On 04/15/2011 01:10 PM, Spacen Jasset wrote:
As other posters have pointed out, it seems to me, at least, that having a way
to express your model/idea or view of a problem directly is the most useful
thing a language can give you.
This is my definition of a good language :-)
Denis
--
On 2011-04-11 21:58, spir wrote:
[slightly OT]
Hello,
I'm reading (just for interest) the LLVM Coding Standards at
http://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html. Find them very interesting
because their purposes are clearly explained. Below sample.
Denis
=== sample
On 12.04.2011 2:31, Spacen Jasset wrote:
On 11/04/2011 20:58, spir wrote:
[slightly OT]
Hello,
I'm reading (just for interest) the LLVM Coding Standards at
http://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html. Find them very interesting
because their purposes are clearly explained. Below sample.
Denis
On 04/11/2011 09:58 PM, spir wrote:
I'm reading (just for interest) the LLVM Coding Standards at
http://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html. Find them very interesting because
their purposes are clearly explained. Below sample.
I also love their note about naming
On 04/12/2011 12:31 AM, Spacen Jasset wrote:
I think that people like to follow rules, that is as soon as they have
internalised them and made them their own. What this means is that they often
then follow them to a fault, and you get deeply nested, but structured code,
where instead you would
On 04/12/2011 02:34 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
The last few years though, I've been finding that I *never* have any trouble
grokking code due to early exits or continue (unless the code is already
convoluted anyway). And I've also realized I find code that makes
intelligent use of it to be much
On 04/12/2011 03:15 AM, Daniel Gibson wrote:
While I am on the subject, I've *always* thought major languages have
poor loop constructs:
(A)
for (;;)
{
std::getline(is, line);
if (line.size() == 0)
break;
...some things...
}
(...)
Instead you
Am 12.04.2011 00:31, schrieb Spacen Jasset:
std::getline(is, line);
while (line.size() != 0)
{
...some things...
std::getline(is, line);
}
What's wrong with
while( std::getline(is, line), (line.size() != 0) ) {
//... some things
}
I mean, that's what the comma operator is for.
Mafi m...@example.org wrote in message
news:io19ar$47h$1...@digitalmars.com...
Am 12.04.2011 00:31, schrieb Spacen Jasset:
std::getline(is, line);
while (line.size() != 0)
{
...some things...
std::getline(is, line);
}
What's wrong with
while( std::getline(is, line),
spir denis.s...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:mailman.3428.1302601845.4748.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
On 04/11/2011 09:58 PM, spir wrote:
I'm reading (just for interest) the LLVM Coding Standards at
http://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html. Find them very interesting
because
Hi,
about early breaks/returns, it seems that might answer to a similar question
is widely aproved, some maybe it's of interest :
http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/58237/are-break-and-continue-bad-programming-practices/58253#58253
(about early breaks/return/continue)
When used at
[slightly OT]
Hello,
I'm reading (just for interest) the LLVM Coding Standards at
http://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html. Find them very interesting because
their purposes are clearly explained. Below sample.
Denis
=== sample ===
Use Early Exits
On 4/11/11 2:58 PM, spir wrote:
[slightly OT]
Hello,
I'm reading (just for interest) the LLVM Coding Standards at
http://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html. Find them very interesting
because their purposes are clearly explained. Below sample.
Denis
=== sample
== Quote from spir (denis.s...@gmail.com)'s article
[slightly OT]
Hello,
I'm reading (just for interest) the LLVM Coding Standards at
http://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html. Find them very interesting because
their purposes are clearly explained. Below sample.
Denis
=== sample
Andrei:
Heh heh heh. This is bound to annoy many a dinosaur. And they even
didn't need to pull the exceptions argument!
I find the LLVM C++ source code readable and sometimes even elegant for being
C++ (it's very far from the C-style hairy code of DMD, despite sometimes DMD is
a little more
On 11/04/2011 20:58, spir wrote:
[slightly OT]
Hello,
I'm reading (just for interest) the LLVM Coding Standards at
http://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html. Find them very interesting
because their purposes are clearly explained. Below sample.
Denis
That seem all fairly sensible. It also
Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote in message
news:invnce$2mfr$4...@digitalmars.com...
On 4/11/11 2:58 PM, spir wrote:
[slightly OT]
Hello,
I'm reading (just for interest) the LLVM Coding Standards at
http://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html. Find them very
On 4/11/2011 2:03 PM, bearophile wrote:
it's very far from the C-style hairy code of DMD
I'm overcompensating for being bald.
Spacen Jasset spacenjas...@yahoo.co.uk wrote in message
news:invvmu$7ha$1...@digitalmars.com...
That seem all fairly sensible. It also reminds me of open source projects
written in C, where GOTO is used, like so:
HANDLE handle1 = open(...);
...
if (out_of_memory)
goto cleanup;
if
Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote in message
news:io08sr$ouq$1...@digitalmars.com...
On 4/11/2011 2:03 PM, bearophile wrote:
it's very far from the C-style hairy code of DMD
I'm overcompensating for being bald.
Heh. Now that's a classic line if I've ever heard one :)
Am 12.04.2011 00:31, schrieb Spacen Jasset:
On 11/04/2011 20:58, spir wrote:
[slightly OT]
Hello,
I'm reading (just for interest) the LLVM Coding Standards at
http://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html. Find them very interesting
because their purposes are clearly explained. Below sample
Walter:
I'm overcompensating for being bald.
*hands a Code Brush [TM]* :-)
Bye,
bearophile
Spacen Jasset wrote:
While I am on the subject, I've *always* thought major languages have
poor loop constructs:
(A)
for (;;)
{
std::getline(is, line);
if (line.size() == 0)
break;
...some things...
}
You have to call getline always at least once, then you need to test
23 matches
Mail list logo
