On 10/29/2012 06:09 PM, bearophile wrote:
Otherwise you risk creating another Delight
(http://delight.sourceforge.net/ ) that no one uses, it's just a waste
of time for you too.
I'm waiting for the bearD programming language :)
Namespace:
or other suggest other features that they would like
to see in remus. I look forward to suggestions. :)
There is a D problem that in my opinion is worth exploring.
Usually I prefer const/immutable variables/collections, but there
are several different situations where this is
On Thursday, 1 November 2012 at 15:41:26 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Namespace:
or other suggest other features that they would like
to see in remus. I look forward to suggestions. :)
There is a D problem that in my opinion is worth exploring.
Usually I prefer const/immutable
Namespace:
When did you use something like this?
Now and then :-)
In this case you could take a function that assign foo:
Usually in that case I use the module static this. But the point
immutable foo;
void assignFoo() {
string bar, barz; // ...
foo = bar + baz;
}
or not?
On 10/31/12 8:35 PM, Faux Amis wrote:
On 22/10/2012 19:25, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
We're on! For one month starting today, we're raising funding for DConf
2013.
http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/2083649206/the-d-programming-language-conference-2013-0
Please pledge your support and
On 10/31/12 8:35 PM, Faux Amis wrote:
I will pledge 100$ if that would mean videos.
I second that. Many of us won't be able to attend to the
conference due to travel costs and it would be nice if there are
videos.
I see.
My comprehension ATM is, that you want to concatenate two or more
strings at compile time, but this works fine: immutable string
test = abc ~ def;
Because of that it would be greatly helped if you can give me a
concrete example.
On Wednesday, 31 October 2012 at 16:19:01 UTC, Sönke Ludwig
wrote:
Am 31.10.2012 17:11, schrieb Rob T:
On Wednesday, 31 October 2012 at 06:59:45 UTC, Sönke Ludwig
wrote:
Changes:
- New HTML form interface generator similar to the REST
interface
generator that simplifies web front end
On 2012-11-01 19:53, Rob T wrote:
I know that the druntime will not link as-is without a rebuild to enable
PIC, so have you found this to be a problem, not using shared libs, or
have you rebuilt druntime to allow for it?
It's not enough to just recompile druntime. It's missing functionality
On Thursday, 1 November 2012 at 19:23:49 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
On 2012-11-01 19:53, Rob T wrote:
I know that the druntime will not link as-is without a rebuild
to enable
PIC, so have you found this to be a problem, not using shared
libs, or
have you rebuilt druntime to allow for it?
On Thu, 01 Nov 2012 21:29:25 +0100
Rob T r...@ucora.com wrote:
On Thursday, 1 November 2012 at 19:23:49 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
On 2012-11-01 19:53, Rob T wrote:
I know that the druntime will not link as-is without a rebuild
to enable
PIC, so have you found this to be a problem,
On Thu, 01 Nov 2012 19:53:37 +0100
Rob T r...@ucora.com wrote:
I'm also wondering how the co-routines are working out with vibe?
I thought of using them, but my current design will be using
message passing instead, where the code is broken up into small
parts to perform the co-processing.
On 31/10/2012 07:59, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Changes:
- New HTML form interface generator similar to the REST interface
generator that simplifies web front end development:
http://vibed.org/api/vibe.http.form/registerFormInterface
(thanks to Robert Klotzner aka eskimor)
- Diet HTML
On Thu, 01 Nov 2012 23:45:17 +0100
Faux Amis f...@amis.com wrote:
I have very little server exp and the little I have is from node.js
tutorials. I have heard about node.js being used as a game server.
Could vibe.d be used as a multiplayer game server?
And, how (well) does it scale?
Far
On 2012-11-01 06:04, Joshua Niehus wrote:
I'm trying to write up a tutorial for D+vibed and have stumbled on a
pretty basic issue. The DMD installer for OSX fails out of the box on
Lion and Mountain Lion because Apple got rid of their developer command
line tools stuff:
On Wednesday, 31 October 2012 at 23:20:15 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
Le 30/10/2012 20:15, Paulo Pinto a écrit :
Now Build 2012 is happening and the new Windows Phone 8
features have
been revealed.
One of the most interesting is that .NET applications are
actually
compiled to native code as well,
On 2012-11-01 06:38, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
I've got some bindings for Nanopb I'll like to contribute to Deimos:
Original C project: http://koti.kapsi.fi/jpa/nanopb/
My D Bindings: https://github.com/Abscissa/nanopb
You should have a short description of the C project as well.
--
/Jacob
On Thu, 01 Nov 2012 09:07:39 +0100
Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
On 2012-11-01 06:38, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
I've got some bindings for Nanopb I'll like to contribute to Deimos:
Original C project: http://koti.kapsi.fi/jpa/nanopb/
My D Bindings: https://github.com/Abscissa/nanopb
Why pb and exi chose to use little endian to encode numbers, I
wonder. Isn't big endian faster to read?
On Wednesday, 31 October 2012 at 18:40:09 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Wednesday, October 31, 2012 11:37:13 monarch_dodra wrote:
IMO, this makes a clean distinction between both types of
slicing. An added bonus is that (for now) it also correctly
supports finite RA ranges that don't define
On 2012-11-01 11:37, Kagamin wrote:
Why pb and exi chose to use little endian to encode numbers, I wonder.
Isn't big endian faster to read?
Isn't little endian standard when sharing the bytes, i.e. transferring
across networks?
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 01-11-2012 12:59, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-11-01 11:37, Kagamin wrote:
Why pb and exi chose to use little endian to encode numbers, I wonder.
Isn't big endian faster to read?
Isn't little endian standard when sharing the bytes, i.e. transferring
across networks?
No, that's actually
On 2012-11-01 14:04, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
No, that's actually big endian.
Right, I always get these endians mixed up.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
Am Wed, 31 Oct 2012 22:53:26 +0100
schrieb Thomas Koch tho...@koch.ro:
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
I don't really understand what's wrong with the current system
- unfamiliar syntax like no other wiki engine I've ever seen
+1. I think having markdown support would be a huge plus as most D
Hi everyone,
I just saw this online.
The German magazine c't kompakt has an article about cool(exotic)
programming languages, Smalltalk, Haskell and D.
Personally, I like all of them.
Here is the link for the German speaking developers.
Le 01/11/2012 05:30, H. S. Teoh a écrit :
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 12:05:18AM +0100, deadalnix wrote:
Le 31/10/2012 18:19, H. S. Teoh a écrit :
[...]
Actually, there is another problem: many algorithms' output will be
transient or not depending on the input range. For example, we could
write
On Thursday, 1 November 2012 at 10:37:19 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
Why pb and exi chose to use little endian to encode numbers, I
wonder. Isn't big endian faster to read?
You avoid having to flip the byte order at the application level
on the prevalent (at least in the domain where protobuf is
On 11/1/12 9:47 AM, Paulo Pinto wrote:
Hi everyone,
I just saw this online.
The German magazine c't kompakt has an article about cool(exotic)
programming languages, Smalltalk, Haskell and D.
Personally, I like all of them.
Here is the link for the German speaking developers.
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 03:18:13PM +0100, deadalnix wrote:
Le 01/11/2012 05:30, H. S. Teoh a écrit :
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 12:05:18AM +0100, deadalnix wrote:
Le 31/10/2012 18:19, H. S. Teoh a écrit :
[...]
Actually, there is another problem: many algorithms' output will be
transient or not
On Thursday, 1 November 2012 at 07:30:58 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
It's not just the installer that depends on having Xcode
installed, D depends on it. DMD uses GCC as the linker.
I see, thanks Jacob. I'll stick with the Xcode-cmd line tools
instructions then and sprinkle in a little more
On Thursday, 1 November 2012 at 15:20:11 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 11/1/12 9:47 AM, Paulo Pinto wrote:
Hi everyone,
I just saw this online.
The German magazine c't kompakt has an article about
cool(exotic)
programming languages, Smalltalk, Haskell and D.
Personally, I like all of
I'm not suggesting this to be implemented, this is just what I
automatically wanted to write.
Anybody else had this kind of thoughts?
I think that code generating mixin strings should be as well
designed and documented as every other code you write. This mixin
feature would be just another
On Thursday, 1 November 2012 at 15:23:35 UTC, David Nadlinger
wrote:
You avoid having to flip the byte order at the application
level on the prevalent (at least in the domain where protobuf
is used) architectures that way.
Yes for platform native numbers, but not for ULEB - which is
On 10/31/12 8:35 PM, Faux Amis wrote:
On 22/10/2012 19:25, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
We're on! For one month starting today, we're raising funding for DConf
2013.
http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/2083649206/the-d-programming-language-conference-2013-0
Please pledge your support and
On 1 November 2012 00:35, Faux Amis f...@amis.com wrote:
On 22/10/2012 19:25, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
We're on! For one month starting today, we're raising funding for DConf
2013.
http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/2083649206/the-d-programming-language-conference-2013-0
Please pledge
On 10/31/12 8:35 PM, Faux Amis wrote:
I will pledge 100$ if that would mean videos.
I second that. Many of us won't be able to attend to the
conference due to travel costs and it would be nice if there are
videos.
On Wednesday, 31 October 2012 at 23:04:15 UTC, bearophile wrote:
The thread contains some sad comments:
It's unfortunate that there's still bad press circulating about a
situation that is long gone. I suppose you just have to try and
ignore those people.
A more interesting comment is this
On 11/1/12 1:40 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On 1 November 2012 00:35, Faux Amisf...@amis.com wrote:
On 22/10/2012 19:25, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
My reason for not having pledged:
Too expensive: flight + ticket.
I will pledge 100$ if that would mean videos.
I should hope that it would be
On Thursday, 1 November 2012 at 18:06:21 UTC, Peter Alexander
wrote:
On Wednesday, 31 October 2012 at 23:04:15 UTC, bearophile wrote:
The thread contains some sad comments:
It's unfortunate that there's still bad press circulating about
a situation that is long gone. I suppose you just have
On 2012-11-01 16:55, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
I find myself doing this very very often and it pains me to write ugly
code like this over and over again:
mixin(()={
string result;
foreach(i; 0..10)
result ~= writeln( ~ to!string(i); ~ );\n'
return result;
}());
All it
On 11/1/2012 12:19 PM, Paulo Pinto wrote: On the other hand, except for the
programming drones, most D concepts are also
available in most mainstream languages.
Most of them are also well established in one form or another, with proven
value.
On 2012-11-01 20:18, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Hoping is good, making it happen is even better. Does anyone have the
equipment and expertise to help with video recording?
Funny thing. Most video clips from conferences I've seen are fairly poor
quality. I don't know if it's the recording or
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 08:19:56PM +0100, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Thursday, 1 November 2012 at 18:06:21 UTC, Peter Alexander wrote:
[...]
A more interesting comment is this one:
But the real problem here is that in order to achieve even that,
the complexity and amount of concepts you have to
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 08:31:30PM +0100, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-11-01 16:55, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
I find myself doing this very very often and it pains me to write
ugly code like this over and over again:
mixin(()={
string result;
foreach(i; 0..10)
result ~=
On Thursday, 1 November 2012 at 18:06:21 UTC, Peter Alexander
wrote:
The same is true in D. Well-written D code often does look
rather elegant, but the amount of understanding needed to write
beautiful D code is staggering.
I'll second that!
I'm finally making good progress with D after a
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 08:49:40PM +0100, Rob T wrote:
On Thursday, 1 November 2012 at 18:06:21 UTC, Peter Alexander wrote:
The same is true in D. Well-written D code often does look rather
elegant, but the amount of understanding needed to write beautiful
D code is staggering.
I'll
On Thursday, 1 November 2012 at 19:44:04 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 08:19:56PM +0100, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Thursday, 1 November 2012 at 18:06:21 UTC, Peter Alexander
wrote:
[...]
A more interesting comment is this one:
But the real problem here is that in order to
On Thursday, 1 November 2012 at 19:49:42 UTC, Rob T wrote:
On Thursday, 1 November 2012 at 18:06:21 UTC, Peter Alexander
wrote:
The number one missing item that I would love to get my hands
on is comprehensive documentaion. What we have now leaves out
far too much detail, and may be
On Thursday, 1 November 2012 at 19:35:35 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
On 2012-11-01 20:18, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Hoping is good, making it happen is even better. Does anyone
have the equipment and expertise to help with video recording?
Funny thing. Most video clips from conferences I've
On Thursday, 1 November 2012 at 19:18:40 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Hoping is good, making it happen is even better. Does anyone
have the equipment and expertise to help with video recording?
I have experience as a live lighting/audio/video engineer and
also did a few smaller film jobs,
On Thu, 01 Nov 2012 08:43:10 +0100
Paulo Pinto pj...@progtools.org wrote:
On Wednesday, 31 October 2012 at 23:20:15 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
Le 30/10/2012 20:15, Paulo Pinto a écrit :
Now Build 2012 is happening and the new Windows Phone 8
features have
been revealed.
One of the most
On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 18:11:17 -0400
Nick Sabalausky seewebsitetocontac...@semitwist.com wrote:
On Thu, 01 Nov 2012 08:43:10 +0100
Paulo Pinto pj...@progtools.org wrote:
On Wednesday, 31 October 2012 at 23:20:15 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
Le 30/10/2012 20:15, Paulo Pinto a écrit :
Now Build
On 11/1/12 5:42 PM, Era Scarecrow wrote:
On Thursday, 1 November 2012 at 19:35:35 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-11-01 20:18, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Hoping is good, making it happen is even better. Does anyone have the
equipment and expertise to help with video recording?
Funny
This is up to the consumer to choose if .front can be oblitered on
popFront, not to an intermediate algorithm.
joiner isn't a consumer, this is a « transformer ». transformer have to
propagate the .fast (I don't like this name, but this is unimportant for
now) to its source.
Let'(s consider
On 11/1/2012 2:20 PM, bearophile wrote:
Some complexity comes from the
desire to do more and more. As example see this recent request from Manu,
What about all your feature requests? I think you've made more than anyone, by a
factor of 10 at least!
:-)
As for Manu's request
On Thursday, 1 November 2012 at 20:10:47 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
But yeah, the current documentation needs work. Unfortunately,
wishing
for it to happen won't make it happen, so if you contribute
(use the
improve this page link) that would be great
I never noticed that link before. When I
On Thursday, 1 November 2012 at 15:59:04 UTC, Gor Gyolchanyan
wrote:
OR, better yet:
mixin MyMixin
{
foreach(i; 0..10)
MyMixin ~= writeln( ~ to!string(i); ~ );\n'
}
And this could be printed out as a pragma(msg, ...) or into a
.log file or
anywhere else. This way it's easy to see
This blog post shows few interesting aspects of the Scala
ecosystem:
http://jazzy.id.au/default/2012/11/02/scaling_scala_vs_java.html
Bye,
bearophile
On 11/1/12 11:26 PM, bearophile wrote:
This blog post shows few interesting aspects of the Scala ecosystem:
http://jazzy.id.au/default/2012/11/02/scaling_scala_vs_java.html
Bye,
bearophile
I have a dream that one day there will be a guy with the ID philobear
discussing D-related stuff on
Andrei Alexandrescu:
I have a dream that one day there will be a guy with the ID
philobear discussing D-related stuff on Java and Scala forums.
It's very important to look at how other very good languages
solve common problems :-)
Bye,
bearophile
On Friday, 2 November 2012 at 04:18:00 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 11/1/12 11:26 PM, bearophile wrote:
This blog post shows few interesting aspects of the Scala
ecosystem:
http://jazzy.id.au/default/2012/11/02/scaling_scala_vs_java.html
Bye,
bearophile
I have a dream that one day
On Thursday, 1 November 2012 at 23:56:00 UTC, Rob T wrote:
On Thursday, 1 November 2012 at 20:10:47 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
But yeah, the current documentation needs work. Unfortunately,
wishing
for it to happen won't make it happen, so if you contribute
(use the
improve this page link) that
On 2012-10-31 23:48, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
I tried it and found getting almost there is easy... but getting it
to work in a bunch of edge cases is incredibly difficult.
I can imagine operator overloading, opDispatch and similar features
making it a lot harder.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Thursday, 11 October 2012 at 21:04:28 UTC, Alex Rønne
Petersen wrote:
On 11-10-2012 22:56, Sean Kelly wrote:
On Oct 11, 2012, at 6:17 AM, Lubos Pintes
lubos.pin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Can someone point me to some source with information about
name demangling when compiling some D
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 03:16:25PM +0100, Dan wrote:
On Thursday, 11 October 2012 at 21:04:28 UTC, Alex Rønne Petersen
wrote:
On 11-10-2012 22:56, Sean Kelly wrote:
On Oct 11, 2012, at 6:17 AM, Lubos Pintes
lubos.pin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Can someone point me to some source with
On Thu, 01 Nov 2012 15:40:23 -, H. S. Teoh hst...@quickfur.ath.cx
wrote:
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 03:16:25PM +0100, Dan wrote:
On Thursday, 11 October 2012 at 21:04:28 UTC, Alex Rønne Petersen
wrote:
On 11-10-2012 22:56, Sean Kelly wrote:
On Oct 11, 2012, at 6:17 AM, Lubos Pintes
On Thu, 01 Nov 2012 15:40:23 -, H. S. Teoh hst...@quickfur.ath.cx
wrote:
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 03:16:25PM +0100, Dan wrote:
On Thursday, 11 October 2012 at 21:04:28 UTC, Alex Rønne Petersen
wrote:
On 11-10-2012 22:56, Sean Kelly wrote:
On Oct 11, 2012, at 6:17 AM, Lubos Pintes
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 04:25:56PM -, Regan Heath wrote:
On Thu, 01 Nov 2012 15:40:23 -, H. S. Teoh
hst...@quickfur.ath.cx wrote:
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 03:16:25PM +0100, Dan wrote:
On Thursday, 11 October 2012 at 21:04:28 UTC, Alex Rønne Petersen
wrote:
On 11-10-2012 22:56, Sean
On Thu, 01 Nov 2012 16:25:56 -, Regan Heath re...@netmail.co.nz
wrote:
Adding writefln to demangle.d to debug the issue shows that args[1] is
- and that getopt is throwing the exception invalid UTF-8 sequence.
I was wrong here, this line is the issue:
stderr.writeln(e.msg);
For some
On Thu, 01 Nov 2012 17:21:29 -, H. S. Teoh hst...@quickfur.ath.cx
wrote:
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 04:25:56PM -, Regan Heath wrote:
On Thu, 01 Nov 2012 15:40:23 -, H. S. Teoh
hst...@quickfur.ath.cx wrote:
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 03:16:25PM +0100, Dan wrote:
On Thursday, 11 October
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 08:40:23AM -0700, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 03:16:25PM +0100, Dan wrote:
On Thursday, 11 October 2012 at 21:04:28 UTC, Alex Rønne Petersen
wrote:
[...]
We even have a tool for that:
The docs say:
Convenience names that allow using e.g. yes!encryption instead
of Flag!encryption.yes and no!encryption instead of
Flag!encryption.no.
I could not get yes!encription to work. But Yes.encription
does. Are the docs out of date? Am I missing something? E.g.,
module yes_no_flag;
Hi,
Some time ago I reported on D.Anounce, that Vibe apps are not working on
my system, they failed with an exception. So I diagnosed a bit and found
the following:
There is a folder on my system
C:\Users\pintes\AppData\Local\Temp\.rdmd\source
which contains some DLLs needed for successful
On 11/01/2012 10:41 AM, Peter Summerland wrote:
The docs say:
Convenience names that allow using e.g. yes!encryption instead of
Flag!encryption.yes and no!encryption instead of
Flag!encryption.no.
The documentation is wrong.
Please either file a bug report or click the Improve this page
On Thursday, 1 November 2012 at 18:25:22 UTC, Lubos Pintes wrote:
Hi,
Some time ago I reported on D.Anounce, that Vibe apps are not
working on my system, they failed with an exception. So I
diagnosed a bit and found the following:
There is a folder on my system
For example, adding 3 strings to type tuple t:
foreach( i; 0..2 )
alias TypeTuple!( t, string ) t; // this is wrong code
and result should be:
TypeTuple!( string, string, string );
On Thu, 01 Nov 2012 19:42:07 +0100, denizzzka wrote:
For example, adding 3 strings to type tuple t:
foreach( i; 0..2 )
alias TypeTuple!( t, string ) t; // this is wrong code
and result should be:
TypeTuple!( string, string, string );
Use a recursive template. Here's one that
On 2012-11-01, 19:52, Justin Whear wrote:
On Thu, 01 Nov 2012 19:42:07 +0100, denizzzka wrote:
For example, adding 3 strings to type tuple t:
foreach( i; 0..2 )
alias TypeTuple!( t, string ) t; // this is wrong code
and result should be:
TypeTuple!( string, string, string );
Use a
Great! Thanks!
TDPL states
--
However, unlike in C++, clear does not dispose of the object’s
own memory and there is no delete operator. (D used to have a
delete operator, but it was deprecated.) You still can free
memory manually if you really, really know what you’re doing by
calling the function
On 01-11-2012 22:21, Dan wrote:
TDPL states
--
However, unlike in C++, clear does not dispose of the object’s
own memory and there is no delete operator. (D used to have a
delete operator, but it was deprecated.) You still can free
memory manually if you really, really know what you’re doing
auto i = SList!int(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7);
auto f = SList!float(1.1, 2.234, 3.21, 4.3, 5.001, 6.2, 7.0);
auto s = SList!string([I, Hello, World]);
auto c = SList!char('a', 'b' ,'c'); // doesn't compile, get the
following
C:\D\dmd2\windows\bin\..\..\src\phobos\std\container.d(905):
Error:
On 11/01/2012 02:21 PM, Dan wrote:
TDPL states
--
However, unlike in C++, clear does not dispose of the object’s
own memory and there is no delete operator.
Additionally, TDPL predates 'clear's deprecation in December 2012. It is
called 'destroy' now.
Ali
On 11/01/2012 03:18 PM, They call me Mr. D wrote:
auto i = SList!int(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7);
auto f = SList!float(1.1, 2.234, 3.21, 4.3, 5.001, 6.2, 7.0);
auto s = SList!string([I, Hello, World]);
auto c = SList!char('a', 'b' ,'c'); // doesn't compile, get the following
On Thursday, November 01, 2012 22:21:11 Dan wrote:
struct S {
int[] a; // array is privately owned by this instance
this(this) {
a = a.dup;
}
~this() {
delete a;
}
}
Is the delete call, then per TDPL not necessary? Is it harmful or
harmless?
It's not necessary at all. delete is
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8927
Summary: Download page should list dependencies
Product: D
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2837
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yebbl...@gmail.com
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8222
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yebbl...@gmail.com
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4897
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8924
Maxim Fomin ma...@maxim-fomin.ru changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ma...@maxim-fomin.ru
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8928
Summary: Poor error message for derived class without
constructor
Product: D
Version: D1 D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8924
Malte Skarupke malteskaru...@web.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8929
Summary: long.min is a Voldermort literal
Product: D
Version: D1 D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8905
--- Comment #5 from monarchdo...@gmail.com 2012-11-01 09:53:40 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
(In reply to comment #3)
[SNIP]
Actually, I remember that I had corrected all these bugs, but had never gotten
around to committing them...
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8930
Summary: std.algorithm.move only operates on hasLvalueElements
Product: D
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8931
Summary: array/slice assignment causes destruction + postblit
instead of opAssign
Product: D
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8931
Maxim Fomin ma...@maxim-fomin.ru changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ma...@maxim-fomin.ru
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8931
--- Comment #2 from monarchdo...@gmail.com 2012-11-01 11:07:07 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
I don't understand clearly this issue. You first state that when arrays are
assigned you expect that this is done element-by element, but actually
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8931
--- Comment #3 from Maxim Fomin ma...@maxim-fomin.ru 2012-11-01 11:48:32 PDT
---
(In reply to comment #2)
I mean:
//void main()
{
S[2] a = [S(1), S(2)];
S[2] b = a; //Fine postblit here
a[] = b[]; //But HERE, please use
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8108
--- Comment #1 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-11-01 13:13:51 PDT ---
Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
