreme rant about replacing '==' with '=' and '='
with ':=', amongst other things?
Well,
On 2012-02-22 19:39, Michel Fortin wrote:
On 2012-02-22 17:32:14 +, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com said:
On 2012-02-22 13:53, Michel Fortin wrote:
On 2012-02-22 07:41:21 +, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com said:
void foo (T) () {}
void main ()
{
foo!(int);
foo!(char);
}
$ dmd -inline -O
On 2012-02-22 15:01, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 2/22/12 1:22 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
Now I'm completely lost. According to what I've read this is thread this
is exactly what you want to do, put the formatting inside the exceptions.
No, just have exceptions inform an external formatter.
On 2012-02-22 18:40, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 06:32:14PM +0100, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
[...]
1. The example is correct, you can call a method without parentheses
[...]
This is not directly related, but isn't calling methods without
parentheses deprecated, unless it's marked
On 22.02.2012 22:56, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
As I'm not satisfied with the current GC D has and don't see the
situation improving in the future without significant changes to the
compiler I wrote the following document that points out all the possible
issues with garbage collection I could think
On 23.02.2012 0:03, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
On 22.02.2012 22:56, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
As I'm not satisfied with the current GC D has and don't see the
situation improving in the future without significant changes to the
compiler I wrote the following document that points out all the possible
On Wednesday, February 22, 2012 14:12:07 Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Wednesday, February 22, 2012 12:16:43 Robert Jacques wrote:
There's a big difference between sealed and not accessible. .data's API
requires exposing an array, and there's no way to do this without leaking
memory like a
On Wed, 22 Feb 2012 13:12:07 -0600, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com
wrote:
On Wednesday, February 22, 2012 12:16:43 Robert Jacques wrote:
There's a big difference between sealed and not accessible. .data's API
requires exposing an array, and there's no way to do this without
leaking
On Wed, 22 Feb 2012 19:46:59 +0100
Kagamin s...@here.lot wrote:
Application spec is one thing, ORM spec is another.
Sure. Considering that there are no ORM for D, afaik, I'm interested
what would be wise to do in D, in a genaral case when one has relational
data model:
a) usee OOP in D and try
Le 22/02/2012 18:50, H. S. Teoh a écrit :
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 11:53:39AM +0100, deadalnix wrote:
[...]
Additionnaly, I would mention that the transient isn't a caracteristic
of the Exception, but of the recovery strategy.
Technically correct. Though I'm playing with the idea of making
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 08:53:45PM +0100, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
Am 22.02.2012 20:40, schrieb H. S. Teoh:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 07:56:15PM +0100, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
As I'm not satisfied with the current GC D has and don't see the
situation improving in the future without significant
On Wednesday, February 22, 2012 14:24:49 Robert Jacques wrote:
I view appender's purpose as array building, which is slightly different
from simply speeding up array appending. Simply put, an array is a
terrible data structure for building arrays. But, I can appreciate the
need for mutation
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 07:56:15PM +0100, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
[...]
2) Tracking references on the stack:
The D compiler always needs to emit a full stack frame so that the
GC can walk up the stack at any time in the program. The stack frame
of every function generated by the D compiler
A discussion on the Mono-D IRC channel just made me realise
something.
dmd -c foo/a.d bar/a.d
The second module overwrites the first. This makes using 'pass
everything at once' with Mono-D (IDE plugin)
difficult/impossible. As far as I'm concerned, it's just a bug
that's never come up.
On Wednesday, 22 February 2012 at 21:33:36 UTC, Bernard Helyer
wrote:
dmd -c foo/a.d bar/a.d
The second module overwrites the first.
-oq, anyone? ;)
David
On Wednesday, 22 February 2012 at 21:36:10 UTC, David Nadlinger
wrote:
-oq, anyone? ;)
Whoops, forgot the link:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/563.
David
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 12:03:59AM +0400, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
[...]
7) Compiler Options
Each of the above mentioned groups of features should be exposed as
compiler options so that you can turn them on/off depending on which
type of GC you use. Default on/off states for these features
On Wednesday, February 22, 2012 22:33:35 Bernard Helyer wrote:
A discussion on the Mono-D IRC channel just made me realise
something.
dmd -c foo/a.d bar/a.d
The second module overwrites the first. This makes using 'pass
everything at once' with Mono-D (IDE plugin)
difficult/impossible.
It does not serve any purpose to insist on closely similar
notations.
So let's make '+' be '$' and '-' be '+'? My point wasn't that
mathematical equations are identical to sequential code
statements, but that they should, as much as possible, attempt to
stay inline. It's all about how
On Wednesday, 22 February 2012 at 22:05:51 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
Then what happens when you have
dmc -c foo/a.d foo_a.d
Good point.
Regardless, I really wouldn't like the idea of screwing with
the object file
names to try and avoid collisions.
Well, the thing is in this case
On Wed, 22 Feb 2012, David Nadlinger wrote:
On Wednesday, 22 February 2012 at 21:36:10 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
-oq, anyone? ;)
Whoops, forgot the link:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/563.
David
If only one of the attempts to implement that option actually
On Wednesday, February 22, 2012 23:33:57 Bernard Helyer wrote:
On Wednesday, 22 February 2012 at 22:05:51 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
Then what happens when you have
dmc -c foo/a.d foo_a.d
Good point.
Regardless, I really wouldn't like the idea of screwing with
the object file
On Wednesday, 22 February 2012 at 22:44:15 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Wednesday, February 22, 2012 23:33:57 Bernard Helyer wrote:
On Wednesday, 22 February 2012 at 22:05:51 UTC, Jonathan M
Davis
wrote:
Then what happens when you have
dmc -c foo/a.d foo_a.d
Good point.
Regardless,
On Wednesday, February 22, 2012 23:50:53 Bernard Helyer wrote:
Except DMD is faster by a factor of 10 when passing it all at
once.
Then maybe there _should_ be a flag to tell it to use/generate the appropriate
directory structure. You already typically give it an output directory. It
wouldn't
On Wed, 22 Feb 2012 14:17:09 -0600, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com
wrote:
On Wednesday, February 22, 2012 14:12:07 Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Wednesday, February 22, 2012 12:16:43 Robert Jacques wrote:
There's a big difference between sealed and not accessible. .data's
API
requires
On Feb 22, 2012, at 10:56 AM, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
5) pointer / reference changed callback
Every time a pointer / reference is changed the D compiler emits a call into
the runtime and passes the new value of the reference / pointer with it.
void _d_pointerChanged(void *ptr);
D can
No, because the array doesn't actually exist until appender
makes copy.
Will one be able to use the sort!()() algorithm directly on your
appender,
that is, without accessing/creating the underlying array?
--jm
On Wednesday, 22 February 2012 at 20:59:15 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
speed [...] is really its whole point of existance. I don't
know why else you'd ever use appender.
[...]
- Jonathan M Davis
A use case is to give identity to a built-in array.
Consider this:
class MyClass {
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 11:15:35PM +0100, F i L wrote:
It does not serve any purpose to insist on closely similar
notations.
So let's make '+' be '$' and '-' be '+'?
Sounds like an esolang (http://esolangs.org/wiki/Main_Page) :)
Maybe I should invent one. I'll call it EsoD, for Esoteric D
1 - 100 of 224 matches
Mail list logo
