On Tuesday, 8 October 2013 at 08:11:34 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Saturday, 5 October 2013 at 20:56:21 UTC, Matt Soucy wrote:
message Point {
optional int32 x = 1 [default=166];
required int32 y = 2;
optional string label = 3;
message Coord {
required
http://beza1e1.tuxen.de/d-tut-0.1/documentation.html
Are doxygen comments still endorsed?
http://beza1e1.tuxen.de/d-tut-0.1/idiomatic.html
Describing a range as a pair of iterators requires a reader with
C++ background; the beginning of the tutorial implied wider
audience. For other people it
I used the QT bindings to make a transparent desktop widget once. So they
have worked but I'm not sure if they do with the current compiler. I'll see
if I can find my old code and see what I have to do to get it to work.
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 9:04 AM, Kagamin s...@here.lot wrote:
On Wednesday, 9 October 2013 at 07:04:07 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
http://beza1e1.tuxen.de/d-tut-0.1/documentation.html
Are doxygen comments still endorsed?
I am not aware about any counter arguments. Are there some
downsides? I noticed that Returns: is rarely used in Phobos.
On 2013-10-09 10:37, qznc wrote:
I am not aware about any counter arguments. Are there some downsides? I
noticed that Returns: is rarely used in Phobos.
D has built-in support for documentation comments, called ddoc:
http://dlang.org/ddoc
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Tuesday, 8 October 2013 at 13:59:22 UTC, Meta wrote:
I haven't really thought about this before, but it's becoming
increasingly difficult for me to come up with a contemporary
simple language. It seems most modern languages are creeping
towards more complexity.
I heard, Lua interpreter
On Oct 9, 2013 12:31 PM, Kagamin s...@here.lot wrote:
On Tuesday, 8 October 2013 at 13:59:22 UTC, Meta wrote:
I haven't really thought about this before, but it's becoming
increasingly difficult for me to come up with a contemporary simple
language. It seems most modern languages are creeping
On Tuesday, 8 October 2013 at 20:50:22 UTC, Matt Soucy wrote:
Thanks for the tip - I actually did find this one when I
started using
this, however I found it on another page that hadn't been
updated (that
I ironically can't find now), so I wrongfully assumed that it
was
abandoned. I did find
On 10/09/2013 01:55 AM, Jesse Phillips wrote:
Groups are a way to combine this, but they are deprecated so
who'd want to support that.
Exactly, I didn't even bother planning out support for them.
--
Matt Soucy
http://msoucy.me/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 10/09/2013 10:38 AM, Jesse Phillips wrote:
On Tuesday, 8 October 2013 at 20:50:22 UTC, Matt Soucy wrote:
Thanks for the tip - I actually did find this one when I started using
this, however I found it on another page that hadn't been updated (that
I ironically can't find now), so I
On Mon, 07 Oct 2013 21:18:38 +0200, qznc wrote:
I believe one of the things D needs right now is more documentation.
Therefore, I started writing a tutorial.
It is aimed at people who can already program well in other languages.
This means nothing about loops or structs, because I expect
On Wednesday, 9 October 2013 at 20:22:39 UTC, Dejan Lekic wrote:
It is a very nice web-site, but the main column should be wider.
Sometimes the source code floats over to the second column...
Hm, not here. I suspect a weird font selection for the code.
I plan to redesign it at some point
On Tue, 08 Oct 2013 20:58:01 -0700, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
http://google-opensource.blogspot.de/2013/10/google-code-in-2013-and-google-summer.html
Andrei
Do you think they'll let us in this year?
--
Adam Wilson
IRC: LightBender
Project Coordinator
The
Am 09.10.2013 07:23, schrieb PauloPinto:
Apple dropped the GC and went ARC instead, because they never
managed to make it work properly.
It was full of corner cases, and the application could crash if
those cases were not fully taken care of.
Or course the PR message is We dropped GC because
On Tuesday, 8 October 2013 at 00:16:45 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
To put my money where my mouth is, I have a proof-of-concept
tokenizer for C++ in working state.
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/d07dd46d
Why do you use \0 as end-of-stream token:
/**
* All token types include regular and
On Tuesday, 8 October 2013 at 19:04:33 UTC, BLM768 wrote:
I've been working on a project that makes relatively heavy use
of nullable values. I've been using std.typecons.Nullable, and
it mostly works well, but there are some improvements that
could be made to the implementation:
* A
On Wednesday, 9 October 2013 at 03:39:38 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 10/8/13 4:45 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Wednesday, October 09, 2013 01:04:39 Tourist wrote:
I thought about an alternative approach:
Instead of using a (yet another) annotation, how about
introducing a flag similar
On Tuesday, 8 October 2013 at 17:47:02 UTC, ollie wrote:
On Sat, 28 Sep 2013 18:38:47 +0200, simendsjo wrote:
I've been working on a more or less complete rewrite of the
mysql-native module.
I think this is a great first step. Code is more readable,
easier
to follow (compared to the
On Tuesday, 8 October 2013 at 23:05:37 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 10/8/2013 12:34 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
I think that it's clear that for some projects, it's critical
to minimize the
GC, and I think that it's clear that we need to do a better
job of supporting
the folks who want to
On 9 October 2013 15:23, PauloPinto pj...@progtools.org wrote:
On Wednesday, 9 October 2013 at 05:15:53 UTC, Manu wrote:
On 9 October 2013 08:58, ponce cont...@gmsfrommars.fr wrote:
On Tuesday, 8 October 2013 at 22:45:51 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Eh, not necessarily. If it expands to
On 9 October 2013 16:05, dennis luehring dl.so...@gmx.net wrote:
Am 09.10.2013 07:23, schrieb PauloPinto:
Apple dropped the GC and went ARC instead, because they never
managed to make it work properly.
It was full of corner cases, and the application could crash if
those cases were not
On Wednesday, 9 October 2013 at 06:05:52 UTC, dennis luehring
wrote:
Am 09.10.2013 07:23, schrieb PauloPinto:
Apple dropped the GC and went ARC instead, because they never
managed to make it work properly.
It was full of corner cases, and the application could crash if
those cases were not
On 10/9/2013 12:29 AM, Manu wrote:
Does anyone here REALLY believe that a bunch of volunteer contributors can
possibly do what apple failed to do with their squillions of dollars and
engineers?
I haven't heard anybody around here propose the path to an acceptable solution.
It's perpetually in
GC works for some cases, but the global one size fits all GC
that D uses is no good.
Am 09.10.2013 01:29, schrieb Adam D. Ruppe:
It is nice to have stdlib functions available that can be used anywhere.
For std.algorithm, Andrei has said if you ever implement an algorithm by
hand, it means the library has failed. But there's two places where that
falls short (IMO at least):
On Wednesday, 9 October 2013 at 07:29:30 UTC, Manu wrote:
On 9 October 2013 15:23, PauloPinto pj...@progtools.org wrote:
On Wednesday, 9 October 2013 at 05:15:53 UTC, Manu wrote:
On 9 October 2013 08:58, ponce cont...@gmsfrommars.fr wrote:
On Tuesday, 8 October 2013 at 22:45:51 UTC, Adam
On Tuesday, 8 October 2013 at 17:47:54 UTC, Brad Anderson wrote:
On Tuesday, 8 October 2013 at 16:29:38 UTC, ponce wrote:
On Tuesday, 8 October 2013 at 16:22:25 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
It is not overblown. It is simply @nogc which is lacking
but absolutely mandatory. Amount of hidden language
On Wednesday, 9 October 2013 at 07:33:38 UTC, Manu wrote:
Is there more to it? Cleaning up circular references I guess...
what does Apple do?
It's an uncommon edge case, so there's gotta be heaps of room
for efficient solutions to that (afaik) one edge case. Are
there others?
There is a
On Wednesday, 9 October 2013 at 07:33:38 UTC, Manu wrote:
On 9 October 2013 16:05, dennis luehring dl.so...@gmx.net
wrote:
Am 09.10.2013 07:23, schrieb PauloPinto:
Apple dropped the GC and went ARC instead, because they never
managed to make it work properly.
It was full of corner cases,
On 10/8/13 11:11 PM, ilya-stromberg wrote:
On Tuesday, 8 October 2013 at 00:16:45 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
To put my money where my mouth is, I have a proof-of-concept tokenizer
for C++ in working state.
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/d07dd46d
Why do you use \0 as end-of-stream token:
/**
On 10/8/13 11:04 PM, Adam Wilson wrote:
On Tue, 08 Oct 2013 20:58:01 -0700, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
http://google-opensource.blogspot.de/2013/10/google-code-in-2013-and-google-summer.html
Andrei
Do you think they'll let us in this year?
Depends on the
Am 09.10.2013 07:15, schrieb Manu:
I've had a lot of conversations with a lot of experts, plenty of
conversations at dconf, and nobody could even offer me a vision for a GC
that is acceptable.
As far as I can tell, nobody I talked to really thinks a GC that doesn't
stop the world, which can be
On 10/9/13 12:01 AM, Mehrdad wrote:
On Wednesday, 9 October 2013 at 03:39:38 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 10/8/13 4:45 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Wednesday, October 09, 2013 01:04:39 Tourist wrote:
I thought about an alternative approach:
Instead of using a (yet another) annotation,
Am 09.10.2013 09:51, schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu:
On 10/9/13 12:01 AM, Mehrdad wrote:
On Wednesday, 9 October 2013 at 03:39:38 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 10/8/13 4:45 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Wednesday, October 09, 2013 01:04:39 Tourist wrote:
I thought about an alternative
On 10/9/13 12:58 AM, dennis luehring wrote:
Am 09.10.2013 09:51, schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu:
On 10/9/13 12:01 AM, Mehrdad wrote:
On Wednesday, 9 October 2013 at 03:39:38 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 10/8/13 4:45 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Wednesday, October 09, 2013 01:04:39
Am 09.10.2013 10:05, schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu:
On 10/9/13 12:58 AM, dennis luehring wrote:
Am 09.10.2013 09:51, schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu:
On 10/9/13 12:01 AM, Mehrdad wrote:
On Wednesday, 9 October 2013 at 03:39:38 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 10/8/13 4:45 PM, Jonathan M Davis
On Wednesday, 9 October 2013 at 07:49:55 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 10/8/13 11:11 PM, ilya-stromberg wrote:
On Tuesday, 8 October 2013 at 00:16:45 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
To put my money where my mouth is, I have a proof-of-concept
tokenizer
for C++ in working state.
09.10.2013 7:55, Nick B пишет:
On Tuesday, 8 October 2013 at 17:26:46 UTC, Stefan Frijters wrote:
andrei wrote:
I too are interesteed in this area as well. Dennis do you only plan to
focus on multidimensional arrays only, or will you incorporate the above
matrices as well ??
What features are
On Wednesday, 9 October 2013 at 02:22:35 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
* Get Robert Schadek's precise GC in. Walter and I have become
101% convinced a precise GC is the one way to go about GC.
An orthogonal question, but is Lucarella's CDGC (still) being
ported? There's nothing mutually
On 10/9/2013 1:59 AM, JR wrote:
On Wednesday, 9 October 2013 at 02:22:35 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
* Get Robert Schadek's precise GC in. Walter and I have become 101% convinced
a precise GC is the one way to go about GC.
An orthogonal question, but is Lucarella's CDGC (still) being
On Tuesday, 8 October 2013 at 22:27:27 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 10/8/2013 1:38 PM, Chris wrote:
Was just wondering if anyone on this forum has any experience
with these things.
After a little bit of research I've come to the conclusion
that it's a
minefield. The old Windows slogan
On 10/09/2013 04:22 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
* Get Robert Schadek's precise GC in. Walter and I have become 101%
convinced a precise GC is the one way to go about GC.
I would like to claim that work, but the Rainer Schütze wrote that. I
know, both german, same initials.
On Wednesday, 9 October 2013 at 09:29:53 UTC, Robert Schadek
wrote:
On 10/09/2013 04:22 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
* Get Robert Schadek's precise GC in. Walter and I have become
101%
convinced a precise GC is the one way to go about GC.
I would like to claim that work, but the Rainer
Am 09.10.2013 10:17, schrieb dennis luehring:
Am 09.10.2013 10:05, schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu:
On 10/9/13 12:58 AM, dennis luehring wrote:
Am 09.10.2013 09:51, schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu:
On 10/9/13 12:01 AM, Mehrdad wrote:
On Wednesday, 9 October 2013 at 03:39:38 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
On 2013-10-09 05:31, Walter Bright wrote:
Making this work is fraught with difficulty. It is normal behavior in D
to create local data with new(), build a data structure, and then cast
it to shared so it can be transferred to another thread. This will fail
miserably if the data is allocated on
On 2013-10-09 07:15, Manu wrote:
What I want is an option to replace the GC with ARC,
We had an email conversation about ARC when I announced the updated
Objective-C support for D. Perhaps it's time make it public. I don't
think we came to a conclusion. I had some trouble following it. It
On 2013-10-09 09:31, Walter Bright wrote:
What do you propose?
He wants ARC.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 2013-10-09 09:33, Manu wrote:
It sounds pretty easy to reach to me. Compiler generating inc/dec ref
calls can't possibly be difficult. An optimisation that simplifies
redundant inc/dec sequences doesn't sound hard either... :/
Is there more to it? Cleaning up circular references I guess...
On Wednesday, 9 October 2013 at 06:48:31 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
On Tuesday, 8 October 2013 at 19:04:33 UTC, BLM768 wrote:
I've been working on a project that makes relatively heavy use
of nullable values. I've been using std.typecons.Nullable, and
it mostly works well, but there are some
On Wednesday, 9 October 2013 at 12:33:07 UTC, Manfred Nowak wrote:
The compiler accepts a dangling comma in a comma separated list
of actual
parameters.
What is the type of this missing actual parameter?
-manfred
There is no missing parameter. It is just a convenience syntax to
avoid
The compiler accepts a dangling comma in a comma separated list of actual
parameters.
What is the type of this missing actual parameter?
-manfred
On Tuesday, 8 October 2013 at 22:02:07 UTC, Peter Alexander wrote:
Just learn where allocations occur and avoid them during
development. This leaves you only with accidental or otherwise
unexpected allocations.
D is not expected to be a single man project language, isn't it?
As I have
On Tuesday, 8 October 2013 at 22:37:28 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 10/8/2013 9:22 AM, Dicebot wrote:
It is simply @nogc which is lacking but absolutely
mandatory.
Adding @nogc is fairly simple. The trouble, though, is (like
purity) it is transitive. Every function an @nogc function
calls
On Tuesday, 8 October 2013 at 23:22:54 UTC, Sean Kelly wrote:
On Oct 8, 2013, at 3:38 PM, Walter Bright
This, of course, is the other problem with @nogc. Having a
forest of attributes on otherwise ordinary functions is
awfully ugly.
And we already have a forest of attributes on otherwise
On 09.10.2013 14:41, Dicebot wrote:
On Tuesday, 8 October 2013 at 22:02:07 UTC, Peter Alexander wrote:
Just learn where allocations occur and avoid them during development.
This leaves you only with accidental or otherwise unexpected allocations.
D is not expected to be a single man project
Dicebot wrote:
Those two are equivalent:
Maybe right for functions, but is currently wrong for templated functions
`this( T ...)( T param)'
I got a Range violation on accessing the last parameter of `param'.
Maybe the parameters are wongly counted?
-manfred
On 2013-10-09 04:07:53 +, deadalnix deadal...@gmail.com said:
That being said, isolated is probably something we want to add in the future.
You'll hit a problem with immutable though. Immutable is implicitly
shared, and immutable strings are everywhere!
--
Michel Fortin
On 10/9/13, Manfred Nowak svv1...@hotmail.com wrote:
Maybe the parameters are wongly counted?
I doubt it. Do you have a test-case?
Works for me: http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/86d226b1
On 2013-10-09 07:33:29 +, Manu turkey...@gmail.com said:
Is there more to it? Cleaning up circular references I guess... what does
Apple do?
Apple implemented auto-nulling weak pointers for ARC (as well as
__unsafe_unretained ones if you are not afraid of dangling pointers).
It's an
The thread-multiplexing in Go is described here:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TTj4T2JO42uD5ID9e89oa0sLKhJYD0Y_kqxDv3I3XMw/edit
The sources are here:
http://code.google.com/p/go/source/browse/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c?r=01acf1dbe91f673f6308248b8f45ec0564b1d751
It should be possible to
On 2013-10-09 11:58:33 +, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com said:
On 2013-10-09 09:33, Manu wrote:
It sounds pretty easy to reach to me. Compiler generating inc/dec ref
calls can't possibly be difficult. An optimisation that simplifies
redundant inc/dec sequences doesn't sound hard either... :/
On Oct 9, 2013, at 5:48 AM, Dicebot pub...@dicebot.lv wrote:
On Tuesday, 8 October 2013 at 23:22:54 UTC, Sean Kelly wrote:
On Oct 8, 2013, at 3:38 PM, Walter Bright
This, of course, is the other problem with @nogc. Having a forest of
attributes on otherwise ordinary functions is awfully
Am Wed, 9 Oct 2013 09:38:12 -0400
schrieb Michel Fortin michel.for...@michelf.ca:
I think the only way to make that work sanely is to create
another root object for ref-counted classes.
The problem here is we need a way to know that type X is refcounted,
right? Couldn't we just use an
On Wednesday, 9 October 2013 at 13:57:03 UTC, Sean Kelly wrote:
They aren't opt-out for really any reasonable project though,
because code is reused and those people may want at least the
standard attributes to be set. Personally, the array of
attributes that can be applied to a D function is
On Oct 9, 2013, at 4:30 AM, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
On 2013-10-09 05:31, Walter Bright wrote:
Making this work is fraught with difficulty. It is normal behavior in D
to create local data with new(), build a data structure, and then cast
it to shared so it can be transferred to
On Wednesday, 9 October 2013 at 14:11:46 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Wednesday, 9 October 2013 at 13:57:03 UTC, Sean Kelly wrote:
They aren't opt-out for really any reasonable project though,
because code is reused and those people may want at least the
standard attributes to be set. Personally,
On 2013-10-09 14:06:51 +, Johannes Pfau nos...@example.com said:
Am Wed, 9 Oct 2013 09:38:12 -0400
schrieb Michel Fortin michel.for...@michelf.ca:
I think the only way to make that work sanely is to create
another root object for ref-counted classes.
The problem here is we need a way to
On 2013-10-09 15:51, Sean Kelly wrote:
Generally not, since even D's precise GC is partially conservative. It's also way more
expensive than any cast should be. For better or worse, I think being able to cast data
to shared means that we can't have thread-local pools. Unless a new attribute
On 9 October 2013 23:06, Michel Fortin michel.for...@michelf.ca wrote:
On 2013-10-09 07:33:29 +, Manu turkey...@gmail.com said:
Is there more to it? Cleaning up circular references I guess... what does
Apple do?
Apple implemented auto-nulling weak pointers for ARC (as well as
Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
Do you have a test-case?
On reducing the case it turned out, that the error message blaimed the
wrong file for a really existing Range violation. By pure chance the
lines in the wrongly given file were these:
AST[] astStar= visit( data.ast[0]);
foreach(
On Wednesday, 9 October 2013 at 13:03:33 UTC, Michel Fortin wrote:
On 2013-10-09 04:07:53 +, deadalnix deadal...@gmail.com
said:
That being said, isolated is probably something we want to add
in the future.
You'll hit a problem with immutable though. Immutable is
implicitly shared, and
On 9 October 2013 17:31, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
On 10/9/2013 12:29 AM, Manu wrote:
Does anyone here REALLY believe that a bunch of volunteer contributors can
possibly do what apple failed to do with their squillions of dollars and
engineers?
I haven't heard anybody
On Wednesday, 9 October 2013 at 14:17:44 UTC, Sean Kelly wrote:
On Oct 9, 2013, at 4:30 AM, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
On 2013-10-09 05:31, Walter Bright wrote:
Making this work is fraught with difficulty. It is normal
behavior in D
to create local data with new(), build a data
Am 09.10.2013 16:52, schrieb Manu:
On 9 October 2013 23:06, Michel Fortin michel.for...@michelf.ca
mailto:michel.for...@michelf.ca wrote:
On 2013-10-09 07:33:29 +, Manu turkey...@gmail.com
mailto:turkey...@gmail.com said:
Is there more to it? Cleaning up circular references
Am 09.10.2013 16:30, schrieb Manu:
On 9 October 2013 17:31, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
On 10/9/2013 12:29 AM, Manu wrote:
Does anyone here REALLY believe that a bunch of volunteer contributors can
possibly do what apple failed to do with their squillions of dollars and
Am Wed, 9 Oct 2013 10:36:36 -0400
schrieb Michel Fortin michel.for...@michelf.ca:
@refcounted interface X{};
@refcounted class Y {};
class X1 : X;
class Y1 : Y;
Now we know for sure that all these classes and SubClasses are
refcounted.
The problem is that you can't cast Y to
On Oct 9, 2013, at 7:35 AM, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
On 2013-10-09 15:51, Sean Kelly wrote:
Generally not, since even D's precise GC is partially conservative. It's
also way more expensive than any cast should be. For better or worse, I
think being able to cast data to shared
Am 09.10.2013 17:46, schrieb Paulo Pinto:
Am 09.10.2013 16:30, schrieb Manu:
On 9 October 2013 17:31, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com
mailto:newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
On 10/9/2013 12:29 AM, Manu wrote:
Does anyone here REALLY believe that a bunch of volunteer
Am 09.10.2013 16:30, schrieb Manu:
On 9 October 2013 17:31, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com
mailto:newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
On 10/9/2013 12:29 AM, Manu wrote:
Does anyone here REALLY believe that a bunch of volunteer
contributors can
possibly do
On Wednesday, 9 October 2013 at 13:36:41 UTC, Bienlein wrote:
The thread-multiplexing in Go is described here:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TTj4T2JO42uD5ID9e89oa0sLKhJYD0Y_kqxDv3I3XMw/edit
The sources are here:
On Oct 9, 2013, at 8:23 AM, deadalnix deadal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, 9 October 2013 at 14:17:44 UTC, Sean Kelly wrote:
On Oct 9, 2013, at 4:30 AM, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
On 2013-10-09 05:31, Walter Bright wrote:
Making this work is fraught with difficulty. It is normal
On 2013-10-09 15:18:23 +, deadalnix deadal...@gmail.com said:
On Wednesday, 9 October 2013 at 13:03:33 UTC, Michel Fortin wrote:
On 2013-10-09 04:07:53 +, deadalnix deadal...@gmail.com said:
That being said, isolated is probably something we want to add in the future.
You'll hit a
Am 09.10.2013 17:49, schrieb dennis luehring:
Am 09.10.2013 17:46, schrieb Paulo Pinto:
Am 09.10.2013 16:30, schrieb Manu:
On 9 October 2013 17:31, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com
mailto:newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
On 10/9/2013 12:29 AM, Manu wrote:
Does anyone
On Wednesday, 9 October 2013 at 15:47:11 UTC, qznc wrote:
On Wednesday, 9 October 2013 at 13:36:41 UTC, Bienlein wrote:
The thread-multiplexing in Go is described here:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TTj4T2JO42uD5ID9e89oa0sLKhJYD0Y_kqxDv3I3XMw/edit
The sources are here:
On Oct 9, 2013, at 8:35 AM, Paulo Pinto pj...@progtools.org wrote:
The Azul VM does not have a problem with it, as it does pauseless concurrent
GC, while being used on online trading systems.
Incremental GCs are awesome. Have you looked at IBM's Metronome for Java?
Maybe this would work
On Wednesday, 9 October 2013 at 15:48:58 UTC, Sean Kelly wrote:
On Oct 9, 2013, at 7:35 AM, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
On 2013-10-09 15:51, Sean Kelly wrote:
Generally not, since even D's precise GC is partially
conservative. It's also way more expensive than any cast
should be. For
On Wednesday, 9 October 2013 at 15:53:13 UTC, Sean Kelly wrote:
If the GC can determine whether a block is shared at allocation
time, it can allocate the block from a thread-local pool in the
unshared case. So if a collection is necessary, no global stop
the world need occur. Only the
On Wednesday, 9 October 2013 at 06:48:31 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
OK, so that's two functions already. What about opCmp? What
about toHash?
Since ordered comparisons make no sense with null values, opCmp
would need to throw an exception when working with null values
anyway. That's exactly
On 2013-10-09 17:48, Sean Kelly wrote:
Okay so following that… it might be reasonable if the location of data keyed off the
attribute set at construction. So new shared(X) puts it in the shared pool.
I thought that was obvious. Is there a problem with that approach?
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Wednesday, 9 October 2013 at 13:38:12 UTC, Michel Fortin wrote:
On 2013-10-09 11:58:33 +, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com said:
On 2013-10-09 09:33, Manu wrote:
It sounds pretty easy to reach to me. Compiler generating
inc/dec ref
calls can't possibly be difficult. An optimisation that
On 10 October 2013 01:40, Johannes Pfau nos...@example.com wrote:
Am Wed, 9 Oct 2013 10:36:36 -0400
schrieb Michel Fortin michel.for...@michelf.ca:
@refcounted interface X{};
@refcounted class Y {};
class X1 : X;
class Y1 : Y;
Now we know for sure that all these classes
On 10 October 2013 01:46, Paulo Pinto pj...@progtools.org wrote:
Am 09.10.2013 16:30, schrieb Manu:
On 9 October 2013 17:31, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com
mailto:newshound2@**digitalmars.com newshou...@digitalmars.com
wrote:
On 10/9/2013 12:29 AM, Manu wrote:
Does
On Wednesday, 9 October 2013 at 16:34:52 UTC, BLM768 wrote:
On Wednesday, 9 October 2013 at 06:48:31 UTC, monarch_dodra
wrote:
OK, so that's two functions already. What about opCmp? What
about toHash?
Since ordered comparisons make no sense with null values, opCmp
would need to throw an
On 10/9/13 4:30 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-10-09 05:31, Walter Bright wrote:
Making this work is fraught with difficulty. It is normal behavior in D
to create local data with new(), build a data structure, and then cast
it to shared so it can be transferred to another thread. This will
On 10/9/13 2:29 AM, Robert Schadek wrote:
On 10/09/2013 04:22 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
* Get Robert Schadek's precise GC in. Walter and I have become 101%
convinced a precise GC is the one way to go about GC.
I would like to claim that work, but the Rainer Schütze wrote that. I
know,
On 2013-10-09 16:51:03 +, Manu turkey...@gmail.com said:
On 10 October 2013 01:40, Johannes Pfau nos...@example.com wrote:
But if someone really wants to strip the GC _completely_ there's a huge
issue with memory management of Exceptions.
Exceptions have a pretty well defined
Hi,
how would I create a dub repository for a ready-to-use C binding
+ pre-compiled binaries?
Doesn't have to distinguish between platforms for now, but I
would appreciate it nonetheless.
I aim to then simply reference it in my actual D project,
preferably using dub ofc.
Thanks!
On 10/9/13 6:06 AM, Michel Fortin wrote:
On 2013-10-09 07:33:29 +, Manu turkey...@gmail.com said:
Is there more to it? Cleaning up circular references I guess... what does
Apple do?
Apple implemented auto-nulling weak pointers for ARC (as well as
__unsafe_unretained ones if you are not
On 10/09/2013 12:40 PM, qznc wrote:
I found no summary and stuff seems to get lost,
so I created a page on the wiki.
http://wiki.dlang.org/Versus_the_garbage_collector
+1
1 - 100 of 308 matches
Mail list logo
