Just letting you all know we're working on the frustrating and
increasingly frequent "Load at xx.xx, try again later" errors when
reading this forum through NNTP. They are caused by a significant growth
spurt in newsgroup readership that occurred in recent times. We are
working with our provide
On Thursday, 3 May 2012 at 14:50:09 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Just letting you all know we're working on the frustrating and
increasingly frequent "Load at xx.xx, try again later" errors
when reading this forum through NNTP. They are caused by a
significant growth spurt in newsgroup reade
Le 03/05/2012 16:50, Andrei Alexandrescu a écrit :
Just letting you all know we're working on the frustrating and
increasingly frequent "Load at xx.xx, try again later" errors when
reading this forum through NNTP. They are caused by a significant growth
spurt in newsgroup readership that occurred
On 05/03/2012 01:52 PM, deadalnix wrote:
Le 03/05/2012 16:50, Andrei Alexandrescu a écrit :
Just letting you all know we're working on the frustrating and
increasingly frequent "Load at xx.xx, try again later" errors when
reading this forum through NNTP. They are caused by a significant growth
s
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 01:51:20PM -0700, Ali Çehreli wrote:
> On 05/03/2012 01:52 PM, deadalnix wrote:
> >Le 03/05/2012 16:50, Andrei Alexandrescu a écrit :
> >>Just letting you all know we're working on the frustrating and
> >>increasingly frequent "Load at xx.xx, try again later" errors when
> >
On 5/3/2012 1:52 PM, deadalnix wrote:
It was so anoying when posting a message and *pof* « error your message is lost
».
Youch. I didn't realize that was happening. I post from Thunderbird, and if it
fails you just try it again.
Anyhow, thanks to Jan Knepper for hosting us and figuring out
On 04-05-2012 00:47, Walter Bright wrote:
On 5/3/2012 1:52 PM, deadalnix wrote:
It was so anoying when posting a message and *pof* « error your
message is lost ».
Youch. I didn't realize that was happening. I post from Thunderbird, and
if it fails you just try it again.
I use Thunderbird too
On Thursday, 3 May 2012 at 20:45:24 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
It was so anoying when posting a message and *pof* « error
your message is lost ».
For the record: forum.dlang.org doesn't do this.
"deadalnix" wrote in message
news:jnuqp4$2hs8$1...@digitalmars.com...
>
> It was so anoying when posting a message and *pof* « error your message is
> lost ».
That's one of the reasons I avoid web-based things whenever possible.
"Alex Rønne Petersen" wrote in message
news:jnv2c1$319r$2...@digitalmars.com...
>
> As far as I can see, Thunderbird doesn't save sent NNTP messages anywhere
> unless you explicitly tell it to. :(
>
Outlook Express does ;)
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 07:50:30PM -0400, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> "Alex R�nne Petersen" wrote in message
> news:jnv2c1$319r$2...@digitalmars.com...
> >
> > As far as I can see, Thunderbird doesn't save sent NNTP messages
> > anywhere unless you explicitly tell it to. :(
[...]
I'm skeptical of a
On 04-05-2012 01:50, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Alex Rønne Petersen" wrote in message
news:jnv2c1$319r$2...@digitalmars.com...
As far as I can see, Thunderbird doesn't save sent NNTP messages anywhere
unless you explicitly tell it to. :(
Outlook Express does ;)
I try to stay away from Wind
On 5/3/2012 3:54 PM, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
I use Thunderbird too, and one of my messages actually *did* get lost. I wrote
the message, hit send, and then right after it "finished" sending the message,
an NG error popped up and the message was lost.
As far as I can see, Thunderbird doesn't s
Le jeudi 03 mai 2012 à 15:47 -0700, Walter Bright a écrit :
> On 5/3/2012 1:52 PM, deadalnix wrote:
> > It was so anoying when posting a message and *pof* « error your message is
> > lost ».
>
> Youch. I didn't realize that was happening. I post from Thunderbird, and if
> it
> fails you just tr
On 05/03/2012 10:50 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Just letting you all know we're working on the frustrating and
increasingly frequent "Load at xx.xx, try again later" errors when
reading this forum through NNTP. They are caused by a significant growth
spurt in newsgroup readership that occurred
On Thu, 03 May 2012 23:25:26 +0100, H. S. Teoh
wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 01:51:20PM -0700, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 05/03/2012 01:52 PM, deadalnix wrote:
>Le 03/05/2012 16:50, Andrei Alexandrescu a écrit :
>>Just letting you all know we're working on the frustrating and
>>increasingly freq
On 5/4/12 2:26 AM, Jeff Nowakowski wrote:
On 05/03/2012 10:50 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Just letting you all know we're working on the frustrating and
increasingly frequent "Load at xx.xx, try again later" errors when
reading this forum through NNTP. They are caused by a significant growth
On Fri, 04 May 2012 05:00:10 -0400, Regan Heath
wrote:
Opera does this right too :)
Yeah, I still have all my sent posts in opera...
One thing that annoys me though, if a message doesn't get sent, it stays
in your outbox. Then when you double-click on it to edit/resend, it's
been refo
Am 03.05.2012 22:51, schrieb Ali Çehreli:
On 05/03/2012 01:52 PM, deadalnix wrote:
Le 03/05/2012 16:50, Andrei Alexandrescu a écrit :
Just letting you all know we're working on the frustrating and
increasingly frequent "Load at xx.xx, try again later" errors when
reading this forum through NNTP
On 05/04/2012 02:27 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> FWIW it seemed to be just a configuration issue.
Perhaps not solved yet? I just hit the same problem about fifteen
minutes ago.
Ali
On Thursday, 3 May 2012 at 14:50:09 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Just letting you all know we're working on the frustrating and
increasingly frequent "Load at xx.xx, try again later" errors
when reading this forum through NNTP. They are caused by a
significant growth spurt in newsgroup reade
On Saturday, 5 May 2012 at 06:04:51 UTC, SomeDude wrote:
I don't know if someone was working on the NNTP server this
morning, but it was really, really bad for a couple of minutes.
I got "XHR error" and nothing else. Then it wen't back to
normal.
20 mn later, it's slow again.
On 03/05/2012 15:50, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Just letting you all know we're working on the frustrating and
increasingly frequent "Load at xx.xx, try again later" errors when
reading this forum through NNTP. They are caused by a significant growth
spurt in newsgroup readership that occurred in
On 5/7/12 10:25 PM, Robert Clipsham wrote:
On 03/05/2012 15:50, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Just letting you all know we're working on the frustrating and
increasingly frequent "Load at xx.xx, try again later" errors when
reading this forum through NNTP. They are caused by a significant growth
sp
On Thu, 03 May 2012 10:50:13 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Just letting you all know we're working on the frustrating and
increasingly frequent "Load at xx.xx, try again later" errors when
reading this forum through NNTP. They are caused by a significant growth
spurt in newsgroup rea
NNTP error: 400 load at 17.54, try later
On 03-05-2012 16:50, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Just letting you all know we're working on the frustrating and
increasingly frequent "Load at xx.xx, try again later" errors when
reading this forum through NNTP. They are caused by a significant growth
spurt in newsgroup readership that occurred in
On 03.05.2012 18:50, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Just letting you all know we're working on the frustrating and
increasingly frequent "Load at xx.xx, try again later" errors when
reading this forum through NNTP. They are caused by a significant growth
spurt in newsgroup readership that occurred in
On Saturday, 12 May 2012 at 10:16:45 UTC, Alex Rønne Petersen
wrote:
I can barely make contact with the newsgroup server at this
point... any news on upping the server capacity?
The idea that any reasonably-sized machine shouldn't be able to
run a fairly small newsgroup server these days still
I wonder if something like this will be more painful?
http://www.freewebhostingarea.com/
On 14.05.2012 22:06, Kagamin wrote:
I wonder if something like this will be more painful?
http://www.freewebhostingarea.com/
Or rather a cheap dedicated VPS box.
http://buyvm.net/
15$/year ?
--
Dmitry Olshansky
On 5/14/12 1:40 PM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
On 14.05.2012 22:06, Kagamin wrote:
I wonder if something like this will be more painful?
http://www.freewebhostingarea.com/
Or rather a cheap dedicated VPS box.
http://buyvm.net/
15$/year ?
The issue seems to be different than sheer computing powe
On 14-05-2012 21:16, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 5/14/12 1:40 PM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
On 14.05.2012 22:06, Kagamin wrote:
I wonder if something like this will be more painful?
http://www.freewebhostingarea.com/
Or rather a cheap dedicated VPS box.
http://buyvm.net/
15$/year ?
The issu
I swear MySQL can handle 168K records at once.
They are caused by a significant growth spurt in newsgroup readership
that occurred in recent times.
a possible solution could include to encourage more people on this
newsgroup to learn how to quote. :)
On Monday, 14 May 2012 at 20:23:25 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
I swear MySQL can handle 168K records at once.
I wonder why it can't just go on a queue that gives you some 30
seconds before timing out and giving you an error message?
It makes me wonder if distributed computing could come to the
r
retard Wrote:
> Tue, 15 Dec 2009 09:42:26 -0500, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
>
> Most likely Walter won't even tell what kind of arrays D2 will have.
> Anything can happen. The final word is the undocumented executable you
> can download when the book hits stores. Even then dmd's behavior isn't
Kevin Bealer wrote:
To smooth this out, it would help to have the best practices for
doing common things in D (e.g. serialization, logging) somewhat
documented for the consumption of non-experts. I wonder what a good
way of doing this is?
It's really impossible to predict what the best practic
Walter Bright:
> Only time and usage will tell. The "best practices" for both C and C++ have
> evolved significantly over time.
I hope D2 will change itself a little (into D3) to adapt itself to such "best
practices", to make them more natural, more easy to use, etc.
Bye,
bearophile
Kevin Bealer Wrote:
> retard Wrote:
>
> > Tue, 15 Dec 2009 09:42:26 -0500, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> >
> > Most likely Walter won't even tell what kind of arrays D2 will have.
> > Anything can happen. The final word is the undocumented executable you
> > can download when the book hits stor
Walter Bright Wrote:
> Kevin Bealer wrote:
> > To smooth this out, it would help to have the best practices for
> > doing common things in D (e.g. serialization, logging) somewhat
> > documented for the consumption of non-experts. I wonder what a good
> > way of doing this is?
>
> It's really im
Kevin Bealer wrote:
Walter Bright Wrote:
Kevin Bealer wrote:
To smooth this out, it would help to have the best practices for
doing common things in D (e.g. serialization, logging) somewhat
documented for the consumption of non-experts. I wonder what a good
way of doing this is?
It's really i
Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
Kevin Bealer wrote:
Walter Bright Wrote:
Kevin Bealer wrote:
To smooth this out, it would help to have the best practices for
doing common things in D (e.g. serialization, logging) somewhat
documented for the consumption of non-experts. I wonder what a good
way of
Lars T. Kyllingstad Wrote:
> Kevin Bealer wrote:
> > Walter Bright Wrote:
> >
> >> Kevin Bealer wrote:
> >>> To smooth this out, it would help to have the best practices for
> >>> doing common things in D (e.g. serialization, logging) somewhat
> >>> documented for the consumption of non-experts.
44 matches
Mail list logo
