Am Thu, 17 May 2012 22:10:23 -0400
schrieb Nick Sabalausky seewebsitetocontac...@semitwist.com:
Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:mailman.904.1337305802.24740.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
On 5/18/12, H. S. Teoh hst...@quickfur.ath.cx wrote:
Is it really
On 17/05/12 01:45, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
My main point is that those features (fork/pull request/issue tracking, etc)
should be decoupled from hosting so that, for example, self-hosted repos
would *not* provide inferior service, in fact they woudn't have to provide
some stupid bundled interface
Joseph Rushton Wakeling joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net wrote in message
news:mailman.886.1337255711.24740.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
On 17/05/12 01:45, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
My main point is that those features (fork/pull request/issue tracking,
etc)
should be decoupled from hosting so
Nick Sabalausky seewebsitetocontac...@semitwist.com wrote in message
news:jp3ocp$2e1c$1...@digitalmars.com...
2. The protocols (ie. either git/hg/etc or better yet a standard extension
that handles both git and hg) would then incorporate the things that
github/bitbucket have proven to be
Nick Sabalausky seewebsitetocontac...@semitwist.com wrote in message
news:jp3oq2$2esa$1...@digitalmars.com...
Nick Sabalausky seewebsitetocontac...@semitwist.com wrote in message
news:jp3ocp$2e1c$1...@digitalmars.com...
2. The protocols (ie. either git/hg/etc or better yet a standard
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 04:51:04PM -0400, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
[...]
Have you ever heard of, or even read, Hugi Magazine? (
http://www.hugi.scene.org/main.php?page=hugi ). It has interesting
content, but the format is absolutely moronic: Instead of coming in
PDF or HTML or even DOC or
H. S. Teoh hst...@quickfur.ath.cx wrote in message
news:mailman.902.1337292243.24740.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 04:51:04PM -0400, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
[...]
Have you ever heard of, or even read, Hugi Magazine? (
http://www.hugi.scene.org/main.php?page=hugi ). It
On 5/18/12, H. S. Teoh hst...@quickfur.ath.cx wrote:
Is it really that bad?
Speaking of Github, it's really annoying how many projects get listed
here even though they have nothing to do with D:
https://github.com/languages/D/created
I don't understand how Github manages to pick up so many
Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:mailman.904.1337305802.24740.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
On 5/18/12, H. S. Teoh hst...@quickfur.ath.cx wrote:
Is it really that bad?
Speaking of Github, it's really annoying how many projects get listed
here even though they
On Tue, 15 May 2012 11:43:42 -0400, Nick Sabalausky
seewebsitetocontac...@semitwist.com wrote:
I'm well aware that it's deliberate, but it's still anti-competetive,
asinine and anachronistic. And it's not as if the whole hosting thing
isn't
worth anything. That is, after all, what they
On May 16, 2012, at 9:38 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Tue, 15 May 2012 11:43:42 -0400, Nick Sabalausky
seewebsitetocontac...@semitwist.com wrote:
I'm well aware that it's deliberate, but it's still anti-competetive,
asinine and anachronistic. And it's not as if the whole hosting
On 16/05/12 15:09, Geoffrey Biggs wrote:
Projects that don't operate around sites like github rely on messages to a
mailing list asking the integrator to pull from some branch of some repository.
Although I'm sure the Linux kernel works like this, I haven't seen it, but I
have seen the same
On 15/05/12 04:16, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
I firmly believe that GitHub/BitBucket/etc-style features need to be
standard *protocols*, not features bundled inseparably to project hosting.
What the hell is this, 1980 all over again where data is routinely tied
inseparably to the software it
Joseph Rushton Wakeling joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net wrote in message
news:mailman.840.1337179907.24740.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
On 15/05/12 04:16, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
I firmly believe that GitHub/BitBucket/etc-style features need to be
standard *protocols*, not features bundled
On 5/14/2012 11:06 PM, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
I was browsing dsource.org http://dsource.org for some libraries, that
I need and every single project, that I looked at was either completely
abandoned or stuck with the ancient D1.
Is there at least one sane project in there or is dsource.org
On 2012-05-15 08:32, Mike Parker wrote:
Derelict 2 is still alive and kicking there. Plus, the Derelict forum
there is where I support both Derelict 2 3.
The forum for Derelict is basically the only one which is active.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
Derelict 3 is under development and is on github, so Derelict is not gonna
be on dsource.org for too long,
A plethora of dead projects on dsource.org is a good way to scare away
newcomers, i think.
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
On 2012-05-15 08:32, Mike
On 15.05.2012 14:04, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
Derelict 3 is under development and is on github, so Derelict is not
gonna be on dsource.org http://dsource.org for too long,
A plethora of dead projects on dsource.org http://dsource.org is a
good way to scare away newcomers, i think.
I think that
I agree. That way it will become more apparent what really needs to be
written for D. Currently there appears to be a lot of stuff written for
D, when there's not more, then just a few.
Also, I think there should be a strict division of D1 and D2 projects
(where projects, supporting both would
Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
I agree. That way it will become more apparent what really needs to be
written for D. Currently there appears to be a lot of stuff written for
D, when there's not more, then just a few.
Also, I think there should be a strict division of D1 and D2 projects
(where
On Tuesday, 15 May 2012 at 02:36:25 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Kapps opantm2+s...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:gvuqhcqczjqmdtpsa...@forum.dlang.org...
It would be nice to make a replacement to dsource. There's a
fair few problems with it. For one, people prefer hosting
their source on
On 5/15/2012 7:04 PM, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
Derelict 3 is under development and is on github, so Derelict is not
gonna be on dsource.org http://dsource.org for too long,
It will be there as long as DSource exists. I have no plans to move it.
My only real alternatives for the forum is to host
Since you're here, I can't seem to get my hands on the sdl2.dll, which is
required by Derelict3's SDL binding. Can you tell me where I can get it?
The official SDL 2.0 snapshot doesn't build currently.
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Mike Parker aldac...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5/15/2012 7:04 PM,
foobar f...@bar.com wrote in message
news:cuucmsymdqnsrurlk...@forum.dlang.org...
On Tuesday, 15 May 2012 at 02:36:25 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Kapps opantm2+s...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:gvuqhcqczjqmdtpsa...@forum.dlang.org...
It would be nice to make a replacement to dsource.
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 7:43 PM, Nick Sabalausky
seewebsitetocontac...@semitwist.com wrote:
This is why OSS software will always be better (on average) than
commercial:
No managers to fuck things up.
This is so true! Commercial software sucks not because it costs money, but
because of being
Nick Sabalausky seewebsitetocontac...@semitwist.com wrote in message
news:jottlr$stf$1...@digitalmars.com...
foobar f...@bar.com wrote in message
news:cuucmsymdqnsrurlk...@forum.dlang.org...
Sure it doesn't support pull requests but that's the base for
GitHub's business model - they make
I was browsing dsource.org for some libraries, that I need and every single
project, that I looked at was either completely abandoned or stuck with the
ancient D1.
Is there at least one sane project in there or is dsource.org an ancient
fossil for museum display?
Sorry for my frustration.
--
On Mon, 14 May 2012 10:06:12 -0400, Gor Gyolchanyan
gor.f.gyolchan...@gmail.com wrote:
I was browsing dsource.org for some libraries, that I need and every
single
project, that I looked at was either completely abandoned or stuck with
the
ancient D1.
Is there at least one sane project in
ancient D1.
druntime has assembler code, assembler is more ancient than D1,
druntime belongs to D2, so D2 is more ancient than D1. Whoops!
It's a time paradox!
Gor Gyolchanyan gor.f.gyolchan...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:mailman.722.1337004471.24740.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
I was browsing dsource.org for some libraries, that I need and every single
project, that I looked at was either completely abandoned or stuck with
the
ancient D1.
Is
It would be nice to make a replacement to dsource. There's a fair
few problems with it. For one, people prefer hosting their source
on Github or Bitbucket or such, it's silly to try and get people
to use your own source control hosting instead of just pointing
to one of those. Another would be
Kapps opantm2+s...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:gvuqhcqczjqmdtpsa...@forum.dlang.org...
It would be nice to make a replacement to dsource. There's a fair few
problems with it. For one, people prefer hosting their source on Github or
Bitbucket or such, it's silly to try and get people to
32 matches
Mail list logo
