On Sunday, 15 June 2014 at 15:31:40 UTC, Brian Rogoff wrote:
Notice that in his post and the comments, a recurring
(negative) issue is garbage collection. This is pretty common
with mentions of D on reddit too, always a few posters
mentioning D's GC as a negative. So many of those comments
c
On Saturday, 31 May 2014 at 13:59:17 UTC, Abdulhaq wrote:
I'm wondering what's the Linux 32 bit usages - embedded I
guess. 64 bits seems to dominate in general. A couple of linux
users seem not to know if they are 32 or 64 bit?
On many laptops there's no extra benefit from running 64 bits.
I
On Saturday, 26 April 2014 at 20:16:34 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 4/26/2014 12:27 PM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
We already have a feature to manage conflicts and organisation
in D code -
modules!
True. But what D doesn't have is a global namespace. I don't
propose one for D, but C++ symbols may
On Saturday, 26 April 2014 at 18:11:18 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 4/26/2014 4:57 AM, Dicebot wrote:
Necessity to define namespaces for
interfacing with C++ must not result in usage of namespaces of
pure D code.
Why?
I don't see much of any use for namespaces in pure D code,
though I could
On Tuesday, 15 April 2014 at 17:01:38 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP60
Walter, the DIP has a funny creation date.
grauzone Wrote:
> bearophile wrote:
> > BCS:
> >> A though on the comma operator: if the comma operator were defined to give
> >> a tuple type and be implicitly castable to any suffix of it's self, then
> >> you could get both the comma expression usage that Walter wants as well as
> >> all the
Denis Koroskin Wrote:
> I believe he could replace comma operator with AOC (Any Other Character)
> operator: just replace comma with "something" which is not yet used.
> Choose some fancy-looking Unicode character that no one will really use
> but the compiler itself to generate intermediate
grauzone Wrote:
> BCS wrote:
> > Hello justme,
> >
> >> bearophile Wrote:
> >>
> >>> C# will probably not follow the route of stagnation of Java for some
> >>> more time, thanks to Mono too. I don't like that string interpolation
&
grauzone Wrote:
> justme wrote:
> > bearophile Wrote:
> >
> >> C# will probably not follow the route of stagnation of Java for some more
> >> time, thanks to Mono too. I don't like that string interpolation syntax
> >> because it looks unsafe,
bearophile Wrote:
> C# will probably not follow the route of stagnation of Java for some more
> time, thanks to Mono too. I don't like that string interpolation syntax
> because it looks unsafe, and that design of tuples can be improved, but they
> are listening to programmes (even if they risk
Denis Koroskin Wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 21:36:25 +0300, justme wrote:
>
> > Nekuromento Wrote:
> >
> >> Simen kjaeraas Wrote:
> >>
> >> > Kevin Bealer wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > I'm curious if the multi-pivot quick
Nekuromento Wrote:
> Simen kjaeraas Wrote:
>
> > Kevin Bealer wrote:
> >
> > > I'm curious if the multi-pivot quicksort (I think everyone gets what I
> > > mean by this? Divide by more than one pivot on each pass? I can give
> > > details if you like ...) has been tried out much. It seem
12 matches
Mail list logo
