On 01/01/2012 04:02 PM, Steve Teale wrote:
On Sat, 31 Dec 2011 20:28:43 -0800, bls wrote:
Not yet available. In case that Steve Teale (and he did a dammed
good Job, as well as Piotr) will add std.database this will not change
the situation significantly. 'Cause std.database will contain
On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 17:16:13 -, bls bizp...@orange.fr wrote:
On 01/01/2012 12:22 AM, Jimmy Cao wrote:
GUI library for Windows. Pretty easy to use.
... and should be named Forms4D
Or DForms (like WinForms from C#), or perhaps DFormed :p
I definitely like this library. Pretty straight
On Monday, 2 January 2012 at 16:21:16 UTC, bls wrote:
WHY PostGres ? Callback notifications/ Server-side events ...
not available in MySQL. (which you prefer in your framework)
Aye, I've done some postgres, but since my main work app
uses mysql I haven't spent a lot of time on it.
While basic
Nobody stops you to fill the gap with your own code...
--
Dejan Lekic - http://dejan.lekic.org
On 01/01/2012 10:49 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Sunday, 1 January 2012 at 04:28:45 UTC, bls wrote:
WEB Development is for sure doable in D, reusable Frameworks are
nevertheless AFAIK not available.
What kind of features did you have in mind for this?
Hi Adam,
first of all: A happy and
On 01/01/2012 07:02 AM, Steve Teale wrote:
On Sat, 31 Dec 2011 20:28:43 -0800, bls wrote:
Not yet available. In case that Steve Teale (and he did a dammed
good Job, as well as Piotr) will add std.database this will not change
the situation significantly. 'Cause std.database will contain
On 01/01/2012 12:22 AM, Jimmy Cao wrote:
GUI library for Windows. Pretty easy to use.
... and should be named Forms4D
I definitely like this library. Pretty straight OOP, Each DOTNET Forms
developer will immediately feel at home. New liberal license. Just cool!
On 1/1/2012 7:02 AM, Steve Teale wrote:
Even being retired does not mean there's nothing else to do but D library
components.
Steve,
Happy New Year!
Now get back to work! g
2012/1/1 Gour g...@atmarama.net
On Sat, 31 Dec 2011 20:28:43 -0800
bls bizp...@orange.fr wrote:
A Database independent, ORM based library module is not even matter of
discussion. That's a pity.
That would be nice, indeed.
Well for us Windoze is the only interesting Desktop platform.
On Sun, 1 Jan 2012 02:22:59 -0600
Jimmy Cao jcao...@gmail.com wrote:
GUI library for Windows. Pretty easy to use.
Thank you, but not interesting for us looking for multi-platform
library.
Sincerely,
Gour
--
Those persons who execute their duties according to My injunctions
and who follow
On Sat, 31 Dec 2011 20:28:43 -0800, bls wrote:
Not yet available. In case that Steve Teale (and he did a dammed
good Job, as well as Piotr) will add std.database this will not change
the situation significantly. 'Cause std.database will contain just
rudimentary DB support.. A Database
On Sunday, 1 January 2012 at 04:28:45 UTC, bls wrote:
WEB Development is for sure doable in D, reusable Frameworks
are nevertheless AFAIK not available.
What kind of features did you have in mind for this?
Not that you really need it.
Things move forward. Phobos becomes more and more reliable and usable,
It seems that the accepting Foreign modules/Fixes situation is better
than ever. So it looks like things went into the right direction
unfortunately not for me.
Let me tell you in a
On Sat, 31 Dec 2011 20:28:43 -0800
bls bizp...@orange.fr wrote:
A Database independent, ORM based library module is not even matter of
discussion. That's a pity.
That would be nice, indeed.
Well for us Windoze is the only interesting Desktop platform.
A _reasonable_ GUI is not available
14 matches
Mail list logo
