On Wed, 23 Oct 2013 00:42:13 +0200, David Nadlinger wrote:
LDC 0.12.0, the LLVM-based D compiler, is available for download!
It is built on the 2.063.2 frontend and standard library and supports
LLVM 3.1-3.3 (OS X: 3.2 only).
As usual, you can find links to the changelog and the binary
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 23:59:33 -0500, SiegeLord wrote:
Hello everyone,
Just wanted to put out an announcement with a progress report on porting
effort of Tango. For those that don't know what it is, Tango is a
framework library that used to be/is the de facto standard library of
D1.
On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 11:21:04 +, Iain Buclaw wrote:
Some of us Great British IRC users in #d have been discussing this for
some time now, but now we'd like to see this organised and put into
fruition. :)
What do you plan?
A nice evening in a pub or something bigger?
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:56:53 +0100, Dejan Lekic wrote:
We talked about this yesterday on IRC. I successfully built everything
on my Fedora 15 workstation. Follow the instruction on Wiki and it will
be OK.
I think these instructions were meant:
On Fri, 03 Jun 2011 13:49:08 +0200, Trass3r wrote:
What's the status of LDC2? Is it usable? Also it seems like work is done
in
https://bitbucket.org/lindquist/ldc/changesets rather than
https://bitbucket.org/prokhin_alexey/ldc2/changesets now?!
All changes from alexeys branch are merged into
On Mon, 30 May 2011 15:08:52 +0200, David Nadlinger wrote:
Hello list,
as I'd like to add SSL support to my Thrift project soon, I am wondering
whether anybody has a set of OpenSSL bindings lying around – or maybe
even a complete D port?
David
Tango has SSLSockets etc., maybe you can
I think this might be interesting; it's also using D.
http://attractivechaos.wordpress.com/2011/04/25/my-programming-language-
benchmarks-plb/
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 07:50:19 -0400, bearophile wrote:
Moritz Warning:
I think this might be interesting; it's also using D.
I was about to post this :-)
I was surprised you haven't had already.
Looks like I got lucky. :-)
Have you seen somewhere what compiler options he did use for gdc
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 17:44:35 -0400, bearophile wrote:
Walter:
On 4/28/2011 11:44 AM, Jens Mueller wrote:
Thanks. So if a compiler can assume that pointers do not alias it can
generate much better code. What's D's standpoint on that matter then?
C99 has restrict. I never came across
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 08:02:40 -0400, bearophile wrote:
A little quiz. This is related to a recent post of mine in the main D
newsgroup, but please don't take a look at that post yet. This is the
original function:
uhm, very sneaky.
I wonder, can there be done smth. on behalf of the language to
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 18:42:32 -0400, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
Link: http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?Videos
[..]
Also, could someone let me know what is the last name of the speaker
from the following DLL video, because I couldn't make it out:
http://vimeo.com/2264486
The name is Tomasz
On Sun, 03 Apr 2011 00:48:29 +, Francisco Almeida wrote:
Are there plans to deprecate the built-in complex types soon?
I assume they will be deprecated when a library replacement is feasible
and implemented.
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 15:01:38 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
We have just got word from Google - Digital Mars has been accepted as a
mentoring organization for Google Summer of Code 2011.
congrats :)
On Sat, 12 Mar 2011 11:58:55 -0500, dsimcha wrote:
I've noticed that the issue tracker tab on the LDC2 project
(https://bitbucket.org/prokhin_alexey/ldc2/overview) is missing. First,
why is it missing? Second, if it's missing on purpose, then where is
the correct place to file bug reports?
On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 17:14:13 +, %u wrote:
== Quote from Simen kjaeraas (simen.kja...@gmail.com)'s article
%u e...@ee.com wrote:
I only need something to make a void deleg() from a void func().
This works for me:
ReturnType!( F ) delegate( ParameterTypeTuple!( F ) ) toDelegate( F )(
F
On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 00:41:12 +, Iain Buclaw wrote:
Just announcing (before I nod off) that gdc is working with gcc-4.5.1.
Builds D1 and compiles Tango.
Commit:
https://bitbucket.org/goshawk/gdc/changeset/8ac6cb4f40aa
Feedback, patches and bug reports welcome!
Regards
Awesome,
On Sat, 06 Nov 2010 23:11:59 +, bioinfornatics wrote:
hello,
I have a question (i would like understand), they are many important
people of D community who do not want go to D2, why ?
thanks for answer
- D2 trades complexity for more features
- D2 has a lot of compiler bugs
On Wed, 03 Nov 2010 13:39:49 +0700, tuanhoanganh wrote:
I am a newbie of D language and DWT.
When i build DWT (lastest hg) and D language 1.0.65 i have a error
...\dwt-win\dwt\dwthelper\File.d(80): Error: function
tango.io.FileSystem.FileSystem.toAbsolute is deprecated How to fix it?
Thank
On Thu, 14 Oct 2010 23:30:02 +1100, Justin Johansson wrote:
Touted often around here is the term systems language.
May we please discuss a definition to be agreed upon for the usage this
term (at least in this community) and also have some agreed upon
examples of PLs that might also be
I suspect there is a bug.
You could use FilePath.toList() as an alternative for now.
foreach(path; FilePath(.).toList())
{
if(path.isFolder)
folder_counter++;
else
file_counter++;
}
On Thu, 14 Oct 2010 15:31:47 +, qwesx wrote:
Hello!
I'm trying out some things in D (with
Here is the bug report (patch proposal included):
http://dsource.org/projects/tango/ticket/2003
On Thu, 14 Oct 2010 15:31:47 +, qwesx wrote:
Hello!
I'm trying out some things in D (with tango) and tried to build a *very*
primitive indexing program. One function requires to run through
Hi,
I need to call a C function from D.
No problem so far, but here is the catch:
The function signature is only known at runtime.
There is the void* pointer to the C-function
and void* pointers to the argument values + value size.
Now I need to build up the call stack myself.
How can it be
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 15:10:31 +, kretinis wrote:
== Quote from Steven Schveighoffer (schvei...@yahoo.com)'s article
[..]
I accept Shoos implementation only with the conditions
[..]
I am sure these requirements are reasonable
Your arguments are futile, explanation:
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 10:33:13 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I want to first qualify that I represent only myself, nobody from
Phobos, nobody from Tango, not Walter nor Andrei nor Kris nor Lars nor
SHOO nor anyone but me.
[..]
I also extend Tango an invitation to use any of my code
On Sun, 30 May 2010 21:43:16 +0200, Robert wrote:
Hi, I hope some of you D gurus can help me getting my mind setup correct
when using D arrays.
I have an array: data[1 .. 2048] of type ubyte
I'm interested in getting the addresse of the array and its data
members. So I used:
On Fri, 28 May 2010 10:40:57 -0700, Ali Çehreli wrote:
It is a Turkish D2 book.
I know that this news is not very useful for the members of this forum,
but I am proud to announce that my D book targeting the Turkish reader
is almost complete.
Congratulations! :)
On Wed, 19 May 2010 06:45:42 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Tue, 18 May 2010 14:10:05 -0400, Moritz Warning
moritzwarn...@web.de wrote:
On Tue, 18 May 2010 14:24:40 +, superdan wrote:
== Quote from Steven Schveighoffer (schvei...@yahoo.com)'s article
On Tue, 18 May 2010 09:39
On Tue, 18 May 2010 03:21:25 +, superdan wrote:
== Quote from Moritz Warning (moritzwarn...@web.de)'s article
On Thu, 13 May 2010 16:45:45 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 09:55:51 -0400, Moritz Warning
moritzwarn...@web.de wrote:
On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 09:07:06
On Tue, 18 May 2010 14:24:40 +, superdan wrote:
== Quote from Steven Schveighoffer (schvei...@yahoo.com)'s article
On Tue, 18 May 2010 09:39:12 -0400, superdan su...@dan.org wrote:
guys go with boost and std.gregorian n shit. sorry shoo. tango is a
fucking boat anchor for d. shit.
On Thu, 13 May 2010 16:45:45 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 09:55:51 -0400, Moritz Warning
moritzwarn...@web.de wrote:
On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 09:07:06 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 09:02:32 -0400, Moritz Warning
moritzwarn...@web.de wrote
On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 18:02:27 +0900, SHOO wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu さんは書きました:
On 04/29/2010 09:39 AM, SHOO wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu さんは書きました:
Thanks! You are now a Phobos developer.
I'm happy to join member of Phobos developer!
Unfortunately you cannot commit
your changes to std.date
On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 07:45:23 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I feel bad for
SHOO that he was caught in the middle of this, his lib looks well
written.
Phobos and Tangos license are both chosen to be for the greatest benefit
to it's users.
That they may differ is no contradiction, the
On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 10:12:53 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 04/30/2010 08:55 AM, Moritz Warning wrote:
On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 09:07:06 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 09:02:32 -0400, Moritz Warning
moritzwarn...@web.de wrote:
have you thought about just asking
On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 20:07:21 +, Moritz Warning wrote:
[..]
Has anyone bothered to ask the authors? It matters.
The authors who can be reached atm., of course. :)
On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 18:02:27 +0900, SHOO wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu さんは書きました:
On 04/29/2010 09:39 AM, SHOO wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu さんは書きました:
Thanks! You are now a Phobos developer.
I'm happy to join member of Phobos developer!
Unfortunately you cannot commit
your changes to std.date
On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 09:07:06 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 09:02:32 -0400, Moritz Warning
moritzwarn...@web.de wrote:
have you thought about just asking the authors of the Tango code in
question?
I would imagine they would say that they only see a minor resemblance
On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 10:12:53 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 04/30/2010 08:55 AM, Moritz Warning wrote:
On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 09:07:06 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 09:02:32 -0400, Moritz Warning
moritzwarn...@web.de wrote:
have you thought about just asking
On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 20:07:21 +, Moritz Warning wrote:
[..]
Has anyone bothered to ask the authors? It matters.
The authors who can be reached atm., of course. :)
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 23:39:09 +0900, SHOO wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu さんは書きました:
Thanks! You are now a Phobos developer.
I'm happy to join member of Phobos developer!
Unfortunately you cannot commit
your changes to std.date because it infringes on Tango's license.
Andrei
What did I
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 09:24:22 -0700, Walter Bright wrote:
Moritz Warning wrote:
[..]
Maybe you can talk to the Tango devs to clear up this matter?
I suggest that the Tango devs convert the Tango modules that can get
full agreement by their respective devs be converted to the Boost
license
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 11:34:19 -0700, Walter Bright wrote:
Moritz Warning wrote:
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 09:24:22 -0700, Walter Bright wrote:
Moritz Warning wrote:
[..]
Maybe you can talk to the Tango devs to clear up this matter?
I suggest that the Tango devs convert the Tango modules that can
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 23:39:09 +0900, SHOO wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu さんは書きました:
Thanks! You are now a Phobos developer.
I'm happy to join member of Phobos developer!
Unfortunately you cannot commit
your changes to std.date because it infringes on Tango's license.
Andrei
What did I
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 09:24:22 -0700, Walter Bright wrote:
Moritz Warning wrote:
[..]
Maybe you can talk to the Tango devs to clear up this matter?
I suggest that the Tango devs convert the Tango modules that can get
full agreement by their respective devs be converted to the Boost
license
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 11:34:19 -0700, Walter Bright wrote:
Moritz Warning wrote:
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 09:24:22 -0700, Walter Bright wrote:
Moritz Warning wrote:
[..]
Maybe you can talk to the Tango devs to clear up this matter?
I suggest that the Tango devs convert the Tango modules that can
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 17:28:36 +0200, Joseph Wakeling wrote:
Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
The D2 language, which has so far been the experimental branch of D
and as such has been a rapidly moving target, is in its final stages of
completion. The specification has more or less been frozen, and
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 11:34:15 -0400, qwesx wrote:
Robert Clipsham Wrote:
Try this:
$ ldc -L-L/usr/lib/d -L-ltango-base-ldc -L-ltango-user-ldc main.d
If that works you need to make sure these -L's are included in yout
ldc.conf (I'm not sure where this is in the debian packages, probably
Can dmd output the location of it's binary and the dmd.conf it uses?
It would be really helpful to solve a lot of problems and confusion that
arises in #D.
People use different installers, packages and what else not when some
installation doesn't work right away.
Usually it makes every other
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 13:55:12 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 03/24/2010 01:33 PM, Moritz Warning wrote:
Can dmd output the location of it's binary and the dmd.conf it uses? It
would be really helpful to solve a lot of problems and confusion that
arises in #D.
People use different
Smth. like this would be helpful.
dmd main.d -v
Binary: /usr/bin/dmd [1.057]
Config: /etc/dmd.conf
parse main
importall main
importobject(object.d)
object.d: Error: module object cannot read file 'object.d'
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 16:06:02 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 03/24/2010 02:11 PM, Moritz Warning wrote:
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 13:55:12 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
[..]
Absolutely. I never know the full logic by which dmd.conf is found, it's
quite convoluted. You may want to submit
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 16:40:51 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 03/24/2010 04:35 PM, Moritz Warning wrote:
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 16:06:02 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 03/24/2010 02:11 PM, Moritz Warning wrote:
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 13:55:12 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 13:34:05 -0700, Walter Bright wrote:
Moritz Warning wrote:
Smth. like this would be helpful.
I like it. It's a good idea.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4002
dependencies, this release incorporates a
wealth of fixes and improvements by Benjamin Kramer, Frits van Bommel,
Kelly Wilson, Leandro Lucarella, Matti Niemenmaa, Moritz Warning, Robert
Clipsham, Tomas Lindquist Olsen and me.
Linux x86-64 download:
http://www.incasoftware.de/~kamm/ldc/ldc-0.9.2
On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 03:07:57 +, Michael Rynn wrote:
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 16:12:25 +, Moritz Warning wrote:
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 04:41:55 +, Michael Rynn wrote:
[..]
But do not take this very restricted and rather extreme sampling of
possible test parameters to be a reliable
On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 19:29:24 -0400, bearophile wrote:
(I am looking for rough corners in D, or in my knowledge of D.)
[..]
template IsPointer1(T) {
enum bool IsPointer1 = is(T : T*);
}
void main() {
int* ptr;
static assert(IsPointer1!(typeof(ptr))); // Err
}
But it
On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 09:26:27 +0100, Christian Kamm wrote:
A new version of LDC, the LLVM based compiler for the D programming
language has been released. It is built with DMDFE version 1.057 and
LLVM 2.6. The runtime library has been upgraded to Tango 0.99.9.
This is great news!
Thanks for
dependencies, this release incorporates a
wealth of fixes and improvements by Benjamin Kramer, Frits van Bommel,
Kelly Wilson, Leandro Lucarella, Matti Niemenmaa, Moritz Warning, Robert
Clipsham, Tomas Lindquist Olsen and me.
Linux x86-64 download:
http://www.incasoftware.de/~kamm/ldc/ldc-0.9.2
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 04:41:55 +, Michael Rynn wrote:
The use of built in Associative Array can have deleterious effects on
Garbage Collection.
:(
Fwiw, here is the original Python Dictionary implementation:
http://svn.python.org/projects/python/trunk/Objects/dictobject.c
This is also a
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:03:10 -0600, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 03/12/2010 03:02 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
If the license allows, it would be great to translate that to D and
make it work with arbitrary ranges of arbitrary data...
Redistributions in binary form
Hi,
the reason for using calloc in PyDict was because GC slows down
allocation way too much.
Maybe it is/was a bug in the GC. I used manual memory management
to cut this problem and I got a huge speed improvement.
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 01:33:32 +, Michael Rynn wrote:
Looked at the
On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 08:47:00 +0800, Lionello Lunesu wrote:
On 10-3-2010 8:35, Walter Bright wrote:
Lionello Lunesu wrote:
I'll be presenting the D Programming Language at the next monthly BLUG
meeting. It'll mostly be for people who haven't heard of D yet.
There'll be a fair chunk of D1 in
I think I might be able to give some feedback.
Don't know if I can find much time, though.
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 14:09:10 +, Norbert Nemec wrote:
Hello everybody,
after last week's decision to pick up the work on numerical arrays,
things are happening faster than I had expected: I found a
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 12:07:29 +0100, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2/11/10 06:11, strtr wrote:
Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
At the moment, no. Currently, Tango is D1-only, but druntime (the
thing that is supposed to allow Tango and Phobos to play nice together
on a single installation) is D2-only. So
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:26:06 +0100, Lars Ivar Igesund wrote:
Dear D community
A new version of Tango is now available for download, named after Kai
for his several contributions in this cycle. The main focus of this
release has been final cleanup and a lot of bugfixing for the upcoming
On Fri, 05 Feb 2010 10:42:14 +0100, smartmobili wrote:
Hi,
From old posts I know that a japanese guy started to developp a Visual
Studio plugin for D :
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives/digitalmars/D/18102.html
I wanted to know if by any chance someone reading my post could sent it
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 10:43:32 +0100, Stephan wrote:
I dunno if anyone knew this before but i wanted to give my kudos to a
guy that did a lot for the D community by developing the still best
debugger for the D Programming Language Ddbg
(http://ddbg.mainia.de/releases.html)
The question often
On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 10:22:02 -0500, Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
Eldar Insafutdinov Wrote:
Walter Bright Wrote:
Fixes the Tango build breaks.
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.055.zip
On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 16:06:02 -0500, digited wrote:
Walter Bright Wrote:
Fixes the Tango build breaks.
With RC's, you'll never need this.
There is always the dmd svn trunk:
dsource.org/projects/dmd
But a release is coming soon, please test announcement
would be nice.
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 21:03:25 +0100, grauzone wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
Happy New Year!
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.054.zip
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.038.zip
Many thanks to
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 21:22:58 +0100, grauzone wrote:
bearophile wrote:
grauzone:
But I have a problem: the compiler is either extremely slow for me, or
is stuck in an endless loop. All it does is to slowly allocate memory.
I aborted the compilation after ~ 20 minutes and 2 GB RAM allocation.
On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 12:41:30 -0500, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
hello there nowh...@company.com wrote in message
news:hhl737$1pg...@digitalmars.com...
(dsource.org is messed up, some library is alpha, beta, abandoned,
incomplete, not compile etc).
There's an update to dsource.org in the works
On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 19:31:49 +0100, Don wrote:
Moritz Warning wrote:
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 21:22:58 +0100, grauzone wrote:
bearophile wrote:
grauzone:
But I have a problem: the compiler is either extremely slow for me,
or is stuck in an endless loop. All it does is to slowly allocate
On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 22:35:12 +, Moritz Warning wrote:
On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 19:31:49 +0100, Don wrote:
Moritz Warning wrote:
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 21:22:58 +0100, grauzone wrote:
bearophile wrote:
grauzone:
But I have a problem: the compiler is either extremely slow for me,
or is stuck
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:14:06 +0100, s_lange wrote:
I know there are ways to get GDC working on ARM CPUs, but I'm interested
to know whether there is also an ARM version of the DMD compiler. If it
isn't yet, then if it is planned or scheduled to port it to ARM, and if
it already is, in what
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:55:02 +0100, Saaa wrote:
struct S : Pos {}
Why is this not possible?
The struct would need an additional pointer
for a dispatch table in case you want to have class semantics.
If you only what a contract that certain functions are implemented,
then it just need to be
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:19:11 +0300, Denis Koroskin wrote:
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:15:47 +0300, Nick Sabalausky a...@a.a wrote:
Don nos...@nospam.com wrote in message
news:he0d7l$34...@digitalmars.com...
The standard download still points to DMD1.030 (May 2008). A couple of
hundred serious
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:37:07 -0600, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
My perception following the discussion around typedef is that we should
eliminate it. What we offer is alias, which is a generalization of C's
typedef, and the change of name is justified by the fact that alias
defines aliases for
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:07:24 -0800, Walter Bright wrote:
Justin Johansson wrote:
I remember the discussion ... and if two intelligent folks in language
design can't agree on inheritance direction ... and given the paucity
of benefits ... there is only one reasonable promise to fulfill ...
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:42:45 -0800, Walter Bright wrote:
Currently, the type is determined by the type of the first element and
the rest are implicitly cast to it.
I propose changing it to being the type produced by applying the ?:
logic repeatedly to all the elements.
vote++
Would be
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:44:22 -0800, Walter Bright wrote:
Moritz Warning wrote:
Would be nice to finally have this (low profile) feature. I think there
was a discussion already but nothing happened.
I heard you guys, it's just that there was so much else going on.
We all feel that you have
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 06:59:31 -0800, Bill Baxter wrote:
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
dsimcha wrote:
== Quote from Andrei Alexandrescu (seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org)'s
article
I consider changing a bit D's range model following
On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 13:17:36 -0500, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 13:17:18 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Don wrote:
[I'm moving this from deep inside a TDPL thread, since I think it's
important]
is(typeof(XXX)) is infamously ugly and
On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 17:47:53 +0100, Don wrote:
[I'm moving this from deep inside a TDPL thread, since I think it's
important]
is(typeof(XXX)) is infamously ugly and unintuitive __traits(compiles,
XXX) is more comprehensible, but just as ugly.
I like your proposal.
__traits is a
On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 09:50:18 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
#ponce wrote:
Walter Bright Wrote:
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=911858
Added mandatory C++ attacks and D fanboyism
I read the exchange just now (nice job ponce) and am a bit surprised how
much others know about what
On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 13:06:15 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Moritz Warning wrote:
On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 09:50:18 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
#ponce wrote:
Walter Bright Wrote:
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=911858
Added mandatory C++ attacks and D fanboyism
I read
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:37:22 +1300, Joel Christensen wrote:
FMOD sound (record and play) is off D Programming web site.
http://wiki.dprogramming.com/FMod/HomePage
I followed instructions from the web site. But one instruction said to
use 'coffimplib.exe' but I couldn't see where it is to
On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 06:36:42 -0400, Justin Johansson wrote:
[..]
Hi LLVM Friends, Fans, Followers and Fanatics,
LLVM 2.6 is live! You can download it here: http://llvm.org/releases/
and read about it here:
http://llvm.org/releases/2.6/docs/ReleaseNotes.html
[..]
\o/
On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 09:40:03 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Justin Johansson wrote:
Looks like Christmas is arriving early this year folks ... just got
this pressy from the LLVM team/Chris Lattner in my inbox.
I'm sure a number of D people will be excited about this announcement.
On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 23:52:39 -0500, AJ wrote:
Who is Walter Bright?
I've heard he is 7 feet tall and has a peg leg!
On Sat, 17 Oct 2009 18:58:08 +, BCS wrote:
Hello Chris Nicholson-Sauls,
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Associative arrays are today quite problematic because they don't
offer any true iteration. Furthermore, the .keys and .values
properties create new arrays, which is wasteful.
On Sat, 17 Oct 2009 19:06:36 +, Moritz Warning wrote:
On Sat, 17 Oct 2009 18:58:08 +, BCS wrote:
Hello Chris Nicholson-Sauls,
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Associative arrays are today quite problematic because they don't
offer any true iteration. Furthermore, the .keys
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 20:46:25 -0700, Walter Bright wrote:
The main purpose of this is to correct a couple of regressions that were
blocking QtD and Tango.
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.050.zip
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 07:03:27 -0400, Justin Johansson wrote:
- the page.
Is this a D1 or a D2 discussion forum?
I find it rather humiliating to respond to a post in a D1 context and
later finding out that the OP was coming from a D2 context.*
(*In reference to a post I made earlier
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 08:15:01 -0400, #ponce wrote:
It's a bit unclear to me.
I know I must compare references with is but pointers ?
There is no difference because you can't overload the == operator etc.
for pointers.
On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 21:28:58 -0300, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Walter Bright, el 6 de octubre a las 12:07 me escribiste:
Robert Clipsham wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
Then please go ahead and set it up.
What exactly would you like setting up? Currently I'm thinking:
* Automated builds of
On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 21:43:36 -0700, Walter Bright wrote:
Folding in patches to compiler faults from bugzilla.
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.049.zip
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 19:29:06 -0400, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Moritz Warning moritzwarn...@web.de wrote in message
news:hb01mo$23g...@digitalmars.com...
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:53:28 -0400, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Moritz Warning moritzwarn...@web.de wrote in message
news:havc43$9a
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:48:17 -0400, Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
This has been raised numerous times by many people before, but still I'm
going to write it. The last three releases are broken for both QtD and
tango. Why is it happening? I see the reason in the dmd development
model. Say dmd
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:50:14 -0700, Walter Bright wrote:
Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
If dmd delepers contributed every change to the VCS separately, it
would be much easier to track down the change that caused the issue.
Yeah, that's probably a good idea.
From my side I could test the
On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 21:25:57 +, Moritz Warning wrote:
On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 09:04:50 -0400, Christopher Wright wrote:
Jeremie Pelletier wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
But if you want to contribute, how about a JSON parser for phobos?
You'll need one anyway for your IDE.
BTW, JSON parsing
1 - 100 of 142 matches
Mail list logo
