On 2012-11-23 05:07, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Or any documentation at all.
I recall, with a shudder, how one fine day a high-priority Javascript
project (high-priority as in, it was due the week before it was given to
me) was dumped on my lap, consisting of a non-trivial class hierarchy
and bunch of m
On 2012-11-23 00:43, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Or even more likely, no design documentation gets written at all...
Example, this post is not threaded correctly for me.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 2012-11-22 22:18, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
It's threading just fine in my mail client. I do recall there being some issue
with newsgroup vs mailing list threading though. Maybe what you're seeing is
related to that.
The threading is not fine on some of your posts in Thunderbird for me.
--
/
On Friday, 23 November 2012 at 06:41:06 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 11/22/2012 6:11 PM, John Colvin wrote:
An error.
Is monarch_dodra correct in saying that one would have to
compile druntime in
non-release to see this error? That would be a pity, couldn't
this be
implemented somehow so tha
On 11/22/2012 6:11 PM, John Colvin wrote:
An error.
Is monarch_dodra correct in saying that one would have to compile druntime in
non-release to see this error? That would be a pity, couldn't this be
implemented somehow so that it would depend on the user code being compiled
non-release, not dr
On 11/22/2012 7:03 PM, xenon325 wrote:
I would think it's actually not preferable.
Imagine you developed and tuned all the code on x86 and everything is fine. Then
run it on ARM and suddenly all computations are inaccurate.
Floating point algorithms don't get less precise when precision is incr
On Friday, November 23, 2012 01:52:51 Timon Gehr wrote:
> On 11/22/2012 11:25 AM, monarch_dodra wrote:
> > On Thursday, 22 November 2012 at 06:52:55 UTC, Rob T wrote:
> >> FYI
> >>
> >> I'm getting these compile errors, must be the compiler flags I'm using?
> >
> > Must be that bearophile and I a
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 03:43:24PM -0800, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> On Thursday, November 22, 2012 15:36:58 H. S. Teoh wrote:
> > In theory, software is implemented according to the design that has
> > been carefully worked out beforehand. In practice, design documents
> > are written after the fac
On Monday, 19 November 2012 at 15:48:23 UTC, Manu wrote:
This wouldn't strictly retain half precision though, it would be
slightly higher precision since the intermediates were full
precision
(which is surely preferable?).
I would think it's actually not preferable.
Imagine you developed and
On Thursday, 22 November 2012 at 13:08:56 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Sunday, November 18, 2012 21:34:37 monarch_dodra wrote:
Should I push a pull request adding such a function (and its
friends) to phobos? How does the group feel about such
functions?
In principle, it's a good idea, but
On Thu, 22 Nov 2012 20:06:44 -0600, John Colvin
wrote:
On Thursday, 22 November 2012 at 21:37:19 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
Array ops supposed to be overhead-free loops transparently leveraging
SIMD parallelism of modern CPUs. No more and no less. It's like
auto-vectorization but it's gua
On Thursday, 22 November 2012 at 22:35:35 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 11/21/2012 5:33 AM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
Hello all,
Now that we know that DConf 2013 is going to happen
(congratulations and thanks
to everyone!), I had a thought about how it might be possible
to give some extra
On Thursday, 22 November 2012 at 20:58:25 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 11/22/2012 3:25 AM, John Colvin wrote:
Anyway, this is a pretty trivial matter, I'd be more
interested in seeing a
definitive answer for what the correct behaviour for the
statement a[] = b[] +
c[] is when the arrays have d
On Thursday, 22 November 2012 at 21:37:19 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky
wrote:
Array ops supposed to be overhead-free loops transparently
leveraging SIMD parallelism of modern CPUs. No more and no
less. It's like auto-vectorization but it's guaranteed and
obvious in the form.
I disagree that array op
On 11/22/2012 11:25 AM, monarch_dodra wrote:
On Thursday, 22 November 2012 at 06:52:55 UTC, Rob T wrote:
FYI
I'm getting these compile errors, must be the compiler flags I'm using?
Must be that bearophile and I are on windows (ergo 32), so "length" is
of type "size_t", which is a "uint". This
On Thursday, 22 November 2012 at 13:15:30 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Thursday, 22 November 2012 at 10:16:53 UTC, David Nadlinger
Also, how »stable« can we expect that instance to be?
As stable as forum.dlang.org.
Do you make backups?
Automatic daily incremental offsite backups are p
On Thursday, November 22, 2012 15:36:58 H. S. Teoh wrote:
> In theory, software is implemented according to the design that has been
> carefully worked out beforehand. In practice, design documents are
> written after the fact to describe the sorry mess that has gone on
> before.
Or even more like
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 12:53:36PM -0800, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 11/22/2012 8:07 AM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> >On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:10:51PM -0800, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> >>On Friday, November 16, 2012 18:09:44 H. S. Teoh wrote:
>
> The way you an Jonathan are replying is breaking the messag
On 11/21/2012 5:33 AM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
Hello all,
Now that we know that DConf 2013 is going to happen (congratulations and thanks
to everyone!), I had a thought about how it might be possible to give some extra
involvement to those who can't physically make it on this occasion.
S
11/23/2012 1:02 AM, Walter Bright пишет:
I'll be bold and predict what will happen if this proposal is implemented:
"Array operations in D are cool but are incredibly slow. D sux."
Few will notice that the hidden memory allocation can be easily removed,
certainly not people casually look
On 11/22/2012 01:10 PM, John Colvin wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 November 2012 at 19:40:25 UTC, Mike Wey wrote:
If you want to use this syntax with images, DMagick's ImageView might
be interesting:
http://dmagick.mikewey.eu/docs/ImageView.html
I like it :)
From what I can see it provides exactly w
On Thursday, November 22, 2012 12:53:36 Walter Bright wrote:
> On 11/22/2012 8:07 AM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:10:51PM -0800, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> >> On Friday, November 16, 2012 18:09:44 H. S. Teoh wrote:
> The way you an Jonathan are replying is breaking the message
On 2012-11-22 20:35, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
Do code examples on Wikipedia look fine for you (e.g.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D_(programming_language)#Metaprogramming )?
Yes, they do. I'm now looking at the "computed" font size in firebug. On
wikipedia it says 12.8px. On the new D wiki pa
On 11/22/2012 3:25 AM, John Colvin wrote:
c[] = a[] + b[];
fast, in place array operation, the cost of allocation happens earlier in the
code.
but also
c = a[] + b[];
a much slower, memory assigning array operation, pretty much just shorthand for
c = new T[a.length];
c[] = a[] + b[];
You could
On 11/22/2012 3:25 AM, John Colvin wrote:
Anyway, this is a pretty trivial matter, I'd be more interested in seeing a
definitive answer for what the correct behaviour for the statement a[] = b[] +
c[] is when the arrays have different lengths.
An error.
On 11/22/2012 8:07 AM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:10:51PM -0800, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Friday, November 16, 2012 18:09:44 H. S. Teoh wrote:
The way you an Jonathan are replying is breaking the message threading model.
How are you doing it?
On Thursday, November 22, 2012 14:51:14 Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
> On 11/19/2012 08:02 PM, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
> > Updated the blog post, thanks.
>
> The one other issue I had with those instructions -- you talk of copying
> dmd.conf into /etc, but I've never come across a dmd.conf an
On Thursday, 22 November 2012 at 18:13:10 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
On 2012-11-22 15:52, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
That would be because your browser is using Courier New for the
monospace CSS font family, which is notable for being smaller
than other
fonts at the same font sizes.
I've over
On 11/22/12, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> It looks really small in Firefox on Mac OS X as well. It has the
> following style according to firebug:
On Chrome (on win32) it looks ok though.
On 2012-11-22 15:52, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
That would be because your browser is using Courier New for the
monospace CSS font family, which is notable for being smaller than other
fonts at the same font sizes.
I've overridden the definition to use the same CSS as the forum
(basically, try "
On 2012-11-22 11:20, David Nadlinger wrote:
That's likely to be about digitalmars.D.bugs, which is only used for
Bugzilla issue updates.
digitalmars.D.bug is only used for that. dmd-internals is used both for
communication and git commit messages.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Thu, 22 Nov 2012 06:10:04 -0600, John Colvin
wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 November 2012 at 19:40:25 UTC, Mike Wey wrote:
If you want to use this syntax with images, DMagick's ImageView might
be interesting:
http://dmagick.mikewey.eu/docs/ImageView.html
I like it :)
From what I can see it
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:10:51PM -0800, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> On Friday, November 16, 2012 18:09:44 H. S. Teoh wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 08:52:39PM -0500, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
[...]
> > > The problem is that supporting transience complicates ranges even
> > > further, and they're
On Thursday, 22 November 2012 at 15:18:24 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
On 11/22/12, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
Does it look better now?
Nope, still the same.
Can you try a force-refresh or clearing the browser cache?
What web browser and operating system do you use?
On 11/22/12, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
> Does it look better now?
Nope, still the same.
On 11/22/12, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
> That would be because your browser is using Courier New for the
> monospace CSS font family, which is notable for being smaller
> than other fonts at the same font si
Al 22/11/12 15:47, En/na Joseph Rushton Wakeling ha escrit:
> On 11/22/2012 03:26 PM, Jordi Sayol wrote:
>> Al 22/11/12 14:51, En/na Joseph Rushton Wakeling ha escrit:
>>> Also, am I right that there are also man-files for dmd included in the
>>> source? Might be worth including a note on how to b
On Thursday, 22 November 2012 at 06:36:48 UTC, Nathan M. Swan
wrote:
(I'm working on automatic demangling for linker error messages)
BTW did you see this post from a few days ago?
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/vvkckjmvyfdtxqdqx...@forum.dlang.org#post-rdjerzfmfcpfxrpcujmx:40forum.dlang.org
It
On Thursday, 22 November 2012 at 10:41:33 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
On 11/22/12, r_m_r wrote:
I just modified the Main_Page
and added the WhySwitch page (content copied from the old wiki:
http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi).
Is it possible to increase the default font size for D syntax
On 11/22/2012 03:26 PM, Jordi Sayol wrote:
Al 22/11/12 14:51, En/na Joseph Rushton Wakeling ha escrit:
Also, am I right that there are also man-files for dmd included in the source?
Might be worth including a note on how to build and install those.
man file should be copied as follow:
*.1 fil
Al 22/11/12 14:51, En/na Joseph Rushton Wakeling ha escrit:
> Also, am I right that there are also man-files for dmd included in the
> source? Might be worth including a note on how to build and install those.
man file should be copied as follow:
*.1 files at /usr/share/man/man1 or /usr/local/sha
On 22-11-2012 14:51, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
On 11/19/2012 08:02 PM, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
Updated the blog post, thanks.
The one other issue I had with those instructions -- you talk of copying
dmd.conf into /etc, but I've never come across a dmd.conf anywhere in
the dmd source tr
Hi folks,
This is just a reminder that code reviews are invaluable. The various
repos on GitHub (see https://github.com/D-Programming-Language) get many
pull requests and we can always use an extra hand in doing code reviews
of them. Your input is very appreciated even if you are not a committ
On 11/19/2012 08:02 PM, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
Updated the blog post, thanks.
The one other issue I had with those instructions -- you talk of copying
dmd.conf into /etc, but I've never come across a dmd.conf anywhere in the dmd
source tree.
I created one manually following instructions
On 11/19/2012 02:41 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
So that it uses the dmd that you just built instead of the one in your path.
Presumably if you just copied your newly-built dmd over the top of that one, you
won't have that problem? ;-)
I've used purely from-source builds of dmd ever since dis
On 11/22/12 02:14, bearophile wrote:
> In the following program there are two versions of the compress function,
> that implement the same bare-bones version of the LZW
> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lempel-Ziv-Welch ) compression algorithm.
>
> compress1 is the simpler version, while compress2
On 11/21/2012 04:21 PM, bearophile wrote:
how about also making it possible for non-attendees to submit video
presentations?
...
A second possibility would be to allow people (whether attending or not) to
submit proceedings articles.
Those seem nice ideas.
no other thoughts or comments f
On 11/20/2012 10:04 PM, G. wrote:
On Tuesday, 20 November 2012 at 02:27:08 UTC, Edward Diener wrote:
Is there a downloadable spec for the D version 2 language, in either
PDF or HTML format ?
The HTML version is in the ZIP with dmd...
Thanks !
On Thursday, 22 November 2012 at 10:16:53 UTC, David Nadlinger
wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 November 2012 at 22:22:02 UTC, Vladimir
Panteleev wrote:
Here's something to start with:
http://dwiki.kimsufi.thecybershadow.net/
Could you please set up a robots.txt which disables indexing
until this has
On Sunday, November 18, 2012 21:34:37 monarch_dodra wrote:
> Should I push a pull request adding such a function (and its
> friends) to phobos? How does the group feel about such functions?
In principle, it's a good idea, but I also worry about a proliferation of such
functions. Personally, I thi
On Thursday, 22 November 2012 at 11:25:31 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
Anyway, this is a pretty trivial matter, I'd be more interested
in seeing a definitive answer for what the correct behaviour
for the statement a[] = b[] + c[] is when the arrays have
different lengths.
I'd say the same as for
On Wednesday, 21 November 2012 at 19:40:25 UTC, Mike Wey wrote:
If you want to use this syntax with images, DMagick's ImageView
might be interesting:
http://dmagick.mikewey.eu/docs/ImageView.html
I like it :)
From what I can see it provides exactly what i'm talking about
for 2D. I haven't loo
On 11/22/12, r_m_r wrote:
> I don't think I can change the font size directly.
Sorry, I should have quoted Vladimir, not you.
On 11/22/12, r_m_r wrote:
> BTW The code displays fine on my browser.
Which browser? It displays the same for me on Firefox and Chrome.
On 11/22/12, r_m_r wrote:
> Ma
On Thursday, 22 November 2012 at 10:41:33 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
Is it possible to increase the default font size for D syntax
highlighting?
I don't think I can change the font size directly.
The CSS style for that tag is generated by the
SyntaxHighlight GeSHi extension as shown belo
On Wednesday, 21 November 2012 at 20:16:59 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 11/21/2012 10:41 AM, John Colvin wrote:
In what way does it become a performance problem?
Allocating memory is always much, much slower than not
allocating memory.
A design that forces allocating new memory and discardi
On 11/22/2012 03:13 AM, Era Scarecrow wrote:
Perhaps a part on how to properly use D without involving the GC.
... perhaps a part on keeping memory use effectively under control _with_ the
GC? (Avoiding all those dangling references, etc...:-)
On 11/22/12, r_m_r wrote:
> I just modified the Main_Page
> and added the WhySwitch page (content copied from the old wiki:
> http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi).
Is it possible to increase the default font size for D syntax highlighting?
This is what it looks like, it's almost unreadable: h
On Thursday, 22 November 2012 at 06:52:55 UTC, Rob T wrote:
FYI
I'm getting these compile errors, must be the compiler flags
I'm using?
Must be that bearophile and I are on windows (ergo 32), so
"length" is of type "size_t", which is a "uint". This matches the
key of the dictionary.
If yo
On Thursday, 22 November 2012 at 08:39:03 UTC, Nathan M. Swan
wrote:
I'd read somewhere that it was only to be used for the
automatic commit logs.
That's likely to be about digitalmars.D.bugs, which is only used
for Bugzilla issue updates.
David
On Wednesday, 21 November 2012 at 22:22:02 UTC, Vladimir
Panteleev wrote:
Here's something to start with:
http://dwiki.kimsufi.thecybershadow.net/
Could you please set up a robots.txt which disables indexing
until this has become officially adopted, and moved to its final
address?
Also, ho
On Friday, November 16, 2012 18:09:44 H. S. Teoh wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 08:52:39PM -0500, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > On Friday, November 16, 2012 13:55:31 H. S. Teoh wrote:
> > > I don't like the prospect of having to duplicate parts of
> > > std.algorithm just because I have some code t
On Thursday, 22 November 2012 at 01:14:23 UTC, bearophile wrote:
[SNIP]
Thank you,
bye,
bearophile
I'd argue that your first "compress1" isn't range correct either
anyways, because "w ~ ch;" (which will allocate) is not part of
the range interface.
Neither is "w = [ch];" (which will also
On Thursday, 22 November 2012 at 08:00:41 UTC, Brad Roberts wrote:
On 11/21/2012 10:36 PM, Nathan M. Swan wrote:
We can't post to dmd-internals anymore, so I assume I should
post here.
Um... what? The list hasn't changed configs since it was
setup. Anyone can subscribe, all new members go t
On 11/21/2012 10:36 PM, Nathan M. Swan wrote:
> We can't post to dmd-internals anymore, so I assume I should post here.
Um... what? The list hasn't changed configs since it was setup. Anyone can
subscribe, all new members go through
moderation once (robots that are smart enough to subscribe do
63 matches
Mail list logo
