On Wednesday, 7 October 2015 at 16:09:37 UTC, Jan Johansson wrote:
Yepp, that's the point of SOA :-) We are in agreement.
:) Since the contract is known upfront, it can be processed at
compile time and D can do it. C# has to do it at run time because
it can't do a thing at compile time.
On Wednesday, 7 October 2015 at 08:27:18 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 October 2015 at 16:38:06 UTC, Jan Johansson wrote:
I know about that too, the KnownType is applied to types that
the DataContractSerializer (not the XmlSerializer) must be
aware of before it can serialize the type (you e
On Wednesday, 7 October 2015 at 14:59:37 UTC, Johannes Pfau wrote:
I think it wouldn't be hard to implement a solution. I guess
it's mainly a political discussion :-(
It should be fairly easy to implement a solution - especially if
it's simply marking the static constructor to say that it does
Am Wed, 07 Oct 2015 10:50:38 +
schrieb Jonathan M Davis :
> On Wednesday, 7 October 2015 at 10:03:11 UTC, Johannes Pfau wrote:
> > Am Wed, 07 Oct 2015 08:41:30 +
> > schrieb Jonathan M Davis :
> >
> >> On Wednesday, 7 October 2015 at 07:08:39 UTC, extrawurst wrote:
> >> > Method 1: Adding
On Wednesday, 7 October 2015 at 10:03:11 UTC, Johannes Pfau wrote:
Am Wed, 07 Oct 2015 08:41:30 +
schrieb Jonathan M Davis :
On Wednesday, 7 October 2015 at 07:08:39 UTC, extrawurst wrote:
> Method 1: Adding a static c'tor to every module does not
> work very long in practice (as experienc
Am Wed, 07 Oct 2015 08:41:30 +
schrieb Jonathan M Davis :
> On Wednesday, 7 October 2015 at 07:08:39 UTC, extrawurst wrote:
> > Method 1: Adding a static c'tor to every module does not work
> > very long in practice (as experienced first handed) cause you
> > are in "cyclic c'tor hell" very
On Wednesday, 7 October 2015 at 07:08:39 UTC, extrawurst wrote:
Method 1: Adding a static c'tor to every module does not work
very long in practice (as experienced first handed) cause you
are in "cyclic c'tor hell" very quick...
The cyclic dependency checking in druntime makes static
construc
On Tuesday, 6 October 2015 at 16:38:06 UTC, Jan Johansson wrote:
I know about that too, the KnownType is applied to types that
the DataContractSerializer (not the XmlSerializer) must be
aware of before it can serialize the type (you enlist the type
to the serializer). Thanks.
For a general pu
On Monday, 5 October 2015 at 09:08:56 UTC, Jonas Drewsen wrote:
On Monday, 5 October 2015 at 06:18:45 UTC, Manu wrote:
[...]
[...]
The first method is bad because you need to mixin code manually
for each module you have.
The second method is bad because you need to keep the
"registration"
On Tuesday, 6 October 2015 at 14:28:42 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Monday, 5 October 2015 at 16:40:06 UTC, Jan Johansson wrote:
Yes, I know WCF more than well, doing my own bindings,
federated security bindings, you name it. I also know that WCF
works with attribute values during runtime, through
r
On Tuesday, 6 October 2015 at 13:31:25 UTC, krzaq wrote:
For example: you can't rely on Clock.currTime.toString() (or
ISO string overloads) to provide a reliable fixed-length
representation for logging purposes and the class mysteriously
lacks any kind of .format() function that's available pre
On Monday, 5 October 2015 at 16:40:06 UTC, Jan Johansson wrote:
Yes, I know WCF more than well, doing my own bindings,
federated security bindings, you name it. I also know that WCF
works with attribute values during runtime, through reflections
and extract aspect oriented instructions on how t
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 02:25:21 UTC, Yaser wrote:
Are there any critical frameworks or libraries that are holding
you back in fully investing in D? Obviously I think D is an
awesome language, but some frameworks/libraries hold me back,
wish I could do everything in D.
Nothing major for
On Monday, 5 October 2015 at 13:38:43 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Monday, 5 October 2015 at 09:08:56 UTC, Jonas Drewsen wrote:
Say a want to have a central place to lookup all classes with
the Foo() attribute on it.
You can also use the RTInfo hook in druntime's object.d to
build that stuff
On Monday, 5 October 2015 at 09:08:56 UTC, Jonas Drewsen wrote:
On Monday, 5 October 2015 at 06:18:45 UTC, Manu wrote:
[...]
This is all nice but still not as slick as could be. Say a want
to have a central place to lookup all classes with the Foo()
attribute on it. The classes can be in sev
On Monday, 5 October 2015 at 08:44:03 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Monday, 5 October 2015 at 04:02:58 UTC, Jan Johansson wrote:
Sure it can, but I want a dynamic behavior, not a static
behavior. Attributes are compiler directives. They are not
available at runtime according to the specification of D
On Monday, 5 October 2015 at 09:08:56 UTC, Jonas Drewsen wrote:
Say a want to have a central place to lookup all classes with
the Foo() attribute on it.
You can also use the RTInfo hook in druntime's object.d to build
that stuff in a central location.
Of course, since that's a centralized fi
On Monday, 5 October 2015 at 06:18:45 UTC, Manu wrote:
You can easily make attributes effectively available at runtime
by
building lists of attributed things at compile time.
I don't understand your problem. Describe the goal?
This is all nice but still not as slick as could be. Say a want
to
On Monday, 5 October 2015 at 04:02:58 UTC, Jan Johansson wrote:
Sure it can, but I want a dynamic behavior, not a static
behavior. Attributes are compiler directives. They are not
available at runtime according to the specification of D
language. Now take the example at:
http://ddili.org/ders/
On 5 October 2015 at 14:02, Jan Johansson via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On Sunday, 4 October 2015 at 23:55:42 UTC, Manu wrote:
>>
>> On 5 October 2015 at 03:44, Jan Johansson via Digitalmars-d
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 02:25:21 UTC, Yaser wrote:
Are there any crit
On Sunday, 4 October 2015 at 23:55:42 UTC, Manu wrote:
On 5 October 2015 at 03:44, Jan Johansson via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 02:25:21 UTC, Yaser wrote:
Are there any critical frameworks or libraries that are
holding you back in fully investing in D? Obviously I thin
On 5 October 2015 at 03:44, Jan Johansson via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 02:25:21 UTC, Yaser wrote:
>>
>> Are there any critical frameworks or libraries that are holding you back
>> in fully investing in D? Obviously I think D is an awesome language, but
>> some frameworks
On Sunday, 4 October 2015 at 17:39:26 UTC, bitwise wrote:
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 02:25:21 UTC, Yaser wrote:
Are there any critical frameworks or libraries that are
holding you back in fully investing in D? Obviously I think D
is an awesome language, but some frameworks/libraries hold me
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 02:25:21 UTC, Yaser wrote:
Are there any critical frameworks or libraries that are holding
you back in fully investing in D? Obviously I think D is an
awesome language, but some frameworks/libraries hold me back,
wish I could do everything in D.
I'd wish for attri
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 02:25:21 UTC, Yaser wrote:
Are there any critical frameworks or libraries that are holding
you back in fully investing in D? Obviously I think D is an
awesome language, but some frameworks/libraries hold me back,
wish I could do everything in D.
OpenCV would be ni
On Saturday, 3 October 2015 at 09:02:52 UTC, ponce wrote:
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 18:56:32 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 02:25:21 UTC, Yaser wrote:
Are there any critical frameworks or libraries that are
holding you back in fully investing in D? Obviously I think D
is
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 05:28:23 UTC, suliman wrote:
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 05:15:26 UTC, luminousone wrote:
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 02:25:21 UTC, Yaser wrote:
Are there any critical frameworks or libraries that are
holding you back in fully investing in D? Obviously I think D
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 18:56:32 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 02:25:21 UTC, Yaser wrote:
Are there any critical frameworks or libraries that are
holding you back in fully investing in D? Obviously I think D
is an awesome language, but some frameworks/libraries hold me
On 2 October 2015 at 12:25, Yaser via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> Are there any critical frameworks or libraries that are holding you back in
> fully investing in D? Obviously I think D is an awesome language, but some
> frameworks/libraries hold me back, wish I could do everything in D.
Emscripten, Q
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 19:17:24 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
Do I need to use specific linker flags to have this work ?
--export-dynamic if you want function names (now done by default
in dmd.conf anyway) and -g if you want file and line numbers; it
pulls the info from the debug information.
On 10/02/2015 03:24 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 10/02/2015 09:11 AM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
On 02-Oct-2015 05:25, Yaser wrote:
Are there any critical frameworks or libraries that are holding you back
in fully investing in D? Obviously I think D is an awesome language, but
some frameworks
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 19:12:08 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 18:56:32 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
don't even have line number in the trace that lead to this
assert (the dogshit).
http://arsdnet.net/this-week-in-d/sep-20.html
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 18:56:32 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
don't even have line number in the trace that lead to this
assert (the dogshit).
http://arsdnet.net/this-week-in-d/sep-20.html
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/pull/1354
works on linux now, already worked on Windows
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 02:25:21 UTC, Yaser wrote:
Are there any critical frameworks or libraries that are holding
you back in fully investing in D? Obviously I think D is an
awesome language, but some frameworks/libraries hold me back,
wish I could do everything in D.
1/ Debug support.
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 12:54:30 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 02:25:21 UTC, Yaser wrote:
Are there any critical frameworks or libraries that are
holding you back in fully investing in D? Obviously I think D
is an awesome language, but some frameworks/libraries hol
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 17:17:07 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Now, using D at work is another thing entirely, but that has
more to do with there being existing codebases and it being
very difficult to talk coworkers into using a new language or
technology than there necessarily being any
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 02:25:21 UTC, Yaser wrote:
Are there any critical frameworks or libraries that are holding
you back in fully investing in D? Obviously I think D is an
awesome language, but some frameworks/libraries hold me back,
wish I could do everything in D.
I want a really go
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 02:25:21 UTC, Yaser wrote:
Are there any critical frameworks or libraries that are holding
you back in fully investing in D? Obviously I think D is an
awesome language, but some frameworks/libraries hold me back,
wish I could do everything in D.
Nothing is holding
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 08:23:56 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Am 02.10.2015 um 10:15 schrieb Kagamin:
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 08:03:03 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky
wrote:
On 02-Oct-2015 10:49, Kagamin wrote:
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 05:15:26 UTC, luminousone wrote:
vibe.d compatible sqlite,
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 13:24:10 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 10/02/2015 09:11 AM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
On 02-Oct-2015 05:25, Yaser wrote:
Are there any critical frameworks or libraries that are
holding you back
in fully investing in D? Obviously I think D is an awesome
language,
On 10/02/2015 09:11 AM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
On 02-Oct-2015 05:25, Yaser wrote:
Are there any critical frameworks or libraries that are holding you back
in fully investing in D? Obviously I think D is an awesome language, but
some frameworks/libraries hold me back, wish I could do everything
On 10/02/2015 08:54 AM, Jack Stouffer wrote:
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 02:25:21 UTC, Yaser wrote:
Are there any critical frameworks or libraries that are holding you
back in fully investing in D? Obviously I think D is an awesome
language, but some frameworks/libraries hold me back, wish I co
On 02-Oct-2015 05:25, Yaser wrote:
Are there any critical frameworks or libraries that are holding you back
in fully investing in D? Obviously I think D is an awesome language, but
some frameworks/libraries hold me back, wish I could do everything in D.
My personal favorite (8+ years old OMG):
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 02:25:21 UTC, Yaser wrote:
Are there any critical frameworks or libraries that are holding
you back in fully investing in D? Obviously I think D is an
awesome language, but some frameworks/libraries hold me back,
wish I could do everything in D.
Yes: https://issue
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 09:44:00 UTC, ponce wrote:
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 02:25:21 UTC, Yaser wrote:
Are there any critical frameworks or libraries that are
holding you back in fully investing in D? Obviously I think D
is an awesome language, but some frameworks/libraries hold me
ba
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 02:25:21 UTC, Yaser wrote:
Are there any critical frameworks or libraries that are holding
you back in fully investing in D? Obviously I think D is an
awesome language, but some frameworks/libraries hold me back,
wish I could do everything in D.
I'd say kickass co
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 02:25:21 UTC, Yaser wrote:
Are there any critical frameworks or libraries that are holding
you back in fully investing in D? Obviously I think D is an
awesome language, but some frameworks/libraries hold me back,
wish I could do everything in D.
Sadly, the preproc
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 03:34:18 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Moreover, and this is really important, D can already interact
the majority of existing software out there.
This is a very important point that is often forgotten. What has
been done in C is also available to D. To work with D yo
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 08:23:56 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
http://code.dlang.org/?sort=name&category=library.database
Unfortunately not everybody is using sqlite and postgresql.
Am 02.10.2015 um 10:15 schrieb Kagamin:
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 08:03:03 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
On 02-Oct-2015 10:49, Kagamin wrote:
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 05:15:26 UTC, luminousone wrote:
vibe.d compatible sqlite, postgresql, and oracle sql drivers.
An ODBC driver would be
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 08:03:03 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
On 02-Oct-2015 10:49, Kagamin wrote:
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 05:15:26 UTC, luminousone wrote:
vibe.d compatible sqlite, postgresql, and oracle sql drivers.
An ODBC driver would be fine too, anything that can connect to
a
On 02-Oct-2015 10:49, Kagamin wrote:
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 05:15:26 UTC, luminousone wrote:
vibe.d compatible sqlite, postgresql, and oracle sql drivers.
An ODBC driver would be fine too, anything that can connect to a database.
http://dlang.org/phobos/etc_c_odbc_sql.html
--
Dmitry O
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 05:15:26 UTC, luminousone wrote:
vibe.d compatible sqlite, postgresql, and oracle sql drivers.
An ODBC driver would be fine too, anything that can connect to a
database.
Yaser píše v Pá 02. 10. 2015 v 02:31 +:
> On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 02:29:47 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> > On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 02:25:21 UTC, Yaser wrote:
> > > Are there any critical frameworks or libraries that are
> > > holding you back in fully investing in D?
> >
> > Nope, if
Full-featured PDF library (with JBIG2 and Jpeg2000 support and so
on...)
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 05:15:26 UTC, luminousone wrote:
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 02:25:21 UTC, Yaser wrote:
Are there any critical frameworks or libraries that are
holding you back in fully investing in D? Obviously I think D
is an awesome language, but some frameworks/libraries hold
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 02:25:21 UTC, Yaser wrote:
Are there any critical frameworks or libraries that are holding
you back in fully investing in D? Obviously I think D is an
awesome language, but some frameworks/libraries hold me back,
wish I could do everything in D.
vibe.d compatible
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 02:31:50 UTC, Yaser wrote:
That's the attitude, but do you think you can rewrite 10+ years
* X man hours of software by yourself
It doesn't actually take that long to write useful programs. (and
btw, I've been writing D for 8+ years already, including a lot of
sup
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 02:52:23 UTC, David DeWitt wrote:
Im sure he meant if he needs something thats not yet available
then he'll just write it. D is a community effort so obviously
many ppl need to chip in. I pretty much use the usual
Python/JS combo professionally and there are a ton
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 02:31:50 UTC, Yaser wrote:
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 02:29:47 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 02:25:21 UTC, Yaser wrote:
Are there any critical frameworks or libraries that are
holding you back in fully investing in D?
Nope, if anything l
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 02:29:47 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 02:25:21 UTC, Yaser wrote:
Are there any critical frameworks or libraries that are
holding you back in fully investing in D?
Nope, if anything like that comes up, I'll just write it myself!
That's th
Are there any critical frameworks or libraries that are holding
you back in fully investing in D? Obviously I think D is an
awesome language, but some frameworks/libraries hold me back,
wish I could do everything in D.
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 02:25:21 UTC, Yaser wrote:
Are there any critical frameworks or libraries that are holding
you back in fully investing in D?
Nope, if anything like that comes up, I'll just write it myself!
63 matches
Mail list logo