On Thursday, 26 March 2015 at 04:57:55 UTC, ketmar wrote:
by the way. do you know that you still CAN overload
postincrement
operation? yes, the code is still here, and it works...
somethimes. ;-)
Thnaks. Indeed, this works:
---
struct S
{
int i;
immutable(Object) o;
void
I don't know if this is a bug or expected behaviour. The struct
is mutable, assignable and pre-increment operator works. But
post-increment doesn't compile because of the immutable member.
--
struct S
{
int i;
immutable(Object) o;
S opUnary(string op)() { return this; }
void
On Sunday, 15 March 2015 at 14:01:00 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Walter Bright:
I'd also prefer to get rid of /+ +/ comments, I thought they'd
be more useful than they are.
I prefer to get rid of /* */ instead :-) Because /++/ can do
things /**/ can't.
+1
And on my keyboard, /++/ is easier
On Sunday, 15 March 2015 at 18:33:32 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
On Sunday, 15 March 2015 at 17:03:42 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14286
In the meantime, does someone know of a suitable workaround?
I found the following workaround. Not beautiful, but it works:
On Wednesday, 11 March 2015 at 17:19:20 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 18:17:38 +0100, Artur Skawina via
Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
On 03/11/15 15:41, ketmar via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 14:36:07 +, wobbles wrote:
On Wednesday, 11 March 2015 at 14:34:32
On Friday, 6 March 2015 at 00:57:16 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Thursday, 5 March 2015 at 23:50:28 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote:
I think I read somewhere you don't want to use unions like
this, but I think it is more because you generally don't want
to reinterpret bits.
It is
In case nobody has noticed it yet, there's an interesting new
challenge on codegolf.stackexchange called Showcase your
language where you can only show a snippet of length equal to
your number of upvotes (more detailed rule there).
On Sunday, 14 December 2014 at 13:47:21 UTC, Suliman wrote:
On Sunday, 14 December 2014 at 13:33:27 UTC, Suliman wrote:
There is also a branch named `develop` which at least
compiles, maybe it is usable.
how to add to dub this branch?
Compiling using dmd...
Linking...
OPTLINK (R) for Win32
On Saturday, 8 November 2014 at 16:01:09 UTC, anonymous wrote:
On Saturday, 8 November 2014 at 12:23:45 UTC, Nicolas Sicard
wrote:
I would like to register a D delegate to a C API that takes a
function pointer as a callback and a void* pointer to pass data
to this callback.
My solution
On Saturday, 1 November 2014 at 10:32:48 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Saturday, November 01, 2014 07:52:38 tcak via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
The module declaration, and the name and path of D files do
not
need to match each other. You include a D file while compiling
the
On Saturday, 1 November 2014 at 14:40:16 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Saturday, 1 November 2014 at 14:03:51 UTC, Nicolas Sicard
wrote:
What's the reason why the module keyword was introduced in the
first place? The package and module hierarchy could have been
deduced from the directory and file
On Saturday, 1 November 2014 at 15:32:22 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Saturday, 1 November 2014 at 14:48:33 UTC, Nicolas Sicard
wrote:
On Saturday, 1 November 2014 at 14:40:16 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Saturday, 1 November 2014 at 14:03:51 UTC, Nicolas Sicard
wrote:
What's the reason why the module
On Friday, 10 October 2014 at 22:34:45 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
I think I like the idea of the factory method now though, as
I've learned you can hide a struct inside a function, and then
call the function to set the struct up properly and return it.
At least, I'm sure I've seen
On Thursday, 18 September 2014 at 21:14:55 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 09/18/2014 02:06 PM, ddos wrote:
The following code fails because Vec2.length() does not return
int ...
so Variant is only usable with types that do not have a method
with name
length() ?? i'm confused
On Thursday, 18
On Monday, 15 September 2014 at 23:20:45 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 9/15/2014 3:24 PM, David Nadlinger wrote:
2. It effectively forces everybody to make all conversions to
long double
explicit in their code,
This is due to D currently not allowing implicit conversion to
a struct. It's a
On Monday, 15 September 2014 at 09:19:12 UTC, eles wrote:
On Monday, 15 September 2014 at 09:13:52 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 9/15/2014 1:54 AM, John Colvin wrote:
On Monday, 15 September 2014 at 00:54:40 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 9/13/2014 12:23 AM, bearophile wrote:
Readability is
On Monday, 25 August 2014 at 06:57:48 UTC, confused wrote:
hi team!
I'm using this swift piece of code to seek out the Option 26
DHCP is deploying and output to the screen:
https://github.com/CyberShadow/dhcptest/blob/master/dhcptest.d
(props for code CyberShadow).
When I get the value it
On Monday, 25 August 2014 at 07:37:59 UTC, hane wrote:
On Monday, 25 August 2014 at 06:57:48 UTC, confused wrote:
hi team!
I'm using this swift piece of code to seek out the Option 26
DHCP is deploying and output to the screen:
https://github.com/CyberShadow/dhcptest/blob/master/dhcptest.d
On Sunday, 20 July 2014 at 15:02:58 UTC, Foo wrote:
On Sunday, 20 July 2014 at 14:55:00 UTC, Foo wrote:
For clarification: how would that work without mixin + string?
I tried this:
mixin template Vala2(uint count, alias arr) {
asm {
sub ESP, count;
mov
On Monday, 10 March 2014 at 03:44:54 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Consider it alpha quality. Please don't announce yet before we
put it in good shape.
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dlang.org/pull/516
http://dlang.org/library
http://dlang.org/library-prerelease
I needed to
On Thursday, 6 March 2014 at 11:49:51 UTC, Edwin van Leeuwen
wrote:
On Thursday, 6 March 2014 at 11:28:21 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
See std.algorithm.move
Thank you, can't believe I missed that. How do I specify that
the function expects a temporary/xvalue () parameter though?
What are you
On Wednesday, 26 February 2014 at 22:49:57 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
On Wednesday, 26 February 2014 at 21:41:57 UTC, Kelet wrote:
Tangentially related: https://github.com/biozic/quantities
Impressive!
This seems similar to David Nadlingers std.units and std.si.
When will all these efforts on
On Tuesday, 4 March 2014 at 13:20:02 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
Thanks! I think David Nadlingers' is more elaborate (scaled and
affine units) and less prone to rounding errors. I haven't used
it yet. Mine is more basic but has a parsing system that I use
to
So you cannot defined things lika kPa from
On Monday, 3 March 2014 at 23:27:42 UTC, Xavier Bigand wrote:
I thought it could be nice to have a static return.
My Idea is to remove unnecessary bracket encapsulation made
with some static if statements.
It will works like this :
module xxx.opengl;
import buildSettings; // contains some
On Tuesday, 25 February 2014 at 05:01:30 UTC, Manu wrote:
In lieu of a clear roadmap, I'm just going to list the things
actively
holding me up on a daily basis.
Others encouraged to add theirs, maybe we'll see patterns
emerge.
What are yours?
Enhanced privacy:
On Wednesday, 19 February 2014 at 09:28:27 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Tarman:
We're doing some super computing big data style stuff with
D. We have a system where we're comparing associative arrays
with billions of entries.
Built-in associative arrays were never tested with so many
pairs, so
On Saturday, 1 February 2014 at 19:52:59 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Looking at http://wiki.dlang.org/Review_Queue there are 4
proposals that are marked as Ready for review or Ready for
comments. I can proceed with any of those any time proposal
author sends me an e-mail acknowledging his attention.
On Tuesday, 11 February 2014 at 21:19:36 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 2/11/2014 1:00 PM, Brian Rogoff wrote:
Which D metaprogramming (templates, mixins, ctfe, ..) features
would be in this
D subset?
All of them.
And would all of D features be available at compile time?
CTFE/string mixins
The URL http://dlang.org links to a page that just says It
works!
So laconic a statement for such a wonderful language! ;-)
Nicolas
On Monday, 27 January 2014 at 12:40:12 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Am 27.01.2014 13:34, schrieb Nicolas Sicard:
The URL http://dlang.org links to a page that just says It
works!
So laconic a statement for such a wonderful language! ;-)
Nicolas
Looks fine from here.
Strange. I'll try again
On Monday, 27 January 2014 at 17:55:35 UTC, Brad Roberts wrote:
On 1/27/14 9:43 AM, Stanislav Blinov wrote:
On Monday, 27 January 2014 at 16:11:56 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
Sure you meant http://issues.dlang.org/
That one is even more desriptive :)
Issues.dlang.org isn't expected
On Monday, 27 January 2014 at 02:27:08 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On Sun, 26 Jan 2014 18:41:00 -0500, Nicolas Sicard
dran...@gmail.com wrote:
Running a piece of code that can be reduced to:
---
import std.stdio;
void main()
{
import std.range;
foreach(item; iota(0, 10
On Monday, 27 January 2014 at 14:47:21 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 03:17:51 -0500, Nicolas Sicard
dran...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually I used a struct because the code is more complex, and
it builds an array of delegates, which are returned from
global functions, like
Running a piece of code that can be reduced to:
---
import std.stdio;
void main()
{
import std.range;
foreach(item; iota(0, 10).transform(2))
writeln(item);
}
auto transform(T)(T list, real x)
{
auto t = /* new */ Transformer(x); // line 12
Hi,
I known this has been discussed before, and there still is an
open issue in bugzilla
(https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1238). Is it
considered a feature or a bug?
Thanks
On Thursday, 23 January 2014 at 17:29:08 UTC, Gary Willoughby
wrote:
On Thursday, 23 January 2014 at 17:06:17 UTC, Nicolas Sicard
wrote:
Hi,
I known this has been discussed before, and there still is an
open issue in bugzilla
(https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1238
On Saturday, 18 January 2014 at 23:00:11 UTC, bearophile wrote:
cmplx:
During the study D, I stumbled upon this design
alias myInt = int;
but the specification says nothing about such use alias. Is
the syntax has been changed?
Yes, it's a recent very small syntax improvement. Eventually I
On Saturday, 18 January 2014 at 22:12:09 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Walter Bright:
I don't think a new syntax is required. We already have the
template syntax:
RangedInt!(0,10)
should do it.
Is this array literal accepted, and can D spot the out-of-range
bug at compile time (Ada language
On Monday, 13 January 2014 at 20:59:28 UTC, Brad Anderson wrote:
There is also std.traits.ReturnType you can use for more
complex types or voldemort types.
Or: typeof(regex())
BTW, how does ReturnType handle overloads?
--
Nicolas
On Thursday, 2 January 2014 at 08:36:24 UTC, Dylan Knutson wrote:
The reason for this is that std.variant.Variant isn't CTFEable,
because it uses memcpy in opAssign. I'd consider that a Phobos
bug; perhaps there is a way to make std.variant CTFE
compatible? That'd allow for a much wider (and
On Friday, 13 December 2013 at 12:10:02 UTC, comco wrote:
Imagine a world in which a simple 'if' has the semantics of a
static if, if the condition is evaluable at CT. Is this a world
you would rather live in?
template Fac(int i) {
if (i == 0) { // static if; doesn't introduce scope
enum Fac
On Saturday, 7 December 2013 at 19:59:50 UTC, Fra wrote:
I finally decided to try out DUB.
The simple examples work great, but I could not find any user
guide/list of possible options to be put in the package.json
file.
Just as an example, how do you pass specific compiler flags
like '-J'?
On Wednesday, 13 November 2013 at 06:30:21 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Tuesday, November 12, 2013 22:11:45 H. S. Teoh wrote:
What's the reason vibe.d's json tools aren't backported to
Phobos?
Probably because no one has ever bothered to try and get them
ready to be
reviewed for inclusion
In this declaration (tango.io.Console.d from Tango2):
__gshared immutable immutable(char)[] Eol = \r\n;
Aren't the two `immutable` keywords redundant? Why would
`__gshared` be necessary for such an immutable type?
Thanks
On Tuesday, 12 November 2013 at 20:16:31 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 November 2013 at 20:09:57 UTC, Martin Drašar
wrote:
Those two immutables are not redundant, because it is an array
of immutable chars (string), that is itself immutable.
It is redundant because immutable is
On Friday, 1 November 2013 at 12:37:20 UTC, simendsjo wrote:
On Friday, 1 November 2013 at 11:41:52 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Friday, November 01, 2013 12:30:10 Gary Willoughby wrote:
I have a class which contains an array as a core collection of
data. I want to pass an instance of this
On Tuesday, 29 October 2013 at 20:56:02 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
On Tuesday, 29 October 2013 at 10:08:00 UTC, Sergei Nosov wrote:
I guess it's a good thing, it's available online. While
looking through it, I also noticed that there are new
functions 'stripLeft/stripRight'. I believe it would
On Sunday, 27 October 2013 at 03:45:50 UTC, Timothee Cour wrote:
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 6:24 PM, Nicolas Sicard
dran...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, 27 October 2013 at 00:18:41 UTC, Timothee Cour
wrote:
I've posted a while back a string=string substring function
that doesn't
allocating
On Sunday, 27 October 2013 at 07:44:06 UTC, Jakob Ovrum wrote:
On Saturday, 26 October 2013 at 21:23:13 UTC, Gautam Goel wrote:
Dumb Newbie Question: I've searched through the library
reference, but I haven't figured out how to extract a
substring from a string. I'd like something like
On Saturday, 26 October 2013 at 14:39:31 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On 10/25/2013 07:46 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Hello,
I was curious how our fledgling wrap and unwrap routines
compare with
Go's duck typing - similarities, distinctions, performance.
Please share
any thoughts, thanks!
On Saturday, 26 October 2013 at 15:08:23 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 10/26/13 7:55 AM, Nicolas Sicard wrote:
On Saturday, 26 October 2013 at 14:39:31 UTC, Martin Nowak
wrote:
On 10/25/2013 07:46 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Hello,
I was curious how our fledgling wrap and unwrap
On Sunday, 27 October 2013 at 00:18:41 UTC, Timothee Cour wrote:
I've posted a while back a string=string substring function
that doesn't
allocating: google
nonallocating unicode string manipulations
code:
auto slice(T)(T a,size_t u, size_t
v)if(is(T==string)){//TODO:generalize to
On Monday, 26 August 2013 at 00:46:50 UTC, Jason den Dulk wrote:
Hi
Consider the following code
module A;
void xx(T:int)(T t) { .. }
void xx(T:float)(T t) { .. }
module B;
import A;
void xx(T:string)(T t) { .. }
void main()
{
xx!(int)(4);
xx(4.5);
xx(abc);
}
The compiler won't let
On Sunday, 18 August 2013 at 02:50:32 UTC, JS wrote:
On Sunday, 18 August 2013 at 01:52:50 UTC, Timothee Cour wrote:
Is there any way to get the enclosing function as symbol ?
I'd like something like that:
alternative names would be:
__function__
__context__
auto fun(alias
On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 01:48:49 UTC, JS wrote:
The following code is used to reduce dependence on new and the
GC. iNew is used as the replacement.
The problem is, where ever New is used, it requires typing the
type twice.
e.g.,
A.New!A(...)
instead of A.New(...)
Is there any way
On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 16:58:37 UTC, JS wrote:
On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 07:21:19 UTC, Nicolas Sicard
wrote:
On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 01:48:49 UTC, JS wrote:
The following code is used to reduce dependence on new and
the GC. iNew is used as the replacement.
The problem
On Thursday, 4 July 2013 at 23:52:35 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu:
Where does the whole stronger typing comes in? This is
poppycock. We need real arguments here.
Maybe it's a matter of definitions, for me having null as
literal for empty array, null pointer, empty associative
On Wednesday, 26 June 2013 at 20:50:03 UTC, bearophile wrote:
If you want a special behavour you should use a special
function as partialWritefln that ignores arguments not present
in the format string.
Or maybe just define a new format specifier (%z, for 'zap'?) to
ignore one or more
On Saturday, 26 January 2013 at 13:21:37 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
It's always possible to avoid keywords in favor of syntax.
Example:
Declaring a getter:
int foo {}
Just as a regular function declaration but without the
parentheses.
Declaring a setter:
void foo= (int value) {}
On Thursday, 24 January 2013 at 06:26:13 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
There's quite a bit of work left to do, but the PDF spec
already has 386 pages of goodness and starts to look seriously
cool. Take a peek!
http://dlang.org/dlangspec.pdf
(still subject to
On Wednesday, 23 January 2013 at 22:39:04 UTC, Alan wrote:
I saw an old thread from 2004 while doing a google search that
discussed D and scientific computing and was looking for some
more recent information or opinions from people who have used
it for such purposes.
I am a graduate student
On Thursday, 24 January 2013 at 10:42:10 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling wrote:
On 01/24/2013 11:16 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
If you use the 64 bit model, dmd will use SIMD instructions
for float and
double, which are much faster.
I generally find that dmd-compiled programs run at about half
On Wednesday, 16 January 2013 at 11:16:41 UTC, bearophile wrote:
In Mathematica and NumPy (and other systems used with REPL) if
you print a very large array you receive a shortened output. In
Mathematica:
http://reference.wolfram.com/mathematica/tutorial/ShortAndShallowOutput.html
On Wednesday, 16 January 2013 at 11:46:10 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Nicolas Sicard:
writeln(iota(10_000).take(10)); ?
You have missed the point. What if you have a [iota(10_000),
iota(10_000)]?
OK, but is there a simple and general way to tell how to skip
elements for ranges other than
On Wednesday, 16 January 2013 at 14:05:03 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Mathematica and NumPy on default shorten the output if it's too
much large, and show it all on request. What I forgot to say in
my first post is that in D it's probably better to have those
conditions swapped, this means printing
On Monday, 14 January 2013 at 06:26:33 UTC, 1100110 wrote:
On 01/13/2013 11:35 PM, 1100110 wrote:
Ok, I wish to create a standard timing system so that I can
measure ~how
long each function takes to execute.
I wish to be able to place at the start of a function
version(Time) mixin
On Tuesday, 15 January 2013 at 11:19:50 UTC, mist wrote:
I thought template itself should compile but its statement-like
instantiation should not.
The template shouldn't compile: the D grammar says that mixin
templates inject declarations only. Hence the text of the error.
By the way, if
On Saturday, 29 December 2012 at 01:53:15 UTC, David Nadlinger
wrote:
- There are also possible performance implications: Structs
that just wrap a single field in order to enrich it with type
information, such as Duration or a Quantity struct from a units
of measurement library, will likely
On Monday, 14 January 2013 at 21:18:13 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/14/2013 11:24 AM, Nicolas Sicard wrote:
I had started but never finished such a wrapping struct for
units, and I gave it
another try recently (https://github.com/biozic/siunits).
Clearly, when using POD structs, the code
On Tuesday, 8 January 2013 at 21:57:17 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 07:48:58PM +0100, Tim Krimm wrote:
Now that D 2.0 is fairly stable, are there any plans of
writing the
official DMD compiler with the D 2.0 language vs the present
language of C++?
DMD 2.0 would have to be
On Saturday, 5 January 2013 at 08:59:32 UTC, Philippe Sigaud
wrote:
From markdown, it can easily be translated into pdf, html, mobi
or epub
(heck, even docx)
Philippe
I was wondering: do you use Pandoc to do that (e.g. for your
D-template tutorial)?
Nicolas
On Saturday, 5 January 2013 at 14:10:38 UTC, Philippe Sigaud
wrote:
Don't tempt me. I'm playing with the idea of writing a Ddoc -
Markdown
converter. Something like Pandoc, but lighter.
Couldn't a .ddoc file with redefined macros produce Markdown
output?
On Friday, 28 December 2012 at 08:46:22 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Wednesday, December 26, 2012 14:08:37 Nicolas Sicard wrote:
I'm not sure whether this has been reported:
---
struct Foo {
void bar(T)() {}
void baz() {}
}
void main() {
Foo foo;
(foo).bar
On Friday, 28 December 2012 at 15:29:58 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-12-28 16:18, Russel Winder wrote:
Is there a reason for using g++ to compile and link the C code
of DMD?
As far as I know it doesn't work with Clang. Did you have any
other compiler in mind?
Actually it works with
I'm not sure whether this has been reported:
---
struct Foo {
void bar(T)() {}
void baz() {}
}
void main() {
Foo foo;
(foo).bar!int(); // Compiler parsing error
((foo)).bar!int(); // OK
foo.bar!int(); // OK
(foo).baz(); // OK
}
On Tuesday, 20 November 2012 at 03:49:57 UTC, Tyler Jameson
Little wrote:
Would a minor refactor of vibe.d be acceptable? This is pretty
much what I'm looking for:
https://github.com/rejectedsoftware/vibe.d/blob/master/source/vibe/http/common.d
The implementation of std.container.Array!bool makes use of ulong
instead of size_t as far as sizes and indices are concerned. This
makes Array!bool inconsistent with other array-like types
(including Array!T if !is(T==bool)) in 32-bit code. What would be
the disadvantages of using size_t?
On Tuesday, 15 May 2012 at 10:04:52 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
On 15.05.2012 13:44, Nicolas Sicard wrote:
The implementation of std.container.Array!bool makes use of
ulong
instead of size_t as far as sizes and indices are concerned.
This makes
Array!bool inconsistent with other array-like
On Wednesday, 9 May 2012 at 14:30:33 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/telhj/voldemort_types_in_d/
Andrei
One drawback of Voldemort types, is that they are incompatible
with the generation of .di files (option -H).
See
--- Comment #1 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-05-08 04:12:12
PDT ---
(In reply to comment #0)
Calling impure functions in the second parameter of an assert
statement within
the body of a pure pure is an error, even in release mode.
This is good.
Since it is allowed to call impure
Bug report: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7995
On Thursday, 26 April 2012 at 10:50:49 UTC, David wrote:
Am 26.04.2012 07:55, schrieb Era Scarecrow:
Associative arrays?
C++:
#include map
#include string
mapstring, string m;
Java:
import java.util.*;
MapString, String map = new HashMapString, String();
D:
string[string] map
(Don't know
Hi,
I am trying to use a D static library from C on Mac OSX Lion, but
it always fails.
--- file mylib.d ---
module mylib;
import core.runtime;
extern(C) {
bool mylib_init() {
return Runtime.initialize();
}
bool mylib_free() {
s/void/int in main.c
More testing. This:
--- file mylib.d
module mylib;
import core.runtime;
import std.stdio;
extern(C) {
bool mylib_init() {
return Runtime.initialize();
}
bool mylib_free() {
return Runtime.terminate();
}
void
On Wednesday, 25 April 2012 at 17:59:38 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
On 4/25/12, Nicolas Sicard dran...@gmail.com wrote:
--- file main.c ---
extern void mylib_init();
extern void mylib_free();
Try changing void to bool there.
This was a typo in my first post. The problem is elsewhere
On Wednesday, 25 April 2012 at 18:11:16 UTC, Nathan M. Swan wrote:
How do I deal with this (on OSX); are CGI programs not allowed
to
write to files? How to change this?
Thanks, NMS
test.d:
#!/usr/local/bin/rdmd
import std.stdio;
void main() {
writeln(Content-type:
Hi
module main;
class Foo(string s) {}
final class Bar(string s) {} // Error
The compiler says:
variable main.s final cannot be applied to variable
Why is this forbidden?
Nicolas
(DMD 2.022 - Linux)
88 matches
Mail list logo
