On Wednesday, 17 October 2018 at 17:37:37 UTC, Kai wrote:
I just ran into this linker issue (see answer below that I
grabbed from the vibe.d forum) as well - where can I ask/track
about the progress on this issue?
Do you have the new dmd installed? Using the x86_64 should work
now if all goes
On Monday, 15 October 2018 at 07:23:07 UTC, Laurent Tréguier
wrote:
If it's about old programs, then Windows should apply their
hacks only for old executables.
It kinda does - this only applies to 32 bit exes without a
manifest resource. If you compile with -m64, it will go away, or
if you ad
On Sunday, 14 October 2018 at 15:46:57 UTC, Laurent Tréguier
wrote:
Why should an OS decide whether an executable should be run
with admin privileges ? If it has to, then it's up to the
developer to explicitly ask for it...
Windows supports programs written as much as 30 years ago. The
develo
On Sunday, 14 October 2018 at 12:16:28 UTC, spikespaz wrote:
I'm compiling an executable that does not need administrator
privileges. For some reason though, LDC thinks it does and
marks it as elevated.
This has nothing to do with ldc. It is just any 32 bit program
called setup.exe or install
On Tuesday, 2 October 2018 at 22:30:38 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
Yeah. IIRC, it was supposed to be _guaranteed_ that the
compiler moved structs in a number of situations - e.g. when
the return value was an rvalue. Something like
Eh, I don't think that moves it, but rather just constructs it
On Tuesday, 2 October 2018 at 14:49:31 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
I believe it would be a mistake to drop DConf.
What about we design a DConf that focuses on interactive
collaboration instead of sitting passively in a room watching
someone talk over a slideshow?
When Joakim talked about this t
On Friday, 28 September 2018 at 16:39:14 UTC, Márcio Martins
wrote:
I would like to generate decent D bindings for
https://github.com/libuv/libuv with as little pain as possible.
I just write bindings by hand as I need them, in the file where I
want to use them. It isn't really that hard to do
On Wednesday, 26 September 2018 at 20:43:47 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
I don't see a scenario where someone would be learning D and
not know English. Non-English D instructional material is
nearly non-existent.
http://ddili.org/ders/d/
On Monday, 24 September 2018 at 10:36:50 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
Given that the typical keyboard has none of those characters,
maintaining code that used any of them would be a royal pain.
It is pretty easy to type them with a little keyboard config
change, and like vim can pick those up
On Monday, 24 September 2018 at 13:26:14 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
Part of the reason, which I haven't read here yet, is that all
the keywords are in English.
Eh, those are kinda opaque sequences anyway, since the meanings
aren't quite what the normal dictionary definition is anyway.
L
On Saturday, 22 September 2018 at 19:59:42 UTC, Erik van Velzen
wrote:
Nobody in this thread so far has said they are programming in
non-ASCII.
This is the obvious observation bias I alluded to before: of
course people who don't read and write English aren't in this
thread, since they cannot
On Saturday, 22 September 2018 at 20:53:02 UTC, krzaq wrote:
C++ added contextual keywords, like `override` and `final`. If
this can be done in C++, surely D is easier to parse?
If D did more stuff like that, it would start to be harder to
parse.
On Friday, 21 September 2018 at 20:25:54 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
But identifiers? I haven't seen hardly any use of non-ascii
identifiers in C, C++, or D. In fact, I've seen zero use of it
outside of test cases.
Do you look at Japanese D code much? Or Turkish? Or Chinese?
I know there are de
On Friday, 21 September 2018 at 13:37:58 UTC, aliak wrote:
Si si, but i believe the loadExecutableIcon actually calls
windows APIs to set an icon on an executable, and they'd
probably @system which means I don't think that could be done
in D.
You don't need an API call to do that. You just pr
On Thursday, 20 September 2018 at 23:13:38 UTC, aliak wrote:
he can now compile an 80,000 line game in about 1.5 seconds on
a laptop
D can compile similar amounts of code in half the time.
For example, the entire D1 runtime and standard library can be
built (compiled and linked!) in 0.6 secon
On Thursday, 20 September 2018 at 17:14:12 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
I don't know how a performance problem can occur on an error
being thrown anyway -- the process is about to end.
Walter's objection was code size - it would throw stuff out of
cache lines, even if it doesn't need to ac
On Thursday, 20 September 2018 at 15:52:03 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
I needed to know what the slice parameters that were failing
were.
Aye. Note that RangeError is called by the compiler though, so
you gotta patch dmd to make it pass the arguments to it for
index. Ugh. I did a PR for
On Wednesday, 19 September 2018 at 21:16:00 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
As Andrei says -- Destroy!
Nah, I agree. Actually, I'm of the opinion that string error
messages in exceptions ought to be considered harmful: you
shouldn't be doing strings at all. All the useful information
should
On Friday, 14 September 2018 at 18:13:49 UTC, Eugene Wissner
wrote:
Makes the code unreadable.
It is the foo: that causes this, not the __not...
For @nogc, pure and so forth there were imho a better proposal
with a boolean value:
@gc(true), @gc(false), pure(true), pure(false) etc. It is also
On Saturday, 15 September 2018 at 10:57:56 UTC, Josphe Brigmo
wrote:
Phobos *NEEDS* to be modified to work with these newer OS's.
You need to look at the source code before posting. The code for
remove is literally
DeleteFileW(name);
it is a one-line wrapper, and obviously uses the unicode
Here's the simple idea: __not(anything) just turns off whatever
`anything` does in the compiler.
__not(final) void foo() {} // turns off the final flag (if it is
set)
__not(@nogc) void foo() {} // turns off the @nogc flag (if it is
set)
__not(const)(int) a; // not const
All it does is inver
On Thursday, 13 September 2018 at 14:43:51 UTC, Arafel wrote:
Why must __gshared be static?? (BTW, thanks a lot, you have
just saved me a lot of debugging!!).
The memory location differences of shared doesn't apply to class
members. All members are stored with the instance, and shared
only c
On Thursday, 13 September 2018 at 13:53:49 UTC, Arafel wrote:
* Make all _private non-reference fields_ of shared,
synchronized classes __gshared.
so __gshared implies static. Are you sure that's what you want?
On Sunday, 9 September 2018 at 14:28:11 UTC, Guillaume Piolat
wrote:
I don't manage to find x-module search again, perhaps disabled.
Yeah, there's a memory leak in it so leaving it up would kill the
box to build actual docs. And the last couple months have been
crazy IRL, but I scheduled some
On Saturday, 8 September 2018 at 07:08:46 UTC, Colin wrote:
Some ad hoc comment system in source code to point out changes
will never be as good.
Just Use Git!
I'd agree for implementation changes, but *interface* changes
should be not just in the comment, but in a doc comment. Ddoc
specifi
On Friday, 7 September 2018 at 15:48:39 UTC, SrMordred wrote:
Yes, but you don't really need this function.
Whoa, when was that added?! I don't remember ctors via ufcs being
there but indeed, it works on newest dmd.
On Friday, 7 September 2018 at 13:58:41 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
If we had implicit construction in D but only allowed one level
of conversion (e.g. String could be implicitly constructed from
a const(char)[], but a type that implicitly converted to
const(char)[] couldn't be used to constru
On Friday, 7 September 2018 at 11:48:47 UTC, RhyS wrote:
... Sorry Adam but if you consider a collection of lose code
production ready for D, then we have different ideas. ;)
All libraries are collections of loose code, except the bad ones,
which are tightly coupled collections of code that br
On Friday, 7 September 2018 at 10:51:28 UTC, RhyS wrote:
** 750$ **
For a build in working high performance documented http server
( with all the basic necessities needed for web development ).
cha-ching
https://github.com/adamdruppe/arsd
just copy/paste code out of there, it works and has
On Thursday, 6 September 2018 at 17:09:34 UTC, SrMordred wrote:
Yes, the true problem arrives on the operations like concat "~"
that call some internal function to do that with strings.
Only if it is string ~ string. If it is your type, that's where
opBinary and opBinaryRight come in.
YourSt
On Thursday, 6 September 2018 at 16:24:12 UTC, SrMordred wrote:
alias string = String;
For the rest of this module, any time you write `string`, the
compiler sees `String`. But inside the compiler, it still thinks
of its own string, hence the confusing looking error messages.
struct String
On Wednesday, 5 September 2018 at 20:53:41 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
Is the praxis that _all_ containers and GC-allocations should
throw a
yeah, but do so via the onOutOfMemoryError function instead of
"throw new"
http://dpldocs.info/experimental-docs/core.exception.onOutOfMemoryError.html
w
On Saturday, 1 September 2018 at 22:10:27 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
I've used StackOverflow. It's NOT a place for asking and
answering questions.
I generally agree, but the D tag on it isn't so bad since most
the annoying regulars keep away. It is more the domain of me and
a handful of oth
On Monday, 6 August 2018 at 14:19:47 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
(e.g. require code signing).
Why don't we just sign the code anyway? This shouldn't be a big
deal and it has been a problem for many people for many years.
On Saturday, 4 August 2018 at 02:21:48 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
Which is converted to void type when passing the object to
rt_finalize, which causes to lost all type information.
It still has run-time type information, but indeed, the compile
time info is lost.
Child classes have independent
On Friday, 3 August 2018 at 20:40:31 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
Did you even bother reading the links that I posted?
I did. Did you? The wikipedia page speaks at length to the
ambiguity of the terms, including that the language construct can
be called a destructor while the implementation method
On Friday, 3 August 2018 at 17:50:10 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
rt_finalize is not the GC.
Yes it is. That why is called finalize.
OK, so you don't like it... because of its name?
It doesn't actually call any GC functions, it just loops through
destructors and calls them all.
On Friday, 3 August 2018 at 16:24:33 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
Your calling the gc if you call the destroy function for
classes as it calls the rt_finalize function.
rt_finalize is not the GC. It just calls destructors in order for
each base class.
Regardless you didn't answer the question tha
On Friday, 3 August 2018 at 15:32:54 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
Is there RecusiveDestruct function that can be called that is
attribute friendly?
No, the destructor definition in the language is not attribute
friendly. Best you can do is `.destroy(obj)` and it can't see all
the @nogc stuff (beca
On Wednesday, 11 July 2018 at 12:45:40 UTC, crimaniak wrote:
This error handling policy makes D not applicable for creating
WEB applications and generally long-running services.
You use process isolation so it is easy to restart part of it
without disrupting others. Then it can crash without b
On Thursday, 12 July 2018 at 22:28:00 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
I have no plans to resign until they carry me out in a box.
That can be arranged.
(lol you guys we should carry walter out of to the stage of the
next dconf in a box)
On Saturday, 7 July 2018 at 18:48:35 UTC, Mr.Bingo wrote:
The enums are local in nature and are used to store
intermediate results but the looping tries to redefine them,
which gives an error.
Have you tried putting a second set of {} around it?
static foreach(...)
{{ // 2 intentional
enum
On Wednesday, 4 July 2018 at 14:54:41 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
How would this affect the package attribute?
Nothing should change, since packages are determined from the D
module declaration, not the filename or directory layout.
This is even true with package.d itself, but it is a w
On Sunday, 1 July 2018 at 14:23:36 UTC, Yuxuan Shui wrote:
I was suggesting we do what Rust did. i.e. 'import foo',
imports foo.d, which can in turn do 'import foo.bar', which
will import foo/bar.d.
Yeah, that's the way it should have been done in the first place.
Nowhere else in D does it re
On Saturday, 30 June 2018 at 02:23:57 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Honestly, this is this first time that I've ever seen anyone
try to argue that conferences like this are a bad idea.
I argued it (though I don't remember how vigorously) back when
the kickstarter was done. I still think there's
On Friday, 22 June 2018 at 22:28:17 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
That would help, do you want to implement it?
I can't for at last two weeks, I'm about to fly tomorrow... and
I'm getting married in August too so my life is kinda hectic.
But I might look at it around July 4 if I get a chance and
On Friday, 22 June 2018 at 22:25:35 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
I've gone through the "annotate this and continue" exercise,
and it is not fun. Especially when the template is used in many
places, you have to make a copy of the template to play with.
Aye. I think that's the most straightf
On Friday, 22 June 2018 at 21:37:07 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
I decided to accept the Mission Impossible of figuring out why
it was inferred as @system.
This would be trivial if the compiler had decent error messages.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17374
It could just tell us the b
On Sunday, 17 June 2018 at 01:02:17 UTC, DigitalDesigns wrote:
If this was a sane language constraint then any identifiers
starting with __ that were not reserved would at least give a
warning but particularly give an error! Not fail silently and
break code in ways that cannot be determined oth
On Sunday, 10 June 2018 at 12:49:31 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
D utilizes from the C library with D implementations. There
are many reasons to do this, one of which is to leverage
information available at compile-time and in D's type system
(type sizes, alignment, etc...) in order to optimize t
On Saturday, 9 June 2018 at 02:13:00 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
But it was never enforced, meaning that suddenly enforcing it
is just going to break code left and right.
It isn't going to break anything. It is going to *correctly
diagnose already broken code*.
That's a significant difference
On Friday, 8 June 2018 at 01:07:17 UTC, Luís Marques wrote:
Shouldn't the property functions' resolution logic take into
account the inherited functions? I had assumed that was the
case (and I was confused by misleading error messages), and
that seems like the more intuitive semantics to me.
On Tuesday, 5 June 2018 at 19:05:27 UTC, DigitalDesigns wrote:
For loops HAVE a direct cpu semantic! Do you doubt this?
What are they?
And for bonus points, are they actually used by compilers?
Then the final question: is the generated code any different than
inlined ranges?
On Tuesday, 5 June 2018 at 10:11:49 UTC, Ethan wrote:
As soon as you have an overload of a function declared in the
base object you're mixing in to, any other overload mixed in
will not resolve correctly. Great.
Yes, it is great, since this lets you selectively override
behavior from a generi
On Sunday, 29 April 2018 at 15:52:11 UTC, dd86k wrote:
It's all fine now. I'll type away my own bindings in a separate
source file (stdc.d).
You can also just do it in the usage module, for the individual
functions you need. I do this a lot for various C libraries (and
used to for the Win32 f
On Tuesday, 24 April 2018 at 10:30:21 UTC, Chris wrote:
- cross platform: no need to deploy libs (e.g. Gtk on Mac and
Windows)
Well... that depends. If you can just use the browser already
installed, yeah, but then you have to deal with cross-browser
(which is still a thing, like I did a wysi
On Thursday, 5 April 2018 at 20:58:32 UTC, unDEFER wrote:
100K * float[3] = 2356 Kbytes
Why not 1200 Kbytes?
My guess is the reallocation triggered by ~= just passed the
double threshold there.
When the runtime appends, it usually reserves (about) 2x of what
it actually needs. This is a pe
On Sunday, 25 March 2018 at 06:58:50 UTC, Seb wrote:
Yeah I have "dumb XYZ, roll my own" experience often too.
As there are already many big libraries like `arsd` or `ae` out
there, I don't think I'm the only one with these feeling.
In my case, there's very little overlap with what Phobos offe
On Sunday, 25 March 2018 at 14:25:49 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
I don't want. I think others will, once their programs
depending on the current semantics will have trouble.
The current semantics are not documented, so any program that
relies on them is foolish anyway.
Like I said in my
On Sunday, 25 March 2018 at 00:47:20 UTC, Dave Jones wrote:
struct Foo
{
int x;
alias x this;
}
Foo f = 12; // error
You just need to define a constructor that takes an int. alias
this is all about taking an existing object and substituting a
member for it - emphasis on *existing* ob
On Friday, 23 March 2018 at 23:29:48 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
I just ran into this seemingly small problem:
The way I'd do this is to only use getopt to build the lists,
then actually process them externally. (lol adding another loop)
string[] searchPaths;
string[] files;
getopt(args,
"l",
On Thursday, 22 March 2018 at 19:20:14 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
"C++ classes and COM classes will still work"
Because they have external runtimes that get used.
I can tell that you're being snarky at me.
If you change .destroy without changing the destructor rule, the
type system has been B
On Thursday, 22 March 2018 at 14:48:04 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
That is not a runtime version of system/user attributes! That
is custom checking for destructor! Hardly the same.
How would your idea work?
Again I do not see it anywhere in the specification that
support your claim that all class
On Thursday, 22 March 2018 at 01:55:48 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
Are you suggesting that we need runtime version of system/user
attributes?
We already have that in a sense - InvalidMemoryOperationError is
thrown if you try to GC allocate from inside a GC destructor. The
attributes are supposed
On Thursday, 22 March 2018 at 02:16:56 UTC, SimonN wrote:
Does the compiler infer nogc-ness of `emplace` at instantiation?
Yes, it does with all templates, actually. Since their nogcness
(and other attributes like nothrow, pure, etc) frequently depend
on what arguments they are passed, the co
On Wednesday, 21 March 2018 at 19:21:15 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
That seems to be it's own separate problem, as it involves
generating dynamic types at run-time, which it needs run-time
equivalent of attribute checking.
But @nogc is a compile time thing, meaning it cannot work here.
My example
On Wednesday, 21 March 2018 at 16:29:26 UTC, aerto wrote:
thanks, a last question in a diffrent function i use
use
BigInt i =
"105312291668557186697918027683670432318895095400549111254310977536";
and it should work. Note the quotation marks - it reads it as a
string because a long number l
On Wednesday, 21 March 2018 at 15:56:00 UTC, aerto wrote:
why pow(256, 27) gives 0, instead of
105312291668557186697918027683670432318895095400549111254310977536L
that result is simply too big to fit in the result. Try using a
bigint instead:
import std.bigint, std.stdio;
void main() {
On Wednesday, 21 March 2018 at 13:39:28 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
You can simply check the .dtor symbols at compile time to see
if every .dtor symbol from child to root have a .dtor that have
the @nogc attribute
In Simen's example, the child information is not available at
compile time. This li
On Wednesday, 21 March 2018 at 08:49:11 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
Step 1. Make `emplace` @nogc
So we need to attribute `std.conv.emplace` as @nogc.
No, do not do that! `emplace` is ALREADY `@nogc` when given
appropriate arguments. Adding the explicit annotation will limit
its flexibility wit
On Monday, 19 March 2018 at 10:04:15 UTC, bauss wrote:
Has it stopped completely or is it just temporary?
I want to restart it with a 2.0 thing probably monthly instead of
weekly (well I might generate the link list automatically each
week, but commit to doing a feature once a month) as part
On Saturday, 17 March 2018 at 13:30:25 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
Does anyone dispute this?
I don't really see how this would help anything.
Alternatively btw you can use the pthreads C functions
import core.sys.posix.pthread;
which shuld also be nogc right now. The condition class wraps
those on Linux fairly thinly; using the C functions should be
little more trouble.
On Thursday, 15 March 2018 at 17:30:50 UTC, Jim King wrote:
The problem with that is that it requires a busy loop to detect
it.
well, what's your thread doing? In the case I used this pattern,
it was blocking on a call to select() anyway, so when it returned
with EINTR, that was a good opport
On Thursday, 15 March 2018 at 16:51:59 UTC, Jim King wrote:
In going through the signal documentation it looks like the
signal handler must be a "nothrow @nogc" variety.
Looks like notify actually can throw an exception... the way I
usually do signal handlers is just set a global variable:
_
On Wednesday, 14 March 2018 at 21:22:01 UTC, Timothee Cour wrote:
would a PR for `dmd -unittest= (same syntax as -i)` be
welcome?
so when this came up on irc earlier (was that you?) this was the
first thought that came to my mind. I'd support it, tho I'm no
decision maker.
On Monday, 12 March 2018 at 13:21:10 UTC, Seb wrote:
BTW since a few months you can directly build everything by
just running `make -f posix.mak` in the Phobos repository.
see i'm trying to build dmd not phobos so you can understand i
wouldn't try to make phobos
It actually concerns me that
On Monday, 12 March 2018 at 13:14:08 UTC, Seb wrote:
Out of interest: Why would you compile the compiler from the
release sources?
Why are there releases at all?
Because the release is (in theory) tested and working and
installed and I want to do a minor tweak to it, not go all-in to
the str
On Monday, 12 March 2018 at 12:50:14 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
obviosly it is unlikely place to download the dlang compiler
sources these days :D
See, I just want to do a small tweak on the installation I have
working. Since druntime, phobos, and dmd are so ridiculously
tightly coupled, you n
On Monday, 12 March 2018 at 12:27:42 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
https://dlang.org/download.html
specifically I grab the linux tarballs
http://downloads.dlang.org/releases/2.x/2.079.0/dmd.2.079.0.linux.tar.xz
and just cd dmd2/src/dmd and make -f posix.mak
this always worked perfectly a year or
On Monday, 12 March 2018 at 12:24:54 UTC, Seb wrote:
Where did you grab the source ball?
an extremely unlikely place to download the dlang compiler.
https://dlang.org/download.html
I do. It was a long, long time ago, but it was a glorious age
when you could hack on dmd with ease. Just download the zip, cd
dmd/src/dmd and make. Seconds later, you'd have a new dmd binary.
But then the dark times came.
dmd/globals.d(362): Error: file "VERSION" cannot be found or not
in a p
On Friday, 9 March 2018 at 18:51:50 UTC, Manu wrote:
If you tried to `import modulename;` from some other module...
how would the compiler know where to find it?
The compiler has to parse the module to find them correctly
already. When you do foo.bar into foo/bar.d, it is just the first
guess
On Thursday, 8 March 2018 at 04:09:17 UTC, Meta wrote:
Has D had static if since its inception, or was it added
somewhere along the way?
https://digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog1.html
What's New for D 0.124
May 19, 2005
New/Changed Features
*snip*
Added static if.
That's before my tim
On Tuesday, 6 March 2018 at 21:09:06 UTC, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso
wrote:
I did post it to Lobsters, though:
This is random but I have been thinking about asking for a
lobsters invite... can you hook me up?
On Tuesday, 6 March 2018 at 03:07:49 UTC, solidstate1991 wrote:
I use classinfo for detecting the type of bitmaps, and while I
probably will have a workaround for the associative array stuff
Have you tried `item.classinfo is typeid(xxx)` so `is` instead of
`==`? That... might not work across s
On Monday, 5 March 2018 at 01:02:52 UTC, Norm wrote:
Might not help much though, I imagine these third-party sources
are built as source only libraries, so they probably appear as
source files anyway.
Yeah, in the case I'm looking at now, they aren't listed as dub
packages at all, just files
On Sunday, 4 March 2018 at 23:18:25 UTC, Norm wrote:
Can you run dub describe and parse the output, which is JSON I
think. It used to indicate a role for each source file under
each configuration, one of which is "unusedSource".
I don't see any info like that when I run it here... :(
Alternat
So the dpldocs scraper right now pulls all the .d files out of a
repo and tries to build docs for them. But in some cases, there's
a lot of added dependencies in there that can cause the built to
time out.
For example, take a look at dlangui:
http://dlangui.dpldocs.info/dlangui.html
Notice t
On Tuesday, 27 February 2018 at 17:41:07 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
And just about every new dmd release, people fume on this forum
about regressions and gratuitous code breakages.
Not all deprecations/code breakages are *regressions* and
*gratuitous*.
You just need to do a cost/benefit look at
On Saturday, 24 February 2018 at 16:42:26 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
source viewer
This now works:
http://dpq.dpldocs.info/source/dpq.query.d.html#L29
the "see implementation" links lead to pages like that. You'll
notice in the source view that many names are links. You can
click on them to g
On Saturday, 24 February 2018 at 05:33:56 UTC, Joe wrote:
The main issue is that, other than derelict-pq, using any of
these libraries involves reading the library code and
understanding the sui generis interfaces implemented by each.
So often in threads like this I chime in to point out my li
On Saturday, 24 February 2018 at 16:41:09 UTC, Martin
Tschierschke wrote:
Please make a post to announce and place the direct link to it
inside code.dlang.org :-)
Well, I forgot to log errors on the server so I see a few
generation failures and I'm not sure if it is because the code is
missin
On Saturday, 24 February 2018 at 15:44:49 UTC, Paolo Invernizzi
wrote:
:-O
Adam, you are the man!
worship me!
So I'm gonna tell you guys a dirty little secret: I intend to
take the documentation throne by means of subterfuge. I've been
generating docs for popular packages already but it ha
On Saturday, 24 February 2018 at 14:13:18 UTC, Joe wrote:
Again, coming from Python, I'm familiar with RTD
So I actually just made this extension to my dpldocs website:
http://ddb.dpldocs.info/ddb.postgres.html
You can try going to
http://any-dub-package.dpldocs.info
and it will try to bui
On Friday, 23 February 2018 at 13:47:16 UTC, biocyberman wrote:
So, even though I wanted to get away with using
stackoverflow.com
A bunch of us are on stackoverflow too, and it could use some
more stuff. I like SO for archiving too, even if you get an
answer here, SO is a lot easier to search
On Friday, 23 February 2018 at 13:55:44 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
And none of the features that you're talking about really make
sense when you're dealing with NNTP or a mailing list. It's all
just plain text.
Well, nntp actually supports basically all that stuff: you can do
multipart/alte
On Thursday, 22 February 2018 at 23:54:48 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
any of those in svg format?
There is an svg one in here!!
https://github.com/dlang-community/d-mans
You know, D-man, like https://dlang.org/images/d5.gif
any of those in svg format?
On Tuesday, 20 February 2018 at 13:27:08 UTC, psychoticRabbit
wrote:
so.. in that case..another idea...how about a compiler option
to output a list of functions. (I don't really expect many will
warm to that idea.)
Does anyone know of any tool that could do such a thing?
I just want of a list
1 - 100 of 1278 matches
Mail list logo
