On Wednesday, February 04, 2015 16:24:14 Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
I'm seeing another idiom that seems to become fashionable. Consider this
excerpt from
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/blob/master/std/algorithm/iteration.d#L407:
auto
On Thursday, February 05, 2015 01:33:54 David Nadlinger via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 01:09:15 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Non-debug mode removes asserts statically. -- Andrei
Using pre-/post-conditions allows the _caller_ to specify whether
the checks are run
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 03:33:40 UTC, Manu wrote:
On 5 February 2015 at 10:07, Andrei Alexandrescu via
Digitalmars-d-announce digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com
wrote:
Please throw your hat in the air with me to hail the new czar!
:o)
Huzzah! Or should I say... Huczar!
Vive le
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 06:55:09 UTC, Vlad Levenfeld
wrote:
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 06:51:35 UTC, Vlad Levenfeld
wrote:
I could care less
Er, stupid but unfortunately common american english idiom. For
Thanks. I was firmly convinced that's a typo...
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 08:01:06 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
the function exits, but in the vast majority of cases, what
you're testing
with an out contract is what unit tests would be testing, in
which case, the
out blocks don't really add anything, and since they're forced
to be
On Thursday, February 05, 2015 17:42:11 Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Meta wrote in message news:ejqtxksoifmqzetll...@forum.dlang.org...
I don't know about others (besides Beatophile, who religiously adheres to
writing contacts), but putting contracts on functions is a hassle. I
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 2:07 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu via
Digitalmars-d-announce digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
Please throw your hat in the air with me to hail the new czar! :o)
Andrei
Thanks Martin, good luck. May the source be with you.
On 5 February 2015 at 07:20, Paulo Pinto via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 06:46:12 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
After reading this thread I think I'm the only person here who actually
likes makefiles.
Nothing ever feels as complete as a good old
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 07:53:34 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 2/4/15 11:48 PM, Foo wrote:
I would be glad if you or Walter could review the other parts
as well.
I'm very sure that your review will be very helpful and I'm
convinced
that the modules Array or Smart Pointer could be
On Thursday, February 05, 2015 08:13:32 eles via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 06:55:09 UTC, Vlad Levenfeld
wrote:
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 06:51:35 UTC, Vlad Levenfeld
wrote:
I could care less
Er, stupid but unfortunately common american english idiom.
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 06:41:59 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
Meta wrote in message
news:ejqtxksoifmqzetll...@forum.dlang.org...
I don't know about others (besides Beatophile, who religiously
adheres to writing contacts), but putting contracts on
functions is a hassle. I never do it
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14128
Vlad Levenfeld vlevenf...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vlevenf...@gmail.com
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14128
Issue ID: 14128
Summary: wrong alias
Product: D
Version: D1 D2
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P1
On Friday, 6 February 2015 at 03:59:51 UTC, tcak wrote:
I am on 64-bit Linux.
I defined a struct that it 8 bytes in total.
align(1) struct MessageBase{
align(1):
ushort qc;
ushort wc;
ushort id;
ushort contentLength;
void[0] content;
}
I defined a
I figured that someone would have already objected to part of this, but
the definition is stronger than I believe is intended for D:
On 2/5/2015 5:23 PM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
2) I think we also all basically agree that the *intent* of @trusted is
to be an encapsulation
On 2/5/2015 8:30 PM, Brad Roberts via Digitalmars-d wrote:
@safe code is memory safe when passed good inputs. @safe code does not have to
detect or prevent garbage input from causing harm. The promises of @trusted
aren't stronger than that either.
This is correct. Thanks for catching it.
On 2/5/2015 8:24 PM, Dicebot wrote:
What is worse, as it has been already mentioned, it is not just a
one time effort - careful review necessity taints all code that
gets called from @trusted code.
That is only true if the @trusted code has an unsafe interface. Determining if a
function has a
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 23:39:39 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
static void trustedMemcopy(T[] dest, T[] src) @trusted
{
assert(src.length == dest.length);
memcpy(dest.ptr, src.ptr, src.length * T.sizeof);
}
I don't have to review callers of trustedMemory() because it
Is there a simple way of conversion? Something like:
uint length = to!uint(buffer[0 .. 4]);
Right now I have:
uint length = *cast(uint*)buffer[0 .. 4].ptr;
Which I'm not entirely sure is the correct way to do that.
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 12:39:18 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
I believe the Eiffel way, just like the industry does, with
endless tools
and processes that follow and validate DbC.
I believe Ada allows the separation of interface and
implementation, and providing the contract in the
On Friday, 6 February 2015 at 05:05:08 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
OT: Have you looked at Ada SPARK 2014 yet? Provides nice and
strong system programming language semantics. With a
verification tool... nice.
http://docs.adacore.com/spark2014-docs/html/ug/spark_2014.html
Even more OT:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13651
mzfh...@foxmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mzfh...@foxmail.com
--
Perhaps it is over ambitious to start with the goal of producing
only code destined to end up in Phobos. The domain is so broadly
defined, and the standard to aspire to so high that one ends up
setting the goalpost so high that given likely contributors one
risks ending up running out of
On Friday, 6 February 2015 at 00:23:59 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
On 6/02/2015 9:30 a.m., CraigDillabaugh wrote:
On Friday, 30 January 2015 at 04:32:14 UTC, Craig Dillabaugh
wrote:
It seems like its been too long since I posted asking for
GSOC help.
The start of submissions for the 2015
On Friday, 6 February 2015 at 01:36:17 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On 2/6/2015 9:50 AM, Gan wrote:
On Friday, 6 February 2015 at 00:35:12 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
On Friday, 6 February 2015 at 00:31:37 UTC, Gan wrote:
Or am I misunderstanding the receive function? Does it send
whole
messages or
On Friday, 6 February 2015 at 04:10:08 UTC, tcak wrote:
On Friday, 6 February 2015 at 03:59:51 UTC, tcak wrote:
I am on 64-bit Linux.
I defined a struct that it 8 bytes in total.
align(1) struct MessageBase{
align(1):
ushort qc;
ushort wc;
ushort id;
ushort
On 2/5/2015 8:20 PM, Dicebot wrote:
I am not even sure how you can show the example though, to be honest - implied
issues are about maintaining code and not just writing it.
Let's start with std.array.uninitializedArray():
auto uninitializedArray(T, I...)(I sizes) nothrow @trusted
Note
OT: Have you looked at Ada SPARK 2014 yet? Provides nice and
strong system programming language semantics. With a verification
tool... nice.
http://docs.adacore.com/spark2014-docs/html/ug/spark_2014.html
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 14:17:16 UTC, bearophile wrote:
In the best language blog:
http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/node/5113
The discussion is long. They discuss if a good GC can be
written in the language itself, about actual security, what a
GC can and can't do, and more.
Bye,
On Friday, 6 February 2015 at 05:16:56 UTC, Vlad Levenfeld wrote:
safety-critical systems. What's this kind of programming
called? And can you recommend any resources for learning about
the subject from square one?
I haven't actually used SPARK, so my knowledge on what it can do
is only
On 2/5/2015 9:00 PM, Ola Fosheim =?UTF-8?B?R3LDuHN0YWQi?=
ola.fosheim.grostad+dl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 23:39:39 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
static void trustedMemcopy(T[] dest, T[] src) @trusted
{
assert(src.length == dest.length);
memcpy(dest.ptr,
On 2015-02-05, 8:17 PM, Gan wrote:
On Friday, 6 February 2015 at 01:36:17 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On 2/6/2015 9:50 AM, Gan wrote:
On Friday, 6 February 2015 at 00:35:12 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Friday, 6 February 2015 at 00:31:37 UTC, Gan wrote:
Or am I misunderstanding the receive
On 2/5/15 8:24 PM, Dicebot wrote:
I referred to this fact with a comment it is better to make no
promises than to make one and break it. Simply dealing with
unsafe language is something I got used to - all crashes and
weird think become expected. It is totally different from seeing
a memory
On Friday, 6 February 2015 at 05:32:48 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 2/5/2015 9:00 PM, Ola Fosheim =?UTF-8?B?R3LDuHN0YWQi?=
ola.fosheim.grostad+dl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 23:39:39 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
static void trustedMemcopy(T[] dest, T[] src) @trusted
{
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14126
--- Comment #7 from Orvid King blah38...@gmail.com ---
It is a valid bug, just not sure of the cause yet.
--
On Friday, 6 February 2015 at 03:14:59 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
I don't see how any proposal can work unless it specifies a
safe interface to an unsafe section of code. (I read a Rust
tutorial that rather bluntly pointed this out as well.)
Link?
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14108
--- Comment #4 from Timothee Cour timothee.co...@gmail.com ---
But the argument $key to aa.get(key) doesn't need to be stored, it's just used
to retrieve the value with that key if it's there (eg by computing a hash
function on the key, which doesn't
I am on 64-bit Linux.
I defined a struct that it 8 bytes in total.
align(1) struct MessageBase{
align(1):
ushort qc;
ushort wc;
ushort id;
ushort contentLength;
void[0] content;
}
I defined a function in this struct that tries to set a pointer
to
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14087
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6400
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rob...@octarineparrot.com
---
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9808
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14126
Puneet Goel pun...@coverify.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
On Friday, 6 February 2015 at 01:12:18 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 2/5/2015 4:13 PM, Dicebot wrote:
I know this definition. It have tried it in practice and
concluded as being
absolutely useless. There is no way I am going to return back
to this broken
concept - better to ignore @safe
On Friday, 6 February 2015 at 00:56:09 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 2/5/15 4:37 PM, Dicebot wrote:
On Friday, 6 February 2015 at 00:31:06 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
On 2/5/15 4:22 PM, Dicebot wrote:
On Friday, 6 February 2015 at 00:21:45 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
On 2/5/15
On 2/5/2015 7:39 PM, Zach the Mystic wrote:
On Friday, 6 February 2015 at 03:14:59 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
I don't see how any proposal can work unless it specifies a safe interface to
an unsafe section of code. (I read a Rust tutorial that rather bluntly pointed
this out as well.)
Link?
On Friday, 6 February 2015 at 00:45:16 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 2/5/15 4:08 PM, Zach the Mystic wrote:
Just use code.dlang.org. It's perfect either as a place for
good work and a stepping stone toward the standard library.
Andrei
I get the feeling you guys will eventually look
On Friday, 6 February 2015 at 05:18:45 UTC, Gan wrote:
Is there a simple way of conversion? Something like:
uint length = to!uint(buffer[0 .. 4]);
Right now I have:
uint length = *cast(uint*)buffer[0 .. 4].ptr;
Which I'm not entirely sure is the correct way to do that.
Hi,
check out
On 2/5/2015 9:55 PM, weaselcat wrote:
What's the D way of checking if a parameter is a reftype, valuetype, etc?
http://dlang.org/phobos/std_traits.html
ldc supports solaris/x86
but druntime/Phobos support will most likely be lacking what
does it's mean? It is not fully work or what?
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14108
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
I haven't read it yet myself, but probably of interest to anyone playing
at the abi layer for x86 languages.
-- Forwarded message --
From: H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 10:35 AM
Subject: ANNOUNCEMENT: Intel386 psABI version 1.0
To: IA32 System V
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14093
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12153
--- Comment #7 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/bdb30977e7084d1c496c7b386203af8dd33eea0d
Move fix Issue 12153 to
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13952
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|change in struct ctor |change in struct
On Thursday, February 05, 2015 12:03:29 Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 2/5/2015 12:22 AM, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d wrote:
No. It's just a frustratingly common mistake - like saying for all
intensive purposes instead of for all intents and purposes.
What? I thought it
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14129
Issue ID: 14129
Summary: stdio.write crashed on window console with codepage
65001
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: x86
OS: Windows
Status: NEW
On Thursday, February 05, 2015 12:34:34 Kagamin via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 09:43:53 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
There is no such difference in the current implementation.
assertions inside
of in and out blocks are no different from assertions inside of
the
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 13:25:37 UTC, FrankLike wrote:
Now I can remove element from a array:
module removeOne;
import std.stdio;
import std.array;
import std.algorithm;
void main()
{
int[] aa =[1,2,3,4,5];
aa = aa[0..2] ~aa[3..$];
writeln(aa); //ok
Now I can remove element from a array:
module removeOne;
import std.stdio;
import std.array;
import std.algorithm;
void main()
{
int[] aa =[1,2,3,4,5];
aa = aa[0..2] ~aa[3..$];
writeln(aa); //ok
remove(aa,1);
writeln(aa);//get error result
}
You
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 13:31:21 UTC, Nicholas Wilson
wrote:
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 12:31:31 UTC, Stéphane wrote:
Syntax for checking if an element exists in a list
Hello,
I would like to know if there is a better (easier to wite,
easier to read, easier to understand) way
On 2/5/2015 4:53 PM, Entity325 wrote:
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 07:23:15 UTC, drug wrote:
Look at this
https://github.com/drug007/geoviewer/blob/master/src/sdlapp.d
I used here SDL and OpenGL and it worked. Ctor of SDLApp creates SDL
window with OpenGL context, may be it helps.
Tested
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 13:55:59 UTC, FrankLike wrote:
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 13:29:30 UTC, Tobias Pankrath
wrote:
Works as designed:
http://dlang.org/phobos/std_algorithm.html#.remove
Thank you.
aa = remove(aa,1);//ok
but how to remove one item?
such as aa.remove(2) ?
I
Am 02.02.2015 um 12:00 schrieb Manu via Digitalmars-d:
On 2 February 2015 at 18:09, Vladimir Panteleev via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Monday, 2 February 2015 at 05:23:52 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
[snip]
I agree with basically everything you said.
I'll add, I have no
In the best language blog:
http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/node/5113
The discussion is long. They discuss if a good GC can be written
in the language itself, about actual security, what a GC can and
can't do, and more.
Bye,
bearophile
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 09:46:44 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
Atila Neves wrote in message
news:wpryuzyjmcdjtocqg...@forum.dlang.org...
I'm don't mind makefiles. That says, our
dmd/druntime/phobos/dlang.org makefiles break at the drop of
a hat. It's also rather difficult to review
I learned a lot about how @trusted is supposed to be used by the
discussion on that bug report. I don't know about the rest of
you, but it wasn't obvious to me at all beforehand.
Atila
On Wednesday, 4 February 2015 at 23:01:48 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
I just stepped into a disaster
Am 04.02.2015 um 23:00 schrieb Mike Parker:
On 2/5/2015 4:02 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-02-02 09:58, Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Scenario: a dependency has a security hole that gets patched. If the
dub package is updated, all applications using that dub package
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 11:43:28 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 11:05:42 UTC, Paulo Pinto
wrote:
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 10:09:34 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 09:33:12 UTC, Paulo Pinto
wrote:
So the caller can break
import std.algorithm;
int main(string[] options)
{
// true if the first option given to this program is
either foo, bar, or baz.
if(options[1].canFind(foo, bar, baz))
return 0;
return 1;
}
On 05/02/2015 01:50, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 01:34:47AM +, deadalnix via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 01:07:56 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Would introduce an exception to our brace-on-its-line rule.
Which is already
On 05/02/2015 08:56, Kagamin wrote:
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 01:34:49 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 01:07:56 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Would introduce an exception to our brace-on-its-line rule.
Will I start the next world war if I mention this rule is
Atila Neves wrote in message news:myzbnoipafejrpzdw...@forum.dlang.org...
I understand why dependencies are to be avoided. The good thing about the
state of things right now is that one needs only a C++ compiler and make.
That's a good thing.
It certainly is. We are however planning to
On 2015-02-05 at 09:58, bearophile wrote:
zhmt:
Will arr.ptr change in the future?
As the array add more members , it need more memroy, then remalloc may be
called, the pointer maybe change, then the stored pointer will be invalid.
Will this happen?
Yes, it can happen.
Therefore, don't
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 12:31:31 UTC, Stéphane wrote:
Syntax for checking if an element exists in a list
Hello,
I would like to know if there is a better (easier to wite,
easier to read, easier to understand) way to check if an element
(string) is
in a list of strings.
Here are
Am 03.02.2015 um 21:08 schrieb ketmar:
On Tue, 03 Feb 2015 19:43:53 +0100, Martin Nowak wrote:
On 02/03/2015 09:51 AM, ketmar wrote:
'cause it really sux as a build tool.
Not getting into any of the lengthy discussions of yours, but 'it sux'
isn't really helping anyone to improve it.
On 2/5/2015 5:22 PM, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Thursday, February 05, 2015 08:13:32 eles via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 06:55:09 UTC, Vlad Levenfeld
wrote:
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 06:51:35 UTC, Vlad Levenfeld
wrote:
I could care less
Er,
On 1/3/14, Iain Buclaw ibuc...@ubuntu.com wrote:
snip
https://github.com/ibuclaw/gdb/
Iain, is there a nice feature list somewhere to tell what's new in
your fork? I saw the changelog but it's not very informative from a
user's point of view:
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 13:29:30 UTC, Tobias Pankrath
wrote:
Works as designed:
http://dlang.org/phobos/std_algorithm.html#.remove
Thank you.
aa = remove(aa,1);//ok
but how to remove one item?
such as aa.remove(2) ?
Am 02.02.2015 um 10:44 schrieb Andrej Mitrovic:
On Monday, 2 February 2015 at 08:09:39 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
snip
Also:
- Dub installs everything in ~/ (home, which on Windows is an awful
location anywho). It's a pain in the ass for browsing dependencies in
your editor. If it's just
Am 02.02.2015 um 15:45 schrieb ketmar:
On Mon, 02 Feb 2015 14:36:00 +, Mathias LANG wrote:
I couldn't disagree more, but I understand how frustrating dub can be. I
also had to adapt my workflow to it.
and sometimes it's plain unusable. it insists on batch builds, and i have
three or so
Tobias Pankrath:
Works as designed:
http://dlang.org/phobos/std_algorithm.html#.remove
Unfortunately it's one of the worst designed functions of Phobos:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10959
Bye,
bearophile
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 01:09:15 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 2/4/15 4:50 PM, Jonathan Marler wrote:
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 00:42:01 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
On 2/4/15 4:40 PM, Jonathan Marler wrote:
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 00:35:50 UTC, bearophile
wrote:
Now operate array is not very quick,such as contains
function,remove item function
can't get from arry module.
template contains(T)
{
bool contains(T[] Array,T Element)
{
foreach(T ArrayElement; Array)
{
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 12:35:03 UTC, Tobias Pankrath
wrote:
import std.algorithm;
if(options[1].canFind(foo, bar, baz))
This looks quite OK. Thank you, I did not know about that
possibility.
Am 02.02.2015 um 15:59 schrieb ketmar:
On Mon, 02 Feb 2015 14:18:47 +, Tobias Pankrath wrote:
At least I don't expect Dub to support every single language out there
natively.
that's why other build tools allows to manually specify dependencies and
commands as a last resort. but dub
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 14:47:40 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
Contains: array.canFind(element)
Oh, canFind is better than Contains.
Thank you.
On Thu, 05 Feb 2015 14:48:12 +0100, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Am 03.02.2015 um 21:08 schrieb ketmar:
On Tue, 03 Feb 2015 19:43:53 +0100, Martin Nowak wrote:
On 02/03/2015 09:51 AM, ketmar wrote:
'cause it really sux as a build tool.
Not getting into any of the lengthy discussions of yours, but
Am 02.02.2015 um 09:09 schrieb Vladimir Panteleev:
On Monday, 2 February 2015 at 05:23:52 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
1. rdmd
BTW, there is one thing about RDMD that can be a real issue and one that
is not easily solved without integrating its functionality directly into
DMD: It doesn't track
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14125
--- Comment #77 from Andrei Alexandrescu and...@erdani.com ---
Thanks Steve for the nice summary!
--
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 14:51:58 UTC, suliman wrote:
My next job will be related with prorgamming under Solaris. I
dont know version but suppose it will be something pretty out
of date.
Once i had seen topic about D and Solaris, but i want to ask if
D solaris version is ready for
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10920
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
--- Comment #7 from
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14125
John Colvin john.loughran.col...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Am 02.02.2015 um 23:15 schrieb Nick Sabalausky:
On 02/02/2015 03:09 AM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
1a. rdmd and D's module system:
[...]
In contrast, Dub's default modus operandi is to blindly send to the
compiler all *.d files found in the src folder, whether they're
actually used or not. Not
On Thu, 05 Feb 2015 15:33:51 +, Mathias LANG wrote:
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 15:26:23 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Thu, 05 Feb 2015 15:21:08 +, Atila Neves wrote:
the package manager part should have good machine interface to
allow it's usage in various scripts and other build
Am 05.02.2015 um 16:18 schrieb ketmar:
On Thu, 05 Feb 2015 16:05:11 +0100, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Yes, incremental building is indeed a missing feature. It's simply a
matter of available developer time, as for many of the other concerns.
Otherwise this is something that has been acknowledged for
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 15:46:57 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Am 03.02.2015 um 09:51 schrieb ketmar:
On Tue, 03 Feb 2015 02:19:55 +, Martin Nowak wrote:
There seems to be a general scepticism against dub and I
wonder what the
reasons are.
'cause it really sux as a build tool.
On 2/5/15 1:53 AM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
Yes, optimization is another nice possibility. I think there is a lot
of untapped potential in using contracts to pass extra information to
the compiler.
I agree. One actionable - albeit crazy :o) - idea is to make __FILE__,
__LINE__, __MODULE__ etc.
On 2/5/15 1:07 AM, Jakob Ovrum wrote:
On Thursday, 21 August 2014 at 22:35:18 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
...
Added to the review queue as a work in progress with relevant links:
http://wiki.dlang.org/Review_Queue
Yay! -- Andrei
Am 03.02.2015 um 09:51 schrieb ketmar:
On Tue, 03 Feb 2015 02:19:55 +, Martin Nowak wrote:
There seems to be a general scepticism against dub and I wonder what the
reasons are.
'cause it really sux as a build tool.
Just to state the design perspective for a little bit of rationale:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote in message
news:mb03nt$1lhr$1...@digitalmars.com...
I agree. One actionable - albeit crazy :o) - idea is to make __FILE__,
__LINE__, __MODULE__ etc. inside contracts bind to the caller context.
Then all failures blame straight to the caller code. -- Andrei
1 - 100 of 342 matches
Mail list logo
