On Thursday, 25 June 2015 at 03:15:58 UTC, Andrew Gough wrote:
On Tuesday, 23 June 2015 at 22:58:32 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Tuesday, 23 June 2015 at 22:45:10 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
A rename can be proposed by creating a subthread: [...]
Rationale:
As with setExt, std.uni
On Tuesday, 23 June 2015 at 22:58:32 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Tuesday, 23 June 2015 at 22:45:10 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
A rename can be proposed by creating a subthread: [...]
Rationale:
As with setExt, std.uni already contains functions called
toLower/toUpper, thus the only
On Sunday, 12 May 2013 at 15:08:22 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I'm thinking we should rename D-programming-language on github
with dlang. While we're at it, project
d-programming-language.org should be renamed dlang.org.
This may cause disruption. Thoughts?
Andrei
+1
Also rename
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 08:07:34 +0100
Gour g...@atmarama.net wrote:
On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 13:57:50 +1100
Andrew Gough and...@goughy.org wrote:
Hello Andrew,
The fork supports DMD, GDC, and LDC - but only for D2, and currently
only for (g)make. If anyone would like to add support for other
be fantastic.
I have successfully built my own projects and
druntime/phobos with it in the past, so I know it can work.
Cheers.
--
Andrew Gough
M: 0408 596 656
and...@goughy.org
--
Andrew Gough
M: 0408 596 656
and...@goughy.org
On Fri, 9 Dec 2011 13:28:45 +0100
Gour g...@atmarama.net wrote:
On Thu, 8 Dec 2011 20:29:20 +1100
Andrew Gough and...@goughy.org wrote:
If there is enough interest, I can fix up some loose ends and try
and get the ball rolling again...
I got reply from premake developer and he told me
On Wed, 07 Dec 2011 14:03:02 +
Russel Winder rus...@russel.org.uk wrote:
On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 22:00 +1100, Andrew Gough wrote:
[...]
I'm suggesting that the current multi-pronged approach to providing
a workable build system is hampered by the multitude of directions
and could
On Wed, 7 Dec 2011 20:56:17 +0100
Jens Mueller jens.k.muel...@gmx.de wrote:
Andrew Gough wrote:
On Tue, 06 Dec 2011 18:14:25 +
Russel Winder rus...@russel.org.uk wrote:
SCons is a Python-based build tool to replace Make and much of the
Autotools functionality. It has D support
again...
--
Andrew Gough
M: 0408 596 656
and...@goughy.org
On Wed, 07 Dec 2011 14:03:02 +
Russel Winder rus...@russel.org.uk wrote:
On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 22:00 +1100, Andrew Gough wrote:
[...]
I'm suggesting that the current multi-pronged approach to providing
a workable build system is hampered by the multitude of directions
and could
On Thu, 08 Dec 2011 11:23:18 +0100
Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
On 2011-12-08 10:13, Andrew Gough wrote:
The reasons I chose premake were primarily:
1. No external dependencies (lua embedded in an executable)
2. Simple configuration
3. Cross platform
4. Generates native build
Makefiles
Eclipse CDT4 - MinGW Makefiles
Eclipse CDT4 - NMake Makefiles
Eclipse CDT4 - Unix Makefiles
--
Andrew Gough
M: 0408 596 656
and...@goughy.org
On Thu, 8 Dec 2011 15:39:59 +0200
Manu turkey...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 December 2011 15:27, Mike Parker aldac...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/8/2011 6:29 PM, Andrew Gough wrote:
On Wed, 7 Dec 2011 22:39:34 +0200
Manuturkey...@gmail.com wrote:
premake supports D? I was planning to add D
fragmented. Java has Ant, Scala has sbt -
surely D should have a canonical build tool?
--
Andrew Gough
M: 0408 596 656
and...@goughy.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, 07 Dec 2011 09:54:08 +
Russel Winder rus...@russel.org.uk wrote:
On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 20:27 +1100, Andrew Gough wrote:
[...]
I think the build tool question is in need of the same level of high
level design and support that Steve Teale is working on for
std.database/std.sql
been working on a HTTP implementation
using the also so the handler code is protocol independent but I'd be
like to compare approaches if that's ok.
--
Andrew Gough
M: 0408 596 656
and...@goughy.org
17 matches
Mail list logo
