Next in Review Queue? (October 2011)

2011-10-27 Thread dsimcha
Dimitry's FReD library review looks to have been a success. (Not sure if voting is technically over but it doesn't exactly look like it's going to come down to the wire.) Congratulations, Dimitry. What's next in the review queue? From my memory of previous times we've had this discussion, thing

Re: Next in Review Queue? (October 2011)

2011-10-27 Thread Jonas Drewsen
Den 27-10-2011 22:11, dsimcha skrev: Dimitry's FReD library review looks to have been a success. (Not sure if voting is technically over but it doesn't exactly look like it's going to come down to the wire.) Congratulations, Dimitry. What's next in the review queue? From my memory of previous

Re: Next in Review Queue? (October 2011)

2011-10-27 Thread Jesse Phillips
dsimcha Wrote: > Dimitry's FReD library review looks to have been a success. (Not sure if > voting is technically over but it doesn't exactly look like it's going to come > down to the wire.) Congratulations, Dimitry. What's next in the review > queue? From my memory of previous times we've ha

Re: Next in Review Queue? (October 2011)

2011-10-27 Thread dsimcha
On 10/27/2011 5:55 PM, Jesse Phillips wrote: dsimcha Wrote: Dimitry's FReD library review looks to have been a success. (Not sure if voting is technically over but it doesn't exactly look like it's going to come down to the wire.) Congratulations, Dimitry. What's next in the review queue? F

Re: Next in Review Queue? (October 2011)

2011-10-27 Thread Jose Armando Garcia
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 1:11 PM, dsimcha wrote: > Dimitry's FReD library review looks to have been a success.  (Not sure if > voting is technically over but it doesn't exactly look like it's going to come > down to the wire.)  Congratulations, Dimitry.  What's next in the review > queue?  From my

Re: Next in Review Queue? (October 2011)

2011-10-27 Thread Trass3r
Dimitry's FReD library review looks to have been a success. What about the other GSoC projects, esp. the linear algebra stuff?

Re: Next in Review Queue? (October 2011)

2011-10-27 Thread dsimcha
On 10/27/2011 7:14 PM, Trass3r wrote: Dimitry's FReD library review looks to have been a success. What about the other GSoC projects, esp. the linear algebra stuff? David Nadlinger's Thrift project can't go into Phobos because of licensing IIUC and probably doesn't belong in a standard libra

Re: Next in Review Queue? (October 2011)

2011-10-27 Thread Jesse Phillips
On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 18:21:38 -0400, dsimcha wrote: > I'll do review manager for this. I've wanted a decent CSV library in > Phobos for a while and the only reason I didn't write it myself is > because you beat me to it. Let me know when you're ready to officially > get started. Ok, I've done my

Re: Next in Review Queue? (October 2011)

2011-10-28 Thread Jacob Carlborg
On 2011-10-27 22:11, dsimcha wrote: Dimitry's FReD library review looks to have been a success. (Not sure if voting is technically over but it doesn't exactly look like it's going to come down to the wire.) Congratulations, Dimitry. What's next in the review queue? From my memory of previous

Re: Next in Review Queue? (October 2011)

2011-10-28 Thread Andrei Alexandrescu
On 10/27/11 6:53 PM, dsimcha wrote: On 10/27/2011 7:14 PM, Trass3r wrote: Dimitry's FReD library review looks to have been a success. What about the other GSoC projects, esp. the linear algebra stuff? David Nadlinger's Thrift project can't go into Phobos because of licensing IIUC and probabl

Re: Next in Review Queue? (October 2011)

2011-10-29 Thread dsimcha
On 10/29/2011 2:03 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 10/27/11 6:53 PM, dsimcha wrote: On 10/27/2011 7:14 PM, Trass3r wrote: Dimitry's FReD library review looks to have been a success. What about the other GSoC projects, esp. the linear algebra stuff? David Nadlinger's Thrift project can't g

Re: Next in Review Queue? (October 2011)

2011-10-29 Thread Andrei Alexandrescu
On 10/29/11 9:21 AM, dsimcha wrote: On 10/29/2011 2:03 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 10/27/11 6:53 PM, dsimcha wrote: On 10/27/2011 7:14 PM, Trass3r wrote: Dimitry's FReD library review looks to have been a success. What about the other GSoC projects, esp. the linear algebra stuff? Dav

Re: Next in Review Queue? (October 2011)

2011-10-29 Thread Jonathan M Davis
On Saturday, October 29, 2011 10:21:39 dsimcha wrote: > On 10/29/2011 2:03 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: > > On 10/27/11 6:53 PM, dsimcha wrote: > >> On 10/27/2011 7:14 PM, Trass3r wrote: > Dimitry's FReD library review looks to have been a success. > >>> > >>> What about the other GSoC proj

Re: Next in Review Queue? (October 2011)

2011-10-29 Thread dsimcha
On 10/29/2011 10:59 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: I understand. The way I see it, if SciD can't be considered functional without triangular and symmetric matrices, then we counted an unfinished project as successfully completed. This is an imperfection of our GSoC planning and scrutiny process t

Re: Next in Review Queue? (October 2011)

2011-10-29 Thread Andrei Alexandrescu
On 10/29/11 10:24 AM, dsimcha wrote: On 10/29/2011 10:59 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: I understand. The way I see it, if SciD can't be considered functional without triangular and symmetric matrices, then we counted an unfinished project as successfully completed. This is an imperfection of ou