On Monday, 23 March 2015 at 21:28:27 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
No issue for the past week? -- Andrei
I checked this page: http://arsdnet.net/this-week-in-d/mar-22.html
I do not see any content that cannot be automated at all. Or is
there an article missing that was supposed to be writte
On Wednesday, 25 March 2015 at 04:13:03 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 3/24/15 8:00 PM, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
There is one thing blatantly missing atleast to me.
Unpacking into function arguments.
void myfunc(int x, string y) {
// ...
}
myfunc({1, "hi!"}.unpack);
myfunc(tuple(1, "h
On 25/03/2015 5:13 p.m., Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 3/24/15 8:00 PM, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
On 25/03/2015 7:11 a.m., Martin Nowak wrote:
On 03/24/2015 03:11 PM, Vlad Levenfeld wrote:
Anything going on with this? Been looking forward to seeing it for
awhile.
I think we should settle on a
On 03/23/2015 05:34 PM, Jake The Baker wrote:
> If D had an ide that could do the following I think development and
> testing could be better managed.
>
> 1. IDE that works with a centralized server to be able to change D
> versions at a drop of a time. e.g., click "Master" and it checks to see
>
On 3/24/15 8:00 PM, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
On 25/03/2015 7:11 a.m., Martin Nowak wrote:
On 03/24/2015 03:11 PM, Vlad Levenfeld wrote:
Anything going on with this? Been looking forward to seeing it for
awhile.
I think we should settle on a syntax and split DIP32 in a tuple part and
a pattern
On Wednesday, 25 March 2015 at 03:30:19 UTC, Jake The Baker wrote:
On Tuesday, 24 March 2015 at 17:49:56 UTC, CraigDillabaugh
wrote:
On Tuesday, 24 March 2015 at 17:13:07 UTC, Jake The Baker
wrote:
You guys are complete ignoring 90% of the post. It is not
just about configuration.
Regardless,
On Tuesday, 24 March 2015 at 17:49:56 UTC, CraigDillabaugh wrote:
On Tuesday, 24 March 2015 at 17:13:07 UTC, Jake The Baker wrote:
You guys are complete ignoring 90% of the post. It is not just
about configuration.
Regardless, I'll be back in another year to see what progress
has been made. G
You have never tried compiling Chromium have you..
Dmd, druntime and phobos do not compare in complexity to that. And
that's with Google backing it.
On 25/03/2015 7:11 a.m., Martin Nowak wrote:
On 03/24/2015 03:11 PM, Vlad Levenfeld wrote:
Anything going on with this? Been looking forward to seeing it for awhile.
I think we should settle on a syntax and split DIP32 in a tuple part and
a pattern matching part.
The proposal wasn't yet formal
On 25/03/2015 7:40 a.m., Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Monday, 23 March 2015 at 21:28:27 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
No issue for the past week? -- Andrei
I forgot to post it online this Sunday. Really, I need to move these to
Saturday, Sundays are just packed full of non-computer time for me.
On Monday, 23 March 2015 at 21:34:09 UTC, Jake The Baker wrote:
In 10 more years I doubt Andrei or Walter will have as much
energy to do all the work that they are doing... Better build
the infrastructure now while there is time.
Make an atom plugin. The one stop shop for all things D.
On Tuesday, 24 March 2015 at 18:12:03 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On 03/24/2015 03:11 PM, Vlad Levenfeld wrote:
Anything going on with this? Been looking forward to seeing it
for awhile.
I think we should settle on a syntax and split DIP32 in a tuple
part and
a pattern matching part.
The propos
On Tuesday, 24 March 2015 at 23:07:29 UTC, Vlad Levenfeld wrote:
Anything wrong with using {}? It looks good to me, does it lead
to any parsing ambiguities?
Before:
auto x = {}; // struct or function?
After:
auto x = {}; // struct, function, or tuple??
On Tuesday, 24 March 2015 at 23:07:29 UTC, Vlad Levenfeld wrote:
Anything wrong with using {}? It looks good to me, does it lead
to any parsing ambiguities?
In this context, it would look like a delegate/function literal
or perhaps the start of a scope in other contexts.
auto a = { arg1, arg
On Tuesday, 24 March 2015 at 23:07:29 UTC, Vlad Levenfeld wrote:
On Tuesday, 24 March 2015 at 18:12:03 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
I think we should settle on a syntax and split DIP32 in a
tuple part and
a pattern matching part.
The proposal wasn't yet formally accepted, partly because we
wanted
On Tuesday, 24 March 2015 at 18:12:03 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
I think we should settle on a syntax and split DIP32 in a tuple
part and
a pattern matching part.
The proposal wasn't yet formally accepted, partly because we
wanted to
wait, whether more needs come up. By now it's already 2 years
On 3/24/15 4:38 PM, Dylan Knutson wrote:
immutable nfields = header.count('\t');
...
output.writeln(cycle("\t-").take(2 * nfields));
Super-win, now I only ever have to update the original column list.
Little things like this are what make me love D.
-Steve
I see that `take` returns a lazy ra
On 3/24/15 4:27 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Tuesday, 24 March 2015 at 20:22:14 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
How do I get to past issues of this week in d?
go to the RSS link in the header text
http://arsdnet.net/this-week-in-d/twid.rss
It lists all of them with links.
OK thanks. I sugge
On Tuesday, 24 March 2015 at 13:09:21 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
Recently, while updating a D utility I wrote to process a
binary log file into a tab-separated text file, I found a nice
use for ranges.
So I have N columns, separated by tabs. The header looks like
this:
"TIME\tCOL1\tCO
On Tuesday, 24 March 2015 at 18:48:11 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Thursday, 19 March 2015 at 11:51:59 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
Adam, have you considered sprucing this up for review?
Not possible right now, my schedule is already overloaded (I'm
working two full-time jobs in addition to a vari
immutable nfields = header.count('\t');
...
output.writeln(cycle("\t-").take(2 * nfields));
Super-win, now I only ever have to update the original column
list.
Little things like this are what make me love D.
-Steve
I see that `take` returns a lazy range. That's really neat! How
does write
On Tuesday, 24 March 2015 at 20:22:14 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
How do I get to past issues of this week in d?
go to the RSS link in the header text
http://arsdnet.net/this-week-in-d/twid.rss
It lists all of them with links.
On 3/24/15 2:40 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
http://arsdnet.net/this-week-in-d/mar-22.html
How do I get to past issues of this week in d?
-Steve
On 3/24/15 4:11 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 3/24/15 11:56 AM, "Jacques =?UTF-8?B?TcO8bGxlciI=?=
" wrote:
On Tuesday, 24 March 2015 at 13:09:21 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
New code:
immutable nfields = header.count('\t');
...
output.writeln(cycle("\t-").take(2 * nfields));
output.w
On 3/24/15 11:56 AM, "Jacques =?UTF-8?B?TcO8bGxlciI=?=
" wrote:
On Tuesday, 24 March 2015 at 13:09:21 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
New code:
immutable nfields = header.count('\t');
...
output.writeln(cycle("\t-").take(2 * nfields));
output.writeln("\t-".repeat(nfields).join);
output.wri
On 3/24/2015 11:35 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Tuesday, 24 March 2015 at 18:16:08 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Can be nice entry for weekly D newsletter tips & tricks.
Aye, write it up!
Also, as a Phobos example for take or cycle.
On Tuesday, 24 March 2015 at 15:38:04 UTC, Andre wrote:
I think it is useful to add to std.typecons as there is no
possibility
to use ref for type tuples.
This sounds like a bad idea because in D `ref` is not a type
qualifier and thus not part of a type. Not though that you can
apply ref sto
On Tuesday, 24 March 2015 at 13:09:21 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
New code:
immutable nfields = header.count('\t');
...
output.writeln(cycle("\t-").take(2 * nfields));
output.writeln("\t-".repeat(nfields).join);
On Tuesday, 24 March 2015 at 16:58:48 UTC, Gary Willoughby wrote:
On Tuesday, 24 March 2015 at 15:38:04 UTC, Andre wrote:
The use case is a type tuple where you cannot use the keyword
ref.
Could template alias parameters not be used here?
http://dlang.org/template.html#aliasparameters
Event
On Thursday, 19 March 2015 at 11:51:59 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
Adam, have you considered sprucing this up for review?
Not possible right now, my schedule is already overloaded (I'm
working two full-time jobs in addition to a variety of little
things).
I'm also not really up with all the rec
On Monday, 23 March 2015 at 21:28:27 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
No issue for the past week? -- Andrei
I forgot to post it online this Sunday. Really, I need to move
these to Saturday, Sundays are just packed full of non-computer
time for me.
http://arsdnet.net/this-week-in-d/mar-22.htm
On Tuesday, 24 March 2015 at 18:16:08 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Can be nice entry for weekly D newsletter tips & tricks.
Aye, write it up!
On Tuesday, 24 March 2015 at 18:12:03 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
wait, whether more needs come up. By now it's already 2 years
old and it
still looks complete IMO.
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP32
Using "$" for something completely different is confusing, but it
looks ok. Maybe rename existing use
On Tuesday, 24 March 2015 at 13:09:21 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
Recently, while updating a D utility I wrote to process a
binary log file into a tab-separated text file, I found a nice
use for ranges.
So I have N columns, separated by tabs. The header looks like
this:
"TIME\tCOL1\tCO
On 03/24/2015 03:11 PM, Vlad Levenfeld wrote:
> Anything going on with this? Been looking forward to seeing it for awhile.
I think we should settle on a syntax and split DIP32 in a tuple part and
a pattern matching part.
The proposal wasn't yet formally accepted, partly because we wanted to
wait,
On 3/24/15 11:09 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 3/24/15 10:52 AM, CraigDillabaugh wrote:
On Monday, 23 March 2015 at 21:28:27 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
No issue for the past week? -- Andrei
Maybe Adam was vaporized by Aliens!
Adam was on reddit a couple of hours ago. This is a bit
On 3/24/15 10:52 AM, CraigDillabaugh wrote:
On Monday, 23 March 2015 at 21:28:27 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
No issue for the past week? -- Andrei
Maybe Adam was vaporized by Aliens!
Adam was on reddit a couple of hours ago. This is a bit of a bummer
because an important feature of a we
On Monday, 23 March 2015 at 21:28:27 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
No issue for the past week? -- Andrei
Maybe Adam was vaporized by Aliens!
On Tuesday, 24 March 2015 at 17:13:07 UTC, Jake The Baker wrote:
You guys are complete ignoring 90% of the post. It is not just
about configuration.
Regardless, I'll be back in another year to see what progress
has been made. Good luck. I really do hope you guys can get
your shit together and
On Tuesday, 24 March 2015 at 17:13:07 UTC, Jake The Baker wrote:
You guys are complete ignoring 90% of the post. It is not just
about configuration.
clip
Regardless, I'll be back in another year to see what progress
has been made. Good luck. I really do hope you guys can get
your shit tog
Just saw this message. Thanks for trying it out.
I will have to look at what Rcpp does on Windows. I've never used
D on Windows either so will have to figure that out as well.
On Friday, 20 March 2015 at 02:38:02 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Wednesday, 18 March 2015 at 18:48:59 UTC, bachmeier wrote
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 20:35:31 UTC, Mengu wrote:
trust me, from an undecided but experienced developer's
perspective there are so many reasons to choose D over Go. on
the
otherhand same person has a lot more reasons to choose Go over
D.
i'm writing a very long blog post about this. if a
On Monday, 23 March 2015 at 09:45:41 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
I think this was not intended and is simply a side effect of
limited D call graph analysis. Relaxing that limitation makes
sense to me because unused impure function can be used for
compile-time reflection or returned from pure function
You guys are complete ignoring 90% of the post. It is not just
about configuration.
1. Whatever you claim to be easy is irrelevant. Just because X
can be done by you. If you want "Me" to do X it better be easy,
else I'm not going to waste my time.
Just because you can write 10 lines of scri
On Tuesday, 24 March 2015 at 15:38:04 UTC, Andre wrote:
The use case is a type tuple where you cannot use the keyword
ref.
Could template alias parameters not be used here?
http://dlang.org/template.html#aliasparameters
On Friday, 20 March 2015 at 20:34:36 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/20/2015 8:25 AM, weaselcat wrote:
All of the content on rosettacode appears to be licensed under
GNU FDL, I
believe it would just have to be released under the GNU FDL or
a similar
copyleft license that fulfills the GNU FDL.
On 03/23/2015 08:18 PM, ketmar wrote:
On Mon, 23 Mar 2015 21:34:08 +, Jake The Baker wrote:
I don't want to spend 30mins to an hour to download the latest version,
compile it if I have to, make sure all the configuration stuff is
correct, create a setup program... just to find out there is
Hi,
Namespace helped me to get following template working.
struct PrimitiveRef(T)
{
private T* _value;
@property
ref inout(T) get() inout pure nothrow {
assert(_value);
return *_value;
}
alias get this;
Definition of BoolRef:
alias BoolRef = PrimitiveRef!bool;
On Tuesday, 24 March 2015 at 14:17:26 UTC, Dejan Lekic wrote:
On Wednesday, 18 March 2015 at 18:48:53 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
I'm fed up with this problem. It is actively hurting us every
day.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14307
Anyone want to take this on? Shouldn't be particula
On Wednesday, 18 March 2015 at 18:48:53 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
I'm fed up with this problem. It is actively hurting us every
day.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14307
Anyone want to take this on? Shouldn't be particularly
difficult.
I could take this task, with help of Brian's
Anything going on with this? Been looking forward to seeing it
for awhile.
Recently, while updating a D utility I wrote to process a binary log
file into a tab-separated text file, I found a nice use for ranges.
So I have N columns, separated by tabs. The header looks like this:
"TIME\tCOL1\tCOL2\t..."
With about 30 or 40 columns.
The first output is a line like thi
On 3/24/15 7:04 AM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
"Steven Schveighoffer" wrote in message
news:mepo3t$8ka$1...@digitalmars.com...
I would also find handy a switch to simply display publicly
undocumented functions in the documentation. I recently went through
and documented all core.stdc items with empt
On Monday, 23 March 2015 at 21:34:09 UTC, Jake The Baker wrote:
1. IDE that works with a centralized server to be able to
change D versions at a drop of a time. e.g., click "Master" and
it checks to see if you have the latest, if not it downloads
it, configures it, and sets it up hands free to
Another good task for dfix.
"Steven Schveighoffer" wrote in message
news:mepo3t$8ka$1...@digitalmars.com...
I would also find handy a switch to simply display publicly undocumented
functions in the documentation. I recently went through and documented all
core.stdc items with empty docs so they would just show up. Was a
On Monday, 23 March 2015 at 21:34:09 UTC, Jake The Baker wrote:
If D had an ide that could do the following I think development
and testing could be better managed.
...
Basically you want something like Nuget in Visual Studio:
https://www.nuget.org/
There is something similar for D called
On Monday, 23 March 2015 at 21:34:09 UTC, Jake The Baker wrote:
If D had an ide that could do the following I think development
and testing could be better managed.
1. IDE that works with a centralized server to be able to
change D versions at a drop of a time. e.g., click "Master" and
it che
On 2015-03-23 20:17, klodkevin wrote:
What are your thoughts on this?
I didn't read the whole post but it looks like you've come up with
what's called Policy-based design [1]. The only difference is that you
combined several template parameters in one single parameter. I have
actually start
60 matches
Mail list logo
