"We decided not to fix the suspension but we painted some cool
flames on the bonnet for you... isn't it awesome!!!".
"Huh???"
"Well you can still drive it, just try to avoid hitting any pot
holes"
On Friday, 12 August 2016 at 19:29:42 UTC, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
I'll give some highlights, but those are, mostly, things that
I've already listed in this forum and in my lightening talk.
- No RAII support, despite the fact everybody here seems to
think that D supports RAII.
Shachar
There
On 21/08/16 12:47, ag0aep6g wrote:
On 08/21/2016 07:12 AM, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
During static analysis, keep both the "most expanded" and the "least
expanded" type of the expression parsed so far. "Least expanded" is the
largest type actually used in the expression.
What's "most expanded"?
A
On Saturday, 2 April 2016 at 06:02:26 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Saturday, 2 April 2016 at 05:18:47 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 4/2/16 12:36 AM, Jack Stouffer wrote:
On Saturday, 2 April 2016 at 03:58:27 UTC, Daniel Murphy
wrote:
On 2/04/2016 7:28 AM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Sunday, 21 August 2016 at 19:12:27 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 08/21/2016 03:01 PM, Seb wrote:
because (1) you need less documentation (just one file to
document) and
Wouldn't it be better to optimize documentation for the reader
instead of the writer? After all if reading is impair
On 8/21/2016 12:12 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
How does that work? Aren't step-by-step documents "how to do this on Posix" and
"how to do this for Windows" best tested in one environment at a time?
I know when I'm following step-by-step procedures, I prefer it to be specific to
my case, not
On Friday, 19 August 2016 at 07:33:42 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe wrote:
Any chance of it becoming official?
Not directly, the core team is married to their old ways.
On Sunday, 21 August 2016 at 17:26:24 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 8/21/2016 2:47 AM, ag0aep6g wrote:
Upon use of the value, resolve which type to actually use for
it. If the
use type requests a type between least and most, use that
type for
evaluating the entire expression. If the use requests
On Sunday, 21 August 2016 at 21:31:07 UTC, Bill Hicks wrote:
On Sunday, 21 August 2016 at 12:51:16 UTC, Lodovico Giaretta
wrote:
Your offensive tone, your attitude to pointing at a single
person as the source of the problems,
My friend (or foe), please don't get it twisted. If D had been
On Sunday, 21 August 2016 at 12:51:16 UTC, Lodovico Giaretta
wrote:
Your offensive tone, your attitude to pointing at a single
person as the source of the problems,
My friend (or foe), please don't get it twisted. If D had been a
huge success, it's Andrei and Walter who were going to take
On Sunday, 21 August 2016 at 00:44:01 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 20.08.2016 21:20, Engine Machine wrote:
That is
It would be nice to have something like
alias Type = Type!();
class Type(T...): TypeParent!T if(T.length==1){
int x;
static if (T is Dog)
int y;
}
I don't understa
On Sunday, 21 August 2016 at 16:41:27 UTC, NX wrote:
crybaby. Real Programmers laughs at you. didn't they tell you
that programming means "pain" -- that is the reason they starting
with the same letter?
On 08/21/2016 03:01 PM, Seb wrote:
because (1) you need less documentation (just one file to document) and
Wouldn't it be better to optimize documentation for the reader instead
of the writer? After all if reading is impaired, that's bound to make
the maintainer unhappy even if she has fewer
On Sunday, 21 August 2016 at 18:57:25 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 08/21/2016 12:56 PM, Seb wrote:
On Sunday, 21 August 2016 at 16:41:27 UTC, NX wrote:
[warning: rant ahead]
I'm amazed by the lack of documentation - or to say it better,
documentation that works - on how to compile DMD an
On 08/21/2016 12:56 PM, Seb wrote:
On Sunday, 21 August 2016 at 16:41:27 UTC, NX wrote:
[warning: rant ahead]
I'm amazed by the lack of documentation - or to say it better,
documentation that works - on how to compile DMD and eventually
Phobos. Here
[https://wiki.dlang.org/Starting_as_a_Contrib
On Sunday, 21 August 2016 at 16:49:53 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 08/21/2016 12:41 PM, NX wrote:
For God's sake no place in docs say that I need DMC,
which is something I figured from make error output. I
reinstalled dmd
and this time I checked that box which makes installer
automatical
On 8/21/2016 2:47 AM, ag0aep6g wrote:
Upon use of the value, resolve which type to actually use for it. If the
use type requests a type between least and most, use that type for
evaluating the entire expression. If the use requests a type outside
that range, use the one closest (and, if the use i
On Sunday, 21 August 2016 at 16:41:27 UTC, NX wrote:
[warning: rant ahead]
I'm amazed by the lack of documentation - or to say it better,
documentation that works - on how to compile DMD and eventually
Phobos. Here
[https://wiki.dlang.org/Starting_as_a_Contributor#Windows_2] we
have awfully
On Sunday, 21 August 2016 at 16:41:27 UTC, NX wrote:
[warning: rant ahead]
Consider using Digger ( https://github.com/CyberShadow/Digger )
in your future attempts to build DMD, to save yourself some
trouble. I've had a great experience using it, apart from the
dependency on visual studio.
On 08/21/2016 12:41 PM, NX wrote:
[warning: rant ahead]
I'm amazed by the lack of documentation - or to say it better,
documentation that works - on how to compile DMD and eventually Phobos.
Here [https://wiki.dlang.org/Starting_as_a_Contributor#Windows_2] we
have awfully categorized yet promisi
[warning: rant ahead]
I'm amazed by the lack of documentation - or to say it better,
documentation that works - on how to compile DMD and eventually
Phobos. Here
[https://wiki.dlang.org/Starting_as_a_Contributor#Windows_2] we
have awfully categorized yet promising information on how to
serio
On Sunday, 21 August 2016 at 15:05:11 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Sunday, 21 August 2016 at 12:51:16 UTC, Lodovico Giaretta
wrote:
Your offensive tone, your attitude to pointing at a single
person as the source of the problems, your improper use of
low-level stereotypes and non-technical poi
On 08/21/2016 01:12 AM, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
I'll suggest an algorithmic definition of (my interpretation of) Adam's
proposal:
During static analysis, keep both the "most expanded" and the "least
expanded" type of the expression parsed so far. "Least expanded" is the
largest type actually used
On 08/20/2016 11:25 AM, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
On 20/08/16 00:51, Walter Bright wrote:
On 8/18/2016 7:59 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Alas, C insisted on making everything int all the time and D followed
that :(
Actually, Adam's suggestion on how things should work is precisely how C
works (exc
On Sunday, 21 August 2016 at 12:51:16 UTC, Lodovico Giaretta
wrote:
Your offensive tone, your attitude to pointing at a single
person as the source of the problems, your improper use of
low-level stereotypes and non-technical pointless argumentation
are definitely out of place.
He's a sem
On Sunday, 21 August 2016 at 13:58:18 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
Many users judge programming languages by activity on their
subreddits. Ours is https://www.reddit.com/r/d_language/
One purpose of the subreddit is to market the language to
non-users. I want to provide those new to the language with
Many users judge programming languages by activity on their
subreddits. Ours is https://www.reddit.com/r/d_language/
One purpose of the subreddit is to market the language to
non-users. I want to provide those new to the language with:
- Evidence that D is a serious, actively used language
-
On Sunday, 21 August 2016 at 12:37:35 UTC, Bill Hicks wrote:
[...]
Your offensive tone, your attitude to pointing at a single person
as the source of the problems, your improper use of low-level
stereotypes and non-technical pointless argumentation are
definitely out of place.
That's a pit
On Saturday, 20 August 2016 at 20:39:13 UTC, Engine Machine wrote:
We have a unittest, what about an examples?
Examples are self contained short programs, each block acts as
a "main" function. One can run all the examples and spit out
all the output consecutively. It also allows for more robus
On Saturday, 20 August 2016 at 09:03:50 UTC, Lodovico Giaretta
wrote:
At this point I'd like to know which non-tumoral language we
should all be using...
(I know I shouldn't feed the trolls, but I'm truly interested
in knowing what's his ideal language).
D++, haha, just kidding.
If you th
On 08/21/2016 07:12 AM, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
During static analysis, keep both the "most expanded" and the "least
expanded" type of the expression parsed so far. "Least expanded" is the
largest type actually used in the expression.
What's "most expanded"?
Upon use of the value, resolve whic
On Sunday, 21 August 2016 at 09:02:09 UTC, Solomon E wrote:
On Saturday, 20 August 2016 at 20:39:13 UTC, Engine Machine
wrote:
We have a unittest, what about an examples?
It seems like there could be a library function that
compile-time-reflects to make a collection of all the functions
On 21/08/2016 9:02 PM, Solomon E wrote:
On Saturday, 20 August 2016 at 20:39:13 UTC, Engine Machine wrote:
We have a unittest, what about an examples?
Examples are self contained short programs, each block acts as a
"main" function. One can run all the examples and spit out all the
output conse
On Saturday, 20 August 2016 at 20:39:13 UTC, Engine Machine wrote:
We have a unittest, what about an examples?
Examples are self contained short programs, each block acts as
a "main" function. One can run all the examples and spit out
all the output consecutively. It also allows for more robus
On Friday, 19 August 2016 at 02:59:40 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Thursday, 18 August 2016 at 22:50:27 UTC, John Smith wrote:
Garbage collector is in a few libraries as well. I think the
only problem I had with that is that the std.range library has
severely reduced functionality when using st
35 matches
Mail list logo
