On Friday, 13 October 2017 at 10:07:39 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 10/12/2017 8:04 AM, moechofe wrote:
What is the wanted lifetime of the project?
Is D will manage to pass through time?
It is valuable to start a 40 years old project using D?
Just download my engrams into the D-9000 computer.
On Saturday, 14 October 2017 at 17:17:41 UTC, Petar Kirov
[ZombineDev] wrote:
Why not simply add extern (C) wrappers for your D code? I see
no point of using C, unless you want to be portable to arcane
architectures.
With this approach you'll have both the portability of C and
the advantages of
On Saturday, 14 October 2017 at 14:51:12 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
My terminal.d works with most that stuff.
Yes I did look into existing solutions. Mainly my desire was not
to work in D alone but something available at command line and as
a library for shell-scripts and other languages too.
Sorry for waiting so long to respond, I had to think about this a lot...
On 10/12/17 3:05 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 10.10.2017 17:05, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 10/9/17 11:22 AM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 09.10.2017 01:20, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
My questioning comes with this:
void bar(i
On Saturday, 14 October 2017 at 22:20:46 UTC, Q. Schroll wrote:
Therefore, and because of brackets, you can distinguish f(1, 2)
from f([1, 2]).
But in f([1, 2]), it's ambiguous (just by parsing) whether [1, 2]
is a tuple literal or a dynamic array literal.
You'd need to use a prefix or somet
On 10/7/17 14:08, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
On 10/6/2017 10:19 PM, Adam Wilson via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> What if we stop focusing on the C/C++ people so much? The > like
their tools and have no perceivable interest in moving > away from
them (Stockholm Syndrome much?). The arguments the > use are
pri
I've thought about tuples and stuff for a while. For tuples, I'll
use [brackets]. Reasons follow.
Homogeneous tuples are repetitions of some single type. We have
them today in form of static arrays. We could allow
"inhomogeneous arrays" and call them tuples. T[n] is then an
alias for [T, T, .
On 10/6/17 23:19, Brad Roberts wrote:
On 10/6/2017 10:19 PM, Adam Wilson via Digitalmars-d wrote:
What if we stop focusing on the C/C++ people so much? The like their
tools and have no perceivable interest in moving away from them
(Stockholm Syndrome much?). The arguments the use are primarily m
On Friday, 13 October 2017 at 14:50:44 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
[snip]
But actually, I really wish D just had implicit ctors on the
types themselves. I think C++'s mistake was that implicit was
the default, and you have to write `explicit`. If we did the
opposite, where implicit was opt in, I
On Friday, 13 October 2017 at 13:01:48 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 10/12/17 7:57 PM, Q. Schroll wrote:
We have some sort of implicit construction already. Weirdly,
it's reserved for classes. Just look at this:
class C { this(int x) { } }
void foo(C c ...) { }
void main()
On 10/11/17 9:09 PM, Mike Parker wrote:
On Thursday, 12 October 2017 at 00:38:37 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner wrote:
As it has been a while since I've seen an update on DIP 1009 I'd like
to ask what the current status of it is: Has it been closed for
feedback and the second stage (submission to languag
On Saturday, 14 October 2017 at 14:35:53 UTC, Shriramana Sharma
wrote:
Hello. I prepared a utility/library to output ANSI escape codes
for terminal text attributes with capabilities as advertised at
https://sites.google.com/site/jamadagni/files/temp/textattr-usage.html. (AFAIK this set of capabi
On Saturday, 14 October 2017 at 14:35:53 UTC, Shriramana Sharma
wrote:
Hello. I prepared a utility/library to output ANSI escape codes
for terminal text attributes with capabilities as advertised at
https://sites.google.com/site/jamadagni/files/temp/textattr-usage.html. (AFAIK this set of capabi
On 10/01/2017 06:51 AM, Petar Kirov [ZombineDev] wrote:
On Sunday, 1 October 2017 at 01:54:24 UTC, Jonathan Marler wrote:
On Saturday, 30 September 2017 at 22:37:31 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Saturday, September 30, 2017 16:57:09 solidstate1991 via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Saturday, 30 Sep
Hello. I prepared a utility/library to output ANSI escape codes
for terminal text attributes with capabilities as advertised at
https://sites.google.com/site/jamadagni/files/temp/textattr-usage.html. (AFAIK this set of capabilities does not exist already in any existing package.)
This was first
On Saturday, 14 October 2017 at 10:48:40 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Saturday, 14 October 2017 at 08:52:54 UTC, Ecstatic Coder
wrote:
On Saturday, 14 October 2017 at 07:45:06 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 6/18/2017 3:38 AM, Ecstatic Coder wrote:
Something I really appreciate a lot with D is how close
On Saturday, 14 October 2017 at 08:52:54 UTC, Ecstatic Coder
wrote:
On Saturday, 14 October 2017 at 07:45:06 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 6/18/2017 3:38 AM, Ecstatic Coder wrote:
Something I really appreciate a lot with D is how close it is
to JavaScript.
There's also a D implementation of Ja
On 10/14/2017 1:52 AM, Ecstatic Coder wrote:
On Saturday, 14 October 2017 at 07:45:06 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 6/18/2017 3:38 AM, Ecstatic Coder wrote:
Something I really appreciate a lot with D is how close it is to JavaScript.
There's also a D implementation of Javascript:
https://gith
On Saturday, 14 October 2017 at 07:45:06 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 6/18/2017 3:38 AM, Ecstatic Coder wrote:
Something I really appreciate a lot with D is how close it is
to JavaScript.
There's also a D implementation of Javascript:
https://github.com/DigitalMars/DMDScript
What about a DS
Am Fri, 13 Oct 2017 17:57:12 +
schrieb John Gabriele :
> Why do you choose Lua? Whatever replaces Javascript (and compiles
> to wasm) will be used for large apps, like how Javascript is
> currently used. My understanding is that Lua is not particularly
> well suited for building large apps.
On Friday, 6 October 2017 at 20:17:33 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Friday, October 06, 2017 17:14:51 Rion via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
https://www.quora.com/What-is-your-review-of-D-programming-language
It seems that D still has the GC being mentioned up to today.
Maybe its better to move the s
On Thursday, 12 October 2017 at 11:32:55 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Thursday, 12 October 2017 at 07:54:19 UTC, Joakim wrote:
By the reasoning in the essay, I don't expect this to be
solved for free: the solution is for the devs behind the IDEs,
Visual Studio, DlangIDE, etc., to charge money for a
On 10/14/2017 12:54 AM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
On Saturday, 14 October 2017 at 07:45:06 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 6/18/2017 3:38 AM, Ecstatic Coder wrote:
Something I really appreciate a lot with D is how close it is to JavaScript.
There's also a D implementation of Javascript:
https://g
On Saturday, 14 October 2017 at 07:45:06 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 6/18/2017 3:38 AM, Ecstatic Coder wrote:
Something I really appreciate a lot with D is how close it is
to JavaScript.
There's also a D implementation of Javascript:
https://github.com/DigitalMars/DMDScript
The surprising
On Monday, 19 June 2017 at 01:57:00 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
On Sunday, 18 June 2017 at 23:11:25 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
On 18/06/2017 5:29 PM, Meta wrote:
We should be careful not to make *too* close a comparison.
While Javascript is a necessary evil for web applications and
some people
On 6/18/2017 3:38 AM, Ecstatic Coder wrote:
Something I really appreciate a lot with D is how close it is to JavaScript.
There's also a D implementation of Javascript:
https://github.com/DigitalMars/DMDScript
26 matches
Mail list logo
