On Tuesday, 19 January 2016 at 07:21:09 UTC, Puming wrote:
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 10:20:13 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
As the new design rolled out on dlang.org, I decided to push
the changes on forum.dlang.org as well. From what I gathered
from the previous feedback thread, I believe
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 14:40:21 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 10:20:13 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
As the new design rolled out on dlang.org, I decided to push
the changes on forum.dlang.org as well.
I can't tell what threads I've read anymore on on the defa
On Tuesday, 19 January 2016 at 01:33:34 UTC, Bubbasaur wrote:
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 10:20:13 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
...
Very good but like someone already said, one problem is the
"light gray" or whatever color used on quoted text.
I changed it to its original color (#666).
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 10:20:13 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
As the new design rolled out on dlang.org, I decided to push
the changes on forum.dlang.org as well. From what I gathered
from the previous feedback thread, I believe we've addressed
the most stringent issues. Once again than
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 19:15:08 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 19:01:05 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
That's wrong. Can you post a screenshot?
For this thread, so obviously I have viewed some of the posts:
http://lancebachmeier.com/pics/screenshot.png
That's r
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 20:14:29 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 14:28:44 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 14:22:16 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
Looks great.
One thing: layout of posts change when selecting them.
I'm not sure what you're referri
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 18:17:31 UTC, Uranuz wrote:
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 10:20:13 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
As the new design rolled out on dlang.org, I decided to push
the changes on forum.dlang.org as well. From what I gathered
from the previous feedback thread, I believe
On Tuesday, 19 January 2016 at 04:54:29 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
Second thing: yup the font is not super duper easy to read.
I think the major issue is that is is quite compact in the
horizontal direction. Previous font was more readable. For
the same reason, it makes some link not very e
On Tuesday, 19 January 2016 at 06:17:17 UTC, tsbockman wrote:
1) It introduces substantial template bloat, as the number of
instantiations of the entire function - including the body! -
scales as the square of the number of `auto ref` parameters.
Oops - I was being a little dyslexic here. It's
On Tuesday, 19 January 2016 at 05:43:57 UTC, bitwise wrote:
Sorry if that seemed mean, but it wasn't meant to be insulting.
But while your solution is clever, I find it totally
unrealistic.
Why would anyone use it when they can just templatize their
function and get exactly the same thing?
On Tuesday, 19 January 2016 at 04:27:12 UTC, tsbockman wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 January 2016 at 03:37:17 UTC, tsbockman wrote:
It's ten times easier to write code that way, than the way
Manu complained about in the OP.
To clarify:
1) If `scope` were implemented, Manu's example would look like
t
Building DMD-Win64 against MSC2015-Win64.
I'm repeating this here from the depths of my prior whinge thread,
since this is kind of a new topic.
D's multiple inheritance solution is single-inheritance + interfaces.
Rightly so, it's a great solution, and this matches what all the C++
programmers I've ever worked with do anyway. Trouble is,
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 20:14:29 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 14:28:44 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 14:22:16 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
Looks great.
One thing: layout of posts change when selecting them.
I'm not sure what you're referri
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 20:51:23 UTC, Nick Treleaven wrote:
This would really help on my nexus tablet, it's painful
selecting a text block of lines that flow off the visible
screen.
Where does that happen?
On Tuesday, 19 January 2016 at 03:37:17 UTC, tsbockman wrote:
It's ten times easier to write code that way, than the way Manu
complained about in the OP.
To clarify:
1) If `scope` were implemented, Manu's example would look like
this:
// Declaration
void func(in CustomString s1, in C
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 23:55:33 UTC, Dibyendu Majumdar
wrote:
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 23:53:45 UTC, Dibyendu Majumdar
wrote:
Thanks - that worked, but I had to write it this way:
import std.c.windows.windows;
import core.sys.windows.dll;
mixin SimpleDllMain;
I noticed that
On Tuesday, 19 January 2016 at 03:01:55 UTC, bitwise wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 January 2016 at 00:11:45 UTC, tsbockman wrote:
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 15:36:09 UTC, Manu wrote:
[...]
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/3937
Is this like...a sarcastic pull request?
You ca
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 21:39:09 UTC, Anon wrote:
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 19:32:19 UTC, bitwise wrote:
struct S;
void func(ref S s);
func(S()); // FINE
void func(ref S s) @safe;
func(S()); // ERROR
Isn't that backwards? I mean, @safe functions can't escape
their parameters,
On Tuesday, 19 January 2016 at 00:11:45 UTC, tsbockman wrote:
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 15:36:09 UTC, Manu wrote:
[...]
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/3937
Is this like...a sarcastic pull request?
You can't actually expect people to write code like this just to
h
On Tuesday, 19 January 2016 at 00:11:40 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
4. sort was and is attackable before all of these changes
(b) Improve sort() first, then apply a similar strategy to
improving topN. Do not use RNGs at all.
Since point 4 is in fact already fixed a good while ago, my
sug
On Tuesday, 19 January 2016 at 00:11:40 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Of course not. I think this back-and-forth takes away from the
gist of things. So let me summarize what has happened:
1. topN was reportedly slow. It was using a random pivot. I
made it use getPivot (deterministic) instead
On Tuesday, 19 January 2016 at 00:11:40 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
4. sort was and is attackable before all of these changes
No, sort utilizes Introsort (Quicksort but switch to Heapsort if
recurse too deep): see
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/blob/2.067/std/algorithm/s
On Tuesday, 19 January 2016 at 00:17:30 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
How would this translate to a matter of selecting the pivot
during sort? -- Andrei
A large chunk of a given datacenter going quadratic at the same
time.
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 17:02:07 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 14:01:15 UTC, rsw0x wrote:
one of the biggest things D has over C++ is its vastly
superior module system.
When you compare D's something with C++'s nothing, then the
module system in D is infinitely
On Tuesday, 19 January 2016 at 01:04:03 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 1/18/16 7:46 PM, Ilya wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 January 2016 at 00:38:14 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 01/19/2016 01:12 AM, Ilya wrote:
There is already implementation with predictable seed. Proof:
https://github.com/D-Progr
On Tuesday, 19 January 2016 at 01:04:03 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 1/18/16 7:46 PM, Ilya wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 January 2016 at 00:38:14 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 01/19/2016 01:12 AM, Ilya wrote:
There is already implementation with predictable seed. Proof:
https://github.com/D-Progr
On Tuesday, 19 January 2016 at 01:33:34 UTC, Bubbasaur wrote:
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 10:20:13 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
...
Very good but like someone already said, one problem is the
"light gray" or whatever color used on quoted text.
Bubba.
And by the way, after the first pa
On Tuesday, 19 January 2016 at 01:04:03 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 1/18/16 7:46 PM, Ilya wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 January 2016 at 00:38:14 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 01/19/2016 01:12 AM, Ilya wrote:
There is already implementation with predictable seed. Proof:
https://github.com/D-Progr
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 10:20:13 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
...
Very good but like someone already said, one problem is the
"light gray" or whatever color used on quoted text.
Bubba.
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 10:20:13 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
[...]
Please change it so that the "Thread Overview" bar appears on
every page, not just the first one in the thread.
On 1/18/16 7:46 PM, Ilya wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 January 2016 at 00:38:14 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 01/19/2016 01:12 AM, Ilya wrote:
There is already implementation with predictable seed. Proof:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/blob/master/std/random.d#L1151
--Ilya
The defau
On Tuesday, 19 January 2016 at 00:38:14 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 01/19/2016 01:12 AM, Ilya wrote:
There is already implementation with predictable seed. Proof:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/blob/master/std/random.d#L1151
--Ilya
The default RNG is seeded with unpredictabl
On 01/19/2016 01:12 AM, Ilya wrote:
There is already implementation with predictable seed. Proof:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/blob/master/std/random.d#L1151
--Ilya
The default RNG is seeded with unpredictableSeed. What is the point you
are trying to make?
On Tuesday, 19 January 2016 at 00:11:40 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 1/18/16 6:51 PM, Ilya wrote:
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 23:49:36 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
On 1/18/16 6:44 PM, Ilya wrote:
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 23:27:19 UTC, Ivan Kazmenko
wrote:
On Monday, 18 January
On 1/18/16 6:55 PM, deadalnix wrote:
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 23:49:36 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
unpredictableSeed uses the system clock as a source of randomness, so
we're good there. -- Andrei
I got problem with that even when crytographically secure randomness
wasn't needed more
On Tuesday, 19 January 2016 at 00:02:08 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 01/19/2016 12:55 AM, Ilya wrote:
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 23:53:53 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 01/19/2016 12:50 AM, Ilya wrote:
...
1. Yes, probability of hitting the worst case repeatedly is
is
practically zero. But RNGs
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 15:36:09 UTC, Manu wrote:
[...]
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/3937
On 1/18/16 6:51 PM, Ilya wrote:
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 23:49:36 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 1/18/16 6:44 PM, Ilya wrote:
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 23:27:19 UTC, Ivan Kazmenko wrote:
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 23:18:03 UTC, Ilya wrote:
A RNGs don't improve worst case. It o
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 23:39:02 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 1/18/16 6:18 PM, Ilya wrote:
A RNGs don't improve worst case. It only changes an
permutation for worst case. --Ilya
Well it does improve things. The probability of hitting the
worst case repeatedly is practically zero,
On 01/19/2016 12:55 AM, Ilya wrote:
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 23:53:53 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 01/19/2016 12:50 AM, Ilya wrote:
...
1. Yes, probability of hitting the worst case repeatedly is is
practically zero. But RNGs do not change this probability.
2. It is possible to build attack
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 23:55:38 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 01/19/2016 12:51 AM, Ilya wrote:
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 23:49:36 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
On 1/18/16 6:44 PM, Ilya wrote:
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 23:27:19 UTC, Ivan Kazmenko
wrote:
[...]
No, it is definitel
On 01/19/2016 12:51 AM, Ilya wrote:
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 23:49:36 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 1/18/16 6:44 PM, Ilya wrote:
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 23:27:19 UTC, Ivan Kazmenko wrote:
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 23:18:03 UTC, Ilya wrote:
A RNGs don't improve worst case.
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 23:53:45 UTC, Dibyendu Majumdar
wrote:
Thanks - that worked, but I had to write it this way:
import std.c.windows.windows;
import core.sys.windows.dll;
mixin SimpleDllMain;
I noticed that above modules are documented in the library
reference so I assume tha
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 23:49:36 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
unpredictableSeed uses the system clock as a source of
randomness, so we're good there. -- Andrei
I got problem with that even when crytographically secure
randomness wasn't needed more than once. A specific case included
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 23:53:53 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 01/19/2016 12:50 AM, Ilya wrote:
...
1. Yes, probability of hitting the worst case repeatedly is is
practically zero. But RNGs do not change this probability.
2. It is possible to build attack for our RNGs, because they
are
Pseu
On 18.01.2016 21:32, wobbles wrote:
On the reddit thread, a bug in safari was posted:
"
I found a bug on Safari 7.1.3: each time I click the "Edit" button for
the code editor, the gray panel with the code it in gets longer, and
pushes the rest of the content in the site down. Here's an album with
On 01/19/2016 12:39 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 1/18/16 6:18 PM, Ilya wrote:
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 20:45:56 UTC, Ivan Kazmenko wrote:
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 12:00:10 UTC, Ivan Kazmenko wrote:
Here goes the test which shows quadratic behavior for the new version:
http://dpa
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 05:58:38 UTC, bitwise wrote:
On Sunday, 17 January 2016 at 22:12:44 UTC, Dibyendu Majumdar
wrote:
Presumably there is no compiler flag to auto generate this?
There's no compiler flag, but you can use this:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/blob/m
On 01/19/2016 12:50 AM, Ilya wrote:
...
1. Yes, probability of hitting the worst case repeatedly is is
practically zero. But RNGs do not change this probability.
2. It is possible to build attack for our RNGs, because they are
Pseudo-RNGs.
--Ilya
You also need to predict the seed. How do you d
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 23:49:36 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 1/18/16 6:44 PM, Ilya wrote:
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 23:27:19 UTC, Ivan Kazmenko
wrote:
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 23:18:03 UTC, Ilya wrote:
A RNGs don't improve worst case. It only changes an
permutation for
w
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 23:39:02 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 1/18/16 6:18 PM, Ilya wrote:
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 20:45:56 UTC, Ivan Kazmenko
wrote:
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 12:00:10 UTC, Ivan Kazmenko
wrote:
Here goes the test which shows quadratic behavior for the
new
On 1/18/16 6:44 PM, Ilya wrote:
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 23:27:19 UTC, Ivan Kazmenko wrote:
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 23:18:03 UTC, Ilya wrote:
A RNGs don't improve worst case. It only changes an permutation for
worst case. --Ilya
Still, use of RNG makes it impossible to construct th
On 1/18/16 6:27 PM, Ivan Kazmenko wrote:
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 23:18:03 UTC, Ilya wrote:
A RNGs don't improve worst case. It only changes an permutation for
worst case. --Ilya
Still, use of RNG makes it impossible to construct the worst case
beforehand, once and for all. In that sense
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 23:27:19 UTC, Ivan Kazmenko wrote:
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 23:18:03 UTC, Ilya wrote:
A RNGs don't improve worst case. It only changes an
permutation for worst case. --Ilya
Still, use of RNG makes it impossible to construct the worst
case beforehand, once an
On 1/18/16 6:18 PM, Ilya wrote:
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 20:45:56 UTC, Ivan Kazmenko wrote:
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 12:00:10 UTC, Ivan Kazmenko wrote:
Here goes the test which shows quadratic behavior for the new version:
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/e4b3bc26c3cf
(dpaste kills the slow code
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 23:18:03 UTC, Ilya wrote:
A RNGs don't improve worst case. It only changes an permutation
for worst case. --Ilya
Still, use of RNG makes it impossible to construct the worst case
beforehand, once and for all. In that sense, this is a
regression.
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 20:45:56 UTC, Ivan Kazmenko wrote:
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 12:00:10 UTC, Ivan Kazmenko wrote:
Here goes the test which shows quadratic behavior for the new
version:
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/e4b3bc26c3cf
(dpaste kills the slow code before it completes the task)
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 19:32:19 UTC, bitwise wrote:
struct S;
void func(ref S s);
func(S()); // FINE
void func(ref S s) @safe;
func(S()); // ERROR
Isn't that backwards? I mean, @safe functions can't escape their
parameters, so whether or not it is a temporary shouldn't matter
to
On 01/18/2016 06:02 PM, Jack Stouffer wrote:
Is there a compiled list of issues?
1. As deadalnix pointed out, a lack of spec
2. Issue 313
3. Issue 314
4. Issue 10378
These are the biggest IMO. There are probably others I don't know of.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1238
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 16:05:37 UTC, Tofu Ninja wrote:
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 15:03:18 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
...
OK, I figured this one out. We weren't loading Roboto Slab
Bold, so the browsers were making up what they thought bold
could look like from the regular weigh
On 01/18/2016 01:00 PM, Ivan Kazmenko wrote:
The old version (2.070.0-b2) could not be tricked with it, does it use
random?
Yes, it selected the pivot uniformly at random using the global RNG.
(This is also why the documentation says topN is O(n) in expectation.)
On 2016-01-18 16:05, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
if you tried something like that, you would get all present LLVM
versions in the path which would likely lead to some chaos.
Hmm, true. I was thinking that one would only have one version
installed. But that might not be the case.
Thanks for developing the forum software.
One feature request: if there's selected text in the message body
when clicking reply, only quote the selected text rather than the
whole message body. This is what my email client does.
This would really help on my nexus tablet, it's painful selectin
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 12:00:10 UTC, Ivan Kazmenko wrote:
Here goes the test which shows quadratic behavior for the new
version:
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/e4b3bc26c3cf
(dpaste kills the slow code before it completes the task)
Correction: this is the result of removing a uniform call in pull
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 15:36:09 UTC, Manu wrote:
One more time...
Assuming:
void func(const CustomString &s1, const CustomString &s2);
void func(ref const(CustomString) s1, ref const(CustomString)
s2);
C++:
func("hello", "world");
D:
auto dumb_name = CustomString("hello");
auto
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 10:20:13 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
As the new design rolled out on dlang.org, I decided to push
the changes on forum.dlang.org as well. From what I gathered
from the previous feedback thread, I believe we've addressed
the most stringent issues. Once again than
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 14:28:44 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 14:22:16 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
Looks great.
One thing: layout of posts change when selecting them.
I'm not sure what you're referring to. Screenshots, please? Is
it the link hotkeys? Is this a
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 10:24:28 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
A known problem is that D doesn't put destructors in the vtbl[]
for C++ classes, although it should. Also, virtual destructors
on Linux 64 consume 2 slots in the vtbl[], which surprised me.
One is for the destructor, the other
On 18.01.2016 20:35, Andrej Mitrovic via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 1/18/16, anonymous via Digitalmars-d wrote:
[...]
Microsoft does this.
And techcrunch apparently too..
Another one: stackoverflow
Am Mon, 18 Jan 2016 14:00:05 +
schrieb Gerald :
> On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 09:04:48 UTC, Luis wrote:
> > On Sunday, 17 January 2016 at 03:03:14 UTC, Gerald wrote:
> >> On Sunday, 17 January 2016 at 02:51:30 UTC, Gerald wrote:
> >>> Are there any other options out there that I might no
On 1/18/16, anonymous via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On 18.01.2016 19:59, Andrej Mitrovic via Digitalmars-d wrote:
>> Btw, drop-down menus which do not drop-down on hover are really
>> strange. I've never seen a drop-down menu on a modern website which
>> required you to click to open and click to clo
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 18:03:34 UTC, Namespace wrote:
That is mine. I closed it after it was more or less abandoned.
Yeah.. I was initially for this proposal/PR, but on top of the
fact that it will cause confusion because of how it differs from
the template auto ref, it simply shouldn'
On 18.01.2016 19:59, Andrej Mitrovic via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Btw, drop-down menus which do not drop-down on hover are really
strange. I've never seen a drop-down menu on a modern website which
required you to click to open and click to close.
Microsoft does this.
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 19:01:05 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
That's wrong. Can you post a screenshot?
For this thread, so obviously I have viewed some of the posts:
http://lancebachmeier.com/pics/screenshot.png
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 15:06:12 UTC, Luis wrote:
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 14:00:05 UTC, Gerald wrote:
[...]
I browse your code and grestful code a few times. I did stuff
with GtkD on a different approach, using GtkBuilder and Gtk
autolink of functions by name. I try to avoid gene
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 18:17:31 UTC, Uranuz wrote:
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 10:20:13 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
As the new design rolled out on dlang.org, I decided to push
the changes on forum.dlang.org as well. From what I gathered
from the previous feedback thread, I believe
Am Mon, 18 Jan 2016 15:05:28 +
schrieb Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d :
> On Mon, 2016-01-18 at 15:33 +0100, Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d
> wrote:
> > On 2016-01-18 14:23, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> >
> > > I am just trying this out. I added -L/usr/lib64/llvm in the
> > >
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 18:59:27 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 1/18/16, Vladimir Panteleev via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
As the new design rolled out on dlang.org
Btw, drop-down menus which do not drop-down on hover are really
strange. I've never seen a drop-down menu on a modern website
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 18:10:01 UTC, tcak wrote:
New design is good, though it uses "Roboto Slab" according to
Firefox Web tools. But due to lack of this font (does the web
site use Google Fonts?), I see everything in Sans Serif. As far
as I see, no other font name is provided in CSS as
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 16:37:53 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 15:13:20 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
Hi Adam,
The forum remembers which posts you've read and marks those
you haven't in bold.
Do you browse the forum without an account and without cookies?
Whe
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 18:08:31 UTC, tsbockman wrote:
Again, I can probably automate generation of the wrapper easily
enough.
Genericized:
template acceptRVals(alias func) {
private:
import std.traits : arity;
alias impl = acceptRVals!(arity!func);
public:
alias acceptRVals
On 1/18/16, Vladimir Panteleev via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> As the new design rolled out on dlang.org
Btw, drop-down menus which do not drop-down on hover are really
strange. I've never seen a drop-down menu on a modern website which
required you to click to open and click to close.
I do think hug
On 01/18/2016 04:06 PM, Luis wrote:
Were I can find the script to generate ddox for GtkD ?
https://github.com/gtkd-developers/GtkD/blob/master/makeddox.sh
--
Mike Wey
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 10:20:13 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
As the new design rolled out on dlang.org, I decided to push
the changes on forum.dlang.org as well. From what I gathered
from the previous feedback thread, I believe we've addressed
the most stringent issues. Once again than
New design is good, though it uses "Roboto Slab" according to
Firefox Web tools. But due to lack of this font (does the web
site use Google Fonts?), I see everything in Sans Serif. As far
as I see, no other font name is provided in CSS as well.
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 15:36:09 UTC, Manu wrote:
One more time...
Assuming:
void func(const CustomString &s1, const CustomString &s2);
void func(ref const(CustomString) s1, ref const(CustomString)
s2);
C++:
func("hello", "world");
D:
auto dumb_name = CustomString("hello");
auto
That is mine. I closed it after it was more or less abandoned.
On 1/18/2016 6:09 AM, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
I'd suggest it needs fixing.
I agree. I suggested the workaround so you wouldn't be blocked by it.
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 15:36:09 UTC, Manu wrote:
One more time...
Assuming:
void func(const CustomString &s1, const CustomString &s2);
void func(ref const(CustomString) s1, ref const(CustomString)
s2);
C++:
func("hello", "world");
D:
auto dumb_name = CustomString("hello");
auto
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 15:36:09 UTC, Manu wrote:
One more time...
Assuming:
void func(const CustomString &s1, const CustomString &s2);
void func(ref const(CustomString) s1, ref const(CustomString)
s2);
C++:
func("hello", "world");
D:
auto dumb_name = CustomString("hello");
auto
On 1/18/2016 6:46 AM, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Yeah, this is now in new territory, since name lookup seems to be working.
Shall I spawn a new thread?
A good idea. This one has run its course.
You don't give up, huh? ;)
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 14:01:15 UTC, rsw0x wrote:
one of the biggest things D has over C++ is its vastly superior
module system.
When you compare D's something with C++'s nothing, then the
module system in D is infinitely better by definition.
Is there a compiled list of issues?
1.
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 09:56:17 UTC, Adrian Matoga wrote:
...
Your idea seems interesting, but IMHO a compacting GC should be
the preferred solution for heap fragmentation.
Implementing a compacting GC in D would be exceedingly difficult,
if not impossible, because of raw pointers, uni
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 15:36:09 UTC, Manu wrote:
Nobody will want to transition if their code gets plainly
worse, from
a basic practical standpoint.
This is a good example of why D should stop trying to convert C++
programmers. There's no way to integrate C++ code into a D
project, b
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 10:20:13 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
- GOOD if you are as specific as possible in what can be
improved
- GREAT if you can provide detailed suggestions in how things
can be improved
- AMAZING if you can provide a mock-up (screenshot or web page)
of how things cou
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 11:46:36 UTC, Nemanja Boric wrote:
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 09:28:59 UTC, tcak wrote:
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 08:12:03 UTC, Nemanja Boric
wrote:
Check https://dlang.org/phobos/std_experimental_allocator.html
Which part of this module provide the functi
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 15:13:20 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
Hi Adam,
The forum remembers which posts you've read and marks those you
haven't in bold.
Do you browse the forum without an account and without cookies?
When I browse on the web (which is a lot of the time) I do so
wi
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 16:11:37 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
Nothing changed in this regard since the last iteration.
Alright and finally (Before you get tired) I was looking the new
DLANG.org and it's very nice. The only small thing I saw is the:
"Latest announcements" and "Active D
1 - 100 of 164 matches
Mail list logo
