Re: DConf Hackathon Ideas

On 2017-05-01 16:51, Mike Parker wrote: I love SDL and much prefer it over JSON for DUB configs. Use it for all of my D projects. It looks cleaner and supports comments. I really would hate to see support dropped. +1 I would be fine with YAML as well. -- /Jacob Carlborg

Re: DConf Hackathon Ideas

On Monday, 1 May 2017 at 17:04:42 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote: On 1 May 2017 at 16:51, Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d wrote: On Monday, 1 May 2017 at 14:38:11 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: On Thursday, 27 April 2017 at 16:33:02 UTC, singingbush wrote: SDL

Re: DConf Hackathon Ideas

On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 06:02:53PM +, Moritz Maxeiner via Digitalmars-d wrote: > On Monday, 1 May 2017 at 17:04:42 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote: > > [...] > > > > We should make XML the default config format for DUB. > > > > [...] > > > > /Runaway! > > Well, at least nearly everyone hates XML

Re: DConf Hackathon Ideas

On Monday, 1 May 2017 at 17:04:42 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote: [...] We should make XML the default config format for DUB. [...] /Runaway! Well, at least nearly everyone hates XML equally, which may be an indicator of a good compromise.

Re: DConf Hackathon Ideas

On Thursday, 27 April 2017 at 14:53:02 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: This year, DConf has an extra day tacked on for problem solving in the form of a hackathon. The intent is to work on issues people find frustrating in the D ecosystem. While there will be time given at the event for proposals, and

Re: DConf Hackathon Ideas

On 1 May 2017 at 16:51, Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d wrote: > On Monday, 1 May 2017 at 14:38:11 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: >> >> On Thursday, 27 April 2017 at 16:33:02 UTC, singingbush wrote: >>> >>> SDL should be dropped. >> >> >> Deprecated, sure. But

Re: DConf Hackathon Ideas

On Monday, 1 May 2017 at 15:36:16 UTC, bachmeier wrote: On Monday, 1 May 2017 at 14:51:19 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: I love SDL and much prefer it over JSON for DUB configs. Use it for all of my D projects. It looks cleaner and supports comments. I really would hate to see support dropped. I'm

Re: DConf Hackathon Ideas

On Monday, 1 May 2017 at 14:51:19 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: I love SDL and much prefer it over JSON for DUB configs. Use it for all of my D projects. It looks cleaner and supports comments. I really would hate to see support dropped. I'm not even sure what it would mean to "drop" support for

Re: DConf Hackathon Ideas

On Thursday, 27 April 2017 at 22:57:48 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner wrote: On Thursday, 27 April 2017 at 19:55:44 UTC, Andre Pany wrote: On Thursday, 27 April 2017 at 17:47:19 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner wrote: [...] As workaround this is possible. Every developer and in every continious integration build

Re: DConf Hackathon Ideas

On Monday, 1 May 2017 at 14:38:11 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: On Thursday, 27 April 2017 at 16:33:02 UTC, singingbush wrote: SDL should be dropped. Deprecated, sure. But dropping it seems a bad idea given that various projects do still use it for their DUB package config. NOBODY

Re: DConf Hackathon Ideas

On Thursday, 27 April 2017 at 16:33:02 UTC, singingbush wrote: SDL should be dropped. Deprecated, sure. But dropping it seems a bad idea given that various projects do still use it for their DUB package config. NOBODY USES IT! Probably not true. Perhaps a hackathon project could be to

Re: OT: Re: DConf Hackathon Ideas

On Monday, 1 May 2017 at 12:35:11 UTC, Petar Kirov [ZombineDev] wrote: On Saturday, 29 April 2017 at 00:54:59 UTC, Nicholas Wilson wrote: On Friday, 28 April 2017 at 13:31:33 UTC, Petar Kirov [ZombineDev] wrote: Other applications include: * compiling/transpiling D functions to targets like

Re: DConf Hackathon Ideas

On 4/29/17 5:42 AM, Daniel N wrote: On Thursday, 27 April 2017 at 14:53:02 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: This year, DConf has an extra day tacked on for problem solving in the form of a hackathon. The intent is to work on issues people find frustrating in the D ecosystem. While there will be time

Re: OT: Re: DConf Hackathon Ideas

On Saturday, 29 April 2017 at 00:54:59 UTC, Nicholas Wilson wrote: On Friday, 28 April 2017 at 13:31:33 UTC, Petar Kirov [ZombineDev] wrote: Other applications include: * compiling/transpiling D functions to targets like JS, SPIR-V, I got you covered ;) I know, and I'm looking forward to

Re: DConf Hackathon Ideas

On Thursday, 27 April 2017 at 14:53:02 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: This year, DConf has an extra day tacked on for problem solving in the form of a hackathon. The intent is to work on issues people find frustrating in the D ecosystem. While there will be time given at the event for proposals, and

Re: DConf Hackathon Ideas

On Thursday, 27 April 2017 at 14:53:02 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: This year, DConf has an extra day tacked on for problem solving in the form of a hackathon. The intent is to work on issues people find frustrating in the D ecosystem. While there will be time given at the event for proposals, and

Re: OT: Re: DConf Hackathon Ideas

On Friday, 28 April 2017 at 13:31:33 UTC, Petar Kirov [ZombineDev] wrote: Other applications include: * compiling/transpiling D functions to targets like JS, SPIR-V, I got you covered ;) (LDC not CTFE though. It would be fiendishly complicated to do at CTFE as a fair amount of compiler magic

Re: OT: Re: DConf Hackathon Ideas

On Friday, 28 April 2017 at 13:31:33 UTC, Petar Kirov [ZombineDev] wrote: [...] Other applications include: * compiling/transpiling D functions to targets like JS, SPIR-V, WebAssembly, etc. using CTFE. * CTFE-driven code diagnostics (linting) * Adding semantic to user defined attributes: E.g.

Re: OT: Re: DConf Hackathon Ideas

On Friday, 28 April 2017 at 10:09:32 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner wrote: On Friday, 28 April 2017 at 09:52:29 UTC, Petar Kirov [ZombineDev] wrote: AST introspection - given a function definition (!= declaration, i.e. the body is available) f, the expression __traits(ast, f) should return an instance

Re: DConf Hackathon Ideas

On 2017-04-27 19:06, Andre Pany wrote: Another big issue for me is using dub in a company. Big companies do not want to use the official dub repository due to security issues. That would be nice. -- /Jacob Carlborg

OT: Re: DConf Hackathon Ideas

On Friday, 28 April 2017 at 09:52:29 UTC, Petar Kirov [ZombineDev] wrote: AST introspection - given a function definition (!= declaration, i.e. the body is available) f, the expression __traits(ast, f) should return an instance of FuncDeclaration

Re: DConf Hackathon Ideas

On Thursday, 27 April 2017 at 14:53:02 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: This year, DConf has an extra day tacked on for problem solving in the form of a hackathon. The intent is to work on issues people find frustrating in the D ecosystem. While there will be time given at the event for proposals, and

Re: DConf Hackathon Ideas

On 2017-04-28 04:12, Luís Marques wrote: Backtraces with line information on macOS? That would be nice. Should be fairly trivial to look at the Linux implementation and to the same but read the data from different sections. -- /Jacob Carlborg

Re: DConf Hackathon Ideas

On Thursday, 27 April 2017 at 14:53:02 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: This year, DConf has an extra day tacked on for problem solving in the form of a hackathon. The intent is to work on issues people find frustrating in the D ecosystem. While there will be time given at the event for proposals, and

Re: DConf Hackathon Ideas

On Thursday, 27 April 2017 at 14:53:02 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: To help in compiling the list, what are some major issues from the ecosystem that you'd like to see fixed? Backtraces with line information on macOS?

Re: DConf Hackathon Ideas

On Thursday, 27 April 2017 at 19:55:44 UTC, Andre Pany wrote: On Thursday, 27 April 2017 at 17:47:19 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner wrote: On Thursday, 27 April 2017 at 17:06:39 UTC, Andre Pany wrote: Another big issue for me is using dub in a company. Big companies do not want to use the official dub

Re: DConf Hackathon Ideas

On Thursday, 27 April 2017 at 17:47:19 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner wrote: On Thursday, 27 April 2017 at 17:06:39 UTC, Andre Pany wrote: Another big issue for me is using dub in a company. Big companies do not want to use the official dub repository due to security issues. They want to run their own

Re: DConf Hackathon Ideas

On 27 April 2017 at 17:15, Jack Stouffer via Digitalmars-d wrote: > * Docs which allow people to go back and see docs for previous versions. > Huge headache when using GDC or LDC > Maybe you could submit a patch to add build hook to generate the documentation for

Re: DConf Hackathon Ideas

On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 11:22:06AM -0700, Brad Roberts via Digitalmars-d wrote: > The pending pull requests. In person is a great high-bandwidth way to > work through the massive backlog. +1. Phobos at one time was down to about 30-40 PRs, but now it has clogged back up to around 100. We need to

Re: DConf Hackathon Ideas

On 04/27/2017 04:53 PM, Mike Parker wrote: This year, DConf has an extra day tacked on for problem solving in the form of a hackathon. The intent is to work on issues people find frustrating in the D ecosystem. While there will be time given at the event for proposals, and those involving

Re: DConf Hackathon Ideas

The pending pull requests. In person is a great high-bandwidth way to work through the massive backlog. On 4/27/2017 7:53 AM, Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d wrote: This year, DConf has an extra day tacked on for problem solving in the form of a hackathon. The intent is to work on issues

Re: DConf Hackathon Ideas

On Thursday, 27 April 2017 at 17:06:39 UTC, Andre Pany wrote: Another big issue for me is using dub in a company. Big companies do not want to use the official dub repository due to security issues. They want to run their own dub repository with dub packages they have done code checks. That

Re: DConf Hackathon Ideas

On Thursday, 27 April 2017 at 14:53:02 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: This year, DConf has an extra day tacked on for problem solving in the form of a hackathon. The intent is to work on issues people find frustrating in the D ecosystem. While there will be time given at the event for proposals, and

Re: DConf Hackathon Ideas

On Thursday, 27 April 2017 at 16:33:02 UTC, singingbush wrote: As far as I can tell the only reason dub defaults to sdl now It did in the past, but hasn't done so for several minor versions (it defaults to json).

Re: DConf Hackathon Ideas

- More than one official package description language (json and sdlang). I honestly don't care which it ends up being, but please pick *one* (I am aware of the previous discussions on the topic, but the current state of supporting both is just one more point of friction for newcomers) SDL

Re: DConf Hackathon Ideas

On Thursday, 27 April 2017 at 14:53:02 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: This year, DConf has an extra day tacked on for problem solving in the form of a hackathon. The intent is to work on issues people find frustrating in the D ecosystem. While there will be time given at the event for proposals, and

Re: DConf Hackathon Ideas

On Thursday, 27 April 2017 at 14:53:02 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: To help in compiling the list, what are some major issues from the ecosystem that you'd like to see fixed? * multi-threaded parsing in DMD * https://github.com/dlang/dub/issues/838 * finishing std.experimental.xml

DConf Hackathon Ideas

This year, DConf has an extra day tacked on for problem solving in the form of a hackathon. The intent is to work on issues people find frustrating in the D ecosystem. While there will be time given at the event for proposals, and those involving third-party projects are welcome, it will help