Re: Jquery SOB killer

2013-08-11 Thread superdan
JS wrote: I wrote the script to get rid of the BS that has been happening lately with my replies. I can't stand people that think the world revolves around them. Hopefully this little script will bring some sanity back to this NG. da irony iz completely lost on u, isnt it?

Re: Marketing of D - article topic ideas?

2010-06-03 Thread superdan
== Quote from retard (r...@tard.com.invalid)'s article > Thu, 03 Jun 2010 16:58:03 -0700, Walter Bright wrote: > > D is an extremely powerful language, but when I read complaints and > > sighs about other languages, few seem to know that these problems are > > solved with D. Essentially, we have a

Re: Please, don't feed the troll (was "Does D Suck?")

2010-05-18 Thread superdan
== Quote from Don (nos...@nospam.com)'s article > superdan wrote: > > == Quote from Bernard Helyer (b.hel...@gmail.com)'s article > >> On 17/05/10 17:17, GirlProgrammer wrote: > >>> If D doesn't suck, and is better than C++ why am I not using it? I

Re: Please, don't feed the troll (was "Does D Suck?")

2010-05-18 Thread superdan
troll is loyal, and will be here for years to come. Looking > > forward to it. > That GirlProgrammer is most likely "Dee Girl 2.0", which is just another name for superdan. you is not da sharpest tool in da shed eh? dee exists but not postin' no more. were both into d. w

Re: Please, don't feed the troll (was "Does D Suck?")

2010-05-17 Thread superdan
== Quote from Bernard Helyer (b.hel...@gmail.com)'s article > On 17/05/10 17:17, GirlProgrammer wrote: > > If D doesn't suck, and is better than C++ why am I not using it? Indeed, > > why isn't hardly anyone using it? > I imagine you get some dull pleasure from posting essentially the same > messag

Re: What is D?

2010-05-09 Thread superdan
general idiotism in the internet > >> (/dev/ > >> null) now. FWIW, I've always consistently used the same user agent and > >> same computer so it shouldn't be to hard to figure out when I'm writing. > >> And I already promised to shut up. Your retard

Re: literals

2010-03-28 Thread superdan
superdan Wrote: > he wanna 1.0 to adapt to T. i'm sayin' if u pass float to inv 1.0 gotta be > 10.F but if u pass real to in 1.0 gotta be 1.0L or shit. dats 1.0F not 10.F. shit. but im sure u peoples feel me.

Re: literals

2010-03-28 Thread superdan
Don Wrote: > so wrote: > > Hello Don, finally! > > > > It is hard to explain yourself when you don't know the people you talk > > have numeric coding background. > > Since we know you have done much numeric and generic coding, it will be > > enough for me if you understand what i mean/ask/want,

Re: D is dead, so now where it the money going?

2010-03-28 Thread superdan
Nick Sabalausky Wrote: > "Steve Teale" wrote in message > news:hononf$1tf...@digitalmars.com... > > > > Why would someone be so bitter and write so badly? Even if it were the > > case that D was not really any more than a discussion group for ideas > > about compiler design, it would still be a

Re: More precise GC

2010-03-28 Thread superdan
William T. Fnk Wrote: > bearophile Wrote: > > > William T. Fnk: > > >This is a rather ridiculous way of emulating algebraic data types< > > > > I think algebraic data types in Haskell don't allow you to use for example > > enums with no tags, where the tag is stored in the less significant bit

Re: D is dead, so now where it the money going?

2010-03-28 Thread superdan
Steve Teale Wrote: > On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 10:55:50 -0400, superdan wrote: > > > > > jesus homies. hez a troll fer fucks sake. can't believe u r tryin' teh > > communicate let alone reason with dat asstodeepthroater. all groups haz > > trollz. its a sig

Re: D is dead, so now where it the money going?

2010-03-28 Thread superdan
Walter Bright Wrote: > superdan wrote: > > jesus homies. > > Hey, we missed you! Nice to see you back! yo walt. u rule.

Re: D is dead, so now where it the money going?

2010-03-28 Thread superdan
Bane Wrote: > > Do you mean this one? > > > > "What problems has D solved? (Other than providing compiler writers with > > masturbatory material). Light bulb (!!!): D is a circle jerk! (Not that > > there's anything wrong with that)." > > > > It has a similar tone. > > > > Why would someone b

Re: Reminds me of?

2009-07-02 Thread superdan
were trying to make > some money. There has to be some direction, and I'm not seeing the leadership > I'd like to anywhere in the D community at present. > > Are there D enthusiasts out there who feel they could handle this task? If > so, please nominate yourselves, and

Re: Give me a break

2009-07-01 Thread superdan
yigal chripun Wrote: > Kagamin Wrote: > > > yigal chripun Wrote: > > > > > there is no defined system for the development of D. even MS has a well > > > defined plan for their .net platform. where's the plan for D? where the > > > process to define that plan? > > > Either you need to have a p

Re: Give me a break

2009-06-30 Thread superdan
Sean Kelly Wrote: > == Quote from Tom S (h3r3...@remove.mat.uni.torun.pl)'s article > > Sean Kelly wrote: > > > == Quote from Tom S (h3r3...@remove.mat.uni.torun.pl)'s article > > > > > >> And apparently, there's been very > > >> little contact with Sean lately, so it's a case of 'us' vs 'them' ag

Re: Give me a break

2009-06-29 Thread superdan
Nick Sabalausky Wrote: > "Nick Sabalausky" wrote in message > news:h29gil$6u...@digitalmars.com... > > "Jarrett Billingsley" wrote in message > > news:mailman.316.1246228005.13405.digitalmar...@puremagic.com... > >> With four or five people having voiced concerns over the future of D > >> in t

Re: Give me a break

2009-06-28 Thread superdan
Jarrett Billingsley Wrote: > With four or five people having voiced concerns over the future of D > in the past week or so, what's the busiest discussion? > > int.nan, of course. > > Come on. Get with the program. Enough already with the bikeshed > bullshit. There are far more important issue

Re: int nan

2009-06-27 Thread superdan
Michiel Helvensteijn Wrote: > BCS wrote: > > >> Interesting idea, but IMO using NaN as a default initializer is just a > >> crutch for not having a real system of compile-time > >> detecting/preventing of uninitialized variables from being read (C#'s > >> system for this works very well in my exp

Re: The proper case for D.

2009-06-22 Thread superdan
Pete Odowd Wrote: > superdan Wrote: > > > Steve Teale Wrote: > > > > > superdan Wrote: > > > > > > > Steve Teale Wrote: > > > > > > > > > Can this group come up with a proper, sober (OK, I'm not) > &g

Re: The proper case for D.

2009-06-21 Thread superdan
Steve Teale Wrote: > superdan Wrote: > > > Steve Teale Wrote: > > > > > Can this group come up with a proper, sober (OK, I'm not) > > > > den pretty please explain why anyone should give a flyin' fuck fer yer > > drunken rant. >

Re: Ranges

2009-06-19 Thread superdan
Yigal Chripun Wrote: > Lutger wrote: > > Yigal Chripun wrote: > > ... > >> IMHO, duck-typing in D is a tragic mistake... This should have been > >> implemented with compile time interfaces. > > > > Care to provide arguments? > > > > > > duck typing makes more sense in dynamic languages like R

Re: The proper case for D.

2009-06-19 Thread superdan
grauzone Wrote: > superdan wrote: > > Steve Teale Wrote: > > > >> Can this group come up with a proper, sober (OK, I'm not) > > > > den pretty please explain why anyone should give a flyin' fuck fer yer > > drunken rant. > > You just

Re: The proper case for D.

2009-06-19 Thread superdan
Steve Teale Wrote: > Can this group come up with a proper, sober (OK, I'm not) den pretty please explain why anyone should give a flyin' fuck fer yer drunken rant.

Re: Ranges

2009-06-19 Thread superdan
Lutger Wrote: > Yigal Chripun wrote: > ... > > > > IMHO, duck-typing in D is a tragic mistake... This should have been > > implemented with compile time interfaces. > > Care to provide arguments? ignorance 'n' arrogance should do.

Re: Fwd: A public apology.

2009-06-17 Thread superdan
Jarrett Billingsley Wrote: > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 6:42 AM, Alexander > Pánek wrote: > > Jarrett Billingsley wrote: > >> > >> I am sorry. > > > > I am not. I’m just thankful for being proven wrong when necessary. > > > > Also: wtf, Jarrett. Is that really you? > > That was me on beer. I'm an a

Re: Fwd: A public apology.

2009-06-17 Thread superdan
Steve Teale Wrote: > Jarrett Billingsley Wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:40 PM, superdan wrote: > > > == Quote from Jarrett Billingsley (jarrett.billings...@gmail.com)'s > > > article > > >> Sorry, I thought you were degrading your

Re: Fwd: A public apology.

2009-06-15 Thread superdan
== Quote from Jarrett Billingsley (jarrett.billings...@gmail.com)'s article > Sorry, I thought you were degrading yourself. I should have read more > carefully. d00d fer cryin' outta louda. u do wut u do & we're back to the apology spiel. stop apologizing or i'ma gonna postal. reach in ur pants.

Re: Fwd: A public apology.

2009-06-15 Thread superdan
== Quote from Jarrett Billingsley (jarrett.billings...@gmail.com)'s article > On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:11 PM, superdan wrote: > > == Quote from Jarrett Billingsley (jarrett.billings...@gmail.com)'s a > rticle > >> I am sorry, superdan, for treating you as les

Re: Fwd: A public apology.

2009-06-15 Thread superdan
== Quote from Jarrett Billingsley (jarrett.billings...@gmail.com)'s article > I am sorry, superdan, for treating you as less than a human because > you didn't express yourself in the way I wanted you to.  Please keep > contributing to the community.   Your common sense eva

Re: DMD 2.030 doesn't exist

2009-06-05 Thread superdan
BCS Wrote: > Hello superdan, > > > every1 here is here 2 have fun. every1. if > > any1 says ain't, that's a mo'fucked hypocrite. we r not paid => we cum > > here 2 feel good > > At one point a few months back, I posted and interacted on this n

Re: DMD 2.030 doesn't exist

2009-06-04 Thread superdan
Derek Parnell Wrote: > On Thu, 04 Jun 2009 11:48:24 -0400, superdan wrote: > > > I can spell and capitalize and shit. It's just not fun. > > I have no doubt about that at all. You appear to be very intelligent and > nearly always have something useful to contribut

Re: DMD 2.030 doesn't exist

2009-06-04 Thread superdan
are indications that the person does not > > tolerate mediocrity. Spelling variations that are "cute" or "modern", are > > fine in other contexts but not really in a technical forum where there > > are > > readers from many different cultures and spoken languages. Using the > > standard form of English is also a sign of politeness and inclusiveness. > > In > > general, we are attempting to communicate our thoughts here so we need to > > do that in a way that makes it easy for all potential readers in the > > forum. > > > > Here comes superdan I can spell and capitalize and shit. It's just not fun.

std.partition is fucked

2009-05-13 Thread superdan
dis must be related to bug 2966 sayin' std.sort is fucked. problem must be with std.partition. i tested and unstable partition is 10 times slower than stable. should be faster akshully. so looked into tat and found in da loop for std.partition unstable and found da range r1 is fucked. f

Re: Write/Writeln, etc

2009-05-07 Thread superdan
Derek Parnell Wrote: > On Thu, 7 May 2009 16:02:52 -0400, Jarrett Billingsley wrote: > > > Once again: 'much' and 'too much' can never. > > > > modify. > > > > adjectives. > > > > They are not adverbs. > > Really? Have

Re: Massive loss for D on Tiobe

2009-05-07 Thread superdan
grauzone Wrote: > superdan wrote: > > grauzone Wrote: > > > >> You're offending me. Please stop this immediately. > >> > >> Thank you. > > > > wut happened to `flame on', hercules? > > > > > > When it comes

Re: Massive loss for D on Tiobe

2009-05-06 Thread superdan
grauzone Wrote: > You're offending me. Please stop this immediately. > > Thank you. wut happened to `flame on', hercules? anyway just killfile me. i dun change handles. better yet. stop being an ass. we'd all be way better off. suit yerself.

Re: Massive loss for D on Tiobe

2009-05-06 Thread superdan
Walter Bright Wrote: > Georg Wrede wrote: > > D's loss seems unbelievable. D now has a 0.628% share, which is even > > less than what it's lost (-0.82%) in the last 12 months. What could be > > the reasons for it? Is it even possible to figure out any reason?? > > Of course it's unbelievable. T

Re: Many questions

2009-05-03 Thread superdan
Fractal Wrote: > D is for me a very good language. At the time everything that i want to do, > is possible with it. And i have deleted all the C++ code and replaced it with > D. here's 1 happy dood without a legacy code problem. boy how i miss kindergarten. welcome 2 da club kiddo.

Re: I can use D all the time

2009-05-01 Thread superdan
Steve Teale Wrote: > It's called retirement. I can use whatever language I like, and write > anything that comes to mind 24 hours a day if I want to. nope. it's called /rich/ retirement. with my fuckin' stox n 401k & the way shit is goin' i'll need to work til they'll hand me prostate in a plas

Re: C tips (again)

2009-05-01 Thread superdan
Steve Teale Wrote: > bearophile Wrote: > > > So I agree with nearly nothing you have (badly) expressed. > > > > Bye, > > bearophile > > Who is this guy?" He must be putting his messages through one of those web > sites that translate into strange dialects - fry my ass! fer tat i recommend da

Re: d assigns name Philosophy

2009-05-01 Thread superdan
dolive Wrote: > hasen �: > > > dolive wrote: > > > Suggest the d Language and phobos lib ( And other lib ) assigns name to > > > use the tallest phrase in the phrase of word frequency . This, should > > > study toward the java . This is also the key that the java jdk source > > > co

Re: C tips (again)

2009-05-01 Thread superdan
Steven Schveighoffer Wrote: > On Fri, 01 May 2009 11:36:08 -0400, bearophile > wrote: > > > superdan: > >> d00d. u first messed with k&r which are Gods. any1 mess'n' with Gods > >> better bring around some fuckin' supergod instead.< &g

Re: C tips (again)

2009-05-01 Thread superdan
bearophile Wrote: > superdan: > > d00d. u first messed with k&r which are Gods. any1 mess'n' with Gods better > > bring around some fuckin' supergod instead.< > > I have not appreciated that book, I don't care of what you say. fine. personal p

Re: C tips (again)

2009-05-01 Thread superdan
bearophile Wrote: > In the past I have probably already discussed about this link here: > http://users.bestweb.net/~ctips/ > > That site contains tips as precious as gold, even for non-C programmers. d00d. u first messed with k&r which are Gods. any1 mess'n' with Gods better bring around some f

Re: I wish I could use D for everything

2009-04-30 Thread superdan
Derek Parnell Wrote: > On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:23:52 -0400, superdan wrote: > (actually who cares what he wrote ...) > > "superdan", when you grow up I'm certain that you will be an important > person. I just hope we don't have to wait too long. > > -

Re: RFC: naming for FrontTransversal and Transversal ranges

2009-04-30 Thread superdan
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote: > Joel C. Salomon wrote: > > Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: > >> A design that has one container type and several slice types that crawl > >> it in various ways is very compelling, and I think it will be a huge > >> selling point for D. It would be odd, not natural, to have

Re: I wish I could use D for everything

2009-04-30 Thread superdan
Steve Teale Wrote: > superdan Wrote: > > > Steve Teale Wrote: > > > > > Jason House Wrote: > > > > > > > Walter Bright Wrote: > > > > > > > > > D aims to reduce project costs by reducing training time and > >

Re: I wish I could use D for everything

2009-04-30 Thread superdan
Steve Teale Wrote: > Jason House Wrote: > > > Walter Bright Wrote: > > > > > D aims to reduce project costs by reducing training time and shortening > > > development time. > > > > It really hasn't worked out that way for me with D2. Here's an example from > > yesterday: > > > > I picked up

Re: AAs [was Re: bigfloat]

2009-04-08 Thread superdan
then lets go all the way. make slices normal types in object.d too. compiler translate t[] to slice!(t) & [ x, y, z ] to slice!(typeof(x))(x, y, z). then u write slice in normal d & put it in object.d. fuck the middleman. i grok why ints and floats must be in the language. optimization shit n bi

Re: The new, new phobos sneak preview

2009-04-08 Thread superdan
Derek Parnell Wrote: > On Wed, 08 Apr 2009 19:24:10 -0400, superdan wrote: > > > ill get hands dirty n maybe report more. > > If you do, can you report back using English. I'm not very good at > translating your, presumably excellent, insights otherwise. watch out.

Re: The new, new phobos sneak preview

2009-04-08 Thread superdan
grauzone Wrote: > bearophile wrote: > > bearophile: > >> I'll probably rewrite my dlibs for 2.0 anyway.< > > > > Ignore this part, please, it's not good. > > Huh, is this some kind of feel-good community? ignore. crybaby wanna attention. new releases piss him off. with each phobos bearophile c

Re: why Unix?

2009-04-08 Thread superdan
Yigal Chripun Wrote: > I agree that a uniform and consistent API is important and I'm sure that > MS managed to mess that up :) but that's besides the point. "Everything > is a file" does not provide a uniform API but rather provides no API. > Each unix tool has its own mini-syntax and its own

Re: bigfloat

2009-04-08 Thread superdan
Frank Torte Wrote: > Paul D. Anderson Wrote: > > > Is there an active project to develop arbitrary-precision floating point > > numbers for D? > > > > I've got a little extra time at the moment and would like to contribute if > > I can. I've done some work in floating point arithmetic and woul

Re: why Unix?

2009-04-07 Thread superdan
grauzone Wrote: > > Stagnation: On *NIX: same (command line) tools, same concepts > > (everything is a file) as decades ago. New ideas are usually copied > > badly from Apple or Windows years later. > > What exciting new concepts are there under Windows? Drive letters? fuckin' ole. bill gates

Re: why Unix?

2009-04-06 Thread superdan
http://artlung.com/smorgasborg/C_R_Y_P_T_O_N_O_M_I_C_O_N.shtml oldie but goldie. my take. cygwin on windoze == fuckin' with two condoms.

Re: Multithreaded I/O in the DMD compiler (DDJ article by Walter)

2009-04-06 Thread superdan
Jarrett Billingsley Wrote: > On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu > wrote: > > >> ComputerIlliterateFriend: Hey Jarrett, can you come over and fix my > >> computer? > >> Jarrett: What's it doing? > >> CIF: It's popping up all sorts of dialog boxes telling me I need to > >> get Spy

Re: What Scala?

2009-04-04 Thread superdan
Sean Kelly Wrote: > Walter Bright wrote: > > Nick Sabalausky wrote: > >> Well, when it comes to college, what you're paying for are the classes > >> and the degree (and, of course, books/room/board). So I'm certainly > >> going to measure it's worth with that in mind. Having a dinner with > >>

Re: Objective-D, reflective programming, dynamic typing

2009-04-04 Thread superdan
Jarrett Billingsley Wrote: > On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 6:09 PM, eljay wrote: > > Hi Jarrett, > > > > Thanks for the information (I've read quite a few responses further into > > this thread). > > > > I thought I was missing something, but this appears to be an area in D that > > could use some imp

range stuff

2009-02-16 Thread superdan
a'ight i've read all range stuff n ruminated on it for a while. yer ranges suck goat balls. something's amiss. yer have ranges that generate stuff. some even ferever. then yer have ranges that eat stuff output ranges that is. but there's no range that has both input and output. some sort of fi

Re: OT -- Re: random cover of a range

2009-02-16 Thread superdan
(Not the language so much ). > > > > I seriously doubt superdan uses profanity to offend. > > > > He's got an ear for dialog, and the wit to write in a style that is a > > parody of those that use profanity. I think it's hilarious and enjoy > > reading i

Re: OT -- Re: random cover of a range

2009-02-15 Thread superdan
Nick Sabalausky Wrote: > "Nick Sabalausky" wrote in message > news:gn8qqd$1k5...@digitalmars.com... > > "John Reimer" wrote in message > > news:28b70f8c143578cb5cec61f27...@news.digitalmars.com... > >> > >> Remember "SuperDan&q

Re: D

2008-11-15 Thread superdan
Jarrett Billingsley Wrote: > On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 10:55 AM, superdan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Jarrett Billingsley Wrote: > > > >> On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 3:01 AM, superdan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > you'd make ahmadine

Re: D

2008-11-15 Thread superdan
anonymous Wrote: > == Quote from superdan ([EMAIL PROTECTED])'s article > > Jarrett Billingsley Wrote: > > > On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 3:01 AM, superdan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > you'd make ahmadinejad become a feminist & join nato. i'

Re: D

2008-11-15 Thread superdan
Jarrett Billingsley Wrote: > On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 3:01 AM, superdan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > you'd make ahmadinejad become a feminist & join nato. i'd rate that post at > > no more than 200 monkey-minutes. > > You have a way with not mak

Re: D

2008-11-15 Thread superdan
Jarrett Billingsley Wrote: > On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 12:35 AM, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Before I begin, know that the things I'm saying here are not meant as > attacks. It's just that your post has a rambling, semi-off-topic feel > to it and so I'll do the same ;) wow. ye sure missed

Re: C++, D: Dinosaurs?

2008-11-14 Thread superdan
Nick Sabalausky Wrote: > "Tony" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > "Walter Bright" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> 1. GC programs can be faster > >> > >> 2. GC programs can use less memory > >> > >> 3. GC programs can b