On 2012-10-12 01:14, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 10/11/12, Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
https://github.com/AndrejMitrovic/dlibgit
Macros are now recreated, and there is a minimal git client sample
ported from C (it has just a few commands implemented).
Cool, did you
On Thursday, 11 October 2012 at 18:03:18 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
There were still some bugs and inconsistencies with how DMD
handles DDOC
macros. I've uploaded a fixed version, also with syntax
highlighting
enabled in text sections*. std.algorithm for example now also
has its
overview table
Am 10/12/2012 10:52 AM, schrieb Jonas Drewsen:
On Thursday, 11 October 2012 at 18:03:18 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
There were still some bugs and inconsistencies with how DMD handles DDOC
macros. I've uploaded a fixed version, also with syntax highlighting
enabled in text sections*.
On 10/12/12, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
Cool, did you translate the macros manually ?
Yeah I had to do it that way.
On 9/10/12, Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.tarnyko.net/en/?q=node/1
Btw for win32 users, GTK_BASEPATH needs to be set to wherever you've
installed the runtime bundle (e.g. C:\Program Files\GTKRuntime-3.4.2).
Don't let it install with the +- in the path because of an
On 9/9/12, nazriel s...@dzfl.pl wrote:
Anyways, for those who wonder how will Gtk3 apps look at Windows:
http://blogs.gnome.org/alexl/2012/03/27/moar-windows-themes/
Only with theming though, classic mode is not supported (yet).
It does have some visual bugs. Text overflows buttons, the menu
On 10/12/12, Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
Most of these are fixable I guess.
FWIW I've filed these to the GTK bugzilla.
Al 12/10/12 15:38, En/na Andrej Mitrovic ha escrit:
Anyway it's not too shabby. It's great that we have a multiplatform
library that's up to date. Thanks GtkD devs!
You can say it in singular. There is only one active dev in GtkD project. Mike
Wey. Many many thanks to him.
--
Jordi Sayol
On 10/12/12, Jordi Sayol g.sa...@yahoo.es wrote:
You can say it in singular. There is only one active dev in GtkD project.
Mike Wey. Many many thanks to him.
Wow, really? That's both amazing and worrying. We seem to have a lot
of 1-man projects in D. Our bus factor is pretty low :p
On 10/11/12 9:15 PM, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
http://xtzgzorex.wordpress.com/2012/10/11/demystifying-garbage-collectors/
Essentially an explanation of garbage collection for the layman
programmer. Though, it does assume some familiarity with C and memory
management. It's an abstract article
On 10/12/2012 03:24 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 9/10/12, Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.tarnyko.net/en/?q=node/1
Btw for win32 users, GTK_BASEPATH needs to be set to wherever you've
installed the runtime bundle (e.g. C:\Program Files\GTKRuntime-3.4.2).
Don't
On 10/12/2012 04:15 PM, Jordi Sayol wrote:
Al 12/10/12 15:38, En/na Andrej Mitrovic ha escrit:
Anyway it's not too shabby. It's great that we have a multiplatform
library that's up to date. Thanks GtkD devs!
You can say it in singular. There is only one active dev in GtkD project. Mike
Is now in a semi-usable state. Problems remain:
$(LI 80 bit reals are truncated to 64 bits when formatting.)
$(LI Many math functions are not implemented.)
$(LI No symbolic debug info is generated.)
$(LI Cannot catch Win64 structured exception handling
Mike,
On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 22:25 +0200, Mike Wey wrote:
[…]
I do seem to be getting more pull requests lately :)
The GtkD README gives the distinct impression that DSSS is the only way
of building GtkD and any projects using it. However, according to its
own webpage, DSSS is a Dv1 system that
On 2012-10-11 20:19, Michel Fortin wrote:
Most likely, the object objc_msgSend is called on has been deallocated,
which would mean that windowSendEvent is called with a deallocated
NSWindow object as its first argument.
How can I detect that? Can I use the object somehow and try to get the
On 2012-10-11 21:28, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
A lot of it is there already: http://dlang.org/phobos/object.html
I wouldn't count that list. I'm thinking more something that explicitly
says: These are reserved symbols by the language or the runtime.
Creating your own function named
On 2012-10-11 21:38, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
I guess it depends on what you get from clang. The XML I'm working on
has this sort of output:
File id=f3 name=git2/submodule.h/
File id=f4
name=c:/mingw/bin/../lib/gcc/mingw32/4.6.1/../../../../include/inttypes.h/
File id=f39
On 2012-10-12 01:03, Kapps wrote:
In an ideal world, your VS plugin would support Packages in the Add
References dialog. Just like you could, in theory, add a project as a
reference, you would add a package. Then, upon build, the plugin would
call the package manager and get the libraries /
On 2012-10-11 21:45, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Yeah, it was one of the things that convinced me to *not* use Redhat. I
saw a similar thing back in the Bad Old Days of Win98, Win2k, and their
ilk, where installing a driver would sometimes prompt you something to
the effect of this driver needs to
On 2012-10-12 07:46, Paulo Pinto wrote:
This already exists, it is called NuGet.
Again, it's not cross-platform. How well does it work with D, at all?
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 10/10/2012 9:11 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
This is mostly for GC experts out there - what statistics are needed and
useful, yet not too expensive to collect?
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/pull/236
Andrei
What about allocation time? Including/excluding possible
On Friday, October 12, 2012 06:42:23 Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
Anyways, is there a reason you cannot use @disable this() for SysTime?
That way,
you have rather explicitly marked .init as invalid.
Disabling init does a lot to make a type unusable such that it really doesn't
make sense to use it
On Friday, October 12, 2012 07:53:09 monarch_dodra wrote:
Yes, as answered, opAssign may do things to this, such as
dealocate a payload, reduce a ref counter, or who knows what.
A valid point, but it would be easy to explicitly call the invariant at the
beginning of opAssign if wanted to
On 12 October 2012 09:51, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
On 2012-10-12 07:46, Paulo Pinto wrote:
This already exists, it is called NuGet.
Again, it's not cross-platform. How well does it work with D, at all?
That's strictly for Microsoft .NET packages isn't it?
On Friday, 12 October 2012 at 07:36:37 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Friday, October 12, 2012 07:53:09 monarch_dodra wrote:
Yes, as answered, opAssign may do things to this, such as
dealocate a payload, reduce a ref counter, or who knows what.
A valid point, but it would be easy to
On Friday, October 12, 2012 10:09:22 monarch_dodra wrote:
When you declare s void, you are supposed to memcpy .init over it
manually, or call emplace (which does the same thing + more).
If that's what you're supposed to do, it's only because opAssign is annoying
enough to check its invariant.
On Friday, 12 October 2012 at 08:20:42 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Friday, October 12, 2012 10:09:22 monarch_dodra wrote:
If that's what you're supposed to do, it's only because
opAssign is annoying
enough to check its invariant. Without the invariant, that's
not something
that would
On Friday, October 12, 2012 10:29:06 monarch_dodra wrote:
On Friday, 12 October 2012 at 08:20:42 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Friday, October 12, 2012 10:09:22 monarch_dodra wrote:
If that's what you're supposed to do, it's only because
opAssign is annoying
enough to check its
On Friday, 12 October 2012 at 07:39:15 UTC, Manu wrote:
On 12 October 2012 09:51, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
On 2012-10-12 07:46, Paulo Pinto wrote:
This already exists, it is called NuGet.
Again, it's not cross-platform. How well does it work with D,
at all?
That's strictly
On Friday, 12 October 2012 at 06:51:19 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-10-12 07:46, Paulo Pinto wrote:
This already exists, it is called NuGet.
Again, it's not cross-platform. How well does it work with D,
at all?
Fare enough, I got the feeling that the conversation had turned
into
On Friday, 12 October 2012 at 08:34:31 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
Try that code defining S as RefCounted!int and see what
happens.
That just means that the problem goes further than just
invariants. It's still
a big problem for invariants.
- Jonathan M Davis
I appologize, but I don't
On Friday, October 12, 2012 11:31:36 monarch_dodra wrote:
Bask on subject, I _have_ started working with invariants. I
think they are nice, but there indeed some times where you'd wish
they wouldn't trigger.
How about the @noinvariant function attribute? Sounds like a
simple enough
On Friday, 12 October 2012 at 09:42:19 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
That sounds like a decent solution to me, but I think that
there's a good
chance that Walter would reject it on principle (since in
general, skipping
the invariant pretty much defeats the purpose of having one).
But he
On Thursday, 11 October 2012 at 22:50:38 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
So the object that interprets pragma(lib) is able to
communicate with
the object that handles what flags to pass to the linker. :-)
Yes, and pragma(lib) is already supported in LDC.
This is not possible with gdc, as the driver
On 12 October 2012 10:47, David Nadlinger s...@klickverbot.at wrote:
On Thursday, 11 October 2012 at 22:50:38 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
So the object that interprets pragma(lib) is able to communicate with
the object that handles what flags to pass to the linker. :-)
Yes, and pragma(lib) is
Hi,
cedet is a collection of emacs dev tools. I understand that it should be
relatively easy to enhance the emacs support of D if one just provides cedet
with a BNF grammar in a Bison like format, I cite:
You should choose to use the Semantic lexer/grammer format for your language
if it has
mist wrote:
After some gentle preachings I have been asked in my company to
prepare presentation regarding D usage in scope of embedded,
kernel-level development and mobile devices. I am quite starving to
find good project examples for D2 though ( most stuff I am aware of
is D1 ) and do not
I have made some research and found a workaround.
It seems that the problem is somehow related to map.array combination,
but couldn't reproduce it on a simple test case.
Alex Rønne Petterson think to think that it is related to this bug
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8774 (and
I'm also curious if druntime can be made compatible with bionic
because now I have to experiment with using a chrooted linux on my
phone to test some D applications.
On Friday, October 12, 2012 11:49:48 David Nadlinger wrote:
On Friday, 12 October 2012 at 09:42:19 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
That sounds like a decent solution to me, but I think that
there's a good
chance that Walter would reject it on principle (since in
general, skipping
the
1) Do you consider garbage collection to be an issue in embedded
programming?
2) Are you dealing with hard timing constraints where garbage
collection could be an issue?
I would love a copy of your presentation
I think the XOMB
On 2012-10-11 20:19, Michel Fortin wrote:
Most likely, the object objc_msgSend is called on has been deallocated,
which would mean that windowSendEvent is called with a deallocated
NSWindow object as its first argument.
I have done some investigation and I can call other methods on the
Hi,
I can give you three options to choose from.
There's the official grammar (don't know what the form is called):
http://dlang.org/declaration.html
A Parser Expression Grammar (PEG):
https://github.com/PhilippeSigaud/Pegged/blob/master/pegged/examples/dparser.d
The source code comments in
On Friday, 12 October 2012 at 10:58:04 UTC, Jens Mueller wrote:
mist wrote:
After some gentle preachings I have been asked in my company to
prepare presentation regarding D usage in scope of embedded,
kernel-level development and mobile devices. I am quite
starving to
find good project
On Friday, 12 October 2012 at 12:20:16 UTC, Tim Krimm wrote:
1) Do you consider garbage collection to be an issue in
embedded programming?
2) Are you dealing with hard timing constraints where garbage
collection could be an issue?
I would love a copy of your presentation
On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 15:11 +0200, Aziz K. wrote:
Hi,
I can give you three options to choose from.
There's the official grammar (don't know what the form is called):
http://dlang.org/declaration.html
A Parser Expression Grammar (PEG):
On 2012-10-12 12:40:35 +, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com said:
On 2012-10-11 20:19, Michel Fortin wrote:
Most likely, the object objc_msgSend is called on has been deallocated,
which would mean that windowSendEvent is called with a deallocated
NSWindow object as its first argument.
I have
On Friday, 12 October 2012 at 14:41:12 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 15:11 +0200, Aziz K. wrote:
Hi,
I can give you three options to choose from.
There's the official grammar (don't know what the form is
called):
http://dlang.org/declaration.html
A Parser Expression
On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 16:59 +0200, Paulo Pinto wrote:
[…]
My grammar knowledge is a bit rusty, but isn't EBNF only possible
for LR(K) languages?
Mentioning EBNF turns out to be a red herring. Indeed mention of BNF is
a red herring also. What is actually needed is a Wisent grammar file.
On Wednesday, 10 October 2012 at 11:39:29 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
NB: GCC has no such equivalent
hmm... really? Tough it seems like ld parses .drectve section:
http://pastebin.com/mc63b1b1
http://www.ibiblio.org/gferg/ldp/man/man1/dlltool.1.html
And syntax used sort of resembles that of gnu
I've read a few threads discussing tail call elimination, but
they all wanted the spec to articulate specific circumstances
where tail call elimination is required. Has there been any
thought to adding syntax to explicitly state tail call
elimination?
D could use something like Newsqueak's
On 12-10-2012 19:29, Tyler Jameson Little wrote:
I've read a few threads discussing tail call elimination, but they all
wanted the spec to articulate specific circumstances where tail call
elimination is required. Has there been any thought to adding syntax to
explicitly state tail call
On 12-Oct-12 21:29, Tyler Jameson Little wrote:
I've read a few threads discussing tail call elimination, but they all
wanted the spec to articulate specific circumstances where tail call
elimination is required. Has there been any thought to adding syntax to
explicitly state tail call
I'm a big fan of explicit, guaranteed TCE.
However, the primary problem with this approach is a really
mundane one: The major compiler back ends (GCC and LLVM) don't
have any means of guaranteeing TCE...
Ugh... I thought that might be a problem.
I don't know too much about GCC/LLVM, but I
Tyler Jameson Little:
D could use something like Newsqueak's become keyword. If
you're not familial with Newsqueak, become is just like a
return, except it replaces the stack frame with the function
that it calls.
Are you talking about CPS?
No idea what you are talking about.
I'm not sure which part wasn't clear, so I'll try to explain
myself. Please don't feel offended if I clarify things you
already understand.
An optimizable tail call must simply be a function call. The
current stack frame would be replaced with the new
.drective looks to be for functions, not libraries.
Iain Buclaw
*(p e ? p++ : p) = (c 0x0f) + '0';
On 12 Oct 2012 17:31, Kagamin s...@here.lot wrote:
On Wednesday, 10 October 2012 at 11:39:29 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
NB: GCC has no such equivalent
hmm... really? Tough it seems like
On Friday, 12 October 2012 at 18:02:57 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Tyler Jameson Little:
D could use something like Newsqueak's become keyword. If
you're not familial with Newsqueak, become is just like a
return, except it replaces the stack frame with the function
that it calls.
Are you
On 12-Oct-12 22:17, Tyler Jameson Little wrote:
No idea what you are talking about.
I'm not sure which part wasn't clear, so I'll try to explain myself.
Please don't feel offended if I clarify things you already understand.
An optimizable tail call must simply be a function call. The
My mention of overhead was just how complicated it would be to
implement. The general algorithm is (for each become keyword):
* determine max stack size (consider all branches in all
recursive
contexts)
* allocate stack size for top-level function
* do normal TCE stuff (use existing stack for
On 12-Oct-12 22:49, Tyler Jameson Little wrote:
That would work too. If scope() is disallowed, it doesn't matter where
the stack comes from. It's only slightly cheaper to reuse the current
stack (CPU), but making a new one would be lighter on memory.
I see nice staff. My use case is
I was looking in countUntil to fix another issue, and I think the
string support is broken
This program:
//
import std.algorithm;
import std.stdio;
void main()
{
日本語.countUntil('本').writeln();
}
//
Will produce 3.
...
I'd have straight up said it was a bug, but the
On Friday, October 12, 2012 21:02:47 monarch_dodra wrote:
I was looking in countUntil to fix another issue, and I think the
string support is broken
This program:
//
import std.algorithm;
import std.stdio;
void main()
{
日本語.countUntil('本').writeln();
}
//
Will
On Friday, 12 October 2012 at 19:17:13 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Friday, October 12, 2012 21:02:47 monarch_dodra wrote:
I was looking in countUntil to fix another issue, and I think
the
string support is broken
This program:
//
import std.algorithm;
import std.stdio;
void main()
{
Hey, that's dmd (compiler) using a ton of memory, not
std.regex :(
It actually flies with only a modest set of ram after CTFE (or
rather 'if') succeeds that is :)
My bad. Even then, TCE wouldn't hurt.
The main problem I see is working with other compilers like
GCC/LLVM. If
this can be done
Dmitry Olshansky:
Perhaps the biggest one would be convincing GCC/LLVM devs to
accept patches :)
From what I've seen LLVM devs seem open enough to good patches.
They have accepted several changes to allow LLVM to become the
back-end of GHC (Haskell compiler), and generally my enhancement
On Fri, 12 Oct 2012 16:16:10 +0100
Russel Winder rus...@winder.org.uk wrote:
On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 16:59 +0200, Paulo Pinto wrote:
[…]
My grammar knowledge is a bit rusty, but isn't EBNF only possible
for LR(K) languages?
Mentioning EBNF turns out to be a red herring. Indeed mention
It looks to be for arbitrary linker commands.
ps I agree that building should be handled by a build system
and/or a build script.
From COFF spec:
--
The .drectve Section (Object Only)
A section is a “directive” section if it has the
IMAGE_SCN_LNK_INFO flag set in the section header. By convention,
such a section also has the name .drectve. The linker removes a
.drectve section after processing the information, so the
On Friday, 12 October 2012 at 17:39:53 UTC, Alex Rønne Petersen
wrote:
However, the primary problem with this approach is a really
mundane one: The major compiler back ends (GCC and LLVM) don't
have any means of guaranteeing TCE...
LLVM shouldn't be as big a problem – there is some support
On Friday, 12 October 2012 at 08:20:42 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
Really, I think that it's a bad design decision to require that
the invariant be called before opAssign. It does _not_ play
nice with some of D's other features, and the result is likely
to be that invariants get used less,
On Friday, 12 October 2012 at 20:33:11 UTC, Era Scarecrow wrote:
I'll say a @novariant is the better answer, and automatically
used on the default copy/opAssign/postblitz (before the call,
but still needed after).
The language already states that the invariant is only called at
the end of
On Thursday, 11 October 2012 at 07:10:57 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
On 2012-10-11 04:54, Jesse Phillips wrote:
I think it would be much better to work with packages and not
individual libraries. You would just tell the build tool,
compiler or whatever to use package foo. Then the package
Don Clugston:
Many of the things you report are examples of bug 8684. Please
file bug reports for any others you think are important.
I have added some cases here:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8684
Add added a new report:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8807
On 11.10.2012 08:52, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
I didn't have any luck with this in the learn newsgroup so I'm trying here.
I'm trying to debug the Mac OS X port of DWT. Almost as soon as a DWT
application starts to process events I receive a segmentation fault. The
error happens in the objc_msgSend
On Saturday, October 13, 2012 01:58:15 Katayama Hirofumi MZ wrote:
Why doesn't D have toStringz function for UTF-16 encoding?
It does. std.utf.toUTFz will do every combination of char type and constness.
And std.utf.toUTF16z will convert any string to a null-terminated
const(wchar)*.
-
On Saturday, October 13, 2012 01:58:15 Katayama Hirofumi MZ wrote:
Why doesn't D have toStringz function for UTF-16 encoding?
std.utf.toUTFz will do every combination of char type and constness. And
std.utf.toUTF16z will convert any string to a null-terminated const(wchar)*.
- Jonathan M Davis
Thanks.
END OF THREAD
On Friday, 12 October 2012 at 20:23:00 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
On Friday, 12 October 2012 at 17:39:53 UTC, Alex Rønne
Petersen wrote:
However, the primary problem with this approach is a really
mundane one: The major compiler back ends (GCC and LLVM) don't
have any means of guaranteeing
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 05:00:40AM +0200, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 10/13/12, H. S. Teoh hst...@quickfur.ath.cx wrote:
This seems to be a compiler bug to me?
Has to be: http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/89a646b7
OK, filed an issue for it:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8809
T
On 2012-10-11 22:16, Aziz K. wrote:
Interesting, I didn't realize until now that you can do that with git.
Is it possible to set the external git repo to a specific commit? I'll
consider this option. Thanks!
That's the whole point, it's locked to a specific commit and you need to
force
On 2012-10-11 22:16, Aziz K. wrote:
On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 21:33:15 +0200, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
If you're using git you could add Tango as a submodule. I'm talking
about Tango-D2 here, I heard you're porting Dil to D2. It might be
possible for D1 as well using git svn.
On Thursday, 11 October 2012 at 14:26:54 UTC, Dan wrote:
Also, pointers to any doc generation setup with decent styling
that works out of the box would be great.
bootDoc[1] uses Twitter's Bootstrap theme for styling, and has a
lot of extra features implemented with JavaScript. It works right
On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 20:30 -0700, Charles Hixson wrote:
[…]
I'm not clear on what Fibers are. From Ruby they seem to mean
co-routines, and that doesn't have much advantage. But it also seems as
[…]
I think the emerging consensus is that threads allow for pre-emptive
scheduling whereas
or dynamic array with this methods
On Thursday, 11 October 2012 at 18:08:47 UTC, Aziz K. wrote:
I'll be happy to help you compile DIL yourself. That way I can
see where my assumptions are false and my instructions are
lacking and make it work for different platforms and needs.
I've been considering just copying Tango's files to
On Fri, 12 Oct 2012 08:16:54 +0200, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
Why is that? Tango is working just fine and Phobos is still missing some
stuff that Tango has. Actually, I'm using both and there's nothing wrong
with that. Tango is just yet another third party library.
Yeah, no
Chopin wrote:
Hello!
I got this 109 MB json file that I read... and it takes over 32
seconds for parseJSON() to finish it. So I was wondering if it
was a way to save it as binary or something like that so I can
read it super fast?
Thanks for all suggestions :)
Try this implementation:
std.stdio has a nice struct called LockingTextReader in the
source. The thing is it isn't documented at all, and I don't
think it even does its own interface.
It claims to return dchars, but apparently reads bytes.
Its counterpart, LockingTextWriter, seems to do a little more
dchar related
Hi,
Why the `in` expression can only be applied to associative
arrays and cannot be used with static or dynamic arrays as
it is possible with, _e.g._, Python?
The following code is not legal:
int[] a = [1,2,3,4,5];
if (1 in a) { }
Are there any technical explanation for this
On Thursday, October 11, 2012 18:45:36 Rizo Isrof wrote:
Hi,
Why the `in` expression can only be applied to associative
arrays and cannot be used with static or dynamic arrays as
it is possible with, _e.g._, Python?
The following code is not legal:
int[] a = [1,2,3,4,5];
if (1 in
Thanks for answer!
After investigation came to the conclusion that here is needed
not synchronized-based solution. I am need compare-and-swap
single linked list because it will be used in callback proc from
C, and it cannot be throwable, but synchronized contains
throwable _d_monitorenter
Thanks! I tried using it:
auto document = parseJSON(content).array; // this works with
std.json :)
Using json.d from the link:
auto j = JSONReader!string(content);
auto document = j.value.whole.array; // this doesn't Error:
undefined identifier 'array'
Chopin wrote:
Thanks! I tried using it:
auto document = parseJSON(content).array; // this works with std.json :)
Using json.d from the link:
auto j = JSONReader!string(content);
auto document = j.value.whole.array; // this doesn't Error:
undefined identifier 'array'
If you're sure that
On Fri, 12 Oct 2012 13:06:16 -0400, Adam D. Ruppe
destructiona...@gmail.com wrote:
std.stdio has a nice struct called LockingTextReader in the source. The
thing is it isn't documented at all, and I don't think it even does its
own interface.
It claims to return dchars, but apparently
I would be grateful if someone share singly linked list based
on cas()
Ok, this is a good opportunity to learn how to write such by
oneself :-)
Hi,
I am still playing with DGUI library. Besides other things, I would like
to convert enum names from
THIS_STUPID_NAMING_CONVENTION_WHICH_I_ABSOLUTELY_HATE to thisGoodOne.
Obviously I could do this by hand but it is a bit time consuming. Any
tool / hack to help me with this?
Thank
Jonathan M Davis:
Because that would mean than in was O(n), whereas it's
generally assumed to be
at least o(log n) (which is what you'd get in a balanced binary
tree such as
red-black tree). AA's do it in O(1), so they're okay, but
dynamic arrays can't do better than O(n).
Time ago the
On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 21:30:11 +0200, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
I liked the style that the Tango docs are using much better.
What? You don't like my soft, green colours? Shame on you! :P
Ok, I'm not happy with the style myself, but I want to concentrate on
functionality more atm.
On Fri, 12 Oct 2012 19:51:02 +0200, Lubos Pintes lubos.pin...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I am still playing with DGUI library. Besides other things, I would like
to convert enum names from
THIS_STUPID_NAMING_CONVENTION_WHICH_I_ABSOLUTELY_HATE to thisGoodOne.
Obviously I could do this by hand but
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
