On Thursday, 5 July 2012 at 16:26:02 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Check this out: on http://dlang.org you can actually click in
the code example and edit it, then click Run and pronto, you
see the output!
Damian is actively working on the UI as I'm writing this. Feel
free to chime in with
On Monday, 9 July 2012 at 11:35:59 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Thursday, 5 July 2012 at 16:26:02 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Check this out: on http://dlang.org you can actually click in
the code example and edit it, then click Run and pronto, you
see the output!
Damian is actively
On Monday, 9 July 2012 at 16:58:26 UTC, nazriel wrote:
David (klickverbot), are examples working for you now? (Back -
Forward transition)?
Yes, they are indeed.
Keep up the good work,
David
On Thursday, 5 July 2012 at 16:26:02 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Damian is actively working on the UI as I'm writing this. Feel
free to chime in with feedback!
When on dlang.org/ and pressing Back and then Forward again, the
contents of the input area disappear on Chrome 20.0.1132.47 (OS
On Saturday, 7 July 2012 at 06:23:03 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
On Thursday, 5 July 2012 at 16:26:02 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Damian is actively working on the UI as I'm writing this. Feel
free to chime in with feedback!
When on dlang.org/ and pressing Back and then Forward again,
On Friday, 6 July 2012 at 19:45:42 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 7/6/2012 5:47 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On the other hand the load on the compilation machine will
influence the
timings, so the numbers are not very relevant.
I don't think the compile time of 10 line programs is relevant.
On 7/7/2012 1:44 AM, nazriel wrote:
Personally I would say no for this.
Already enough trolls around, no need to feed them more :)
I'd be wary about providing such data just because we can, because it is not
reflective of what people will experience using dmd on their own machines, and
so it
On Friday, 6 July 2012 at 05:45:25 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jul 2012 12:26:01 -0400
Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Check this out: on http://dlang.org you can actually click in
the
code example and edit it, then click Run and pronto, you see
the
On 7/5/2012 11:06 PM, Bernard Helyer wrote:
otherwise everyone is just going to filter you out as old man
nick is complaining about JS again :)
Young whippersnappers with your fancy cell phones and color monitors! Why, in my
day we had ASR-33 teletypes at 10 characters per second, and we were
On Friday, 6 July 2012 at 05:45:25 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jul 2012 12:26:01 -0400
Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Check this out: on http://dlang.org you can actually click in
the
code example and edit it, then click Run and pronto, you see
the
On Friday, 6 July 2012 at 07:39:14 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 7/5/2012 11:06 PM, Bernard Helyer wrote:
otherwise everyone is just going to filter you out as old man
nick is complaining about JS again :)
Young whippersnappers with your fancy cell phones and color
monitors! Why, in my day we
On Friday, 6 July 2012 at 06:06:28 UTC, Bernard Helyer wrote:
On Friday, 6 July 2012 at 05:45:25 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jul 2012 12:26:01 -0400
Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Check this out: on http://dlang.org you can actually click in
the
code
On Friday, 6 July 2012 at 08:07:19 UTC, Bernard Helyer wrote:
On Friday, 6 July 2012 at 07:39:14 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 7/5/2012 11:06 PM, Bernard Helyer wrote:
otherwise everyone is just going to filter you out as old man
nick is complaining about JS again :)
Young whippersnappers
Looks just great!
Maybe it should output compilation/execution times as well ?
On Fri, 06 Jul 2012 09:51:59 +0200
nazriel nazriel6...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, 6 July 2012 at 05:45:25 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jul 2012 12:26:01 -0400
Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Check this out: on http://dlang.org you can actually click in
Nick Sabalausky seewebsitetocontac...@semitwist.com wrote:
Yea, sorry, in my haste I worded it all very poorly. I was just
concerned about whether using jquery (and pulling it in from a
whole
separate server) might have a lot of (or too much) bloat for the
homepage. I haven't used jquery, but
On 7/6/2012 1:06 AM, nazriel wrote:
I believe there are not much 56kbps modem users this days anyways! *grins*
I still have one in my equipment closet, and a 2400 one in the basement.
Funny how the only computer I didn't keep turned out to be the collector one
worth a tidy sum.
On 2012-07-06 10:55, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Yea, sorry, in my haste I worded it all very poorly. I was just
concerned about whether using jquery (and pulling it in from a whole
separate server) might have a lot of (or too much) bloat for the
homepage. I haven't used jquery, but if I understand
On 7/6/12 4:43 AM, xenon325 wrote:
Looks just great!
Maybe it should output compilation/execution times as well ?
I think that's a good idea. We can show the compile and run time
separately, where the compilation speed should come shining.
Right now clicking on run brings a frame title
On Friday, 6 July 2012 at 12:47:59 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 7/6/12 4:43 AM, xenon325 wrote:
Looks just great!
Maybe it should output compilation/execution times as well ?
I think that's a good idea. We can show the compile and run
time separately, where the compilation speed
On Friday, 6 July 2012 at 12:47:59 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 7/6/12 4:43 AM, xenon325 wrote:
Looks just great!
Maybe it should output compilation/execution times as well ?
I think that's a good idea. We can show the compile and run
time separately, where the compilation speed
On 7/6/12 10:11 AM, Paulo Pinto wrote:
We can always make use of that information to compare compile times
with Go. :)
Damian is working on integrating accurate compilation and run times.
Andrei
On Friday, 6 July 2012 at 12:47:59 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 7/6/12 4:43 AM, xenon325 wrote:
Looks just great!
Maybe it should output compilation/execution times as well ?
I think that's a good idea. We can show the compile and run
time separately, where the compilation speed
On 7/6/12 10:43 AM, Dejan Lekic wrote:
I humbly believe that information is useless.
Why? - Because at any point of time the server can be congested and
those running time figures will go high...
I decided to include those only after Damian mentioned (a) there's
sufficient reserve power for
On 7/6/2012 5:47 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On the other hand the load on the compilation machine will influence the
timings, so the numbers are not very relevant.
I don't think the compile time of 10 line programs is relevant. All you're
measuring is the time it takes to load the
Check this out: on http://dlang.org you can actually click in the code
example and edit it, then click Run and pronto, you see the output!
Damian is actively working on the UI as I'm writing this. Feel free to
chime in with feedback!
Andrei
On 2012-07-05 18:26, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Check this out: on http://dlang.org you can actually click in the code
example and edit it, then click Run and pronto, you see the output!
Damian is actively working on the UI as I'm writing this. Feel free to
chime in with feedback!
Andrei
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 12:26:01PM -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Check this out: on http://dlang.org you can actually click in the code
example and edit it, then click Run and pronto, you see the output!
Damian is actively working on the UI as I'm writing this. Feel free to
chime in with
On 5 July 2012 17:51, H. S. Teoh hst...@quickfur.ath.cx wrote:
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 12:26:01PM -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Check this out: on http://dlang.org you can actually click in the code
example and edit it, then click Run and pronto, you see the output!
Damian is actively
On Thu, 05 Jul 2012 09:51:50 -0700, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 12:26:01PM -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Check this out: on http://dlang.org you can actually click in the code
example and edit it, then click Run and pronto, you see the output!
Damian is actively working on
Great tool!
Just a small layout bug: On Firefox 3.6.4 (on Mac) the [your code
here] tags is misplaced after clicking the Run button. It then
overlaps the appearing output box.
Cheers,
André
On Thursday, 5 July 2012 at 16:59:33 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On 5 July 2012 17:51, H. S. Teoh
On Thursday, 5 July 2012 at 16:26:02 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Check this out: on http://dlang.org you can actually click in
the code example and edit it, then click Run and pronto, you
see the output!
Damian is actively working on the UI as I'm writing this. Feel
free to chime in with
On 05-Jul-12 20:26, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Check this out: on http://dlang.org you can actually click in the code
example and edit it, then click Run and pronto, you see the output!
Damian is actively working on the UI as I'm writing this. Feel free to
chime in with feedback!
Wonderful!
Nice.
Should probably remove the references to local files when
compilation fails. Not very user friendly to see:
/home/jail/compileme369.d(14): expression expected, not '}'
Would probably suffice just to switch the filename with something
less distracting.
2012/7/5 André nos...@spambog.com:
Great tool!
Just a small layout bug: On Firefox 3.6.4 (on Mac) the [your code
here] tags is misplaced after clicking the Run button. It then
overlaps the appearing output box.
Cheers,
André
same bug with chrome
On 7/5/12 12:26 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Check this out: on http://dlang.org you can actually click in the code
example and edit it, then click Run and pronto, you see the output!
Damian is actively working on the UI as I'm writing this. Feel free to
chime in with feedback!
Updated to a
On Thursday, 5 July 2012 at 16:59:33 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On 5 July 2012 17:51, H. S. Teoh hst...@quickfur.ath.cx wrote:
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 12:26:01PM -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Check this out: on http://dlang.org you can actually click in
the code
example and edit it, then
On Thursday, 5 July 2012 at 19:10:57 UTC, Peter Alexander wrote:
Nice.
Should probably remove the references to local files when
compilation fails. Not very user friendly to see:
/home/jail/compileme369.d(14): expression expected, not '}'
Would probably suffice just to switch the filename
On Thursday, 5 July 2012 at 17:56:34 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
On 05-Jul-12 20:26, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Check this out: on http://dlang.org you can actually click in
the code
example and edit it, then click Run and pronto, you see the
output!
Damian is actively working on the UI as
On 06-Jul-12 01:28, nazriel wrote:
On Thursday, 5 July 2012 at 17:56:34 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
On 05-Jul-12 20:26, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Check this out: on http://dlang.org you can actually click in the code
example and edit it, then click Run and pronto, you see the output!
Damian
On Thu, 05 Jul 2012 12:26:01 -0400
Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Check this out: on http://dlang.org you can actually click in the
code example and edit it, then click Run and pronto, you see the
output!
Damian is actively working on the UI as I'm writing this.
41 matches
Mail list logo
