On Thursday, December 29, 2016 14:54:35 Ali Çehreli via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> I'm working on understanding how different qualifiers of the same type,
> the kinds of indirections that its members may have, and the expressions
> being lvalue versus rvalue affect function overload resolution.
>
> For
Why is the compiler for the D language not downloading from your
site. It has not enabled me to be entirely fascinated with the
language with confidence. Please correct the challenge. Does it
have issues with Windows 7?
On Friday, 30 December 2016 at 08:17:54 UTC, Joseph Agiri wrote:
Why is the compiler for the D language not downloading from
your site. It has not enabled me to be entirely fascinated with
the language with confidence. Please correct the challenge.
Does it have issues with Windows 7?
The com
If you improve the standard library, everything OK? If...
Next Version Request.
Add To The F Sharp Like Pipeline Operator(D Language Pipeline
Syntax is BAD.) & SML(C Language Compatible) Like Function Syntax
&Haskell Like Maybe Monad&Binary Execution speed Up.
Plz,Now!!!
On Tuesday, 20 December 2016 at 01:45:27 UTC, Tommi wrote:
Improve the standard library!
...If you improve the standard library, everything OK? If...
Next Version Request.
Add To The F Sharp Like Pipeline Operator(D Language Pipeline
Syntax is BAD.) & SML(C Language Compatible) Like Function S
On Friday, 30 December 2016 at 06:22:40 UTC, bauss wrote:
[...]
Yeah. I meant a subset. But widgets will not follow the DOM query
syntax, it should use class attributes.
.button {
border-color: red;
}
.container {
...
}
auto btn = new Button();
btn.addClass("button");
btn.addStyleFromF
On Friday, 30 December 2016 at 11:32:50 UTC, aberba wrote:
On Friday, 30 December 2016 at 06:22:40 UTC, bauss wrote:
[...]
Yeah. I meant a subset. But widgets will not follow the DOM
query syntax, it should use class attributes.
.button {
border-color: red;
}
.container {
...
}
auto b
On Friday, 30 December 2016 at 13:26:15 UTC, Bauss wrote:
On Friday, 30 December 2016 at 11:32:50 UTC, aberba wrote:
[...]
Yeah it kinda follows classes right now already.
It follows a little different concept, where it's based on
selectors and not classes.
So you give your component selec
Are there any C-like bitfields in D?
Yes - How can I use them?
No - What could be used in their stead?
On Thursday, 29 December 2016 at 21:41:45 UTC, aberba wrote:
Styling is similar to CSS but different. Wished someone would
just go for a full blown CSS parser. CSS has proven its more
capable and loved for client side styling/decoration.
Isn't this what GTK is essentially doing already where
On Friday, 30 December 2016 at 13:56:30 UTC, Getald wrote:
On Thursday, 29 December 2016 at 21:41:45 UTC, aberba wrote:
Styling is similar to CSS but different. Wished someone would
just go for a full blown CSS parser. CSS has proven its more
capable and loved for client side styling/decoratio
On Friday, 30 December 2016 at 13:45:23 UTC, Martin wrote:
Are there any C-like bitfields in D?
Yes - How can I use them?
No - What could be used in their stead?
Not built-in, but in the standard library:
https://dlang.org/phobos/std_bitmanip.html#.bitfields
On Friday, 30 December 2016 at 09:49:27 UTC, keito940 wrote:
If you improve the standard library, everything OK? If...
Next Version Request.
Add To The F Sharp Like Pipeline Operator(D Language Pipeline
Syntax is BAD.) & SML(C Language Compatible) Like Function
Syntax &Haskell Like Maybe Monad&
On Friday, 30 December 2016 at 14:06:06 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
On Friday, 30 December 2016 at 13:45:23 UTC, Martin wrote:
Are there any C-like bitfields in D?
Yes - How can I use them?
No - What could be used in their stead?
Not built-in, but in the standard library:
https://dlang.org/phobo
On Wednesday, 28 December 2016 at 23:14:48 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
On 12/28/16 10:48 AM, deadalnix wrote:
On Saturday, 24 December 2016 at 15:44:18 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
A compiler enhancement can do this _without_ a language
change.
The language addition has additional bene
On Friday, 30 December 2016 at 18:11:54 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
I think the performance gain we are looking at here is
marginal, and I don't expect people to change their code to get
a marginal benefit, so I suggest the performance aspect of the
change to be simply left aside.
Yes, imports are
On Thursday, 29 December 2016 at 18:21:30 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
Hi Guys,
I just figured out why array constants did not work as function
arguments.
It's because the array-constant undergoes a cast when used as
slice, while an array literal can be taken as is.
The currently newCTFE does not
On 12/29/2016 11:59 PM, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> In practice, I wouldn't expect it to matter - and usually if
> you've overloaded on mutable and immutable, you're going to
> want to overload on const as well anyway
Coming up with such guidelines is exactly the reason why I was
On Fri, 30 Dec 2016 18:18:12 +, Stefan Koch wrote:
> I am still not sure what problem it is trying to solve :)
* Performance improvements, primarily when a module imports another,
bulky module for optional functionality.
* Making it easier to locate where things are defined when reading code.
On Friday, 30 December 2016 at 22:29:18 UTC, Chris Wright wrote:
* Performance improvements, primarily when a module imports
another,
bulky module for optional functionality.
That is solved by selective imports.
* Making it easier to locate where things are defined when
reading code.
That i
Stefan Koch wrote:
> On Friday, 30 December 2016 at 22:29:18 UTC, Chris Wright wrote:
>> * Performance improvements, primarily when a module imports
>> another,
>> bulky module for optional functionality.
> That is solved by selective imports.
>
>> * Making it easier to locate where things are d
On Friday, 30 December 2016 at 23:49:23 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
The main win, which indeed is not emphasized enough, is better
encapsulation. Walter pointed that out, and I will redo the DIP
to put that front and center.
Maybe i can provide an example where i think DCD's would be
us
On Fri, 30 Dec 2016 22:42:39 +, Stefan Koch wrote:
> On Friday, 30 December 2016 at 22:29:18 UTC, Chris Wright wrote:
>> * Performance improvements, primarily when a module imports another,
>> bulky module for optional functionality.
> That is solved by selective imports.
Well, not today, but
On Fri, 30 Dec 2016 23:49:23 +, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> The main win, which indeed is not emphasized enough, is better
> encapsulation. Walter pointed that out, and I will redo the DIP to put
> that front and center.
Encapsulation is an abstraction over several concrete benefits. We're no
On 12/30/16 7:32 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
On Fri, 30 Dec 2016 22:42:39 +, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Friday, 30 December 2016 at 22:29:18 UTC, Chris Wright wrote:
* Performance improvements, primarily when a module imports another,
bulky module for optional functionality.
That is solved by sele
On 12/30/16 7:34 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
On Fri, 30 Dec 2016 23:49:23 +, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
The main win, which indeed is not emphasized enough, is better
encapsulation. Walter pointed that out, and I will redo the DIP to put
that front and center.
Encapsulation is an abstraction o
On Fri, 30 Dec 2016 21:13:19 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> DIP1005 can't be in
> the business of arguing that encapsulation is good by means of examples.
Right. I said we should talk about the concrete benefits of the proposal
instead of talking about encapsulation.
27 matches
Mail list logo
