[snip]
Sorry to hear you've left D behind! Hopefully it's only
temporarily because I'm finding Dgame is great fun to use.
Cheers,
uri
I'm glad to hear that. :) Maybe I will come back but currently
I'm absolute happy with C++ (11, 14)
I would second that, on having Dgame maintained.
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 12:37:18 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
New videos are online :)
part 1:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_YAUfd41URA
part 2:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGLgiPhwskM
please give me feedback in this thread
Hi.
I'm an intermediate level programmer and I'm interested
please tell me what concepts you would like to have explained.
perhaps I should do a live-stream for QA maybe ?
On Tuesday, 16 December 2014 at 08:28:43 UTC, Joel wrote:
[snip]
Sorry to hear you've left D behind! Hopefully it's only
temporarily because I'm finding Dgame is great fun to use.
Cheers,
uri
I'm glad to hear that. :) Maybe I will come back but currently
I'm absolute happy with C++ (11,
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 19:45:34 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 12/15/2014 03:17 AM, Mengu wrote:
blank space on the left which is caused by the width of the
div#content.
I was hoping that no one would notice. :p
if you can change width in styling of div#content
The design of the whole
On 12/16/2014 07:55 AM, Mengu wrote:
is the source open at somewhere so i can help?
https://bitbucket.org/acehreli/ddili/
Ali
Am I the only one to be left completely cold with the new wave
of C++ to GPU libraries (Bolt/ArrayFire/OpenACC) which take
back the control compute APIs give? For example this one
removes double precision and multiple devices, something that
is builtin with OpenCL.
These libraries build on
On Sunday, 14 December 2014 at 13:31:57 UTC, disapoint wrote:
On Sunday, 14 December 2014 at 03:26:56 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
http://code.dlang.org/packages/sargon
These two modules failed to generate much interest in
incorporating them into Phobos, but I'm still rather proud of
them :-)
On Tuesday, 16 December 2014 at 23:16:32 UTC, poucave wrote:
On Sunday, 14 December 2014 at 13:31:57 UTC, disapoint wrote:
On Sunday, 14 December 2014 at 03:26:56 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
http://code.dlang.org/packages/sargon
These two modules failed to generate much interest in
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 05:51:56 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Short story about my attempt to put a bit more efforts in
detecting user projects breakage by compiler changes:
http://blog.dicebot.lv/2014/12/making-sure-your-d-projects-wont-break.html
Quoting important bit:
It is quite likely
[snip]
I'm glad to hear that. :) Maybe I will come back but
currently I'm absolute happy with C++ (11, 14)
I would second that, on having Dgame maintained.
That is nice to hear. :)
I will try to maintain Dgame in my holidays next week, if you
have any questions, you can post them on the
On Wednesday, 17 December 2014 at 01:40:05 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling wrote:
Thanks very much for this, it's a very valuable piece of work.
I'd be very happy if you were to add
https://github.com/WebDrake/Dgraph
https://github.com/WebDrake/hap
to your testing list. I've just tried them out
On 2014-11-04 10:07, Christian Schneider wrote:
Ok, some more info:
I changed the mapping in tableview.d to:
void setDoubleAction(void __selector(ObjcObject))
[setDoubleAction:] ;
This should be the way to do it. Now in the implementation of the
action:
void
Original:
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/uapqmdbtadpwnciwf...@forum.dlang.org
Reposting here, because I got no answer in D.learn:
std.container.BinrayHeap
(http://dlang.org/library/std/container/BinaryHeap.html)
implements a binary heap on top of a) a given random access range
or b) another
On Tue, 16 Dec 2014 13:24:34 +1300
Rikki Cattermole via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 16/12/2014 8:30 a.m., ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote:
so as you can see this is not about GPL or something. this is about
attitude which i don't like. maybe i'm overreacting, but i'm
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 23:40:43 +
bitwise via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
@manu
I'm a little confused.. Looking through your Fuji/Source/Drivers
folder, I see folders for IPhone and Android, among others...
does your engine actually run on these platforms?
I was
On 16/12/2014 9:01 p.m., ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Tue, 16 Dec 2014 13:24:34 +1300
Rikki Cattermole via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 16/12/2014 8:30 a.m., ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote:
so as you can see this is not about GPL or something. this is about
On Tue, 16 Dec 2014 21:20:39 +1300
Rikki Cattermole via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Yes but in this case this is mute. You will talk about Github
negatively. You having an account won't cause you to talk positively
about it.
but it will add one more user to their
On Sunday, 14 December 2014 at 00:30:22 UTC, Joel wrote:
I'm using Windows. I get this error trying to compile the demo
on DGame.
C:\jpro\dpro2\OtherPeoples\Dgame-0.3.2\builddmd build.d
Using the Digital Mars DMD compiler.
C:\jpro\dpro2\OtherPeoples\Dgame-0.3.2\buildbuild.exe
Assume
On Tuesday, 16 December 2014 at 01:00:47 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 12/15/2014 5:38 AM, deadalnix wrote:
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 11:32:11 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
For me scopeness is a property of view, not object itself
- this also
makes ownership method of actual data irrelevant. Only
On Tuesday, 16 December 2014 at 06:18:10 UTC, Leandro T. C. Melo
via Digitalmars-d wrote:
including special-purpose registers (4 of them), a bounds
directory/tables
for storing/loading linearized pointer addresses, specific
instructions to
independently make/check upper/lower bounds, and even
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 18:55:42 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
Interesting, given that bounds checking support is an old
feature
http://x86.renejeschke.de/html/file_module_x86_id_18.html
If I remember my Assembly days in the 90's BOUND was slower
than doing the check explicitly.
Yes, and
On 16 December 2014 at 09:40, bitwise via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
@manu
I'm a little confused.. Looking through your Fuji/Source/Drivers folder, I
see folders for IPhone and Android, among others... does your engine
actually run on these platforms?
I was under the
Is it a good idea to introduce in D a fat delegate that has a
variable length (but its length is known at compile-time), able
to contain two or more context pointers and/or one or more values
or references, avoiding both some heap allocations of the closure
and allowing coding patterns that
2014-12-16 10:30 GMT-02:00 via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com:
Did you run the MPX-enabled executable on an emulator?
Exactly, you need to link the code against an MPX runtime and run it
through Intel's SDE.
--
Leandro
On Tuesday, 16 December 2014 at 05:48:27 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-EiBquZktsLc0czUzZVeGlLM00/view?usp=sharing
No guarantees of how long it'll stay up there.
And to reiterate, its only just a start. And I don't know if I
ever complete it. There isn't really
On Tuesday, 16 December 2014 at 13:26:56 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Is it a good idea to introduce in D a fat delegate that has a
variable length (but its length is known at compile-time), able
to contain two or more context pointers and/or one or more
values or references, avoiding both some heap
On Tuesday, 16 December 2014 at 01:00:47 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 12/15/2014 5:38 AM, deadalnix wrote:
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 11:32:11 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
For me scopeness is a property of view, not object itself
- this also
makes ownership method of actual data irrelevant. Only
On 12/16/14 3:20 AM, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
Yes but in this case this is mute.
moot. Sorry, couldn't stop myself. Carry on :)
-Steve
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 22:23:17 UTC, evenex wrote:
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 21:15:21 UTC, CraigDillabaugh
wrote:
Is your project open source? If so as a student we will
likely be looking for applications to the 2015 Google Summer
of Code, if D is accepted as a mentoring
deadalnix:
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP30
It seems DIP30 proposes a struct with a pointer as second field.
Are the delegates of DIP30 usually @nogc? They don't seem
variable-length structs.
Bye,
bearophile
On Tuesday, 16 December 2014 at 14:13:23 UTC, bearophile wrote:
deadalnix:
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP30
It seems DIP30 proposes a struct with a pointer as second
field. Are the delegates of DIP30 usually @nogc? They don't
seem variable-length structs.
Bye,
bearophile
The first element
On Tuesday, 16 December 2014 at 13:37:05 UTC, Leandro T. C. Melo
via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Exactly, you need to link the code against an MPX runtime and
run it through Intel's SDE.
Sounds like fun! I guess it is possible to play with ADX (multi
precision integers) that came with Broadwell
You'll notice that the engine code is not D code...
Hmm... Indeed.. I just assumed when I saw Walter get all excited
;)
D will work on most of those platforms just fine if you abandon
the GC and exception handler.
Unfortunately, I don't know D-compiler/runtime well enough to
actually
On 2014-12-16 07:57:32 +, Tobias Pankrath said:
Original: http://forum.dlang.org/thread/uapqmdbtadpwnciwf...@forum.dlang.org
Reposting here, because I got no answer in D.learn:
std.container.BinrayHeap
(http://dlang.org/library/std/container/BinaryHeap.html)
implements a binary heap on top
On Saturday, 13 December 2014 at 15:58:29 UTC, Joakim wrote:
When should it be redundant, for every single Posix declaration
in druntime? That's far from the case now. When the authors
think a handful of declarations might vary on some future
unspecified platform? Each of the linked
On Monday, 5 August 2013 at 18:18:30 UTC, Jonathan A Dunlap wrote:
I am one of the few who have taken a keen interest in D for
game development. The concise language and modern conveniences
may be able to reduce many hours worth of development time off
a game project, while making the code
On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 22:40:20 UTC, landaire wrote:
On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 22:35:16 UTC, Jeremy Powers via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
This looks eerily familiar...
I took a stab at an Intellij plugin a long time ago, and
happened to pick
the same name:
On Tuesday, 16 December 2014 at 23:25:02 UTC, Kingsley wrote:
On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 22:40:20 UTC, landaire wrote:
On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 22:35:16 UTC, Jeremy Powers via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
This looks eerily familiar...
I took a stab at an Intellij plugin a long time ago, and
On 17 December 2014 at 07:24, LaMainNoire via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Monday, 5 August 2013 at 18:18:30 UTC, Jonathan A Dunlap wrote:
I am one of the few who have taken a keen interest in D for game
development. The concise language and modern conveniences may be
On Tuesday, 16 December 2014 at 12:56:48 UTC, Manu via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
D will work on most of those platforms just fine if you abandon
the GC and exception handler.
I'm out of date on the progress in getting @nogc and @nothrow
rolled out as widely as possible across the codebase, but
On 17/12/2014 1:35 p.m., Kingsley wrote:
On Tuesday, 16 December 2014 at 23:25:02 UTC, Kingsley wrote:
On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 22:40:20 UTC, landaire wrote:
On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 22:35:16 UTC, Jeremy Powers via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
This looks eerily familiar...
I took a stab at
On 17/12/2014 2:53 a.m., Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 12/16/14 3:20 AM, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
Yes but in this case this is mute.
moot. Sorry, couldn't stop myself. Carry on :)
-Steve
And this is why I get people to review my work before publication (other
than blogs). Well atleast
On 12/16/2014 5:37 AM, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
ola.fosheim.grostad+dl...@gmail.com wrote:
The current proposal is either too limiting or not limiting enough.
I'm afraid I don't understand at all what you wrote.
On 12/16/2014 10:53 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 12/16/14 3:20 AM, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
Yes but in this case this is mute.
moot. Sorry, couldn't stop myself. Carry on :)
-Steve
You're both wrong :)
http://www.1001moviequotes.com/joey-moo-point/
Walter Bright:
I'm afraid I don't understand at all what you wrote.
Perhaps reading about linear type systems could help:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Substructural_type_systemredirect=no#Linear_type_systems
Bye,
bearophile
On 17 December 2014 at 11:44, Joseph Rushton Wakeling via
Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Tuesday, 16 December 2014 at 12:56:48 UTC, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
D will work on most of those platforms just fine if you abandon the GC and
exception handler.
I'm out of
Hello,
I'm trying to use DDOX to generate documentation pages for my
library (dlangui).
dub --build=ddox produces nice output with navigation by modules,
but I cannot find out how to embed some custom navigation pane on
all pages.
E.g. put links to some additional pages like downloads,
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 23:21:05 UTC, anonymous wrote:
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 23:14:30 UTC, aldanor wrote:
Could someone please explain why the following doesn't compile
with const qualifier while it does work without it?
/* test.d */
module test;
mixin template Foo() {
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 22:20:53 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 22:09:28 +
CraigDillabaugh via Digitalmars-d-learn
digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com wrote:
Given the following program:
import std.string;
import std.stdio;
void main()
{
struct FooPasted(Args...){}
class A
{
mixin foo;
void func1() @mark { ... }
void func2( int x, string a ) @mark { ... }
}
must change to:
class A
{
void func1() @mark { ... }
void func2( int x, string a ) @mark { ... }
FooPasted!() func1_mark;
FooPasted!(int,string) func2_mark;
}
so it will be documented? that was the rhetorical question.
Does it need to be? I don't see a reason for anyone to go out
of their way to make the implementation inconsistent. Do you?
At least I would prefer not to rely on undefined behaviour. If we
ever do change the AA implementation
On 12/16/14 10:33 AM, Tobias Pankrath wrote:
so it will be documented? that was the rhetorical question.
Does it need to be? I don't see a reason for anyone to go out of their
way to make the implementation inconsistent. Do you?
At least I would prefer not to rely on undefined behaviour.
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 23:21:44 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Nordlöw:
BTW: Why doesn't aa.byKey.map work?
It currently works.
Bye,
bearophile
My mistake. Now both are at
https://github.com/nordlow/justd/blob/master/range_ex.d#L527
On Tuesday, 16 December 2014 at 16:08:09 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
I can never ever see a reason to implement 2 different ways to
traverse the elements, just to piss off people?
If you make a PR that adds that to documentation, I will pull
it if it makes you feel better. I don't think
On 12/16/14 11:47 AM, Nordlöw wrote:
On Tuesday, 16 December 2014 at 16:08:09 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I can never ever see a reason to implement 2 different ways to
traverse the elements, just to piss off people?
If you make a PR that adds that to documentation, I will pull it if it
On Tuesday, 16 December 2014 at 16:56:20 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
I can do PR for adding
https://github.com/nordlow/justd/blob/master/range_ex.d#L527
to Phobos.
Were should I put it/them?
I think to be clear, the PR I said I will pull is for the
documentation update. A doc change
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 11:56:20AM -0500, Steven Schveighoffer via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On 12/16/14 11:47 AM, Nordlöw wrote:
On Tuesday, 16 December 2014 at 16:08:09 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I can never ever see a reason to implement 2 different ways to
traverse the elements,
On Tuesday, 16 December 2014 at 04:56:10 UTC, Ellery Newcomer
wrote:
If I have a thread that I need to detach from druntime, I can
call thread_detachInstance, but for 2.066, this function does
not exist. Is there any way to do this in 2.066? I notice there
is a thread_detachByAddr, but I'm not
On Tuesday, 16 December 2014 at 17:47:18 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
also rename
byPair to something else in the process).
What about by Python's byItem() and items()?
Would something like this be possible at all? A hypothetical
mixin template
mixin template makeProperty(T, string name, alias func) {
...
}
that could be called like this:
makeProperty!(int, foo, f)
and would generate code like
int @property foo() { return f(); }
On 12/16/2014 10:41 AM, Sean Kelly wrote:
On Tuesday, 16 December 2014 at 04:56:10 UTC, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
If I have a thread that I need to detach from druntime, I can call
thread_detachInstance, but for 2.066, this function does not exist. Is
there any way to do this in 2.066? I notice
A partial solution would be something like this:
mixin template makeProperty(T, string name, alias func) {
enum p = makeUnnamedProperty!(T, func);
mixin(enum %s = p;.format(name)); // or alias
}
however now the parent namespace is polluted with p, is there
any way to
On Wednesday, 17 December 2014 at 01:14:36 UTC, aldanor wrote:
A partial solution would be something like this:
mixin template makeProperty(T, string name, alias func) {
enum p = makeUnnamedProperty!(T, func);
mixin(enum %s = p;.format(name)); // or alias
}
however now
To make my C++ binding life easier, I wrote a small string structure [1]
in C++ to use instead of std::string and produced the D declarations for
some of it [2]. (It's not that complicated, I promise.) The important
properties of this struct are that it has a non-trivial copy constructor
and a
On Wednesday, 17 December 2014 at 01:39:07 UTC, anonymous wrote:
But if you want to avoid `p`, just do the substitution:
mixin template makeProperty(T, string name, alias func) {
mixin(enum %s = makeUnnamedProperty!(T,
func);.format(name)); // or alias
}
Thanks, that looks
On Wednesday, 17 December 2014 at 01:49:14 UTC, aldanor wrote:
Wonder if this is doable within a single mixin template without
using makeUnnamedProperty?
Sure, straight forward:
mixin template makeProperty(T, string name, alias func) {
mixin(T %s() @property { return func();
On Wednesday, 17 December 2014 at 02:12:52 UTC, anonymous wrote:
Sure, straight forward:
mixin template makeProperty(T, string name, alias func) {
mixin(T %s() @property { return func();
}.format(name));
}
Indeed... thanks! Just one thing that I find confusing here --
Is there a phobos way to do eraseInPlace (eg with optimization using
memmove where appropriate) ? (akin to insertInPlace)
Here's what I'd like in phobos:
void eraseInPlace(T)(ref T a, size_t index, size_t n=1)
if(isArray!T){
enum s=typeof(a[0]).sizeof;
auto ptr=a.ptr+index;
import core.stdc.string:memmove;
memmove(ptr,ptr+n,(a.length-(index+n))*s);
a.length-=n;
}
unittest{
auto a=[0,1,2,3,4,5,6];
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13868
Ketmar Dark ket...@ketmar.no-ip.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ket...@ketmar.no-ip.org
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13861
--- Comment #8 from John Colvin john.loughran.col...@gmail.com ---
Further reduced:
struct Foo(alias f)
{
struct Bar
{
Bar func()
{
return Bar();
}
}
}
void main()
{
Foo!(n = n) a;
}
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13869
Issue ID: 13869
Summary: Not good error message with not compatible lambda
template argument
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: x86
OS: Windows
Status:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13866
John Colvin john.loughran.col...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|major
---
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8008
Nick Treleaven ntrel-...@mybtinternet.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8008
--- Comment #6 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc ---
(In reply to Nick Treleaven from comment #5)
Is there an advantage of literal syntax vs. a template function
staticArray(1, 2)?
There are various small advantages. A template function like that seems
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13864
hst...@quickfur.ath.cx changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hst...@quickfur.ath.cx
--- Comment
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13825
hst...@quickfur.ath.cx changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hst...@quickfur.ath.cx
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13806
hst...@quickfur.ath.cx changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hst...@quickfur.ath.cx
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13806
--- Comment #1 from hst...@quickfur.ath.cx ---
IMO, proper ctors should be used instead of init(), since that is essentially
what they do.
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13806
hst...@quickfur.ath.cx changed:
What|Removed |Added
Hardware|x86_64 |All
OS|Windows
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13864
--- Comment #2 from Vlad Levenfeld vlevenf...@gmail.com ---
I'm using git HEAD, I still get the range violation. Not only that but this:
auto y = x[0];
auto z = x[0.tuple.expand]; // ok
runs fine. (got rid of writeln)
but also
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13864
--- Comment #3 from Vlad Levenfeld vlevenf...@gmail.com ---
this works as well:
writeln (x[0]);
auto y = x[0.tuple.expand];
writeln (x[0.tuple.expand]); // ok again??
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13864
--- Comment #4 from Vlad Levenfeld vlevenf...@gmail.com ---
its not writeln, this works as well:
auto f (T...)(T)
{
}
void main (string[] args)
{
int[] x = [2,3,4];
f (x[0]);
auto a = x[0.tuple.expand];
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13864
--- Comment #5 from Vlad Levenfeld vlevenf...@gmail.com ---
It only seems to happen with T[] types, struct with opIndex to catch and print
args confirms that the tuple expand call just resolves to a 0 int. Np luck
catching it with gdb so far, the
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13870
Issue ID: 13870
Summary: [ICE] shared or immutable types can not be mapped to
C++ (immutable(char))
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13871
Issue ID: 13871
Summary: [REG] Segmentation fault from std/variant.d:609
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: regression
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6856
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
88 matches
Mail list logo
