On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 10:48, Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com wrote:
That's one of the caveats on PEG. That and greedy operators.
'a*a' never succeeds because 'a*' consumes all the available a's.
Hey, wait, I thought there has to be backtrack here, i.e. when second 'a'
finally
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 21:03, Andrej Mitrovic
andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
how would one use a parser like Pegged for syntax
highlighting?
Ok, typically one would use a lexer and not a parser. But using a
parser might be more interesting for creating more complex syntax
highlighting.
On 17.03.2012 10:59, Philippe Sigaud wrote:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 10:48, Dmitry Olshanskydmitry.o...@gmail.com wrote:
That's one of the caveats on PEG. That and greedy operators.
'a*a' never succeeds because 'a*' consumes all the available a's.
Hey, wait, I thought there has to be
On Monday, 20 February 2012 at 01:49:04 UTC, Juan Manuel Cabo
wrote:
I thought I could do a better effort to describe why DUnit is
so extraordinary,
for a native language, especially for those unfamiliar with
xUnit frameworks
This is great stuff, thanks !
Anyway, I'm not fond of your
On 17.03.2012 08:01, Philippe Sigaud wrote:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 21:03, Andrej Mitrovic
andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
how would one use a parser like Pegged for syntax
highlighting?
Ok, typically one would use a lexer and not a parser. But using a
parser might be more interesting for
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 10:09, Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, let's agree on fact that semantically
a* is :
As - a As / a
and a*? is this:
As - a / a As
Now that's local ;)
It's local, yes. But the pb is with Expr - A* B C D, when D fails.
PEG sequences don't
On 17.03.2012 15:13, Philippe Sigaud wrote:
The D grammar is a 1000-line / hundreds of rules monster. I finished
writing it and am now crushing bugs.
Any ETA when u gonna commit it for the public ? Wouldn't mind getting my
hands dirty on it and looking for bugs too ;)
On 17.03.2012 18:11, Philippe Sigaud wrote:
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 10:09, Dmitry Olshanskydmitry.o...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, let's agree on fact that semantically
a* is :
As- a As / a
and a*? is this:
As- a / a As
Now that's local ;)
It's local, yes. But the pb is with Expr- A* B C D,
On 2012-03-16 19:32, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 14:24:38 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Just got the acceptance message. This is great news!
If you consider being a mentor, please apply as described in
http://dlang.org/gsoc2012.html.
On 3/17/12 9:13 AM, Philippe Sigaud wrote:
I want to use Pegged for that purpose. So go ahead an commit the D grammar
;)
Would be so awesome if Pegged would be able to parse D.
~Extrawurst
The D grammar is a 1000-line / hundreds of rules monster. I finished
writing it and am now crushing
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 15:48, Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com wrote:
PEG sequences don't backtrack.
I'd argue they do. As I see it as:
Expr - As B C D / B C D
As - A / A As
That's what people doing Regex-to-PEG translations do, yes. But it's
not the spontaneous behavior of A* B C D
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 15:44, Extrawurst s...@extrawurst.org wrote:
On 17.03.2012 15:13, Philippe Sigaud wrote:
The D grammar is a 1000-line / hundreds of rules monster. I finished
writing it and am now crushing bugs.
Any ETA when u gonna commit it for the public ? Wouldn't mind getting my
Hi D friends.
I'd like to share with you a little tool. It allows you to execute SQL
statements in your MySQL database.
It displays the data in a nice data grid widget written by David Hillard.
I hope you like it.
Link
http://my.opera.com/run3/blog/2012/03/17/mysql-tool
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 18:11, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
The D grammar is a 1000-line / hundreds of rules monster. I finished
writing it and am now crushing bugs.
God, that generates a 10_000 line module to parse it. I should
simplify the code generator
On 03/17/2012 01:53 PM, Philippe Sigaud wrote:
Does anyone have experience with other languages similar to D and that
offer AST-walking? Doesn't C# have something like this?
(I'll have a look at Scala macros)
Hi Philippe.
Of course the visitor pattern comes in mind.
Eclipse (Java) uses a
This is still alive:
https://github.com/adamdruppe/dmd/tree/dtojs
Merging in DMD changes as they happen has been fairly
easy, so we have things like UFCS in there.
I'm pretty happy with the core setup, though it still
isn't finished. Enough of the D language works like
you expect that you can
On 3/17/12 3:53 PM, Philippe Sigaud wrote:
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 18:11, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
The D grammar is a 1000-line / hundreds of rules monster. I finished
writing it and am now crushing bugs.
God, that generates a 10_000 line module to parse it. I
On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 02:29:26 +0100
Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry for the long wait. Turns out I was *extremely* wrong about this.
Generating the D side turned out to be a hell of a lot more work then
I initially thought (mostly due to C++ and D type incompatibilities
On 16/03/12 13:24, Kevin Cox wrote:
On Mar 16, 2012 7:45 AM, Alex Rønne Petersen xtzgzo...@gmail.com
mailto:xtzgzo...@gmail.com wrote
I don't see any reason why c couldn't point to element number 3 of b,
and have its length set to 3...
--
- Alex
And the previous examples were
In the Phobos documentation for std.format:
[O]utput is sent do this writer. Typical output writers include
std.array.Appender!string and std.stdio.BlockingTextWriter.
std.stdio doesn't have a BlockingTextWriter but it does have a
LockingTextWriter.
Typo? Name change? BlockingTextWriter is
On 03/16/2012 06:29 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
So, stay tight! Good times ahead.:)
Incredible good news! Thanks.
One of the very first wxD applications could be a GUI for the generator.
Am Fri, 16 Mar 2012 14:37:43 -0700
schrieb Sean Kelly s...@invisibleduck.org:
On Mar 16, 2012, at 2:19 PM, Johannes Pfau wrote:
Am Fri, 16 Mar 2012 12:08:01 -0700
schrieb Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com:
On 3/16/2012 7:53 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Just found this, has
On 17 March 2012 02:53, Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/17/12, Kapps opantm2+s...@gmail.com wrote:
@WebForm(Account);
@PostTo(Services/CreateAccount)
@SecureOnly(true)
struct CreateAccountForm {
That kind of turns D from a structural to a declarative language. :p
I think Walter and Andrei are both right, just about different things.
I think Walter is right that there is no such thing as a default
implementation when it comes to compatibility with the host environment,
and asserting is the best course of action.
I think Andrei is right that when a
There a different tools for rewriting code out there. Maybe you
can get some inspiration by there syntax.
Examples are:
TXL (www.txl.ca)
Domain Maintenance System (www.semdesigns.com)
Raincode (www.raincode.com)
where the last one probably isn't worth the look.
What we're talking about here is subject-oriented programming: having
the attributes get enclosed into objects, rather then objects
enclosing attributes. And this is extremely useful, IMO.
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Manu turkey...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 March 2012 02:53, Andrej Mitrovic
On Mar 17, 2012, at 1:25 AM, Johannes Pfau nos...@example.com wrote:
Am Fri, 16 Mar 2012 14:37:43 -0700
schrieb Sean Kelly s...@invisibleduck.org:
On Mar 16, 2012, at 2:19 PM, Johannes Pfau wrote:
Am Fri, 16 Mar 2012 12:08:01 -0700
schrieb Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com:
On
Pretty much. I'd expect to see:
version (linux) {
// optimized impl
} else version (OSX) {
version = UseDefault;
} else {
static assert(false, unknown platform);
}
version (UseDefault) {
...
}
This way, new platforms have to be evaluated, but once they are they can all
share
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 02:07:04PM -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
[...]
Aha! This is one of those cases in which built-in magic smells of
putrid beef soup.
[...]
It gets worse than we first thought:
void f1(dstring x) { dstring y = x; }
void f2()(dstring x) { dstring y = x;
Le 15/03/2012 21:20, FeepingCreature a écrit :
On 03/15/12 16:16, Kagamin wrote:
Does it recover from
void function() f=null;
f();
Not as currently written, no. It should be possible to detect this case and get
a proper stackframe back, though.
It is supported as written in my sample
On 2012-03-16 14:35, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On the ride over here today, I had a thought that
I think neatly solves the user defined attribute
question.
I would love to have user defined attributes in D but I'm not completely
like your approach. I would go with something more like Java
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 7:10 AM, Sean Kelly s...@invisibleduck.org wrote:
Pretty much. I'd expect to see:
version (linux) {
// optimized impl
} else version (OSX) {
version = UseDefault;
Speaking of version specification, in this particular example is
version(UseDefault) only define
On 3/17/12 2:29 AM, Paul D. Anderson wrote:
In the Phobos documentation for std.format:
[O]utput is sent do this writer. Typical output writers include
std.array.Appender!string and std.stdio.BlockingTextWriter.
std.stdio doesn't have a BlockingTextWriter but it does have a
LockingTextWriter.
On 3/17/12 9:10 AM, Sean Kelly wrote:
Pretty much. I'd expect to see:
version (linux) {
// optimized impl
} else version (OSX) {
version = UseDefault;
} else {
static assert(false, unknown platform);
}
version (UseDefault) {
...
}
Taking this to its logical conclusion
On 2012-03-17 04:34, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 3/17/12, Brad Andersone...@gnuk.net wrote:
Could the wxc generator be be used as a base for building bindings for
other libraries?
I hope it will be. It's kind of crazy that the first thing I'm using
it on is a huge library like wxD, this will
Using dmd 2.058 I can compile the following
pure bool has_path(string paths[], string needle) {
paths[0] = bad;
... do something else ...
return false;
}
and change the passed in array paths. Isn't this a violation of
has_path's pure contract? Shouldn't all pure function parameters
In D, pure means it doesn't have any side effects outside
its parameter list.
It can change what you pass in, but nothing else.
Pass it all in, const, or best of all, immutable params
and it can't change anything - that's the pure you're
probably thinking of.
The reason it lets you change
(Sorry if this is the wrong place for this, or if there's already
a thread in existence which would be better. If either of these
is the case, simply point me in the right direction, and I'll be
on my way.)
My first interaction with Templates was about 5 years ago, in a
C++ class at my
On 03/17/2012 09:50 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
This is why a proper compiler is needed, this will not work in the long
run.
Are you aware that doxgen's xml output is based on gcc-xml ?
I think it is necessary to say that doxygen, respective gcc-xml, is
working on stripped and annotated header
On 2012-03-17 18:36, bls wrote:
On 03/17/2012 09:50 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
This is why a proper compiler is needed, this will not work in the long
run.
Are you aware that doxgen's xml output is based on gcc-xml ?
No, I was not aware of that. What is the problem then, doxygen choking
on
On 03/17/2012 10:44 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-03-17 18:36, bls wrote:
On 03/17/2012 09:50 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
This is why a proper compiler is needed, this will not work in the long
run.
Are you aware that doxgen's xml output is based on gcc-xml ?
No, I was not aware of that.
On 03/17/2012 10:44 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
What is the problem then, doxygen choking on the XML or GCC choking on
the include files?
gcc-xml is stalled. Means newer C++ stuff is not supported.
See news...
http://www.gccxml.org/HTML/News.html
On 3/17/12 12:14 PM, Entity325 wrote:
Who's with me? Anybody have a short(but COMPLETE!) example of code that
makes use of Templates that you actually understand what's going on there?
You're on to something here. Then, as usual, from idea to realization
there are quite a few steps.
I took
On 3/17/12 12:02 PM, markusle wrote:
Using dmd 2.058 I can compile the following
pure bool has_path(string paths[], string needle) {
paths[0] = bad;
... do something else ...
return false;
}
and change the passed in array paths. Isn't this a violation of
has_path's pure contract? Shouldn't
On 3/17/2012 9:16 AM, Jose Armando Garcia wrote:
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 7:10 AM, Sean Kellys...@invisibleduck.org wrote:
version (linux) {
// optimized impl
} else version (OSX) {
version = UseDefault;
Speaking of version specification, in this particular example is
On 03/17/2012 10:51 AM, bls wrote:
Are you aware that doxgen's xml output is based on gcc-xml ?
I should be more carefull :( It's another wxWidgets utility that is
using gcc-xml.
On 3/17/2012 10:55 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 3/17/12 12:14 PM, Entity325 wrote:
Who's with me? Anybody have a short(but COMPLETE!) example of code that
makes use of Templates that you actually understand what's going on there?
You're on to something here. Then, as usual, from idea to
On Mar 17, 2012, at 9:43 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
On 3/17/12 9:10 AM, Sean Kelly wrote:
Pretty much. I'd expect to see:
version (linux) {
// optimized impl
} else version (OSX) {
version = UseDefault;
} else {
static assert(false, unknown
On Saturday, 17 March 2012 at 17:59:12 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 3/17/12 12:02 PM, markusle wrote:
Using dmd 2.058 I can compile the following
pure bool has_path(string paths[], string needle) {
paths[0] = bad;
... do something else ...
return false;
}
and change the passed in
Am Sat, 17 Mar 2012 07:04:20 -0700
schrieb Sean Kelly s...@invisibleduck.org:
On Mar 17, 2012, at 1:25 AM, Johannes Pfau nos...@example.com wrote:
Am Fri, 16 Mar 2012 14:37:43 -0700
schrieb Sean Kelly s...@invisibleduck.org:
OSX pre-Lion doesn't support __thread either, so DMD
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 16:45:05 -0500, Manu turkey...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 March 2012 22:39, Robert Jacques sandf...@jhu.edu wrote:
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 08:24:58 -0500, David Nadlinger s...@klickverbot.at
wrote:
On Thursday, 15 March 2012 at 23:32:29 UTC, Robert Jacques wrote:
[snip]
On Saturday, 17 March 2012 at 18:16:31 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
i.e. templates are type parameters.
Maybe in C++. In C++, templates are attached to a class or
function, where as in D, they're an independent construct. The
way I think of it, templates are a tool for building static code
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 21:00:47 +0100, Nick Sabalausky a@a.a wrote:
Martin Nowak d...@dawgfoto.de wrote in message
news:op.wa9r9izqsqugbd@localhost...
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 15:53:45 +0100, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Just found this, has anyone tried dmd or friends on
Maybe you should first try to learn some concepts about generic programming
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generic_programming
You will see this is nothing specific to C++ or D, and almost
all modern languages do have some form of genericity.
If you still cannot understand them, you cold try to
On 17 March 2012 20:42, Robert Jacques sandf...@jhu.edu wrote:
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 16:45:05 -0500, Manu turkey...@gmail.com wrote:
Can you give me an example of a non-simd context where this is the case?
Don't say shaders, because that is supported in hardware, and that's my
point.
Also
On 3/17/12, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
This is why a proper compiler is needed, this will not work in the long run.
The generator doesn't really care which tool you use to extract the
data. It should be possible to use a tool such as LLVM to fill the
structs with all the information it
AFAICS OpenBSD doesn't support TLS (the __thread tls, posix
pthread_getspecific works of course). Can D work at all without TLS
support?
(We have a similar problem with Android, I know for sure TLS isn't
supported there.)
Which is just strange given how little effort is needed to
implement this
On 03/17/2012 10:14 AM, Entity325 wrote:
Who's with me? Anybody have a short(but COMPLETE!) example of code that
makes use of Templates that you actually understand what's going on
there?
The Templates chapter of Programming in D is supposed to be a gentle
introduction to templates:
On 3/16/2012 7:11 AM, Manu wrote:
attribute myAttribute
{
this(int something);
bool bNeedsAttention;
property void refresh(bool bRefresh) { bNeedsAttention = bRefresh; }
}
@myAttribute(10) int thing;
thing.refresh = true;
Under the hood, where would that per-instance data be
On 03/17/2012 12:57 PM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
http://ddili.org/ders/d.en/templates.html
[...]
The chapter also contains a link to Philippe Sigaud's D Templates: A
Tutorial.
Sorry, I did not intend to leave the link to that document out:
On 2012-03-17 20:14:47 +0300, Entity325 said:
Who's with me? Anybody have a short(but COMPLETE!) example of code
that makes use of Templates that you actually understand what's going
on there?
Philippe Sigaud made a very good tutorial on templates in D -
Entity325 lonewolf...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:pgzkvphadihglayfu...@forum.dlang.org...
That is to say, nobody understands how Templates work is because, as was
the case for me, the sum total of explanation we are given on them in
programming class is These are Templates. They exist.
On 3/17/12, Entity325 lonewolf...@gmail.com wrote:
Who's with me? Anybody have a short(but COMPLETE!) example of
code that makes use of Templates that you actually understand
what's going on there?
I wrote this a long time ago when I was just figuring out what
templates were about (it's not a
templates are a tool for building static code from a set of
parameters.
unfortunately (imho), there is no way to see the result code
On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 21:29:18 +0100
Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
I had no idea what templates were when I started using D, and I
thought I would never need to use them either. But now I use them
extensively. They really become a natural tool in programming. They're
so nice
On 2012-03-17 20:20, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 3/17/12, Jacob Carlborgd...@me.com wrote:
This is why a proper compiler is needed, this will not work in the long run.
The generator doesn't really care which tool you use to extract the
data. It should be possible to use a tool such as LLVM to
How it come, that we build another abstartion level above strong
typed language?
Onece we builded high level language above assembler. Are we now
building another more high level? Will temlate will become
another language used as complete language? Will generic
prigramming become mainstream,
Am 17.03.2012 21:20, schrieb Nick Sabalausky:
Entity325lonewolf...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:pgzkvphadihglayfu...@forum.dlang.org...
That is to say, nobody understands how Templates work is because, as was
the case for me, the sum total of explanation we are given on them in
programming
On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 21:56:14 +0100, novice2 so...@noem.ail wrote:
How it come, that we build another abstartion level above strong typed
language?
Onece we builded high level language above assembler. Are we now
building another more high level? Will temlate will become another
language
Am 17.03.2012 21:56, schrieb novice2:
How it come, that we build another abstartion level above strong typed
language?
Onece we builded high level language above assembler. Are we now
building another more high level? Will temlate will become another
language used as complete language? Will
On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 22:16:37 +0100, Paulo Pinto pj...@progtools.org
wrote:
Am 17.03.2012 21:56, schrieb novice2:
How it come, that we build another abstartion level above strong typed
language?
Onece we builded high level language above assembler. Are we now
building another more high level?
On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 21:20:42 +0100, Nick Sabalausky a@a.a wrote:
I've spent a total of about 6 years in college, always got A's and B's in
the CS classes, and yet I'm convinced that programming classes are
completely and utterly useless. Most of the instructors themselves barely
even know how
Am 17.03.2012 22:19, schrieb Simen Kjærås:
On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 22:16:37 +0100, Paulo Pinto pj...@progtools.org
wrote:
Am 17.03.2012 21:56, schrieb novice2:
How it come, that we build another abstartion level above strong typed
language?
Onece we builded high level language above assembler.
On 17 March 2012 21:56, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
On 3/16/2012 7:11 AM, Manu wrote:
attribute myAttribute
{
this(int something);
bool bNeedsAttention;
property void refresh(bool bRefresh) { bNeedsAttention = bRefresh; }
}
@myAttribute(10) int thing;
On 17 March 2012 23:52, Manu turkey...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 March 2012 21:56, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
On 3/16/2012 7:11 AM, Manu wrote:
attribute myAttribute
{
this(int something);
bool bNeedsAttention;
property void refresh(bool bRefresh) {
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 10:13:44PM +0100, Paulo Pinto wrote:
Am 17.03.2012 21:20, schrieb Nick Sabalausky:
[...]
I've spent a total of about 6 years in college, always got A's and
B's in the CS classes, and yet I'm convinced that programming classes
are completely and utterly useless. Most of
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 10:15:26PM +0100, Simen Kjærås wrote:
On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 21:56:14 +0100, novice2 so...@noem.ail wrote:
How it come, that we build another abstartion level above strong
typed language?
Onece we builded high level language above assembler. Are we now
building another
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 09:45:51PM +0100, Gour wrote:
On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 21:29:18 +0100
Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
I had no idea what templates were when I started using D, and I
thought I would never need to use them either. But now I use them
extensively. They
On 17-3-2012 21:20, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Here's a little templates primer, I hope it helps:
[...]
Part of this primer would serve well as introduction
to Phillipe's tutorial, because it skips the basics.
(I knew the basics, but not everybody does.)
Jos
I just started writing an emulator in D for some fun; I needed an
application to case-study aggressive performance characteristics in
hot-loop situations.
I know this has come up time and time again, but I just want to put it out
there again... if I were shipping this product, I would NEED
On 17-03-2012 23:53, Manu wrote:
I just started writing an emulator in D for some fun; I needed an
application to case-study aggressive performance characteristics in
hot-loop situations.
I know this has come up time and time again, but I just want to put it
out there again... if I were shipping
On 3/17/12, Manu turkey...@gmail.com wrote:
I just started writing an emulator in D for some fun
FWIW another dev did this http://code.google.com/p/pspemu/
Wow, popular thread is popular.
Thanks for all the help, everyone. I haven't read all of it, but
I will take the time to sift through everything and see what I
can apply.
Response to some of what I did read:
-I didn't conclude that templates are confusing because they
confused me. I
On 18 March 2012 01:51, Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/17/12, Manu turkey...@gmail.com wrote:
I just started writing an emulator in D for some fun
FWIW another dev did this http://code.google.com/p/pspemu/
Yeah, I've seen that. But it's a PC app, and JITs. Different
On 17/03/2012 16:43, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 3/17/12 9:10 AM, Sean Kelly wrote:
Pretty much. I'd expect to see:
version (linux) {
// optimized impl
} else version (OSX) {
version = UseDefault;
} else {
static assert(false, unknown platform);
}
version (UseDefault) {
...
}
Taking this
H. S. Teoh hst...@quickfur.ath.cx wrote in message
news:mailman.834.1332023905.4860.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
(Not to mention, D templates can do some stuff that no OO can hope to
attain. But it goes both ways. Templates can't do runtime polymorphism
either.)
Combined with compile-time
In truth it would be
else version (Posix)
Anyway, which isn't the bare else Walter was advising against.
On Mar 17, 2012, at 5:10 PM, Alix Pexton alix.dot.pex...@gmail.dot.com wrote:
On 17/03/2012 16:43, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 3/17/12 9:10 AM, Sean Kelly wrote:
Pretty much. I'd
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 08:37:35PM -0400, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
H. S. Teoh hst...@quickfur.ath.cx wrote in message
news:mailman.834.1332023905.4860.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
(Not to mention, D templates can do some stuff that no OO can hope
to attain. But it goes both ways.
Entity325 lonewolf...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:vxadflowsujbbmpnr...@forum.dlang.org...
-While most of my programming professors had a decent idea of what they
were doing, the classes themselves left massive, gaping holes in my
education that I never even realized were there until I
On 3/17/2012 5:40 PM, Sean Kelly wrote:
In truth it would be
else version (Posix)
Anyway, which isn't the bare else Walter was advising against.
And is Posix really predictably compatible across diverse systems?
Simen Kjærås simen.kja...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:op.wbb24i010gp...@biotronic.lan...
On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 21:20:42 +0100, Nick Sabalausky a@a.a wrote:
I've spent a total of about 6 years in college, always got A's and B's in
the CS classes, and yet I'm convinced that programming
On Sunday, 18 March 2012 at 00:53:17 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/17/2012 5:40 PM, Sean Kelly wrote:
In truth it would be
else version (Posix)
Anyway, which isn't the bare else Walter was advising against.
And is Posix really predictably compatible across diverse
systems?
If you
H. S. Teoh hst...@quickfur.ath.cx wrote in message
news:mailman.839.1332031513.4860.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 08:37:35PM -0400, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
H. S. Teoh hst...@quickfur.ath.cx wrote in message
news:mailman.834.1332023905.4860.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
On 3/17/2012 2:55 PM, Manu wrote:
I tend to think of 'struct's as 'passive', and compile-time annotations would
provide me with every use case I can imagine for my own purposes in the case of
structs. classes seem far more likely to need stateful attributes.
I currently find the notion of
novice2 so...@noem.ail wrote in message
news:hzbmfpsyzezjwzshx...@forum.dlang.org...
How it come, that we build another abstartion level above strong typed
language?
Onece we builded high level language above assembler. Are we now building
another more high level? Will temlate will become
The virtual model broken. I've complained about it lots, and people always
say stfu, use 'final:' at the top of your class.
That sounds tolerable in theory, except there's no 'virtual' keyword to
keep the virtual-ness of those 1-2 virtual functions I have... so it's no
good (unless I rearrange my
On 18 March 2012 03:10, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
On 3/17/2012 2:55 PM, Manu wrote:
I tend to think of 'struct's as 'passive', and compile-time annotations
would
provide me with every use case I can imagine for my own purposes in the
case of
structs. classes seem far
On Sunday, 18 March 2012 at 01:23:42 UTC, Manu wrote:
My minimum recommendation: D needs an explicit 'virtual'
keyword, and to
fix that D1 bug, so putting final: at the top of your class
works, and
everything from there works as it should.
Agreed. Final by default is a proposition long gone,
On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 02:23:31 +0100, Manu turkey...@gmail.com wrote:
The virtual model broken. I've complained about it lots, and people
always
say stfu, use 'final:' at the top of your class.
That sounds tolerable in theory, except there's no 'virtual' keyword to
keep the virtual-ness of
On 3/17/2012 6:39 PM, Manu wrote:
I'm sure C# already answers all these questions. It has precisely the same set
of issues associated.
C# doesn't have RAII, immutable, nor the notion of threadlocal/shared types.
1 - 100 of 149 matches
Mail list logo
