Re: DConf 2020 Early-Bird Registration & Submission Deadlines

On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 2:05 PM Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > [snip] > I'll open registration through PayPal once the official > announcement goes out on the blog and social media. Both > registration options will be available at

Re: DCompute - Native heterogeneous computing for D - is here!

On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 10:37 AM, Nicholas Wilson via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > DCompute is an extension to LDC capable of generating code (with no language > changes*) for NVIDIA's NVPTX for use with CUDA, SPIRV for use with the > OpenCL runtime, and

Re: Android LDC in a Container

On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 1:16 AM, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > I haven't actually had a chance to try either this or Joakims's stuff by > itself, although I am interested. Can you describe how this repo simplifies > things?

Re: Call for arms: Arch Linux D package maintenance

On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 6:47 PM, Vladimir Panteleev via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > On Wednesday, 1 February 2017 at 12:47:51 UTC, Dicebot wrote: >> >> As I have previously announced >> (http://forum.dlang.org/post/o6fbbu$1qli$1...@digitalmars.com), I am

Re: Call for arms: Arch Linux D package maintenance

On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Dicebot via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Wednesday, 1 February 2017 at 18:32:48 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote: > >> I use arch and D every day. I'm willing to volunteer. I keep up to date >> with all releases and keep

Re: Call for arms: Arch Linux D package maintenance

On Wednesday, February 1, 2017, Dicebot via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > As I have previously announced > (http://forum.dlang.org/post/o6fbbu$1qli$1...@digitalmars.com), I am > stepping down from maintaining Arch Linux packages for D. > > That means

Re: DIP 1003: remove `body` as a keyword

On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Basile B. via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Saturday, 10 December 2016 at 13:49:09 UTC, Basile B. wrote: > >> On Monday, 28 November 2016 at 02:17:20 UTC, Dicebot wrote: >> >>> On 11/24/2016 05:29 PM, WM.H wrote: >>>

Re: Mir Random announce - Professional RNGs

On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 1:14 AM, Ilya Yaroshenko via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > > https://github.com/libmir/mir-random > http://docs.random.dlang.io/latest/index.html Like the betterC use case. Nice API. first example from the docs: import

Re: Battle-plan for CTFE

On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 8:17 AM, Stefam Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Monday, 24 October 2016 at 05:57:42 UTC, Stefam Koch wrote: > >> On Sunday, 16 October 2016 at 00:27:50 UTC, Uplink_Coder wrote: >> >>> >>> Little update here: >>> The LLVM

Re: Battle-plan for CTFE

On 19 Oct 2016 17:46, "Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce" < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > > On Wednesday, 19 October 2016 at 07:11:24 UTC, Nordlöw wrote: >> >> On Sunday, 25 September 2016 at 20:47:41 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote: >>> >>> If all goes well there will be a separate

Re: Examples Wanted: Usages of "body" as a Symbol Name

On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 5:32 PM, angel via Digitalmars-d < digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Wednesday, 5 October 2016 at 02:11:14 UTC, Meta wrote: > >> I'm currently writing up a DIP to propose removing `body` as a keyword to >> allow it to be used for variable names, functions, etc. I'm

Re: code-d 0.12.0 - The user friendly release (code-d for noobs)

On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 3:22 PM, WebFreak001 via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Wednesday, 5 October 2016 at 07:44:00 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 7:53 AM, Suliman via Digitalmars-d-announce < >>

Re: D, ZeroMQ, Nanomsg

I also chose Ilya's nanomsg over zeromq, there were some fundamental flaws in ZMQ that it addresses, and it is more flexible. On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 3:42 PM, Laeeth Isharc via Digitalmars-d < digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Thursday, 29 September 2016 at 04:18:55 UTC, Nikolay wrote: >

Re: Battle-plan for CTFE

On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 10:47 PM, Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Sunday, 25 September 2016 at 18:21:27 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote: > >> >> :D congrats! >> > > I appreciate it. > If all goes well there will be a separate nightly release

Re: code-d 0.12.0 - The user friendly release (code-d for noobs)

On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 7:53 AM, Suliman via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > Please, add Sublime support > @WebFreak001: I too am curious as to why you chose to support two obscure editors rather than Sublime as your first supported editors. (Obscure

Re: Diet-NG 1.0.0 released

On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Sönke Ludwig via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > Am 24.09.2016 um 15:04 schrieb WebFreak001: > >> On Friday, 23 September 2016 at 11:47:23 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote: >> >>> The Diet template language is aimed at providing a

Re: Release candidate vibe.d 0.7.30-rc.1

On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 12:01 AM, Jack Applegame via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Thursday, 29 September 2016 at 13:44:53 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote: > >> >> If no new issues come up, the 0.7.30 release is scheduled for the 9th of >> October. >> >> Please

Re: Battle-plan for CTFE

On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 4:47 PM, Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Tuesday, 20 September 2016 at 05:06:57 UTC, Nordlöw wrote: > >> On Monday, 19 September 2016 at 10:07:06 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote: >> >>> Compiling all of phobos does not

Re: mysql-native v0.1.5

On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 3:00 PM, Nick Sabalausky via Digitalmars-d-announce <digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On 09/16/2016 02:41 PM, Rory McGuire via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > >> On 11 Sep 2016 16:57, "Nick Sabalausky via Digitalmars-d-announce"

Re: mysql-native v0.1.5

On 11 Sep 2016 16:57, "Nick Sabalausky via Digitalmars-d-announce" < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: >[snip] >... a top priority for mysqln-native at this point. Hi Nick is that a typo or are you working on a completely different library? mysqln-native?

Re: Beta D 2.071.2-b5

On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Ali Çehreli via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On 09/14/2016 05:58 AM, Johan Engelen wrote: > >> On Wednesday, 14 September 2016 at 12:16:51 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote: >> >>> Fifth and hopefully last beta for the 2.071.2

Re: DlangUI 0.9.0: Console backend added

On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:11 PM, ketmar via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Wednesday, 14 September 2016 at 13:08:18 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote: > >> Screenshots here are what can be done with terminal/ascii: >> http://caca.zoy.org/wiki/libcaca >> > >

Re: DlangUI 0.9.0: Console backend added

On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:04 PM, ketmar via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Wednesday, 14 September 2016 at 05:58:51 UTC, Vadim Lopatin wrote: > >> Thank you! >> Now dlangui terminal mode supports only 16 colors. >> Some refactoring is required to

Re: Beta D 2.071.2-b4

On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 9:30 AM, Ali Çehreli via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On 09/12/2016 12:47 AM, Martin Nowak wrote: > > > This comes with a different fix for Issue 15907 than 2.071.2-b3. > > Kisses and hugs! :) > > Ali > > +1, this is _way_ better.

Re: DlangUI 0.9.0: Console backend added

On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Vadim Lopatin via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Tuesday, 13 September 2016 at 12:18:19 UTC, Bauss wrote: > >> Good job, but why do people still use tinypic in 2016, when things like >> imgur exist that are a 1000 times

Re: DlangUI 0.9.0: Console backend added

On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Vadim Lopatin via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Friday, 9 September 2016 at 11:56:11 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote: > >> On Friday, 9 September 2016 at 11:21:07 UTC, Vadim Lopatin wrote: >> >>> Now it's possible to build

Re: [OT] LLVM 3.9 released - you can try the release already with LDC!

On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 10:46 PM, Kai Nacke via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Tuesday, 6 September 2016 at 10:51:16 UTC, eugene wrote: > >> On Tuesday, 6 September 2016 at 09:42:11 UTC, Lodovico Giaretta wrote: >> >>> >>> There are lot of projects using

Re: [OT] LLVM 3.9 released - you can try the release already with LDC!

On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 9:31 AM, eugene via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Thursday, 8 September 2016 at 20:46:57 UTC, Kai Nacke wrote: > >> >> What do YOU do to advocate D? >> >> > What i do to advocate D is nothing, as D is not to be advocated but to

Re: Battle-plan for CTFE

On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Thursday, 8 September 2016 at 10:44:55 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote: > >> compiling parts of phobos does no longer crash the new engine. >> However it still produces incorrect

Re: workspace-d 2.7.2 & code-d 0.10.14

On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 8:50 AM, Suliman via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Wednesday, 7 September 2016 at 18:27:41 UTC, WebFreak001 wrote: > >> On Wednesday, 7 September 2016 at 18:14:29 UTC, Suliman wrote: >> >>> You could look my PC with TeamViewer

Re: Return type deduction

On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 11:59 AM, Andrea Fontana via Digitalmars-d < digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote: > I asked this some time (years?) ago. Time for a second try :) > > Consider this: > > --- > > T simple(T)() { return T.init; } > > > void main() > { > int test = simple!int(); // it

Re: CompileTime performance measurement

On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 7:42 PM, Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d < digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Tuesday, 6 September 2016 at 10:42:00 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote: > >> On Sunday, 4 September 2016 at 00:04:16 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote: >> >>> I recently implemented __ctfeWriteln. >>> >> >> Nice,

Re: Battle-plan for CTFE

On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > FunctionCall support is done. (with a lot of room for improvement) > you can already return strings. > now I just have to finish string-comparison and string-concat support to >

Re: Beta D 2.071.2-b3

On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 10:15 AM, ketmar via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Friday, 2 September 2016 at 07:46:30 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote: > actually, from my PoV solution is supereasy: just remove ALL visibility > restrictions for traits. and i mean all.

Re: [GSoC] Precise GC

On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Jeremy DeHaan via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > [snip]. Precisely scanning unions is tricky since they could mix pointer > and non pointer types. [snip] > Can we rather just make a special tagged union that is scanned...

Re: Beta D 2.071.2-b3

On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 8:47 AM, ketmar via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Friday, 2 September 2016 at 06:27:11 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote: > >> Perhaps @system code should just completely ignore privacy? >> > > it is uncontrollable. imagine attribute

Re: Beta D 2.071.2-b3

On 02 Sep 2016 07:40, "ketmar via Digitalmars-d-announce" < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > > On Tuesday, 30 August 2016 at 23:54:45 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote: >> >> Allowing access to private members has a lot of implications, e.g. breaks lots of optimizations b/c you can't know who

Re: Battle-plan for CTFE

On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 11:26 PM, ag0aep6g via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On 09/01/2016 11:01 PM, Rory McGuire via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > >> I'm actually asking why we can't catch the ctfe error. >> > > There is

Re: Battle-plan for CTFE

On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 11:05 PM, David Nadlinger via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > On Thursday, 1 September 2016 at 21:01:46 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote: > >> I'm actually asking why we can't catch the ctfe error. >> > > You can, by using __traits(compiles,

Re: Battle-plan for CTFE

On 01 Sep 2016 21:36, "David Nadlinger via Digitalmars-d-announce" < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > > On Thursday, 1 September 2016 at 19:27:17 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote: >> >> So why can't we even catch the Error during CTFE, that would at least help somewhat. > > > You are mixing

Re: Battle-plan for CTFE

On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 9:09 PM, David Nadlinger via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Thursday, 1 September 2016 at 16:43:53 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote: > >> is that in one of the "semantic" passes the compiler has? >> > > For reference, I've laid out the

Re: Battle-plan for CTFE

On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 6:29 PM, Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Thursday, 1 September 2016 at 13:18:18 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote: > >> the _checkCTFE() function is just a function that does something we're not >> allowed to do at CTFE, but

Re: DMD front-end can be used as a library with Dub

Thanks, for the GC stub, that will be great for playing with whether or not a little dmd app crashes after gc_annihilate(true). Did I understand that right? R On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 6:16 PM, Cauterite via Digitalmars-d < digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Monday, 29 August 2016 at

Re: DMD front-end can be used as a library with Dub

I didn't see your announcement, but... AWESOME!! This could be the basis for some really good tutorials on making compiler backends etc... We need more little teaser examples like the one you posted in the beginning of this thread. PS: I did already check the code out on github because I watch

Re: Battle-plan for CTFE

On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 10:43 PM, Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Tuesday, 30 August 2016 at 22:01:45 UTC, tsbockman wrote: > >> On Monday, 29 August 2016 at 08:39:56 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote: >> >>> I just came up with a nifty little patch

Re: Battle-plan for CTFE

On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 10:35 AM, Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > [snip] > But yes you can circumvent the code-generation and pulling in the druntime > dependency using a static if. > That will be awesome!

Re: Battle-plan for CTFE

On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Dominikus Dittes Scherkl via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > On Monday, 29 August 2016 at 00:24:01 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote: > >> I feel that this can have a positive impact on the whole of dmd, since >> that will allow better

Re: Aedi - a dependency injection library

On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 8:56 PM, Alexandru Ermicioi via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > On Tuesday, 16 August 2016 at 19:24:22 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote: > >> On 16 Aug 2016 20:45, "Alexandru Ermicioi via Digitalmars-d-announce" < >>

Re: Berlin D Meetup August 2016

Man I wish I was in Berlin. Will be awesome if we get to see a video of this. R On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Ben Palmer via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > The August Berlin D Meetup will be happening at 20:00 on Friday the 26th > of

Re: Battle-plan for CTFE

On 17 Aug 2016 18:50, "Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce" < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > > Just a small update today. > if(__ctfe) and if(!__ctfe) > now get special treatment. > Also working on getting compiletime-parsers to run. > Nice tease with the "compile time parsers

Re: DIP1000: Scoped Pointers

On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Mike via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > > > Or perhaps DIP1000 changes the current behavior of the `scope` storage > class. > > My understanding is that the `scope` storage class currently allocates a > class on the stack

Re: DIP1000: Scoped Pointers

On 17 Aug 2016 04:00, "Mike via Digitalmars-d-announce" < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > > On Wednesday, 17 August 2016 at 01:42:00 UTC, Walter Bright wrote: > >>> Can you please clarify the current implementation `scope`, and what DIP1000 >>> proposes to change with respect to the

Re: Aedi - a dependency injection library

On 16 Aug 2016 20:45, "Alexandru Ermicioi via Digitalmars-d-announce" < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > > On Tuesday, 16 August 2016 at 14:25:10 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote: >> >> On 2016-08-16 11:41, Alexandru Ermicioi wrote: >> >>> https://github.com/aermicioi/aedi >> >> >> If you

Re: DIP1000: Scoped Pointers

On 16 Aug 2016 21:01, "Dicebot via Digitalmars-d-announce" < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > > On Tuesday, 16 August 2016 at 18:55:40 UTC, Dicebot wrote: >> >> On Tuesday, 16 August 2016 at 18:25:42 UTC, Meta wrote: >>> >>> What about this? >>> >>> struct Rnd >>> { >>> int*

Re: DIP1000: Scoped Pointers

On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 4:05 PM, Dicebot via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On 08/15/2016 04:54 PM, Rory McGuire via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > > okay nice, so that code would not compile but code such as: > > void test() { >

Re: DIP1000: Scoped Pointers

On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Dicebot via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On 08/15/2016 03:41 PM, Rory McGuire via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > > scope rnd = new Rnd; // reference semantic and stack allocated > > auto rnd2 = r

Re: DIP1000: Scoped Pointers

On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 1:57 PM, ZombineDev via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Monday, 15 August 2016 at 10:27:00 UTC, Dicebot wrote: > >> On Monday, 15 August 2016 at 07:19:00 UTC, lobo wrote: >> >>> When was it deprecated? I use it a lot and DMD

Re: Battle-plan for CTFE

On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 5:21 AM, Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I took a break from work on string operations and focused instead of > improving the robustness of the engine. > I.E. for it not to halt the compiler on unsupported

Re: Battle-plan for CTFE

On 06 Aug 2016 16:30, "Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce" < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > > Time for an update. > (ASCII)-Strings work reasonably well. > > I am now working on supporting general Sliceing and Appending. > The effort on function calls is also still ongoing. > >

Re: LDC 1.1.0-beta2 has been released!

On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 11:36 AM, Temtaime via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Friday, 5 August 2016 at 06:13:54 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote: > >> On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 3:28 AM, Emre Temelkuran via >> Digitalmars-d-announce <

Re: LDC 1.1.0-beta2 has been released!

On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 3:28 AM, Emre Temelkuran via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Wednesday, 3 August 2016 at 20:12:59 UTC, Kai Nacke wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> LDC 1.1.0-beta2, the LLVM-based D compiler, is available for download! >> This BETA

Re: New Diet template engine almost complete, ready for comments

On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 3:26 PM, Chris via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > > Great stuff! Very much appreciated. Btw, the link to jade-lang.org (don't > click!) leads to a dodgy business homepage atm. The right address is > > http://jade-lang.com/ > Also:

Re: New Diet template engine almost complete, ready for comments

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 7:54 AM, Sönke Ludwig < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > [snip] > and on Linux the Gold linker should be used for speed, but then it should > be almost as good as a runtime solution. > Note on using Gold on linux. You can use lflags "-fuse-ld=gold", to get

Re: New Diet template engine almost complete, ready for comments

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 7:54 AM, Sönke Ludwig < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > Am 26.07.2016 um 05:22 schrieb Puming: > >> On Monday, 25 July 2016 at 09:29:38 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote: >> >>> The Diet template language is aimed at providing a way to define >>> procedurally

Re: New Diet template engine almost complete, ready for comments

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 5:22 AM, Puming via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Monday, 25 July 2016 at 09:29:38 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote: > >> The Diet template language is aimed at providing a way to define >> procedurally generated HTML/XML pages (or other

Re: Battle-plan for CTFE

On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 6:08 PM, Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Sunday, 17 July 2016 at 15:57:28 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote: > >> >> Thanks that would be great, however I think its a while off before it can >> work on your ctfe

Re: Battle-plan for CTFE

On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Sunday, 17 July 2016 at 13:04:33 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote: > >> On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce < >>

Re: Battle-plan for CTFE

On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Sunday, 17 July 2016 at 12:12:17 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote: > >> Nice! how are you keeping track of changes? Are you tagging / branching >> each time you get something new

Re: Battle-plan for CTFE

Nice! how are you keeping track of changes? Are you tagging / branching each time you get something new working? On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Friday, 15 July 2016 at 20:36:46 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote: >

Re: Battle-plan for CTFE

On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 8:09 AM, ketmar via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Wednesday, 6 July 2016 at 05:54:48 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote: > >> Are you sharing this code >> > > yes. we are chatting with Stefan in IRC, and the repository is public (i > mean,

Re: Battle-plan for CTFE

On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 11:54 PM, ketmar via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > and just to make sure that my approach is working: bytecode compiler now > compiles simple free functions without args and returning int (yep, there > are some in phobos! ;-), while

Re: daffodil, a D image processing library

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 10:11 AM, Benjamin Schaaf via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > On Friday, 1 July 2016 at 01:24:55 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote: > >> On 01/07/2016 9:35 AM, Benjamin Schaaf wrote: >> >>> daffodil is a image processing library inspired by

Re: Button: A fast, correct, and elegantly simple build system.

On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 2:23 AM, Jason White via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Monday, 20 June 2016 at 08:21:29 UTC, Dicebot wrote: > >> On Monday, 20 June 2016 at 02:46:13 UTC, Jason White wrote: >> >>> This actually sounds nice. Main problem that

Re: Button: A fast, correct, and elegantly simple build system.

On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 10:21 AM, Dicebot via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Monday, 20 June 2016 at 02:46:13 UTC, Jason White wrote: > >> This actually sounds nice. Main problem that comes to my mind is that >>> there is no cross-platform shell script.

Re: pure D JPEG decoder, with progressive JPEG support, public domain

On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 3:35 PM, John Colvin via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Friday, 17 June 2016 at 13:05:47 UTC, ketmar wrote: > >> finally, the thing you all waited for years is here! pure D no-frills >> JPEG decoder with progressive JPEG support!

Re: Work in Amsterdam

On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 1:50 AM, Ali Çehreli wrote: > On 06/13/2016 04:48 PM, Walter Bright wrote: >> >> On 6/13/2016 4:00 PM, Ali Çehreli wrote: >>> >>> On 06/13/2016 03:45 PM, Márcio Martins wrote: Forgive me if this is not the best place for this

Re: Beta release DUB 1.0.0-beta.1

ory. I currently have to use > 0.9.24. > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Sönke Ludwig > <digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: >> Am 10.06.2016 um 10:02 schrieb Rory McGuire via Digitalmars-d-announce: >>> >>> I made a version that ignores c

Re: Beta release DUB 1.0.0-beta.1

On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 8:30 AM, Rory McGuire wrote: > On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 10:48 PM, Steven Schveighoffer via > Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: >> On 6/9/16 4:37 PM, Sönke Ludwig wrote: >>> >>> Am 09.06.2016 um 15:06 schrieb Steven

Re: Beta release DUB 1.0.0-beta.1

On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 10:48 PM, Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > On 6/9/16 4:37 PM, Sönke Ludwig wrote: >> >> Am 09.06.2016 um 15:06 schrieb Steven Schveighoffer: >>> >>> On 6/8/16 2:45 PM, Sönke Ludwig wrote: >>> (...)

Re: Beta release DUB 1.0.0-beta.1

I made a little parser, it doesn't handle nested + comments (just needs a depth check). https://github.com/dlang/dub/pull/871 On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 9:44 PM, Rory McGuire wrote: > regex version pull request: > https://github.com/dlang/dub/pull/869 > > On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at

Re: Beta release DUB 1.0.0-beta.1

regex version pull request: https://github.com/dlang/dub/pull/869 On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 8:50 PM, Rory McGuire wrote: > On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Sönke Ludwig > wrote: >> Am 08.06.2016 um 08:59 schrieb Jacob Carlborg: >>> >>> On

Re: Beta release DUB 1.0.0-beta.1

On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Sönke Ludwig wrote: > Am 08.06.2016 um 08:59 schrieb Jacob Carlborg: >> >> On 2016-06-07 20:42, Sönke Ludwig wrote: >> >>> No, it has to be the "+" variant (the first /+ +/ comment is evaluated). >> >> >> That's unfortunate. >

Re: Beta release DUB 1.0.0-beta.1

On 07 Jun 2016 11:56, "Sönke Ludwig" wrote: > > DUB 1.0.0 is nearing completion. The new feature over 0.9.25 is support for single-file packages, which can be used to write shebang-style scripts on Posix systems: > > #!/usr/bin/env dub > /++ dub.sdl:

Re: The Official D Blog is Live

On 03 Jun 2016 22:35, "Jack Stouffer via Digitalmars-d-announce" < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > > On Friday, 3 June 2016 at 19:33:31 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: >> >> The D Blog was born at DConf this year. With help from Jack Stouffer, it is now live at: >> >> http://dlang.org/blog/

Re: D's Auto Decoding and You

On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 8:58 AM, tsbockman via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > On Friday, 3 June 2016 at 06:37:59 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote: >> >> This dpaste shows a couple of issues with combining chars in D. >> >> https://dpaste.dzfl.pl/4b006959c5c0 >> >> The

Re: D's Auto Decoding and You

On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 5:16 AM, jmh530 via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > On Thursday, 2 June 2016 at 21:33:02 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: >> >> >> Should I assume some normalization occurred on the way? >> > > I'm just looking over std.uni's section on

Re: My ACCU 2016 keynote video available online

On 18 May 2016 1:25 PM, "Bill Hicks via Digitalmars-d-announce" < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > > On Tuesday, 17 May 2016 at 09:34:53 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote: >> >> >> As a South African, I can only say that you are talking nonsense regarding the horse/zebra joke. If you've been

Re: D's Auto Decoding and You

On 17 May 2016 16:21, "Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d-announce" < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > > On 5/17/16 10:06 AM, Jack Stouffer wrote: >> >> http://jackstouffer.com/blog/d_auto_decoding_and_you.html >> >> Based on the recent thread in General, I wrote this blog post

Re: My ACCU 2016 keynote video available online

On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 10:42 AM, Bill Hicks via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Monday, 16 May 2016 at 13:46:11 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: > >> Uses D for examples, showcases Design by Introspection, and rediscovers a >> fast partition routine. It

Re: To all DConf speakers: please upload slides!

On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 10:55 PM, Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > On 5/12/16 4:13 PM, Seb wrote: > >> On Wednesday, 11 May 2016 at 09:17:54 UTC, Dicebot wrote: >> >>> To do the editing of HD videos we need presentation slides which

Re: Battle-plan for CTFE

On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 8:45 AM, Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > > I was listening to a discussion Don and Daniel had about the current > implementation of CTFE. They talked about using a byte code interpreter. > Even implementing a really

Re: Battle-plan for CTFE

On 09 May 2016 19:01, "Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce" < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > > Hi Guys, > > I have been looking into the DMD now to see what I can do about CTFE. > Unfortunately It is a pretty big mess to untangle. > Code responsible for CTFE is in at least 3

Re: LDC 1.0.0-beta1 has been released! Please help testing!

>From the github issue it appears it was just a issue with the build script. On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Guillaume Chatelet via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > On Monday, 25 April 2016 at 06:42:02 UTC, Kai Nacke wrote: >> >> Hi everyone, >> >> LDC

Re: It's alive! D building D building D, all on Android

On 08 May 2016 02:21, "Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce" < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > > On Saturday, 7 May 2016 at 09:58:14 UTC, Johan Engelen wrote: >> >> Fantastic news! >> >> I hope we can find a good way to integrate automated testing of github branches/PRs for Android. >

Re: Proposed: start DConf days one hour later

On 28 Apr 2016 6:30 AM, "Mithun Hunsur via Digitalmars-d-announce" < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > > On Thursday, 28 April 2016 at 03:44:51 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: >> >> On Wednesday, 27 April 2016 at 18:36:54 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: >>> >>> The folks at Sociomantic

Re: Ddb needs a maintainer

On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Suliman via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > This code compile and run: > > try { >auto result = cmd.executeQuery; > >foreach (row; result) >{ > writeln(row[0]); >

Re: Ddb needs a maintainer

On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Suliman via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Monday, 15 February 2016 at 22:50:56 UTC, Piotr Szturmaj wrote: > >> On 2016-02-14 20:48, Eugene Wissner wrote: >> >>> I think may be we should discuss if we can/should change

Re: Release D 2.071.0

Here is the exact link I used. It is the source and binaries together. http://downloads.dlang.org/releases/2.x/2.071.0/dmd.2.071.0.linux.tar.xz On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 3:49 PM, Cy Schubert via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > On Wednesday, 6 April 2016 at

Re: Release D 2.071.0

.tar.xz works and its much smaller On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Cy Schubert via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > On Tuesday, 5 April 2016 at 22:43:05 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote: >> >> Glad to announce D 2.071.0. >> >> http://dlang.org/download.html >> >> This

Re: Beta D 2.071.0-b2

On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 1:59 PM, tost via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Wednesday, 30 March 2016 at 11:03:51 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote: > >> Second beta for the 2.071.0 release. >> >> http://dlang.org/download.html#dmd_beta >>

  1   2   >