On Saturday, 14 October 2017 at 10:48:40 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Saturday, 14 October 2017 at 08:52:54 UTC, Ecstatic Coder
wrote:
On Saturday, 14 October 2017 at 07:45:06 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 6/18/2017 3:38 AM, Ecstatic Coder wrote:
Something I really appreciate a lot with D is how close
On Saturday, 14 October 2017 at 08:52:54 UTC, Ecstatic Coder
wrote:
On Saturday, 14 October 2017 at 07:45:06 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 6/18/2017 3:38 AM, Ecstatic Coder wrote:
Something I really appreciate a lot with D is how close it is
to JavaScript.
There's also a D implementation of Ja
On 10/14/2017 1:52 AM, Ecstatic Coder wrote:
On Saturday, 14 October 2017 at 07:45:06 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 6/18/2017 3:38 AM, Ecstatic Coder wrote:
Something I really appreciate a lot with D is how close it is to JavaScript.
There's also a D implementation of Javascript:
https://gith
On Saturday, 14 October 2017 at 07:45:06 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 6/18/2017 3:38 AM, Ecstatic Coder wrote:
Something I really appreciate a lot with D is how close it is
to JavaScript.
There's also a D implementation of Javascript:
https://github.com/DigitalMars/DMDScript
What about a DS
Am Fri, 13 Oct 2017 17:57:12 +
schrieb John Gabriele :
> Why do you choose Lua? Whatever replaces Javascript (and compiles
> to wasm) will be used for large apps, like how Javascript is
> currently used. My understanding is that Lua is not particularly
> well suited for building large apps.
On 10/14/2017 12:54 AM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
On Saturday, 14 October 2017 at 07:45:06 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 6/18/2017 3:38 AM, Ecstatic Coder wrote:
Something I really appreciate a lot with D is how close it is to JavaScript.
There's also a D implementation of Javascript:
https://g
On Saturday, 14 October 2017 at 07:45:06 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 6/18/2017 3:38 AM, Ecstatic Coder wrote:
Something I really appreciate a lot with D is how close it is
to JavaScript.
There's also a D implementation of Javascript:
https://github.com/DigitalMars/DMDScript
The surprising
On Monday, 19 June 2017 at 01:57:00 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
On Sunday, 18 June 2017 at 23:11:25 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
On 18/06/2017 5:29 PM, Meta wrote:
We should be careful not to make *too* close a comparison.
While Javascript is a necessary evil for web applications and
some people
On 6/18/2017 3:38 AM, Ecstatic Coder wrote:
Something I really appreciate a lot with D is how close it is to JavaScript.
There's also a D implementation of Javascript:
https://github.com/DigitalMars/DMDScript
On Monday, 19 June 2017 at 02:02:05 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
On 19/06/2017 2:57 AM, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
On Sunday, 18 June 2017 at 23:11:25 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
On 18/06/2017 5:29 PM, Meta wrote:
We should be careful not to make *too* close a comparison.
While Javascript is a nece
As just requested by a user, I've put the image size on the
right. Nice remark, this indeed improves their readability.
The image syntax will now be frozen this way :
[[image_name.jpg:size]].
To update the existing files, just open them all in Geany, and
replace the regular expression "\[\[(
On Sunday, 18 June 2017 at 10:38:49 UTC, Ecstatic Coder wrote:
Something I really appreciate a lot with D is how close it is
to JavaScript.
For instance, I have to maintain two similar versions of
Pendown, a Markdown alternative for colored documents.
There is a server-side version, in D :
Have you ever seen my jsvar.d ?
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/kuxfkakrgjaofkrdv...@forum.dlang.org
AWESOME !!!
On 19/06/2017 2:57 AM, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
On Sunday, 18 June 2017 at 23:11:25 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
On 18/06/2017 5:29 PM, Meta wrote:
We should be careful not to make *too* close a comparison. While
Javascript is a necessary evil for web applications and some people
do like it, I get
On Sunday, 18 June 2017 at 23:11:25 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
On 18/06/2017 5:29 PM, Meta wrote:
We should be careful not to make *too* close a comparison.
While Javascript is a necessary evil for web applications and
some people do like it, I get the feeling that it's becoming
less and les
On 18/06/2017 5:29 PM, Meta wrote:
We should be careful not to make *too* close a comparison. While
Javascript is a necessary evil for web applications and some people do
like it, I get the feeling that it's becoming less and less liked. It's
not quite a fractal of bad design like PHP, but it h
On Sunday, 18 June 2017 at 10:38:49 UTC, Ecstatic Coder wrote:
Something I really appreciate a lot with D is how close it is
to JavaScript.
Have you ever seen my jsvar.d ?
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/kuxfkakrgjaofkrdv...@forum.dlang.org
This was a good talk last year you might be interested in:
http://dconf.org/2016/talks/schadek.html
-Steve
Nice pick :)
I'm currently planning to use D instead of Go for web
development, so I may try such an approach, if I somehow manage
to understand how to reproduce it :)
At the moment
On Sunday, 18 June 2017 at 16:25:06 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Sunday, 18 June 2017 at 10:38:49 UTC, Ecstatic Coder wrote:
Something I really appreciate a lot with D is how close it is
to JavaScript.
[...]
Talk to Mike Parker about submitting a blog post, detailing the
similarities you see and u
I don't think that's a good selling point. The obvious reply is
"but why should I use an unknown language like D if I could
just use node.js and share the client and server code?".
I don't think that's a good selling point. The obvious reply is
"but why should I use an unknown language like D
On Sunday, 18 June 2017 at 18:06:50 UTC, Joakim wrote:
Of course, once webasm takes off, everyone will simply compile
their server code to webasm and ditch javascript altogether.
Although there are proposals to access the dom directly from
webasm [1], right now you'll still need js. And I doub
On Sunday, 18 June 2017 at 16:31:28 UTC, JN wrote:
On Sunday, 18 June 2017 at 10:38:49 UTC, Ecstatic Coder wrote:
Something I really appreciate a lot with D is how close it is
to JavaScript.
[...]
I don't think that's a good selling point. The obvious reply is
"but why should I use an unkno
On Sunday, 18 June 2017 at 10:38:49 UTC, Ecstatic Coder wrote:
Something I really appreciate a lot with D is how close it is
to JavaScript.
[...]
This was a good talk last year you might be interested in:
http://dconf.org/2016/talks/schadek.html
-Steve
On Sunday, 18 June 2017 at 10:38:49 UTC, Ecstatic Coder wrote:
Something I really appreciate a lot with D is how close it is
to JavaScript.
[...]
I don't think that's a good selling point. The obvious reply is
"but why should I use an unknown language like D if I could just
use node.js and
On Sunday, 18 June 2017 at 10:38:49 UTC, Ecstatic Coder wrote:
Something I really appreciate a lot with D is how close it is
to JavaScript.
For instance, I have to maintain two similar versions of
Pendown, a Markdown alternative for colored documents.
There is a server-side version, in D :
On Sunday, 18 June 2017 at 10:38:49 UTC, Ecstatic Coder wrote:
Something I really appreciate a lot with D is how close it is
to JavaScript.
[...]
Talk to Mike Parker about submitting a blog post, detailing the
similarities you see and using this example, for the official D
blog.
Something I really appreciate a lot with D is how close it is to
JavaScript.
For instance, I have to maintain two similar versions of Pendown,
a Markdown alternative for colored documents.
There is a server-side version, in D :
https://github.com/senselogic/PENDOWN/blob/master/pendown.d
27 matches
Mail list logo
